Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Neuroophthalmology ; 46(3): 194-198, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574170

ABSTRACT

A 37-year-old man presented with a 1-week history of diplopia. He was under investigation by otorhinolaryngology for left sinonasal malignancy after imaging of the paranasal sinuses had revealed a large homogenous mass in the left nasal cavity. His visual acuity was 6/9 in each eye with no relative afferent pupillary defect. The left pupil, though was mid-dilated and unresponsive to light. He had a left-sided ptosis. Extraocular movements of the left eye were restricted in all directions of gaze and there was with limited abduction, dextroelevation and dextrodepression of the right eye. A trans-nasal biopsy revealed extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma. Further imaging showed a large enhancing nasopharyngeal mass with intracranial extension to the cavernous sinuses and local infiltration together with intracranial abscesses. The patient was started on empirical intravenous antibiotics and supportive treatment. While awaiting institution of lymphoma chemotherapy, he died. The involvement of the cavernous sinus in sinonasal lymphoma represents an advanced stage. This case highlights that lymphoma should be considered in any patient presenting with a cavernous sinus syndrome and sinonasal disease.

2.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol ; 13: 1243055, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37790912

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We report the ocular findings that patients experienced after receiving the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in three different eye centers in Malaysia. Observations: A total of four cases were reported. Three patients received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while the other received the Oxford AstraZeneca type. Ocular symptoms occurred after the first vaccine dose in two patients and after the second vaccine dose in the other two. Three out of four patients required active treatment for their vision complications postvaccination. The first patient had acute-onset retinal pigment epitheliitis within 3 h of vaccination and was treated conservatively. The second patient developed unilateral choroidal neovascularization 3 days after vaccination and required intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor injection. The third patient presented with bilateral acute multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy a week after vaccination and responded to intravenous methylprednisolone. The fourth patient presented with herpes zoster infection and unilateral anterior nongranulomatous uveitis 2 weeks after vaccination and was treated with oral acyclovir and topical corticosteroids. All patients reported some amount of visual recovery. Conclusions and importance: Visual symptoms and various ocular adverse events can occur following COVID-19 vaccination, which warrants further investigation and urgent intervention if necessary. We would suggest patients receiving the COVID-19 vaccination be aware of possible ocular complications and report any symptoms, regardless of severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Humans , Acute Disease , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Eye , Vaccination/adverse effects
3.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 12(2): 313-319, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33486745

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Using data from the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research (MELoR), this study investigated the association between visual function (visual acuity and contrast sensitivity) and frailty in a group of urban-dwelling older adults. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. 1332 participants aged ≥ 55 years were selected by random sampling from the parliamentary electoral register. Only 1274 participants completed the frailty assessment and 1278 participants completed the contrast sensitivity assessment. Impaired vision was defined as a Snellen visual acuity of worse than 6/12 in the better eye. Poor contrast sensitivity was defined as a score on the Pelli Robson chart of lower than 1.65. Frailty was defined with the Fried's phenotype criteria. Inter-group comparisons were determined with the independent T-test for continuous variables and the Pearson's Chi-squared test for categorical variables. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to evaluate the cross-sectional association between frailty and visual function. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 68.8 ± 7.5 years, of which 58.1% (774) were women. Impaired vision and poor contrast sensitivity were present in 187 (14%) and 271 (21.2%) subjects respectively. 73 (5.8%) individuals were classified as frail, 1161 (91.0.%) pre-frail, and 40 (2.8%) non-frail. There was no significant difference in frailty phenotypes between those with good and impaired vision (p = 0.241). Fried's component of handgrip strength, gait speed and exhaustion were significantly better in those with good visual function (p < 0.05). Participants with poor contrast sensitivity were significantly more likely to be frail (OR: 5.34, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Poor contrast sensitivity was significantly associated with frailty. This highlights the importance of incorporating assessment of contrast sensitivity in those at risk of frailty.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Aged , Contrast Sensitivity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Frail Elderly , Frailty/diagnosis , Geriatric Assessment , Hand Strength , Humans , Independent Living , Middle Aged
4.
Asia Pac J Public Health ; 33(2-3): 280-286, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33375833

ABSTRACT

Low vision and blindness are major health issues affecting ageing population. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the prevalence of visual impairment (VI) in Petaling Jaya North, Petaling Jaya South, and Lembah Pantai using data from the Malaysian Elders Longitudinal Research. There were 1322 participants aged ≥55 years selected by random sampling from parliamentary electoral rolls. Visual acuity was assessed using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 4 m distance. The overall population-adjusted prevalence of VI was 9.0%. The estimated prevalence of VI was highest in Malays followed by Indians and Chinese. Following adjustments for ethnic discrepancies in age, marital status, education level, gender and medical illness, the Malay ethnicity remained an independent association for VI. Education level was associated with Indian ethnicity. In conclusion, the Malay ethnicity and lower education level among Indian ethnicity were found to be associated with VI among the older population in Malaysia. The Malay ethnicity showed the highest prevalence of VI followed by Indians and Chinese.


Subject(s)
Urban Population , Vision Disorders , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Malaysia/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Vision Disorders/ethnology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL