Impact of Age and Comorbidities on Use of Sacral Neuromodulation.

PURPOSE: We investigated the influence of patient age on sacral nerve stimulation trial outcomes, device implantation and treatment durability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a database of all sacral nerve stimulation procedures performed between 2012 and 2014 at a high volume institution for associations of patient age with sacral nerve stimulation indication, trial stimulation success, device revision and device explantation. RESULTS: In a cohort of 356 patients those with nonobstructive urinary retention and urgency-frequency were younger than patients with urgency urinary incontinence. Trial stimulation success did not differ by age in stage 1 and percutaneous nerve evaluation trials (p = 0.51 and 0.84, respectively). Logistic regression identified greater odds of trial success in females compared to males (OR 2.97, 95% CI 1.32-6.04, p = 0.009) and for urgency urinary incontinence compared to urgency-frequency (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.39-6.50, p = 0.006). In analyzed patients there were 119 surgical revisions, including battery replacement, and 53 explantations. Age was associated with a decreased risk of revision with 3% lower odds per each additional year of age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98, p <0.0001). While age did not influence explantation, for each body mass index unit there was a 5% decrease in the odds of explantation (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, older patients experienced no difference in the sacral nerve stimulation response in stimulation trials and no difference in the implantation rate. Furthermore, age was modestly protective against device revision. This suggests that age alone should not negatively predict sacral nerve stimulation responses.

Perioperative Educational Interventions and Contemporary Sexual Function Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Men undergoing prostatectomy can have unrealistic preoperative expectations regarding sexual function after surgery and may desire more education on recovery and symptom management. AIM: To present contemporary data on recovery of sexual function after prostatectomy and characterize how it is impacted by perioperative patient educational interventions. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the English-language literature available by PubMed search. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of sexual function recovery after prostatectomy and the impact of educational interventions on these and related outcomes. RESULTS: Available studies describe heterogeneous educational and support interventions that differ by patient selection, content, method of delivery, timing, and duration. Interventions with group-based education or peer support benefitted sexual satisfaction metrics. Many studies included men and their partners in supportive interventions. However, the few randomized controlled trials directly analyzing the effect of partner attendance revealed no additional benefit to outcomes. Interventions within 6 weeks of prostatectomy variably aided measures of sexual recovery. Some studies with greater time between prostate cancer treatment and interventions revealed only temporary improvements in outcomes. Yet durable improvements in sexual satisfaction and sexual function were observed in some men enrolled years after prostate cancer treatment. At times, web-based interventions had lower completion rates, but sexual function outcomes were comparable to traditional in-person interventions within randomized trials. CONCLUSION: Educational interventions imparted variable benefit to sexual function and satisfaction, with group-based designs mostly benefitting satisfaction outcomes. Despite standardized interventions, men reported worse-than-expected outcomes, suggesting an emphasis on counseling regarding changes in erectile function at multiple time points before surgery and during the recovery period may be helpful. Earlier interventions may help with recovery by establishing more accurate patient expectations. Regarding accessibility, future endeavors may be improved with internet-based educational content, as such interventions appeared to provide comparable benefits to in-person sessions. Faris AER, Montague DK, Gill BC. Perioperative Educational Interventions and Contemporary Sexual Function Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy. Sex Med Rev 2019;7:293-305.

Neural Explant Cultures from Xenopus laevis.

The complex process of axon guidance is largely driven by the growth cone, which is the dynamic motile structure at the tip of the growing axon. During axon outgrowth, the growth cone must integrate multiple sources of guidance cue information to modulate its cytoskeleton in order to propel the growth cone forward and accurately navigate to find its specific targets(1). How this integration occurs at the cytoskeletal level is still emerging, and examination of cytoskeletal protein and effector dynamics within the growth cone can allow the elucidation of these mechanisms. Xenopus laevis growth cones are large enough (10-30 microns in diameter) to perform high-resolution live imaging of cytoskeletal dynamics (e.g.(2-4) ) and are easy to isolate and manipulate in a lab setting compared to other vertebrates. The frog is a classic model system for developmental neurobiology studies, and important early insights into growth cone microtubule dynamics were initially found using this system(5-7) . In this method(8), eggs are collected and fertilized in vitro, injected with RNA encoding fluorescently tagged cytoskeletal fusion proteins or other constructs to manipulate gene expression, and then allowed to develop to the neural tube stage. Neural tubes are isolated by dissection and then are cultured, and growth cones on outgrowing neurites are imaged. In this article, we describe how to perform this method, the goal of which is to culture Xenopus laevis growth cones for subsequent high-resolution image analysis. While we provide the example of +TIP fusion protein EB1-GFP, this method can be applied to any number of proteins to elucidate their behaviors within the growth cone.