Search details
1.
Is mammographic density a marker of breast cancer phenotypes?
Cancer Causes Control
; 31(8): 749-765, 2020 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410205
2.
Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Carotid Plaque: A Pilot Study of Risk Factors in an Indigenous Nigerian Population.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis
; 28(5): 1346-1352, 2019 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777620
3.
Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations: results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey.
J Radiol Prot
; 38(2): 525-535, 2018 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29376504
4.
Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 206(5): 1119-23, 2016 May.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26999655
5.
An Evaluation of Performance Characteristics of Primary Display Devices.
J Digit Imaging
; 29(2): 175-82, 2016 Apr.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26438424
6.
Operator eye doses during computed tomography fluoroscopic lung biopsy.
J Radiol Prot
; 36(2): 290-8, 2016 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27250649
7.
Association between Family History of Breast Cancer and Breast Density in Saudi Premenopausal Women Participating in Mammography Screening.
Clin Pract
; 14(1): 164-172, 2024 Jan 19.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391399
8.
Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci
; 54(1): 58-65, 2023 03.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456458
9.
Reliability of radiologists' first impression when interpreting a screening mammogram.
PLoS One
; 18(4): e0284605, 2023.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37098013
10.
A machine learning model based on readers' characteristics to predict their performances in reading screening mammograms.
Breast Cancer
; 29(4): 589-598, 2022 Jul.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35122217
11.
Reply to "Breast Density Categories".
AJR Am J Roentgenol
; 207(6): W137, 2016 Dec.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27622592
12.
Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram.
Radiol Phys Technol
; 14(3): 248-261, 2021 Sep.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076829
13.
Mammographic density changes following BC treatment.
Clin Imaging
; 76: 88-97, 2021 Aug.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578136
14.
Global processing provides malignancy evidence complementary to the information captured by humans or machines following detailed mammogram inspection.
Sci Rep
; 11(1): 20122, 2021 10 11.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34635726
15.
Are mammographic density phenotypes associated with breast cancer treatment response and clinical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Breast
; 47: 62-76, 2019 Oct.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352313
16.
Value and Diagnostic Efficacy of Fetal Morphology Assessment Using Ultrasound in A Poor-Resource Setting.
Diagnostics (Basel)
; 9(3)2019 Sep 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31480636
17.
Transforming Screening Uptake in Low-resource and Underinformed Populations: A Preliminary Study of Factors Influencing Women's Decisions to Uptake Screening.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci
; 50(2): 323-330.e2, 2019 Jun.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31176441
18.
The associated factors for radiation dose variation in cardiac CT angiography.
Br J Radiol
; 92(1096): 20180793, 2019 Apr.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30633548
19.
DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR CARDIAC CT ANGIOGRAPHY IN AUSTRALIA.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry
; 182(4): 525-531, 2018 Dec 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30032302
20.
Radiologists can detect the 'gist' of breast cancer before any overt signs of cancer appear.
Sci Rep
; 8(1): 8717, 2018 06 07.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29880817