Minimally invasive lumbar decompression: long-term outcome, morbidity, and the learning curve from the first 50 cases.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience with the first 50 cases of minimally invasive lumbar canal decompression in terms of patient outcome up to 2 years, the learning curve incurred, and complications when compared with our most recent 50 cases. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar canal stenosis is a common condition in the elderly population, the symptoms of which respond well to surgical decompression. A minimally invasive approach offers potential short and long-term benefits to patients but the technique is associated with a learning curve and equivalence to open surgery regarding efficacy and complications needs to be demonstrated. METHODS: Fifty patients (mean age 70 y) who presented with clinical and radiological features of lumbar canal stenosis and who had failed a period of conservative management underwent lumbar canal decompression through a paramedian oblique, muscle splitting approach using a 16 to 18 mm operating tube and microscope. Outcome was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index and Short Form-36 at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. RESULTS: Significant clinical improvements were seen at 3 months that were sustained at 1 and 2 years. Clinical outcome improved whereas operative time and complications fell as experience increased, helping to define the learning curve with this technique. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive lumbar decompression seems to offer patients a clinical benefit comparable to that observed in published open series, with potential advantages in terms of postoperative pain and recovery. However, there is a learning curve and whether this technique offers long-term benefits with regard to a reduction in back pain or postoperative spondylolisthesis is not yet known.

Septic arthritis of the lumbar facet joint. Case and literature review.

Septic Arthritis of the facet joint (SAFJ) is an uncommon but severe condition of the spine with only 61 cases published to date. Diagnosis is notoriously difficult and can take several months which can lead to significant delays in treatment. We report a case of a 52-year-old female with 2-month history of back pain diagnosed with septic arthritis of the left lumbar L4/5 facet joint and associated epidural abscess. She presented with no fevers, normal neurological examination and normal blood parameters posing a diagnostic challenge. In this report we conclude normal inflammatory markers cannot be used as exclusion criteria for the disease. We also review the body of literature to summarise the key features of the condition to assist clinicians in its diagnosis.

Non missile penetrating spinal injury.

Non-missile penetrating spinal injury (NMPSI) is a rare form of traumatic spinal injury. Cases with neurological deficit on presentation are treated surgically. In the extremely rare circumstance of NMPSI presenting with no neurological deficit the management is contentious. We report a case of a 43-year-old male presenting with a penetrating stab injury through the thoracolumbar spinal canal. On presentation he had no neurological deficits and subsequently the knife was removed in theatre without deep surgical exploration. In this report we review the literature of non-missile penetrating spinal injuries as well as their management and conclude that exploratory surgery for NMPSI without neurological deficit may not be necessary as previously thought.

Migration of Self-Introduced Acupuncture Needle into the Brainstem.

Acupuncture-related injuries to the central nervous system are a rare but well-documented occurrence. This report describes the case of a self-introduced acupuncture needle migrating into the brainstem following an initial failed attempt at surgical extraction. The patient displayed no neurological deficits, and the needle was eventually successfully removed under direct vision intraoperatively. We discuss the role of various imaging modalities in pre- and post-operative assessment of penetrating foreign bodies in the brainstem. We also discuss the options available for the management of such foreign bodies, including possible approaches for operative intervention, and the risks involved with both surgical and conservative management.

Complications from minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion: experience from 100 patients.

Minimally invasive lumbar fusion is well described and is reported to offer significant advantages to patients in terms of blood loss, a reduction in post-operative pain and a quicker recovery. However, this technique may expose patients to a greater risk of complications when compared to open lumbar instrumented fusion that may negate these advantages. Between January 2007 and March 2001, we conducted a prospective observational study of 100 consecutive patients (48 males and 52 females, mean age of 54 years) to investigate complications occurring from minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion surgery using an image-guided technique. All patients underwent post-operative CT scans to assess implant placement. Scanning was repeated at 6 months to assess bony fusion. We observed the following complications: 2.5% (11/435) pedicle screw misplacement, 1.7% (2/120) interbody cage misplacement; 0.8% (1/120) interbody cage migration; 0.8% (1/120) patients requiring a post-operative blood transfusion; 2% (2/100) venous thrombo-embolism and 3% (3/100) patients with complications thought to be related to the use of bone morphogenic protein. There were no occurrences of infection and no cerebrospinal fluid leaks. We concluded that the rate of complications from minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion is low, and compares favourably with the rates of complication from open procedures. Moreover, computerised navigation systems can be used in place of real-time fluoroscopy to guide implant placement, without an increase in the rate of complications.

Safety and efficacy of intradural extramedullary spinal tumor removal using a minimally invasive approach.

BACKGROUND: Although minimally invasive surgery for intradural tumors offers the potential benefits of less postoperative pain, a quicker recovery, and the avoidance of long-term instability from multilevel laminectomy, there are concerns over whether one can safely and effectively remove intradural extramedullary tumors in a fashion comparable to open techniques and whether the advantages of minimally invasive surgery are clinically significant. OBJECTIVE: To review our early experience with minimally invasive techniques for intradural extramedullary tumors of the spine. METHODS: Thirteen intradural tumors (1 cervical, 6 thoracic, 6 lumbar) in 11 patients were operated on using a muscle-splitting, tube-assisted paramedian oblique approach with hemilaminectomy to access the spinal canal while preserving the spinous process and ligaments. Fluoroscopy and navigation were used to determine the surgical level in all thoracic and lumbar cases. RESULTS: Satisfactory tumor resection using standard microsurgical techniques was achieved in all but 1 case using a minimally invasive approach. Surgical time and intraoperative blood loss were favorable compared with our open technique cases. There was no postoperative morbidity with the minimally invasive approach, although in 2 patients with tumors in the mid- and upper thoracic spine, the surgical incision was inaccurately placed by 1 level. In 1 case, the approach was converted to open when the tumor could not be found, and postoperatively there was a cerebrospinal fluid leak with infection that required readmission. CONCLUSION: Intradural extramedullary tumors can be safely and effectively removed using minimally invasive techniques. The pros and cons of minimally invasive vs open surgery are discussed.