Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Ethics ; 22(3): 212-6, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22167983

ABSTRACT

Although it is well known that intimacy and sexual expression are an important part of being human and of healthy living, facilities such as nursing homes, adult group homes, or assisted living residences commonly struggle with knowing how to balance supporting residents who are incapable to have sexual lives with their duty to protect them from foreseeable harm. This article presents a challenging case and uses the British Columbia Supporting Sexual Health and Intimacy in Care Facility Guidelines to determine what should be done.


Subject(s)
Assisted Living Facilities/standards , Coitus , Decision Making , Personal Autonomy , Quality of Life , Safe Sex , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adult , British Columbia , Female , Group Homes/standards , Homes for the Aged/standards , Humans , Nursing Homes/standards , Organizational Case Studies , Practice Guidelines as Topic
2.
J Clin Ethics ; 22(1): 54-60, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21595355

ABSTRACT

Offering intensive care to neonates who have conditions that carry extremely poor prognoses is a source of great contention amongst neonatologists. The concept of best interests is commonly used as a rationale for refusing such care, despite the fact that parents of these infants often have a different view of what best interests means. This article takes up the question of what best interests should incorporate for infants with lethal conditions not curable with intensive care, and how and who should decide which treatment options should be implemented. Based on our recommendation that parents be apprised of the basis upon which physicians are evaluating treatment options, we offer a framework that allows all relevant parties to approach the issue of what is appropriate treatment from a similar place. We maintain that this approach will increase transparency, dialogue, understanding, and trust, which, in turn, may result in greater consensus.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple , Decision Making/ethics , Intensive Care, Neonatal/ethics , Parents , Physicians/ethics , Problem Solving/ethics , Abnormalities, Multiple/therapy , Choice Behavior/ethics , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 18 , Communication , Consensus , Ethics, Medical , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Negotiating , Time Factors , Trisomy , Uncertainty
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL