Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 50
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
J Sleep Res ; 27(5): e12678, 2018 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29516556

ABSTRACT

Sleep timing shifts later during adolescence (second decade). This trend reverses at ~20 years and continues to shift earlier into adulthood. The current analysis examined the hypothesis that a longer free-running circadian period during late adolescence (14-17 years) compared with adulthood (30-45 years) accounts for sleep timing differences. Sex and ancestry were also examined because previous reports find that women and those with African-American ancestry have shorter free-running periods. Circadian period was measured using an ultradian dark-light protocol (2 hr dark/sleep, 2 hr dim room light [~20 lux]/wake) over 3.4 days. Dim light melatonin onsets were measured before and after the ultradian protocol, from which the circadian period was derived. In contrast to our hypothesis, we found that free-running circadian period was similar in adolescents and adults. African-American adults had shorter free-running circadian periods compared with adults of other ancestries. This ancestry difference was not seen in the adolescent group. Finally, we observed a non-significant trend for shorter free-running circadian periods in females compared with males. These data suggest that age-related changes in circadian period after late adolescence do not account for sleep timing differences. These data provide further support for ancestry-related differences in period, particularly in adults. Whether the large difference in circadian period between African-American and other ancestries emerges later in development should be explored.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
J Sleep Res ; 26(5): 547-550, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28332253

ABSTRACT

The endogenous, free-running circadian period (τ) determines the phase relationship that an organism assumes when entrained to the 24-h day. We found a shorter circadian period in African Americans compared to non-Hispanic European Americans (24.07 versus 24.33 h). We speculate that a short circadian period, closer to 24 h, was advantageous to humans living around the equator, but when humans migrated North out of Africa, where the photoperiod changes with seasons, natural selection favoured people with longer circadian periods. Recently, in evolutionary terms, immigrants came from Europe and Africa to America ('the New World'). The Europeans were descendents of people who had lived in Europe for thousands of years with changing photoperiods (and presumably longer periods), whereas Africans had ancestors who had always lived around the equator (with shorter periods). It may have been advantageous to have a longer circadian period while living in Europe early in the evolution of humans. In our modern world, however, it is better to have a shorter period, because it helps make our circadian rhythms earlier, which is adaptive in our early-bird-dominated society. European American women had a shorter circadian period than men (24.24 versus 24.41), but there was no sex difference in African Americans (24.07 for both men and women). We speculate that selection pressures in Europe made men develop a slightly longer period than women to help them track dawn which could be useful for hunters, but less important for women as gatherers.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/genetics , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Sex Characteristics , Africa/ethnology , Black or African American , Europe/ethnology , Female , Human Migration , Humans , Male , Photoperiod , Seasons , Time Factors , White People
3.
Sleep ; 46(1)2023 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36006948

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Shift sleep onset earlier and extend school-night sleep duration of adolescents. METHODS: Forty-six adolescents (14.5-17.9 years; 24 females) with habitual short sleep (≤7 h) and late bedtimes (≥23:00) on school nights slept as usual for 2 weeks (baseline). Then, there were three weekends and two sets of five weekdays in between. Circadian phase (Dim Light Melatonin Onset, DLMO) was measured in the laboratory on the first and third weekend. On weekdays, the "Intervention" group gradually advanced school-night bedtime (1 h earlier than baseline during week 1; 2 h earlier than baseline during week 2). Individualized evening time management plans ("Sleep RouTeen") were developed to facilitate earlier bedtimes. On the second weekend, Intervention participants received bright light (~6000 lux; 2.5 h) on both mornings. A control group completed the first and third weekend but not the second. They slept as usual and had no evening time management plan. Weekday sleep onset time and duration were derived from actigraphy. RESULTS: Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) advanced more in the Intervention (0.6 ±â€…0.8 h) compared to the Control (-0.1 ±â€…0.8 h) group. By week 2, the Intervention group fell asleep 1.5 ±â€…0.7 h earlier and sleep duration increased by 1.2 ±â€…0.7 h; sleep did not systematically change in the Control group. CONCLUSIONS: This multi-pronged circadian-based intervention effectively increased school-night sleep duration for adolescents reporting chronic sleep restriction. Adolescents with early circadian phases may only need a time management plan, whereas those with later phases probably need both time management and morning bright light. CLINICAL TRIALS: Teen School-Night Sleep Extension: An Intervention Targeting the Circadian System (#NCT04087603): https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04087603.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm , Melatonin , Adolescent , Female , Humans , Light , Sleep , Time Management
4.
J Physiol ; 590(19): 4859-68, 2012 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22753544

ABSTRACT

Light shifts the timing of the circadian clock according to a phase response curve (PRC). To date, all human light PRCs have been to long durations of bright white light. However, melanopsin, the primary photopigment for the circadian system, is most sensitive to short wavelength blue light. Therefore, to optimise light treatment it is important to generate a blue light PRC.We used a small, commercially available blue LED light box, screen size 11.2 × 6.6 cm at ∼50 cm, ∼200 µW cm(−2), ∼185 lux. Subjects participated in two 5 day laboratory sessions 1 week apart. Each session consisted of circadian phase assessments to obtain melatonin profiles before and after 3 days of free-running through an ultradian light­dark cycle (2.5 h wake in dim light, 1.5 h sleep in the dark), forced desynchrony protocol. During one session subjects received intermittent blue light (three 30 min pulses over 2 h) once a day for the 3 days of free-running, and in the other session (control) they remained in dim room light, counterbalanced. The time of blue light was varied among subjects to cover the entire 24 h day. For each individual, the phase shift to blue light was corrected for the free-run determined during the control session. The blue light PRC had a broad advance region starting in the morning and extending through the afternoon. The delay region started a few hours before bedtime and extended through the night. This is the first PRC to be constructed to blue light and to a stimulus that could be used in the real world.


Subject(s)
Circadian Clocks/radiation effects , Light , Adolescent , Adult , Circadian Clocks/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/analysis , Melatonin/physiology , Saliva/chemistry , Young Adult
5.
J Biol Rhythms ; 24(2): 161-72, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19346453

ABSTRACT

Scheduled bright light and darkness can phase shift the circadian clocks of night workers for complete adaptation to a night work, day sleep schedule, but few night workers would want this because it would leave them out of phase with the diurnal world on days off. This is the final study in a series designed to produce a compromise circadian phase position for permanent night shift work in which the sleepiest circadian time is delayed out of the night work period and into the first half of the day sleep episode. The target compromise phase position was a dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) of 3:00, which puts the sleepiest circadian time at approximately 10:00. This was predicted to improve night shift alertness and performance while permitting sufficient daytime sleep after work as well as late-night sleep on days off. In a between-subjects design, 19 healthy subjects underwent 3 simulated night shifts (23:00-7:00), 2 days off, 4 more night shifts, and 2 more days off. Subjects "worked" in the lab and slept at home. Experimental subjects received four 15-min bright light pulses during each night shift, wore dark sunglasses when outside, slept in dark bedrooms at scheduled times, and received outdoor afternoon light exposure ("light brake") to keep their rhythms from delaying too far. Control subjects remained in normal room light during night shifts, wore lighter sunglasses, and had unrestricted sleep and outdoor light exposure. The final DLMO of the experimental group was 3:22 +/- 2.0 h, close to the target of 3:00, and later than the control group at 23:24 +/- 3.8 h. Experimental subjects slept for nearly all the permitted time in bed. Some control subjects who slept late on weekends also reached the compromise phase position and obtained more daytime sleep. Subjects who phase delayed (whether in the experimental or control group) close to the target phase performed better during night shifts. A compromise circadian phase position improved performance during night shifts, allowed sufficient sleep during the daytime after night shifts and during the late nighttime on days off, and can be produced by inexpensive and feasible interventions.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Darkness , Work Schedule Tolerance , Biological Clocks , Female , Humans , Light , Male , Photoperiod , Sleep/physiology
6.
Front Neurosci ; 14: 99, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32116532

ABSTRACT

Many adolescents fall asleep too late to get enough sleep (8-10 h) on school nights. Morning bright light advances circadian rhythms and could help adolescents fall asleep earlier. Morning bright light treatment before school, however, is difficult to fit into their morning schedule; weekends are more feasible. We examined phase advances in response to morning light treatment delivered over one weekend. Thirty-seven adolescents (16 males; 14.7-18.0 years) who reported short school-night sleep (≤7 h) and late bedtimes (school-nights ≥23:00; weekend/non-school nights ≥24:00) slept as usual at home for ∼2 weeks ("baseline") and then kept a fixed sleep schedule (baseline school-night bed and wake-up times ±30 min) for ∼1 week before living in the lab for one weekend. Sleep behavior was measured with wrist actigraphy and sleep diary. On Saturday morning, we woke each participant 1 h after his/her midpoint of baseline weekend/non-school night sleep and 1 h earlier on Sunday. They remained in dim room light (∼20 lux) or received 1.5 or 2.5 h of intermittent morning bright light (∼6000 lux) on both mornings. The dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), a phase marker of the circadian timing system, was measured on Friday and Sunday evenings to compute the weekend circadian phase shift. The dim room light and 1.5-h bright light groups advanced the same amount (0.6 ± 0.4 and 0.6 ± 0.5 h). The 2.5-h bright light group advanced 1.0 ± 0.4 h, which was significantly more than the other groups. These data suggest that it is possible to phase advance the circadian clock of adolescents who have late bedtimes and short school-night sleep in one weekend using light that begins shortly after their sleep midpoint.

7.
Sleep ; 32(11): 1481-9, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19928387

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess night shift improvements in mood, fatigue, and performance when the misalignment between circadian rhythms and a night shift, day sleep schedule is reduced. DESIGN: Blocks of simulated night shifts alternated with days off. Experimental subjects had interventions to delay their circadian clocks to partially align with a night shift schedule. Control subjects had no interventions. Subjects were categorized according to the degree of circadian realignment independent of whether they were in the experimental or control groups. Twelve subjects were categorized as not re-entrained, 21 as partially re-entrained, and 6 as completely re-entrained. SETTING: Home sleep and laboratory night shifts. PARTICIPANTS: Young healthy adults. INTERVENTIONS: Experimental subjects had intermittent bright light pulses during night shifts, wore dark sunglasses outside, and had scheduled sleep episodes in darkness. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: A computerized test battery was administered every 2 hours during day and night shifts. After about one week on the night shift schedule, which included a weekend off, the partially and completely re-entrained groups had markedly improved mood, fatigue, and performance compared to the group that was not re-entrained. The completely and partially re-entrained groups were similar to each other and had levels of mood, fatigue, and performance that were close to daytime levels. CONCLUSIONS: Partial re-entrainment to a permanent night shift schedule, which can be produced by feasible, inexpensive interventions, is associated with greatly reduced impairments during night shifts.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm , Mental Fatigue/prevention & control , Mood Disorders/prevention & control , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/prevention & control , Work Schedule Tolerance/psychology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Fatigue/etiology , Mental Fatigue/physiopathology , Mood Disorders/etiology , Mood Disorders/physiopathology , Psychomotor Performance , Reaction Time , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/etiology , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
8.
Sleep Med ; 10(3): 287-94, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18805055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that the human circadian system is maximally sensitive to short-wavelength (blue) light. Whether this sensitivity can be utilized to increase the size of phase shifts using light boxes and protocols designed for practical settings is not known. We assessed whether bright polychromatic lamps enriched in the short-wavelength portion of the visible light spectrum could produce larger phase advances than standard bright white lamps. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy young adults received either a bright white or bright blue-enriched 2-h phase advancing light pulse upon awakening on each of four treatment days. On the first treatment day the light pulse began 8h after the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO), on average about 2h before baseline wake time. On each subsequent day, light treatment began 1h earlier than the previous day, and the sleep schedule was also advanced. RESULTS: Phase advances of the DLMO for the blue-enriched (92+/-78 min, n=12) and white groups (76+/-45 min, n=10) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Bright blue-enriched polychromatic light is no more effective than standard bright light therapy for phase advancing circadian rhythms at commonly used therapeutic light levels.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Lighting/methods , Phototherapy/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/metabolism , Sleep , Wakefulness , Young Adult
9.
J Circadian Rhythms ; 7: 8, 2009 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19615064

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Light exposure in the late evening and nighttime and a delay of the sleep/dark episode can phase delay the circadian clock. This study assessed the size of the phase delay produced by a single light pulse combined with a moderate delay of the sleep/dark episode for one day. Because iris color or race has been reported to influence light-induced melatonin suppression, and we have recently reported racial differences in free-running circadian period and circadian phase shifting in response to light pulses, we also tested for differences in the magnitude of the phase delay in subjects with blue and brown irises. METHODS: Subjects (blue-eyed n = 7; brown eyed n = 6) maintained a regular sleep schedule for 1 week before coming to the laboratory for a baseline phase assessment, during which saliva was collected every 30 minutes to determine the time of the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). Immediately following the baseline phase assessment, which ended 2 hours after baseline bedtime, subjects received a 2-hour bright light pulse (~4,000 lux). An 8-hour sleep episode followed the light pulse (i.e. was delayed 4 hours from baseline). A final phase assessment was conducted the subsequent night to determine the phase shift of the DLMO from the baseline to final phase assessment.Phase delays of the DLMO were compared in subjects with blue and brown irises. Iris color was also quantified from photographs using the three dimensions of red-green-blue color axes, as well as a lightness scale. These variables were correlated with phase shift of the DLMO, with the hypothesis that subjects with lighter irises would have larger phase delays. RESULTS: The average phase delay of the DLMO was -1.3 +/- 0.6 h, with a maximum delay of ~2 hours, and was similar for subjects with blue and brown irises. There were no significant correlations between any of the iris color variables and the magnitude of the phase delay. CONCLUSION: A single 2-hour bright light pulse combined with a moderate delay of the sleep/dark episode delayed the circadian clock an average of ~1.5 hours. There was no evidence that iris color influenced the magnitude of the phase shift. Future studies are needed to replicate our findings that iris color does not impact the magnitude of light-induced circadian phase shifts, and that the previously reported differences may be due to race.

10.
Sleep ; 31(12): 1639-45, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19090319

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To produce a compromise circadian phase position for permanent night shift work in which the sleepiest circadian time is delayed out of the night work period and into the first half of the day sleep period. This is predicted to improve night shift alertness and performance while permitting adequate late night sleep on days off. DESIGN: Between-subjects. SETTING: Home and laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: 24 healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects underwent 3 simulated night shifts, 2 days off, and 4 more night shifts. Experimental subjects received five, 15 minute bright light pulses from light boxes during night shifts, wore dark sunglasses when outside, slept in dark bedrooms at scheduled times after night shifts and on days off, and received outdoor afternoon light exposure (the "light brake"). Control subjects remained in normal room light during night shifts, wore lighter sunglasses, and had unrestricted sleep and outdoor light exposure. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The final dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) of the experimental group was approximately approximately 04:30, close to our target compromise phase position, and significantly later than the control group at approximately 00:30. Experimental subjects performed better than controls, and slept for nearly all of the allotted time in bed. By the last night shift, they performed almost as well during the night as during daytime baseline. Controls demonstrated pronounced performance impairments late in the night shifts, and exhibited large individual differences in sleep duration. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively inexpensive and feasible interventions can produce adaptation to night shift work while still allowing adequate nighttime sleep on days off.


Subject(s)
Arousal , Attention , Chronotherapy , Circadian Rhythm , Melatonin/blood , Phototherapy , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/therapy , Adaptation, Physiological , Adult , Arousal/physiology , Attention/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm/blood , Young Adult
11.
Physiol Behav ; 95(3): 449-56, 2008 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18675836

ABSTRACT

This is the second in a series of simulated night shift studies designed to achieve and subsequently maintain a compromise circadian phase position between complete entrainment to the daytime sleep period and no phase shift at all. We predict that this compromise will yield improved night shift alertness and daytime sleep, while still permitting adequate late night sleep and daytime wakefulness on days off. Our goal is to delay the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) from its baseline phase of approximately 21:00 to our target of approximately 3:00. Healthy young subjects (n=31) underwent three night shifts followed by two days off. Two experimental groups received intermittent bright light pulses during night shifts (total durations of 75 and 120 min per night shift), wore dark sunglasses when outside, slept in dark bedrooms at scheduled times after night shifts and on days off, and received outdoor light exposure upon awakening from sleep. A control group remained in dim room light during night shifts, wore lighter sunglasses, and had unrestricted sleep and outdoor light exposure. After the days off, the DLMO of the experimental groups was approximately 00:00-1:00, not quite at the target of 3:00, but in a good position to reach the target after subsequent night shifts with bright light. The DLMO of the control group changed little from baseline. Experimental subjects performed better than control subjects during night shifts on a reaction time task. Subsequent studies will reveal whether the target phase is achieved and maintained through more alternations of night shifts and days off.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Physiological/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Darkness , Light , Work Schedule Tolerance , Adult , Body Temperature/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Reaction Time , Sleep , Wakefulness , Young Adult
12.
Chronobiol Int ; 35(2): 280-288, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148844

ABSTRACT

The timing of the circadian clock, circadian period and chronotype varies among individuals. To date, not much is known about how these parameters vary over time in an individual. We performed an analysis of the following five common circadian clock and chronotype measures: 1) the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO, a measure of circadian phase), 2) phase angle of entrainment (the phase the circadian clock assumes within the 24-h day, measured here as the interval between DLMO and bedtime/dark onset), 3) free-running circadian period (tau) from an ultradian forced desynchrony protocol (tau influences circadian phase and phase angle of entrainment), 4) mid-sleep on work-free days (MSF from the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire; MCTQ) and 5) the score from the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). The first three are objective physiological measures, and the last two are measures of chronotype obtained from questionnaires. These data were collected from 18 individuals (10 men, eight women, ages 21-44 years) who participated in two studies with identical protocols for the first 10 days. We show how much these circadian rhythm and chronotype measures changed from the first to the second study. The time between the two studies ranged from 9 months to almost 3 years, depending on the individual. Since the full experiment required living in the laboratory for 14 days, participants were unemployed, had part-time jobs or were freelance workers with flexible hours. Thus, they did not have many constraints on their sleep schedules before the studies. The DLMO was measured on the first night in the lab, after free-sleeping at home and also after sleeping in the lab on fixed 8-h sleep schedules (loosely tailored to their sleep times before entering the laboratory) for four nights. Graphs with lines of unity (when the value from the first study is identical to the value from the second study) showed how much each variable changed from the first to the second study. The DLMO did not change more than 2 h from the first to the second study, except for two participants whose sleep schedules changed the most between studies, a change in sleep times of 3 h. Phase angle did not change by more than 2 h regardless of changes in the sleep schedule. Circadian period did not change more than 0.2 h, except for one participant. MSF did not change more than 1 h, except for two participants. MEQ did not change more than 10 points and the categories (e.g. M-type) did not change. Pearson's correlations for the DLMO between the first and second studies increased after participants slept in the lab on their individually timed fixed 8-h sleep schedules for four nights. A longer time between the two studies did not increase the difference between any of the variables from the first to the second study. This analysis shows that the circadian clock and chronotype measures were fairly reproducible, even after many months between the two studies.


Subject(s)
Circadian Clocks/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Melatonin/metabolism , Sleep/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
13.
Chronobiol Int ; 35(12): 1748-1752, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084658

ABSTRACT

We examined phase shifts to bright morning light when sleep was restricted by delaying bedtimes. Adolescents (n = 6) had 10-h sleep/dark opportunities for 6 days. For the next 2 days, half were put to bed 4.5 h later and then allowed to sleep for 5.5 h (evening room light + sleep restriction). The others continued the 10-h sleep opportunities (sleep satiation). Then, sleep schedules were gradually shifted earlier and participants received bright light (90 min, ~6000 lux) after waking for 3 days. As expected, sleep satiation participants advanced (~2 h). Evening room light + sleep restriction participants did not shift or delayed by 2-4 h. Abbreviations: DLMO: dim light melatonin onset.


Subject(s)
Biological Clocks/physiology , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Sleep/physiology , Work Schedule Tolerance/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Light , Male , Melatonin/metabolism
14.
Drugs ; 77(6): 637-650, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28229310

ABSTRACT

Non-24-h sleep-wake disorder (non-24) is a circadian rhythm disorder occurring in 55-70% of totally blind individuals (those lacking conscious light perception) in which the 24-h biological clock (central, hypothalamic, circadian pacemaker) is no longer synchronized, or entrained, to the 24-h day. Instead, the overt rhythms controlled by the biological clock gradually shift progressively earlier or later (free run) in accordance with the clock's near-24-h period, resulting in a recurrent pattern of daytime hypersomnolence and night-time insomnia. Orally administered melatonin and the melatonin agonist tasimelteon have been shown to entrain (synchronize) the circadian clock, resulting in improvements in night-time sleep and daytime alertness. We review the basic principles of circadian rhythms necessary to understand and treat non-24. The time of melatonin or tasimelteon administration must be considered carefully. For most individuals, those with circadian periods longer than 24 h, low-dose melatonin should be administered about 6 h before the desired bedtime, while in a minority, those with circadian periods shorter than 24 h (more commonly female individuals and African-Americans), melatonin should be administered at the desired wake time. Small doses (e.g., 0.5 mg of melatonin) that are not soporific would thus be preferable. Administration of melatonin or tasimelteon at bedtime will entrain individuals with non-24 but at an abnormally late time, resulting in continued problems with sleep and alertness. To date, tasimelteon has only been administered 1 h before the target bedtime in patients with non-24. Issues of cost, dose accuracy, and purity may figure into the decision of whether tasimelteon or melatonin is chosen to treat non-24. However, there are no head-to-head studies comparing efficacy, and studies to date show comparable rates of treatment success (entrainment).


Subject(s)
Benzofurans/therapeutic use , Blindness/complications , Circadian Clocks/drug effects , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Melatonin/therapeutic use , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Benzofurans/administration & dosage , Benzofurans/pharmacology , Blindness/physiopathology , Circadian Clocks/physiology , Cyclopropanes/administration & dosage , Cyclopropanes/pharmacology , Humans , Melatonin/administration & dosage , Melatonin/agonists , Melatonin/pharmacology , Sleep Wake Disorders/complications , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology
15.
J Biol Rhythms ; 32(4): 334-344, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28651468

ABSTRACT

Older adolescents are particularly vulnerable to circadian misalignment and sleep restriction, primarily due to early school start times. Light can shift the circadian system and could help attenuate circadian misalignment; however, a phase response curve (PRC) to determine the optimal time for receiving light and avoiding light is not available for adolescents. We constructed light PRCs for late pubertal to postpubertal adolescents aged 14 to 17 years. Participants completed 2 counterbalanced 5-day laboratory sessions after 8 or 9 days of scheduled sleep at home. Each session included phase assessments to measure the dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) before and after 3 days of free-running through an ultradian light-dark (wake-sleep) cycle (2 h dim [~20 lux] light, 2 h dark). In one session, intermittent bright white light (~5000 lux; four 20-min exposures) was alternated with 10 min of dim room light once per day for 3 consecutive days. The time of light varied among participants to cover the 24-h day. For each individual, the phase shift to bright light was corrected for the free-run derived from the other laboratory session with no bright light. One PRC showed phase shifts in response to light start time relative to the DLMO and another relative to home sleep. Phase delay shifts occurred around the hours corresponding to home bedtime. Phase advances occurred during the hours surrounding wake time and later in the afternoon. The transition from delays to advances occurred at the midpoint of home sleep. The adolescent PRCs presented here provide a valuable tool to time bright light in adolescents.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Sleep/radiation effects , Adolescent , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/physiology , Schools , Sleep/physiology
16.
PLoS One ; 12(10): e0186843, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29073187

ABSTRACT

We conducted two studies of circadian misalignment in non-Hispanic African and European-Americans. In the first, the sleep/wake (light/dark) schedule was advanced 9 h, similar to flying east, and in the second these schedules were delayed 9 h, similar to flying west or sleeping during the day after night work. We confirmed that the free-running circadian period is shorter in African-Americans compared to European-Americans, and found differences in the magnitude and direction of circadian rhythm phase shifts which were related to the circadian period. The sleep and cognitive performance data from the first study (published in this journal) documented the impairment in both ancestry groups due to this extreme circadian misalignment. African-Americans slept less and performed slightly worse during advanced/misaligned days than European-Americans. The current analysis is of sleep and cognitive performance from the second study. Participants were 23 African-Americans and 22 European-Americans (aged 18-44 years). Following four baseline days (8 h time in bed, based on habitual sleep), the sleep/wake schedule was delayed by 9 h for three days. Sleep was monitored using actigraphy. During the last two baseline/aligned days and the first two delayed/misaligned days, beginning 2 h after waking, cognitive performance was assessed every 3 h using the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) battery. Mixed model ANOVAs assessed the effects of ancestry (African-American or European-American) and condition (baseline/aligned or delayed/misaligned) on sleep and performance. There was decreased sleep and impaired cognitive performance in both ancestry groups during the two delayed/misaligned days relative to baseline/aligned days. Sleep and cognitive performance did not differ between African-Americans and European-Americans during either baseline/aligned or delayed/misaligned days. While our previous work showed that an advance in the sleep/wake schedule impaired the sleep of African-Americans more than European-Americans, delaying the sleep/wake schedule impaired the sleep and cognitive performance of African-Americans and European-Americans equally.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Circadian Rhythm , Cognition , Sleep , Wakefulness , White People , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
17.
PLoS One ; 12(10): e0186887, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29059251

ABSTRACT

There are differences in sleep duration between Blacks/African-Americans and Whites/European-Americans. Recently, we found differences between these ancestry groups in the circadian system, such as circadian period and the magnitude of phase shifts. Here we document the role of ancestry on sleep and cognitive performance before and after a 9-h advance in the sleep/wake schedule similar to flying east or having a large advance in sleep times due to shiftwork, both of which produce extreme circadian misalignment. Non-Hispanic African and European-Americans (N = 20 and 17 respectively, aged 21-43 years) were scheduled to four baseline days each with 8 h time in bed based on their habitual sleep schedule. This sleep/wake schedule was then advanced 9 h earlier for three days. Sleep was monitored using actigraphy. During the last two baseline/aligned days and the first two advanced/misaligned days, beginning 2 h after waking, cognitive performance was measured every 3 h using the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) test battery. Mixed model ANOVAs assessed the effects of ancestry (African-American or European-American) and condition (baseline/aligned or advanced/misaligned) on sleep and cognitive performance. There was decreased sleep and impaired performance in both ancestry groups during the advanced/misaligned days compared to the baseline/aligned days. In addition, African-Americans obtained less sleep than European-Americans, especially on the first two days of circadian misalignment. Cognitive performance did not differ between African-Americans and European-Americans during baseline days. During the two advanced/misaligned days, however, African-Americans tended to perform slightly worse compared to European-Americans, particularly at times corresponding to the end of the baseline sleep episodes. Advancing the sleep/wake schedule, creating extreme circadian misalignment, had a greater impact on the sleep of African-Americans than European-Americans. Ancestry differences in sleep appear to be exacerbated when the sleep/wake schedule is advanced, which may have implications for individuals undertaking shiftwork and transmeridian travel.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Sleep , Wakefulness , White People , Adult , Humans , Sleep Disorders, Circadian Rhythm , Young Adult
18.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 91(1): 54-9, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16263827

