Asystolic donor warm ischemia time is associated with development of postreperfusion syndrome in donation after circulatory death liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Individual events during donation after circulatory death (DCD) procurement, such as hypotensive or hypoxic warm ischemia, or circulatory arrest are all a part of donor warm ischemia time (dWIT), and may have differing effects on the outcome of the liver graft. This study aimed to identify risk factors for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), a state of severe hemodynamic derangement following graft reperfusion, and its impact on DCD liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis using 106 DCD LT. Detailed information for events during procurement (withdrawal of life support; systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg; oxygen saturation < 80%; circulatory arrest; aortic cold perfusion) and their association with the development of PRS were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall incidence of PRS was 26.4%, occurring in 28 patients. Independent risk factors for PRS were asystolic dWIT (odds ratio (OR) 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-9.66) and MELD score (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10). Total bilirubin was significantly higher in the PRS group at postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = .02; 5.2 mg/dL vs. 3.4 mg/dL), POD 3 (p = .049; 4.5 mg/dL vs. 2.8 mg/dL), and POD 7 (p = .04; 3.1 mg/dL vs. 1.9 mg/dL). Renal replacement therapy after LT was more likely to be required in the PRS group (p = .01; 48.2% vs. 23.1%). CONCLUSION: Asystolic dWIT is a risk factor for the development of PRS in DCD LT. Our results suggest that asystolic dWIT should be considered when selecting DCD liver donors.

Improved outcomes of liver resection for hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma after the introduction of direct-acting antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND: Assess impact of direct-acting antivirals introduction on outcomes after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: 391 patients (1991-2021) treated with resection for hepatocellular carcinoma on Hepatitis C background were divided according to receiving Hepatitis C treatment, treatment type, achievement of sustained virological response (SVR), time of resection pre- (Era 1, 1991-2011) and post-direct acting antivirals introduction (Era 2, 2012-2021). Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, Cox regression analysis performed to identify survival predictors. RESULTS: Majority of patients had single lesion (67.8%), diameter >2 cm in 60.6%, no evidence of macroscopic vascular invasion on imaging. Pathology showed vascular invasion in 69.6% of patients, 76.5% microvascular. Recurrence developed in 247 patients (63.2%). 194 patients (49.6%) achieved SVR. Overall survival at 1-, 3-, 5-years was 94.6%, 85.7%, 78.8% for patients who achieved SVR, 80.1%, 48.1%, 29.9% in those who did not (p < 0.001). 220 patients (56.3%) were in Era 1, 171 (43.7%) in Era 2. Survival at 1-, 3-, 5-years was 76.1%, 49%, 36% in Era 1, 94.5%, 82.5%, 70.3% in Era 2 (p < 0.001). SVR was an independent predictor of survival on multiple Cox Regression analysis. CONCLUSION: While many aspects of HCC management have evolved, SVR following direct-acting antivirals independently improves HCC resection outcomes.

The Importance of Segment 4 Anatomy on Outcomes Following Living Donor Left Lateral Segmentectomy.

BACKGROUND: During left lateral section (LLS) resection for live liver donation, the vascular inflow and the bile drainage of segment 4 (S4) are compromised. We investigated the long-term changes of S4 after donation and their potential prognostic impact on living liver donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 42 consecutive left lateral (LLS, S2/3) liver resections for living donation. RESULTS: There were 25 female and 17 male donors. Median age was 33 y and median body mass index was 26. Median LLS, S2/3, volume was 262 cc, and median sS4 volume was 160 cc. Complications were encountered in three donors (7%). An independent extrahepatic S4 artery (S4A) (with a proximal left heptic artery or a right hepatic artery origin) was identified in 41% of the donors. Ligation of the independent S4A was not associated with the rate of post resection liver dysfunction, complications, or the degree of S4 atrophy. Having a dominant S4 portal triad pedicle feeding the right anterior sectors, segment 5/8, of the liver was associated with increased parenchymal damage as evidenced by a higher peak of alanine aminotransferase but was not associated with postoperative complications. The median degree of atrophy of S4 at 1 y post donation as noted on imaging was 66%. The presence of a dominant S4 portal triad pedicle and the peak alanine aminotransferase early postoperatively were both predictors of the degree of S4 atrophy post donation. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an independent S4A or dominant S4 portal triad pedicle feeding the liver right anterior sectors, segment 5/8, should not be a contraindication for left lateral segment living donation.

Postreperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation: Outcomes, predictors, and application for recipient selection.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to identify risk factors for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS) and its impact on LT outcomes. METHODS: Data analysis was performed in 1021 adult patients undergoing donation after brain death (DBD) LT to identify PRS incidence, the risk factors for PRS development, and its impact on LT outcomes. RESULTS: The overall incidence of PRS was 16.1%. Independent risk factors for PRS included donor age (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, P = .02), donor body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.04, P = .003), moderate macrosteatosis (OR 2.48, P = .02), and cold ischemia time (CIT) (OR 1.06, P = .02). On multivariable analysis for 30-day graft failure, PRS (hazard ratio (HR) 3.49; P < .001) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (HR 1.01; P = .05) were independent risk factors. Patients were categorized into four distinct groups based on PRS risk groups and MELD groups, which showed different 1-year graft survival (P < .001). There were comparable outcomes between low PRS risk - high MELD and high PRS risk - low MELD group (P = .33). CONCLUSIONS: Donor age, donor BMI, moderate macrosteatosis, and CIT were identified as risk factors for the development of PRS in LT using DBD grafts. PRS risk evaluation may improve donor-to-recipient matching based on their MELD scores.

Radiological and pathological assessment with EOB-MRI after Y90 radiation lobectomy prior to liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Radiation lobectomy (RL) utilizes Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization for achieving tumor control and inducing contralateral lobe hypertrophy. Our objective was to evaluate the chronological changes occurring radiologically and histopathologically after Y90 RL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent Y90 RL prior to planned liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) was performed every 3 months. RESULTS: Future liver remnant volume (FLRV) significantly increased up to 9 months after Y90 RL. Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake in the treated lobe experienced a 40% reduction in enhancement ratio (ER) during ensuing first 3 months, and never recovered. The reduced ER in the non-tumoral parenchyma was significantly correlated with increased FLRV and FLR (r = 0.41 and r = 0.35, respectively; both p < 0.01). Histopathological evaluation of non-tumor liver tissue found features of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome as an early change after Y90 RL (median 5.7 months) and parenchymal collapse as a late change (mean 11 months). DISCUSSION: The reduced uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA at 3 months post Y90 RL correlates with a significant increase in FLRV prior to liver resection. EOB-MRI evaluation at 3 months can guide future plan of action after Y90 RL.

Left lateral segment pediatric liver transplantation: a 25 year experience at Mount Sinai.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of left lateral segment (LLS) grafts in pediatric recipients were compared between living (LD-LLS) and deceased donor (DD-LLS) grafts. METHODS: 195 LLS grafts (99DD-LLS-96LD-LLS) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.1years. The primary endpoints were overall patient/graft survival. RESULTS: LD-LLS grafts were younger (0.9vs.1.4years, p = 0.039), more likely to have a fulminant liver failure (17.9%vs.5.3%,p = 0.002), less likely to have a metabolic disorder (6.3%vs.25.5%,p = 0.002), and less likely to be undergoing retransplantation (5.3% vs.16.2%,p = 0.015). There was a trend toward decreased hepatic artery thrombosis in LD-LLS grafts (6.6% vs. 15.5%,p = 0.054). No differences in the overall biliary complications occurred. The LD-LLS group had prolonged survival compared to the DD-LLS group with 10-year survival rates of 81%, and 74% (p = 0.005), respectively. LD-LLS grafts had longer graft survival compared to DD-LLS grafts (10-year graft survival 85%vs.67%,p = 0.005). Recipient age >1year (HR 2.39,p = 0.026), aortic reconstruction (HR 2.12,p = 0.046) and vascular complication (HR 3.12,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor patient survival. Non-biliary liver disease (HR 2.17,p = 0.015), DD-LLS (HR 2.06,p = 0.034) and vascular complication (HR 4.61,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor graft survival. CONCLUSION: The use of SLT remains a viable option with excellent long-term outcomes. We show improved graft and patient survival with living donor grafts.

The utility of thrombophilia and hematologic screening in live liver donation.

BACKGROUND: Most centers perform some degree of hematologic screening, including thrombophilia testing, on prospective live liver donors. The nature and extent of such screens are not standardized, and there is limited evidence regarding hematologic risk stratification. METHODS AND RESULTS: We present an experience of hematologic screening among prospective liver donors. Five-hundred-eightyfour patients were screened for liver donation between 1/2013 and 1/2020, of whom 156 (27%) proceeded to donor hepatectomy. Thirty-three of 428 (8%) declined patients were excluded for hematologic indications. Hematologic indications were the 2nd most frequent medical indications for exclusion (trailing only hepatologic indications). The most common reason for hematologic exclusion was concern regarding thrombophilia. Nevertheless, 21 patients with evidence of possible thrombophilia proceeded to donor hepatectomy, and none incurred hematologic complications. Similarly, seven patients with screening findings concerning for increased bleeding risk (most often thrombocytopenia) underwent donor hepatectomy without hematologic complication. Three of 156 (2%) of patients who underwent donor hepatectomy incurred a hematologic complication (all thrombotic, none fatal). None of these patients had any evident hematologic risk factor on screening. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the difficulty of hematologic risk stratification among prospective living donors, however, suggests that some patients with relatively mild risk factors may be safe for donation.

Resection of Mixed Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) is a biphenotypic liver cancer thought to have unfavorable tumor biology and a poor prognosis. Surgical outcomes of HCC-CC remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of HCC-CC. We analyzed a series of patients undergoing resection for HCC-CC (n = 47), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 468), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC; n = 108) at a single Western center between 2001 and 2015. Patients with HCC-CC were matched to patients with HCC and ICC on important clinical factors including tumor characteristics (size, vascular invasion, and differentiation) and underlying cirrhosis. Patients with HCC-CC had rates of viral hepatitis comparable to patients with HCC (78.7% versus 80.0%), and 42.5% had underlying cirrhosis. When matched on tumor size, HCC-CC was more poorly differentiated than HCC (68.3% versus 27.3%; P < 0.001) and ICC (68.3% versus 34.8%; P = 0.01) but had similar postresection survival (5-year survival: HCC-CC 49.7%, HCC 54.8%, ICC 68.7%; P = 0.61) and recurrence (3-year recurrence: HCC-CC 57.9%, HCC 61.5%, and ICC 56%; P = 0.58). Outcomes were similar between HCC-CC and HCC when matched on underlying cirrhosis and tumor size. Cancer type was not predictive of survival or tumor recurrence. Survival after resection of HCC-CC is similar to HCC when matched for tumor size, despite HCC-CC tumors being more poorly differentiated. Exclusion of HCC-CC from management strategies recommended for HCC, including consideration for liver transplantation, may not be warranted.

Hypo-vascular hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation: Morphological characteristics and implications on outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The clinical importance of hypovascular liver lesions in cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT) has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to characterize the clinicopathologic features and management of these tumors and to assess their impact on post-LT outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of cirrhotic patients with lesions suspicious for hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent LT at a single institution from 2011- 2017. RESULTS: We identified 22 pre-LT patients with radiologic diagnosis of a lesion(s) suspicious for hypovascular HCC. There were 28 hypovascular lesions within the 22 patient cohort; 9 lesions (32%) converted to hypervascular HCC before LT and 19 lesions remained hypovascular at LT. 88% of hypovascular lesions were HCC on explant pathology. Compared to patients with hyper-vascular HCC lesions, hypovascular HCC lesions underwent less preoperative tumor ablation (58% vs 89%; P < .01). Hypovascular HCC were more likely to be well-differentiated (67% vs 11%; P < .01), but there were no differences in the microvascular invasion, tumor recurrence, or survival post-LT. CONCLUSIONS: Hypovascular HCC has similar clinical outcomes and needs for transplantation as hypervascular HCC. The high prevalence of HCC within suspicious hypovascular lesions supports a similar monitoring and locoregional therapy strategy as for hypervascular HCC.

The impact of donor liver allograft fibrosis on patients undergoing liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of extended criteria liver allografts (ECD) shortens time to transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effect of liver allograft fibrosis on graft and patient survival after liver transplantation (LT), with particular attention to fibrosis progression. METHODS: Retrospective database search of donor and recipient liver allograft histology of liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2011. Donor and patient characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients underwent LT with donor liver allografts with early-stage fibrosis (stage 1 fibrosis and stage 2 fibrosis). The level of liver fibrosis did not progress in 40% of the patients tested, and there was a regression of fibrosis in 30%. At a median follow-up of 71 months, of 101 patients transplanted with fibrotic livers, 63 patients (63%) were alive with functioning initial grafts, six patients (6%) were retransplanted, and 35 patients expired. The graft survival rates were 82% and 69% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Graft survival differences were not found to be statistically significant between the degrees of liver allograft fibrosis: 5-year graft survival (73% for stage 1 fibrosis and 62% for stage 2 fibrosis, P = .24). The entire fibrosis group was further compared with a control group of 208 consecutive primary liver transplant patients with allografts having no fibrosis. The 5-year graft survival was not significantly different between the groups (69% for the fibrosis group vs 75% for the nonfibrosis group, P = .19). Survival was also not statistically different between the groups (5-year survival of 73% for the fibrosis group vs 79% for the nonfibrosis group, P = .2). In patients with HCV, graft survival differences were not found to be statistically significant with the use of early-stage fibrotic livers: 5-year graft survival of 60% for fibrosis group vs 70% for the nonfibrosis group, P = .22). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that allografts with early-stage fibrosis achieve acceptable long-term survival after liver transplantation. Given these preliminary results, the use of organs with early-stage fibrosis warrants further studies at a larger scale to validate these results.

Analysis of Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Outcomes in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

PURPOSE: To analyze outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of survival, recurrence, and complications was performed in 82 patients with HCC undergoing preoperative PVE and surgical treatment with curative intention from June 2006 to December 2014. RESULTS: Rate of major adverse events after PVE was 11% with no mortality. Twenty-eight (34.1%) patients showed radiologic progression of HCC after PVE; 72 patients (87.8%) eventually were accepted as surgical candidates. Median interval between PVE and surgery was 37 days, and 69 patients (84.1%) ultimately underwent surgical resection. At 1 and 3 years, disease-free survival rates were 81.3% and 53.1%, respectively, and overall patient survival rates were 77.5% and 63.1%. Compared with patients accepted as surgical candidates, patients who did not undergo surgery had a higher median number of HCC tumors (1 [range, 1-5] vs 2 [range, 1-4], P = .031). At 1 and 3 years, patients with disease progression after PVE but who still underwent surgical resection showed similar recurrence-free (90% vs 79.6% and 75% vs 48.6%) and overall (72.2% vs 78.4% and 57.8% vs 64%) survival rates as the rest of the patients who underwent resection. CONCLUSIONS: PVE is a safe technique with good outcomes that potentially increases the number of patients with initially unresectable HCC who can be offered resection. Radiologic progression after PVE should not be seen as a contraindication to offer resection if it is still deemed possible.

Ischemia time impacts recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

UNLABELLED: Although experimental evidence has indicated that ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury of the liver stimulates growth of micrometastases and adhesion of tumor cells, the clinical impact of I/R injury on recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after liver transplantation (LT) has not been fully investigated. To study this issue, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 391 patients from two transplant centers who underwent LT for HCC. Ischemia times along with other tumor/recipient variables were analyzed as risk factors for recurrence of HCC. Subgroup analysis focused on patients with HCC who had pathologically proven vascular invasion (VI) because of the associated increased risk of micrometastasis. Recurrence occurred in 60 patients (15.3%) with median time to recurrence of 0.9 years (range, 40 days-4.6 years). Cumulative recurrence curves according to cold ischemia time (CIT) at 2-hour intervals and warm ischemia time (WIT) at 10-minute intervals showed that CIT>10 hours and WIT>50 minutes were associated with significantly increased recurrence (P=0.015 and 0.036, respectively). Multivariate Cox's regression analysis identified prolonged cold (>10 hours; P=0.03; hazard ratio [HR]=1.9) and warm (>50 minutes; P=0.003; HR=2.84) ischemia times as independent risk factors for HCC recurrence, along with tumor factors, including poor differentiation, micro- and macrovacular invasion, exceeding Milan criteria, and alpha-fetoprotein>200 ng/mL. Prolonged CIT (P=0.04; HR=2.24) and WIT (P=0.001; HR=5.1) were also significantly associated with early (within 1 year) recurrence. In the subgroup analysis, prolonged CIT (P=0.01; HR=2.6) and WIT (P=0.01; HR=3.23) were independent risk factors for recurrence in patients with VI, whereas there was no association between ischemia times and HCC recurrence in patients with no VI. CONCLUSION: Reducing ischemia time may be a useful strategy to decrease HCC recurrence after LT, especially in those with other risk factors.

Upper midline incision for living donor right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation is a viable option to increase access to transplantation and techniques to limit the operative incision is one way to increase donation by decreasing donor morbidity. We describe our experience with a limited upper midline incision (UMI) for living donor right hepatectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective data were collected on 58 consecutive living liver donors who underwent right hepatectomy via a UMI. RESULTS: Donor median age was 32 years, with median body mass index of 24.6. The mean incision length was 11.7 cm. Ten liver grafts included middle hepatic vein. The mean graft volume by preoperative imaging was 940 cc. The mean operative time was 407 minutes; cellsaver was utilized in 35 patients with median of 1 unit. Mean peak aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were 492 and 469, and peak bilirubin and international normalized ratio (INR) were 3.3 and 1.8. The average length of stay was 6 days. There were 10 Clavien grade I and 11 Clavien grade II complications. Three patients developed an incisional hernia requiring surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Living liver donor hepatectomy can be safely performed through a UMI. This approach consolidates the steps of liver mobilization, hilar dissection, and parenchymal transection in a single-exposure technique, with incision comparable to the laparoscopic-assisted modality.

Outcomes of Radioembolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Invasion: Resin versus Glass Microspheres.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of yttrium-90 radioembolization performed with resin-based ((90)Y-resin) and glass-based ((90)Y-glass) microspheres in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with associated portal vein invasion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review (January 2005-September 2014) identified 90 patients ((90)Y-resin, 21; (90)Y-glass, 69) with HCC and ipsilateral portal vein thrombosis (PVT). Patients were stratified according to age, sex, ethnicity, Child-Pugh class, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, α-fetoprotein > 400 ng/mL, extent of PVT, tumor burden, and sorafenib therapy. Outcome variables included clinical and laboratory toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events, Version 4.03), imaging response (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Grade 3/4 bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase toxicities developed at a 2.8-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-6.1) and 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.1-6.1) greater rate in the (90)Y-resin group. The disease control rate was 37.5% in the (90)Y-resin group and 54.5% in the (90)Y-glass group (P = .39). The median (95% CI) TTP was 2.8 (1.9-4.3) months in the (90)Y-resin group and 5.9 (4.2-9.1) months in the (90)Y-glass group (P = .48). Median (95% CI) survival was 3.7 (2.3-6.0) months in the (90)Y-resin group and 9.4 (7.6-15.0) months in the (90)Y-glass group (hazard ratio, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.5-4.3, P < .001). Additional multivariate predictors of improved OS included age < 65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status < 1, α-fetoprotein ≤ 400 ng/mL, and unilobar tumor distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging response of (90)Y treatment in patients with HCC and PVT was not significantly different between (90)Y-glass and (90)Y-resin groups. Lower toxicity and improved OS were observed in the (90)Y-glass group.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters at 3.0T.

PURPOSE: To evaluate short-term test-retest and interobserver reproducibility of IVIM (intravoxel incoherent motion) diffusion parameters and ADC (apparent diffusion coefficient) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver parenchyma at 3.0T. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study, 11 patients were scanned twice using a free-breathing single-shot echo-planar-imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence using 4 b values (b = 0, 50, 500, 1000 s/mm(2)) and IVIM DWI using 16 b values (0-800 s/mm(2)) at 3.0T. IVIM parameters (D: true diffusion coefficient, D*: pseudodiffusion coefficient, PF: perfusion fraction) and ADC (using 4 b and 16 b) were calculated. Short-term test-retest and interobserver reproducibility of IVIM parameters and ADC were assessed by measuring correlation coefficient, coefficient of variation (CV), and Bland-Altman limits of agreements (BA-LA). RESULTS: Fifteen HCCs were assessed in 10 patients. Reproducibility of IVIM metrics in HCC was poor for D* and PF (mean CV 60.6% and 37.3%, BA-LA: -161.6% to 135.3% and -66.2% to 101.0%, for D* and PF, respectively), good for D and ADC (CV 19.7% and <16%, BA-LA -57.4% to 36.3% and -38.2 to 34.1%, for D and ADC, respectively). Interobserver reproducibility was on the same order of test-retest reproducibility except for PF in HCC. Reproducibility of diffusion parameters was better in liver parenchyma compared to HCC. CONCLUSION: Poor reproducibility of D*/PF and good reproducibility for D/ADC were observed in HCC and liver parenchyma. These findings may have implications for trials using DWI in HCC.

Yttrium-90 Glass-Based Microsphere Radioembolization in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Secondary to the Hepatitis B Virus: Safety, Efficacy, and Survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of yttrium-90 radioembolization performed with glass-based microspheres in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) secondary to the hepatitis B virus (HBV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 675 patients treated between January 2006 and July 2014 were reviewed, of which 45 (age 62 y ± 10; 91% male) received glass-based radioembolization for HCC secondary to HBV. All patients were stratified according to previous therapy (naive, n = 14; 31.1%), Child-Pugh class (class A, n = 41; 91%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS; < 1, n = 21; 47%), solitary (n = 26; 58%) and unilobar (n = 37; 82%) tumor distribution, tumor size < 5 cm (n = 29; 64%), portal vein thrombosis (n = 14; 31%), α-fetoprotein level > 400 ng/mL (n = 17; 38%), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage (A, n = 8; B, n = 9; C, n = 28). RESULTS: A total of 50 radioembolization treatments were performed, with a 100% technical success rate (median target dose, 120 Gy). Clinical toxicities included pain (16%), fatigue (12%), and nausea (4%). Grade 3/4 laboratory toxicities included bilirubin (8%) and aspartate aminotransferase (4%) toxicities. Observed toxicities were independent of treatment dose. The objective response rates were 55% per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors and 21% per World Health Organization criteria, and the disease control rate was 63%. Disease progression was secondary to new, nontarget HCC in 45% of cases. Median time to progression and overall survival were 6.0 mo (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.4-8.0 mo) and 19.3 mo (95% CI, 11.2-22.7 mo), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated ECOG PS ≥ 1 and AFP level > 400 ng/mL to be independent predictors of inferior overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Glass-based radioembolization for HCC secondary to HBV can be safely performed, with favorable target lesion response and overall survival.

