Early detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections in solid organ transplant recipients and household members using wearable devices.

The increasing global prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and the resulting COVID-19 disease pandemic pose significant concerns for clinical management of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR). Wearable devices that can measure physiologic changes in biometrics including heart rate, heart rate variability, body temperature, respiratory, activity (such as steps taken per day) and sleep patterns, and blood oxygen saturation show utility for the early detection of infection before clinical presentation of symptoms. Recent algorithms developed using preliminary wearable datasets show that SARS-CoV-2 is detectable before clinical symptoms in >80% of adults. Early detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and other pathogens in SOTR, and their household members, could facilitate early interventions such as self-isolation and early clinical management of relevant infection(s). Ongoing studies testing the utility of wearable devices such as smartwatches for early detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other infections in the general population are reviewed here, along with the practical challenges to implementing these processes at scale in pediatric and adult SOTR, and their household members. The resources and logistics, including transplant-specific analyses pipelines to account for confounders such as polypharmacy and comorbidities, required in studies of pediatric and adult SOTR for the robust early detection of SARS-CoV-2, and other infections are also reviewed.

Translatability Analysis of National Institutes of Health-Funded Biomedical Research That Applies Artificial Intelligence.

Importance: Despite the rapid growth of interest and diversity in applications of artificial intelligence (AI) to biomedical research, there are limited objective ways to characterize the potential for use of AI in clinical practice. Objective: To examine what types of medical AI have the greatest estimated translational impact (ie, ability to lead to development that has measurable value for human health) potential. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cohort study, research grants related to AI awarded between January 1, 1985, and December 31, 2020, were identified from a National Institutes of Health (NIH) award database. The text content for each award was entered into a Natural Language Processing (NLP) clustering algorithm. An NIH database was also used to extract citation data, including the number of citations and approximate potential to translate (APT) score for published articles associated with the granted awards to create proxies for translatability. Exposures: Unsupervised assignment of AI-related research awards to application topics using NLP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Annualized citations per $1 million funding (ACOF) and average APT score for award-associated articles, grouped by application topic. The APT score is a machine-learning based metric created by the NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis that quantifies the likelihood of future citation by a clinical article. Results: A total of 16 629 NIH awards related to AI were included in the analysis, and 75 applications of AI were identified. Total annual funding for AI grew from $17.4 million in 1985 to $1.43 billion in 2020. By average APT, interpersonal communication technologies (0.488; 95% CI, 0.472-0.504) and population genetics (0.463; 95% CI, 0.453-0.472) had the highest translatability; environmental health (ACOF, 1038) and applications focused on the electronic health record (ACOF, 489) also had high translatability. The category of applications related to biochemical analysis was found to have low translatability by both metrics (average APT, 0.393; 95% CI, 0.388-0.398; ACOF, 246). Conclusions and Relevance: Based on this study's findings, data on grants from the NIH can apparently be used to identify and characterize medical applications of AI to understand changes in academic productivity, funding support, and potential for translational impact. This method may be extended to characterize other research domains.

Deep Learning for Classification of Bone Lesions on Routine MRI.

BACKGROUND: Radiologists have difficulty distinguishing benign from malignant bone lesions because these lesions may have similar imaging appearances. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm that can differentiate benign and malignant bone lesions using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and patient demographics. METHODS: 1,060 histologically confirmed bone lesions with T1- and T2-weighted pre-operative MRI were retrospectively identified and included, with lesions from 4 institutions used for model development and internal validation, and data from a fifth institution used for external validation. Image-based models were generated using the EfficientNet-B0 architecture and a logistic regression model was trained using patient age, sex, and lesion location. A voting ensemble was created as the final model. The performance of the model was compared to classification performance by radiology experts. FINDINGS: The cohort had a mean age of 30±23 years and was 58.3% male, with 582 benign lesions and 478 malignant. Compared to a contrived expert committee result, the ensemble deep learning model achieved (ensemble vs. experts): similar accuracy (0·76 vs. 0·73, p=0·7), sensitivity (0·79 vs. 0·81, p=1·0) and specificity (0·75 vs. 0·66, p=0·48), with a ROC AUC of 0·82. On external testing, the model achieved ROC AUC of 0·79. INTERPRETATION: Deep learning can be used to distinguish benign and malignant bone lesions on par with experts. These findings could aid in the development of computer-aided diagnostic tools to reduce unnecessary referrals to specialized centers from community clinics and limit unnecessary biopsies. FUNDING: This work was funded by a Radiological Society of North America Research Medical Student Grant (#RMS2013) and supported by the Amazon Web Services Diagnostic Development Initiative.