Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(2): e1042, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38333077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Neurologic outcomes of patients under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) may be worsened by secondary insults of systemic origin. We aimed to assess whether sepsis, commonly observed during ECMO support, is associated with brain injury and outcomes. DESIGN: Single-center cohort study of the "exposed-non-exposed" type on consecutive adult patients treated by VA-ECMO. SETTING: Medical ICU of a university hospital, France, 2013-2020. PATIENTS: Patients with sepsis at the time of VA-ECMO cannulation ("sepsis" group) were compared with patients without sepsis ("no sepsis" group). The primary outcome measure was poor functional outcome at 90 days, defined by a score greater than or equal to 4 on the modified Rankin scale (mRS), indicating severe disability or death. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included ("sepsis," n = 128; "no sepsis," n = 68), of whom 87 (44.4%) had presented cardiac arrest before VA-ECMO cannulation. A poor functional outcome (mRS ≥ 4) was observed in 99 of 128 patients (77.3%) of the "sepsis" group and 46 of 68 patients (67.6%) of the "no sepsis" group (adjusted logistic regression odds ratio (OR) 1.21, 95% CI, 0.58-2.47; inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.79-1.95). Subsequent analyses performed according to pre-ECMO cardiac arrest status suggested that sepsis was independently associated with poorer functional outcomes in the subgroup of patients who had experienced pre-ECMO cardiac arrest (adjusted logistic regression OR 3.44; 95% CI, 1.06-11.40; IPTW OR 3.52; 95% CI, 1.68-7.73), whereas no such association was observed in patients without pre-ECMO cardiac arrest (adjusted logistic regression OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.27-1.69; IPTW OR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.35). Compared with the "no sepsis" group, "sepsis" patients presented a significant increase in S100 calcium-binding protein beta concentrations at day 1 (0.94 µg/L vs. 0.52 µg/L, p = 0.03), and more frequent EEG alterations (i.e., severe slowing, discontinuous background, and a lower prevalence of sleep patterns), suggesting brain injury. CONCLUSION: We observed a detrimental role of sepsis on neurologic outcomes in the subgroup of patients who had experienced pre-ECMO cardiac arrest, but not in other patients.

2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 16(10): e0010889, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36315609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Viral hemorrhagic fevers (VHFs) are a group of diseases, which can be endemo-epidemic in some areas of the world. Most of them are characterized by outbreaks, which occur irregularly and are hard to predict. Innovative medical countermeasures are to be evaluated but due to the field specificities of emerging VHF, challenges arise when implementing clinical studies. To assess the state of the art around VHFs, we conducted a systematic review for all reports and clinical studies that included specific results on number of cases, mortality and treatment of VHFs. METHODS: The search was conducted in January 2020 based on PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42020167306). We searched reports on the WHO and CDC websites, and publications in three international databases (MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL). Following the study selection process, qualitative and quantitative data were extracted from each included study. A narrative synthesis approach by each VHF was used. Descriptive statistics were conducted including world maps of cases number and case fatality rates (CFR); summary tables by VHF, country, time period and treatment studies. RESULTS: We identified 141 WHO/CDC reports and 126 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies were published after 2010 (n = 97 for WHO/CDC reports and n = 93 for publications) and reported number of cases and/or CFRs (n = 141 WHO/CDC reports and n = 88 publications). Results varied greatly depending on the outbreak or cluster and across countries within each VHF. A total of 90 studies focused on Ebola virus disease (EVD). EVD outbreaks were reported in Africa, where Sierra Leone (14,124 cases; CFR = 28%) and Liberia (10,678 cases; CFR = 45%) reported the highest cases numbers, mainly due to the 2014-2016 western Africa outbreak. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) outbreaks were reported from 31 studies in Africa, Asia and Europe, where Turkey reported the highest cases number (6,538 cases; CFR = 5%) and Afghanistan the last outbreak in 2016/18 (293 cases; CFR = 43%). Regarding the 38 studies reporting results on treatments, most of them were non-randomized studies (mainly retrospective or non-randomized comparative studies), and only 10 studies were randomized controlled trials. For several VHFs, no specific investigational therapeutic option with strong proof of effectiveness on mortality was identified. CONCLUSION: We observed that number of cases and CFR varied greatly across VHFs as well as across countries within each VHF. The number of studies on VHF treatments was very limited with very few randomized trials and no strong proof of effectiveness of treatment against most of the VHFs. Therefore, there is a high need of methodologically strong clinical trials conducted in the context of VHF.


Subject(s)
Hemorrhagic Fever Virus, Crimean-Congo , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola , Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral , Humans , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral/epidemiology , Hemorrhagic Fevers, Viral/therapy , Disease Outbreaks , Liberia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL