Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J ; 20: 1967-1978, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35521558

ABSTRACT

Background: EGFR amplification and/or mutation are found in more than half of the cases with glioblastoma. Yet, the role of chromatin interactions and its regulation of gene expression in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we explored alterations in 3D chromatin organization of EGFR-amplified glioblastoma and its subsequent impact by performing a comparative analysis of Hi-C, RNA-seq, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on EGFR-amplified glioblastoma-derived A172 and normal astrocytes (HA1800 cell line). Results: A172 cells showed an elevated chromatin relaxation, and unexpected entanglement of chromosome regions. A genome-wide landscape of switched compartments and differentially expressed genes between HA1800 and A172 cell lines demonstrated that compartment activation reshaped chromatin accessibility and activated tumorigenesis-related genes. Topological associating domain (TAD) analysis revealed that altered TAD domains in A172 also contribute to oncogene activation and tumor repressor deactivation. Interestingly, glioblastoma-derived A172 cells showed a different chromatin loop contact propensity. Genes in tumorigenesis-associated signaling pathways were significantly enriched at the anchor loci of altered chromatin loops. Oncogene activation and tumor repressor deactivation were associated with chromatin loop alteration. Structure variations (SVs) had a dramatic impact on the chromatin conformation of EGFR-amplified glioblastoma-derived tumor cells. Moreover, our results revealed that 7p11.2 duplication activated EGFR expression in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma via neo-TAD formation and novel enhancer-promoter interaction emergence between LINC01446 and EGFR. Conclusions: The disordered 3D genomic map and multi-omics data of EGFR-amplified glioblastoma provide a resource for future interrogation of the relationship between chromatin interactions and transcriptome in tumorigenesis.

2.
Science ; 377(6609): 967-975, 2022 08 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36007034

ABSTRACT

Chromosome engineering has been attempted successfully in yeast but remains challenging in higher eukaryotes, including mammals. Here, we report programmed chromosome ligation in mice that resulted in the creation of new karyotypes in the lab. Using haploid embryonic stem cells and gene editing, we fused the two largest mouse chromosomes, chromosomes 1 and 2, and two medium-size chromosomes, chromosomes 4 and 5. Chromatin conformation and stem cell differentiation were minimally affected. However, karyotypes carrying fused chromosomes 1 and 2 resulted in arrested mitosis, polyploidization, and embryonic lethality, whereas a smaller fused chromosome composed of chromosomes 4 and 5 was able to be passed on to homozygous offspring. Our results suggest the feasibility of chromosome-level engineering in mammals.


Subject(s)
Artificial Gene Fusion , Gene Editing , Karyotype , Translocation, Genetic , Animals , Artificial Gene Fusion/methods , Chromatin/chemistry , Embryonic Stem Cells , Gene Editing/methods , Haploidy , Mice , Mitosis
3.
J Hematol Oncol ; 14(1): 120, 2021 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34348759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer's poor prognosis is caused by distal metastasis, which is associated with epigenetic changes. However, the role of the 3D epigenome in pancreatic cancer biology, especially its metastasis, remains unclear. METHODS: Here, we developed high-resolution 3D epigenomic maps of cells derived from normal pancreatic epithelium, primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer by in situ Hi-C, ChIP-seq, ATAC-seq, and RNA-seq to identify key genes involved in pancreatic cancer metastasis RESULTS: We found that A/B compartments, contact domains, and chromatin loops changed significantly in metastatic pancreatic cancer cells, which are associated with epigenetic state alterations. Moreover, we found that upregulated genes, which were located in switched compartments, changed contact domains, and metastasis-specific enhancer-promoter loops, were related to cancer metastasis and poor prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. We also found that transcription factors in specific enhancer-promoter loop formation were also associated with metastasis. Finally we demonstrated that LIPC, looped to metastasis-specific enhancers, could promote pancreatic cancer metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the multiscale 3D epigenome reprogramming during pancreatic cancer metastasis and expand our knowledge of mechanisms of gene regulation during pancreatic cancer metastasis.


Subject(s)
Epigenesis, Genetic , Epigenome , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Pancreatic Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Cell Line , Cell Line, Tumor , Epigenomics/methods , Female , Humans , Mice , Neoplasm Metastasis/genetics , Neoplasm Metastasis/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Tumor Cells, Cultured
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL