Evaluating the YMCA Move for Health Program in Individuals With Osteoarthritis and Assessing Maintenance During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Osteoarthritis is the most common condition to co-occur with other chronic health conditions and a broad exercise program on management of chronic conditions may be suitable for this group. This study evaluated the 12-week YMCA Move for Health exercise program among adults with osteoarthritis or with/at risk of chronic health conditions using a mixed-methods study design based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance (RE-AIM) framework. Participants (n = 66) completed the exercise program at the YMCAs in Cambridge, Kitchener, and Waterloo. Assessments included physical function, health-related quality of life, symptoms of arthritis, and physical activity levels and were conducted at baseline (B), postprogram (PP), and 3-month postprogram. Due to interruption by COVID-19, a subgroup of participants completed the 3-month postprogram assessments after the onset of the pandemic. At PP, participants with OA showed significant improvements in level of disability (B = 0.63 ± 0.45 and PP = 0.55 ± 0.47; p = .049), pain (B = 4.3 ± 2.5 and PP = 3.6 ± 2.4; p = .026), fatigue (B = 3.9 ± 3.1 and PP = 2.8 ± 2.6; p = .003), and several domains related to health-related quality of life. Despite interruption by the COVID-19 pandemic and poor maintenance of physical activity levels, nearly all improvements related to level of disability, symptoms of arthritis, and health-related quality of life observed at PP were maintained 3-months postprogram. The Move for Health program proved to be a feasible and effective community program for people with osteoarthritis. Additional supports may be needed to maintain physical activity levels after the program.

Barriers to preexposure prophylaxis use among individuals with recently acquired HIV infection in Northern California.

Barriers to HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use have not been well-characterized in people who became HIV-infected, all of whom could have benefited from PrEP. We invited Kaiser Permanente Northern California members diagnosed with HIV during 2014-2016, following a negative HIV test in the prior year, to complete a survey assessing barriers to PrEP use before HIV diagnosis. Of 268 patients surveyed, 122 (46%) responded. Median age was 36, most (84%) were men who have sex with men, and 64% were of minority racial/ethnic background. Thirty-six (30%) had discussed PrEP with a provider, of whom 10 were diagnosed with HIV at PrEP intake. Overall, only 5 (4.1%) had used PrEP, and all 5 discontinued before diagnosis. Among all respondents, the most common barrier to PrEP use was lack of PrEP awareness (51%). Among those aware of PrEP, the most common barriers were cost/insurance concerns (36%) and perceived low risk for HIV (24%). Lack of PrEP awareness ranged from 39% among those aged 25-34 to 88% among those aged <25 (P = 0.011), and from 33% among Hispanics to 69% among Blacks (P = 0.055). Increasing awareness and affordability of PrEP, and facilitating accurate assessment of HIV risk, are critical to reducing missed opportunities for PrEP.

Validity of a novel screen for cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric symptoms in cardiac rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is no composite screening tool that can efficiently and effectively assess prevalent yet under-recognized cognitive and neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to determine the validity and feasibility of a novel screen assessing cognitive impairment, anxiety, apathy and depression (CAAD screen) in those attending cardiac rehabilitation (CR). METHODS: All patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors entering CR were screened as part of clinical care. A subset of those patients agreed to complete validation assessments (n = 127). Screen results were compared to widely accepted standards for cognition, anxiety, apathy, and depression using a modified receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve analysis. RESULTS: The screen was completed by 97% of participants in 10 min or less with an average completion time of approximately 5 min. Screening scores adjusted for age, sex and years of education had acceptable or excellent validity compared to widely accepted standard diagnoses: CAAD-Cog (AUC = 0.80); CAAD-Anx (AUC = 0.81); CAAD-Apathy (AUC = 0.79) and CAAD-Dep (AUC = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The CAAD screen may be a valid and feasible tool for detecting cognitive impairment, anxiety, apathy and depression in CR settings.

Higher Hepatitis C Cure Rates in a Patient-Centered Medical Home Compared to Specialist Care.

PURPOSE: The new era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against the hepatitis C virus (HCV) has led many primary care clinicians to begin treating HCV. Nevertheless, many patients are referred to specialists due to comorbidities, care complexities, and knowledge gaps of the primary care provider. We compared clinical outcomes for patients treated within a Family Medicine Residency Program (FMRP) affiliated patient-centered medical home (PCMH) with those referred to a specialist. METHODS: Following didactic education and development of practice resources we conducted a single-center quasi-experimental study of adults with HCV referred for treatment either internally or externally to a specialist between January 2019 and December 2020. The primary outcome was the number of patients with a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12), utilizing an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: During the study period 107 patients were assessed by the PCMH, of whom 24 were deemed not a good candidate for treatment. Of the 83 patients referred for treatment, 36 patients were referred externally and 47 were treated internally. While the rate of SVR12 was 100% for both groups when analyzed per protocol (ie, only patients who completed treatment and attended all follow-ups), the rate of SVR12 was 31% for patients referred externally and 62% for patients treated internally when analyzed by intention to treat (relative risk [RR] 2.02, 95% CI 1.18-3.47, P = .01). This difference was entirely attributable to differences in lost to follow-up rates. CONCLUSIONS: Following education and creation of practice resources, achievement of SVR12 among patients with HCV treated by an internal interdisciplinary family medicine team was superior to those who were externally referred. This was primarily attributable to differences in follow-up rates.

Psychometric properties of apathy scales in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review.

Apathy is among the most prevalent neuropsychiatric symptom experienced in Parkinson's disease (PD) and can be assessed with a variety of scales. To identify which scale is most suitable for apathy assessment in PD, the psychometric properties of each scale and its sensitivity to change were analyzed. The methodological quality of the studies ranged from adequate to excellent. The Lille Apathy Rating Scale demonstrated consistently favorable psychometric properties and was used in two of four clinical trials found. The Starkstein Apathy Scale was the only other scale used in clinical trials. Further work is necessary to develop a gold standard for assessing apathy in PD.

Psychometric Properties of Apathy Scales in Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Apathy is a prevalent and problematic neuropsychiatric symptom in those with dementia that is emerging as a treatment target, necessitating accurate assessment. While many apathy scales are available, not all have been developed for use exclusively in dementia, and psychometric properties may vary across different populations. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the psychometric properties of apathy scales used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias, as well as rate the methodological quality of supporting studies. In addition, for those scales identified, performance in clinical trials was reviewed. A search was conducted through Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles that reported psychometric properties of an apathy scale in an AD or mixed dementia population were included. Of 15 articles, the methodological quality ratings of the studies ranged from adequate to excellent. Three clinical trials and two pooled analyses of clinical trials were included that used apathy scales evaluated in this review. Three scales emerged. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy subscale (NPI-apathy) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) had the greatest number of studies evaluating psychometric properties and were also used in the clinical trials and have shown sensitivity to change. The Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating demonstrated excellent values of internal consistency, validity, and reliability for use in an AD population. Future research should address comparative scale performance and assess ability to distinguish subtypes of apathy. Validation may include evaluation of performance against specific imaging defined deficits.

Association of raltegravir use with long-term health outcomes in HIV-infected patients: an observational post-licensure safety study in a large integrated healthcare system.

BACKGROUND: Raltegravir became the first integrase inhibitor to gain FDA approval; but with limited evidence documenting long-term risks in real world care, especially for major health outcomes of interest. OBJECTIVE: Assess raltegravir safety in clinical practice within an integrated health system. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of HIV-infected adults within Kaiser Permanente California from 2005 to 2013. We compared patients initiating raltegravir during the study period with two groups; a historical cohort (started new antiretroviral regimen [ART] 2005-2007) and a concurrent cohort that did not initiate raltegravir (2007-2013). We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression to obtain hazard ratios (HR) for pre-specified incident health outcomes, employing propensity scores to adjust for potential confounding. RESULTS: The population included 8,219 HIV-infected adults (raltegravir cohort N = 1,757; 4,798 patient-years), with greater years known HIV-infected among raltegravir patients. The raltegravir cohort had increased HR for AIDS-defining (HR 2.69 [1.53-4.71]; HR 1.85 [1.21-2.82]) and non-AIDS-defining malignancies (HR 2.26 [1.29-3.94]; HR 1.88 [1.26-2.78]) relative to both comparison cohorts. Compared to the historical cohort we found no significant difference in all-cause mortality; the raltegravir cohort experienced increased HR for all-cause mortality compared to concurrent (HR 1.53 [1.02-2.31]). Raltegravir appeared protective of lipodystrophy when compared to the historical cohort but associated with increased incidence compared to concurrent. There were no significant differences in the incidence of hepatic, skin, or cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS: The potentially elevated risk for malignancy and mortality with raltegravir and residual confounding merits further investigation. We demonstrate the value of observational cohorts for monitoring post-licensure medication safety.

Implementation of a novel living-donor kidney transplant preoperative checklist within the electronic medical record: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Checklist utilization in surgery has contributed to improved patient safety and reduced numbers of preventable complications. A living-donor kidney transplant (LDKT) preoperative checklist embedded within electronic medical record (EMR) was developed to enhance patient safety and prevent "never" events including: unexpected donor-recipient blood (ABO) incompatibility, positive (XM) cross match, infectious disease transmission, or procurement of an anatomically inappropriate allograft. Review of the initial 2 years of checklist utilization was performed. FINDINGS: This safety instrument operates by facilitating critical review and referencing of source documentation to confirm ABO, XM, infectious risk, and organ anatomy compatibility. It was met with high compliance rates and no "never events" have occurred following its inception. The checklist is readily available in the EMR and is accessible by all members of the LDKT recipient healthcare team. CONCLUSIONS: Checklist utilization was associated with zero LDKT "never event" occurrences. Surgeons felt the checklist was easy to use.

The HIV Care Cascade Measured Over Time and by Age, Sex, and Race in a Large National Integrated Care System.

HIV care cascades can evaluate programmatic success over time. However, methodologies for estimating cascade stages vary, and few have evaluated differences by demographic subgroups. We examined cascade performance over time and by age, sex, and race/ethnicity in Kaiser Permanente, providing HIV care in eight US states and Washington, DC. We created cascades for HIV+ members' age ≥13 for 2010-2012. We measured "linkage" (a visit/CD4 within 90 days of being diagnosed for new patients; ≥1 medical visit/year if established); "retention" (≥2 medical visits ≥60 days apart); filled ART (filled ≥3 months of combination ART); and viral suppression (HIV RNA <200 copies/mL last measured in year). The cascades were stratified by calendar year, sex, age, and race/ethnicity. We found men had statistically (p < 0.05) higher percent linkage, filled ART, and viral suppression for 2010 and 2011 but not for 2012. Women had significantly greater retention for all years. Annually, older age was associated (p < 0.05) with retention, filled ART, and viral suppression but not linkage. Latinos had greater (p < 0.05) retention than whites or blacks in all years, with similar retention comparing blacks and whites. Filled ART and viral suppression was increased (p < 0.05) for whites compared with all racial/ethnic groups in all years. Cascade methodology requiring success at upstream stages before measuring success at later stages (i.e., "dependent" methodology) underreported performance by up to 20% compared with evaluating each stage separately ("independent"). Thus, care results improved over time, but significant differences exist by patient demographics. Specifically, retention efforts should be targeted toward younger patients and blacks; women, blacks, and Latinos require greater ART prescribing.