Segment 4 and the left lateral segment regeneration pattern after resection of the middle hepatic vein in a living donor right hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) with a right hepatectomy (RH) in live donor liver transplantation improves venous drainage of the anterior sector of the graft. Its long-term effects on donor left liver (LL) regeneration are not well described. METHODS: Donors who underwent RH with MHV (MHV+, n = 12) were compared with donors who underwent RH with preservation of the MHV (MHV-, n = 24). Peri-operative complications and volume of the entire liver and individual segments were evaluated at 1 year post-donation. RESULTS: There was a trend towards a higher complication rate in the MHV+ group (41% versus 25%), without reaching statistical significance (P = 0.3). Males, high body mass index (BMI) and a smaller residual liver volume (RLV) were predictors for greater LL regeneration. MHV+ donors had impaired regeneration of segment 4 (S4) at 1 year, and compensatory greater left lateral segment regeneration. The absence of venous drainage of S4 (V4) to left hepatic vein (LHV) was a predictor of impaired S4 regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Regeneration of S4 is impaired in MHV+ donors. Caution should be taken when considering MHV removal on donors with dominant S4, especially on those with potential increased demand for liver regeneration, such as males, higher BMI and a smaller RLV.

WITHDRAWN: Recurrence prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation by ischemia time and tumor characteristics.

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

The utility of recanalized umbilical vein graft to the hepato-pancreato-biliary surgeon.

BACKGROUND: The authors recently published their experience of recanalizing umbilical veins in deceased liver donors, with recanalized umbilical veins as vascular conduits for meso-Rex bypass procedures. They have since found recanalized umbilical veins to be an excellent, easy to harvest vascular conduit that can be used for multiple vascular procedures and repair. Here, they report their experience using this vessel for bypass and vascular reconstruction. METHODS: They have recanalized umbilical veins and used them in a total of 5 Meso-Rex bypasses; 5 pancreaticoduodenectomies; 1 left hepatic trisegmentectomy with right portal vein (PV) resection and reconstruction; 1 right hepatectomy and 1 adrenalectomy, both with partial inferior vena cava (IVC) resection and reconstruction; 1 coronary-Rex bypass shunt for extrahepatic PV thrombosis; and 1 orthotopic liver transplantation with infrahepatic IVC anastomotic dehiscence patched with umbilical vein graft. Umbilical veins were dilated mechanically and used in situ for the meso-Rex bypass surgery; they were ligated in the space of Rex and then dilated ex vivo otherwise to be used as interposition grafts or a vein patch. RESULTS: A total of 15 hepato-pancreato-biliary procedures were done using the recanalized umbilical vein as graft; 2 patients required thrombectomy postoperatively with reexploration, venotomy, thrombectomy with fogarty catheter, and venotomy closure. CONCLUSION: The umbilical vein graft is a fine vascular conduit and can serve many purposes in hepatobiliary surgery.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis: evaluation of radiological and pathological response.

BACKGROUND: Loco-regional therapies for cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are awaiting liver transplantation (OLT) attempt to prevent tumor progression. However, there is limited data regarding the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as loco-regional treatment. METHODS: From 2006 to 2009, 27 HCC patients (AJCC I, II) listed for OLT underwent SBRT. Thirty-nine lesions were treated and 27 assessed radiologically. Seventeen patients had OLT, liver explants were analyzed and 22 lesions underwent pathological evaluation. RESULTS: In a cumulative analysis of all imaging, 30% had complete response, 7% had partial response, 56% were stable, and 7% had progression of disease. Of the 22 pathologically evaluated lesions, 37% were responders: 14% with complete response, 23% with partial response, and 63% with no response. Side effects from SBRT were recorded in three patients, which included nausea in two and liver decompensation in one. CONCLUSION: SBRT achieves total or partial radiological response in 37% of patients and total or partial pathological response in 37% of patients with early HCC in the setting of cirrhosis. SBRT may be a safe and effective alternative for local tumor control in patients with HCC and cirrhosis awaiting OLT.