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Both light and melatonin can be used to phase shift the human circadian clock, but the phase-advancing effect of the combination has not been extensively investigated. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether phase advances induced by morning intermittent bright light and a gradually advancing sleep schedule could be increased with afternoon melatonin. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults (25 males, 19 females, between the ages of 19 and 45 yr) participated in the study. DESIGN: There were 3 d of a gradually advancing sleep/dark period (wake time 1 h earlier each morning), bright light on awakening [four 30-min bright-light pulses (approximately 5000 lux) alternating with 30 min room light < 60 lux] and afternoon melatonin, either 0.5 or 3.0 mg melatonin timed to induce maximal phase advances, or matching placebo. The dim light melatonin onset was measured before and after the treatment to determine the phase advance. RESULTS: There were significantly larger phase advances with 0.5 mg (2.5 h, n = 16) and 3.0 mg melatonin (2.6 h, n = 13), compared with placebo (1.7 h, n = 15), but there was no difference between the two melatonin doses. Subjects did not experience jet lag-type symptoms during the 3-d treatment CONCLUSIONS: Afternoon melatonin, morning intermittent bright light, and a gradually advancing sleep schedule advanced circadian rhythms almost 1 h/d and thus produced very little circadian misalignment. This treatment could be used in any situation in which people need to phase advance their circadian clock, such as before eastward jet travel or for delayed sleep phase syndrome.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants/pharmacology , Circadian Rhythm/drug effects , Circadian Rhythm/radiation effects , Light , Melatonin/pharmacology , Adult , Female , Humans , Jet Lag Syndrome/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Sleep/drug effects , Sleep/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Sleep ; 29(1): 25-30, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16453978

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Short sleep episodes are common in modern society. We recently demonstrated that short nights reduce phase advances to light. Here we show that short nights also reduce phase delays to light. DESIGN: Two weeks of 6-hour sleep episodes in the dark (short nights) and 2 weeks of long 9-hour sleep episodes (long nights) in counterbalanced order, separated by 7 days. Following each series of nights, there was a dim-light phase assessment to assess baseline phase. Three days later, subjects were exposed to a phase-delaying light stimulus for 2 days, followed by a final phase assessment. SETTING: Subjects slept at home in dark bedrooms but came to the laboratory for the phase assessments and light stimulus. PARTICIPANTS: Seven young healthy subjects. INTERVENTIONS: The 3.5-hour light stimulus was four 30-minute pulses of bright light (-5000 lux) separated by 30-minute intervals of room light. The stimulus began 2.5 hours after each subject's dim-light melatonin onset, followed by a 6- or 9-hour sleep episode. On the second night, the bright light and sleep episode began 1 hour later. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The dim-light melatonin onset and dimlight melatonin offset phase delayed 1.4 and 0.7 hours less in the short nights, respectively (both p < or = .015). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate for the first time that short nights can reduce circadian phase delays, that long nights can increase phase delays to light, or both. People who curtail their sleep may inadvertently reduce their circadian responsiveness to evening light.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Light , Photoperiod , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Melatonin/blood , Sleep Deprivation/metabolism , Time Factors
20.
Neurosci Lett ; 395(3): 191-5, 2006 Mar 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16309837

ABSTRACT

Short sleep/dark durations, due to late bedtimes or early wake times or both, are common in modern society. We have previously shown that a series of days with a late bedtime phase delays the human dim light melatonin rhythm, as compared to a series of days with an early bedtime, despite a fixed wake time. Here we compared the effect of an early versus late wake time with a fixed bedtime on the human dim light melatonin rhythm. Fourteen healthy subjects experienced 2 weeks of short 6h nights with an early wake time fixed at their habitual weekday wake time and 2 weeks of long 9 h nights with a wake time that occurred 3h later than the early wake time, in counterbalanced order. We found that after 2 weeks with the late wake time, the dim light melatonin onset delayed by 2.4 h and the dim light melatonin offset delayed by 2.6 h (both p < 0.001), as compared to after 2 weeks with the early wake time. These results highlight the substantial influence that wake time, likely via the associated morning light exposure, has on the timing of the human circadian clock. Furthermore, the results suggest that when people truncate their sleep by waking early their circadian clocks phase advance and when people wake late their circadian clocks phase delay.


Subject(s)
Circadian Rhythm/physiology , Melatonin/metabolism , Wakefulness/physiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Lighting , Male , Sleep/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL