Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 26(8): 778-785, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35934822

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate concerns surrounding the benefits of antiresorptive drugs in older adults, a systematic review was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of these treatments in the prevention of osteoporotic hip fractures in older adults. DESIGN: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: older adults ≥65 years with osteoporosis, with or without a previous fragility fracture. Studies with cancer-related and corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis, participants <65 years and no reported hip fracture were not included. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched. The primary outcome was hip fracture, and subgroup analysis (≥75 years, with different drug types and secondary prevention) and sensitivity analysis was carried out using a GRADE evaluation. Secondary outcomes were any type of fractures, vertebral fracture, bone markers and adverse events. The risk of bias was assessment with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. RESULTS: A total of 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) qualified for this meta-analysis, with 36,196 participants. Antiresorptive drugs have a statistically significant effect on the prevention of hip fracture (RR=0.70; 95%CI 0.60 to 0.81), but with a moderate GRADE quality of evidence and a high number needed to treat (NNT) of 186. For other outcomes, there is a statistically significant effect, but with a low to moderate quality of evidence. Antiresorptives showed no reduction in the risk of hip fracture in people ≥75 years. The results for different drug types, secondary prevention and sensitivity analysis are similar to the main analyses and have the same concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Antiresorptive drugs have a statistically significant effect on preventing hip fracture but with a moderate quality (unclear/high risk of bias) and high NNT (186). This small benefit disappears in those ≥75 years, but increases in secondary prevention. More RCTs in very old osteoporotic adults are needed.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Hip Fractures , Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Spinal Fractures , Aged , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Hip Fractures/drug therapy , Hip Fractures/etiology , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Humans , Osteoporosis/complications , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/prevention & control , Osteoporotic Fractures/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Spinal Fractures/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL