Maternal Morbidity According to Mode of Delivery Among Pregnant Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pulmonary hypertension have a high risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. It is unknown if a trial of labor carries a lower risk of morbidity in these patients compared to a planned cesarean delivery. The objective of this study was to examine the association of delivery mode with severe maternal morbidity events during delivery hospitalization among patients with pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Premier inpatient administrative database. Patients delivering ≥25 weeks gestation from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020, and with pulmonary hypertension were included. The primary analysis compared intended vaginal delivery (ie, trial of labor) to intended cesarean delivery (intention to treat analysis). A sensitivity analysis was conducted comparing vaginal delivery to cesarean delivery (as treated analysis). The primary outcome was nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity during the delivery hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included blood transfusion (4 or more units) and readmission to the delivery hospital within 90 days from discharge from delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 727 deliveries. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in nontransfusion morbidity between intended vaginal delivery and intended cesarean delivery groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-1.15). In secondary analyses, intended cesarean delivery was not associated with blood transfusion (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34-1.50) or readmission within 90 days (aOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.32-1.14). In the sensitivity analysis, cesarean delivery was associated with a 3-fold higher risk of nontransfusion morbidity compared to vaginal delivery (aOR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.54-3.93), a 3-fold higher risk of blood transfusion (aOR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.17-7.99), and a 2-fold higher risk of readmission within 90 days (aOR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.09-4.46) compared to vaginal delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Among pregnant patients with pulmonary hypertension, a trial of labor was not associated with a higher risk of morbidity compared to an intended cesarean delivery. One-third of patients who required an intrapartum cesarean delivery had a morbidity event, demonstrating the increased risk of adverse events in this group.

Validation of Three Models for Prediction of Blood Transfusion during Cesarean Delivery Admission.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of blood transfusion during delivery admission allows for clinical preparedness and risk mitigation. Although prediction models have been developed and adopted into practice, their external validation is limited. We aimed to evaluate the performance of three blood transfusion prediction models in a U.S. cohort of individuals undergoing cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial of tranexamic acid for prevention of hemorrhage at time of cesarean delivery. Three models were considered: a categorical risk tool (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) and two regression models (Ahmadzia et al and Albright et al). The primary outcome was intrapartum or postpartum red blood cell transfusion. The CMQCC algorithm was applied to the cohort with frequency of risk category (low, medium, high) and associated transfusion rates reported. For the regression models, the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC) was calculated and a calibration curve plotted to evaluate each model's capacity to predict receipt of transfusion. The regression model outputs were statistically compared. RESULTS: Of 10,785 analyzed individuals, 3.9% received a red blood cell transfusion during delivery admission. The CMQCC risk tool categorized 1,970 (18.3%) individuals as low risk, 5,259 (48.8%) as medium risk, and 3,556 (33.0%) as high risk with corresponding transfusion rates of 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-2.9%), 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8-2.6%), and 7.5% (95% CI: 6.6-8.4%), respectively. The AUC for prediction of blood transfusion using the Ahmadzia and Albright models was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.76-0.81) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.77-0.82), respectively (p = 0.38 for difference). Calibration curves demonstrated overall agreement between the predicted probability and observed likelihood of blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: Three models were externally validated for prediction of blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission in this U.S. COHORT: Overall, performance was moderate; model selection should be based on ease of application until a specific model with superior predictive ability is developed. KEY POINTS: · A total of 3.9% of individuals received a blood transfusion during cesarean delivery admission.. · Three models used in clinical practice are externally valid for blood transfusion prediction.. · Institutional model selection should be based on ease of application until further research identifies the optimal approach..

Risk of stillbirth in United States patients with diagnosed intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with a 4- to 10-fold increase in the risk of stillbirth in the absence of intervention, leading to recommendations for antenatal assessment, ursodiol use, and often preterm or early term delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether current management strategies for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy mitigate the elevated risk of stillbirth at a population level. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study using the 2015-2020 National Readmissions Database, an administrative database developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Our study identified delivery hospitalizations, gestational age at delivery, occurrence of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and stillbirth, and comorbid conditions using the International Classification of Diseases diagnosis and procedure codes. Moreover, this study compared the timing of delivery and stillbirth rates of pregnant patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy vs those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy at the time of delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: This study identified a cohort of 9,987,705 delivery hospitalizations in the National Readmissions Database, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 18,609,207 births. Of these births, 152,040 (0.8%) were noted to have an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis. Patients with an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis were older, with small differences in comorbidities, such as a higher rate of gestational diabetes mellitus, than patients without an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis at delivery hospitalization. The overall rates of stillbirth were lower among those with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy than among those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (252 vs 386 per 100,000 deliveries; risk difference, 133 fewer per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 98-170), a finding that persisted after adjustment for insurance status, socioeconomic factors, and comorbid conditions (risk difference, 160 fewer stillbirths per 100,000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 127-194). Furthermore, although patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy were more likely to deliver before term than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (30.1% vs 9.3%; P<.001), increased rates of stillbirth were not noted at any point after stratification of the cohort by gestational age at delivery. CONCLUSION: Patients with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes delivered earlier than those without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis codes, but the percentage of births affected by stillbirth was lower, even when stratifying for gestational age at birth. These results may provide reassurance to patients receiving an intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy diagnosis that current management does mitigate stillbirth risk in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Maternal morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer at time of delivery.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with cancer during pregnancy are a medically complex patient population that is anticipated to grow. A better understanding of this population and patterns of risk at time of delivery would offer an opportunity for providers to mitigate maternal morbidity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the prevalence in the United States of concurrent cancer diagnoses at time of delivery by cancer type and associated maternal morbidity and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Using the National Inpatient Sample, we identified delivery-associated hospitalizations between 2007 and 2018. Concurrent cancer diagnoses were classified using the Clinical Classifications Software. Main outcomes included severe maternal morbidity, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicators, and mortality during delivery hospitalization. We calculated adjusted rates for cancer diagnosis at time of delivery and adjusted odds ratios of severe maternal morbidity and maternal death during hospitalization using survey-weighted multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: In this sample of 9,418,761 delivery-associated hospitalizations, 63 per 100,000 deliveries had a concurrent cancer diagnosis (95% confidence interval, 60-66; national weighted estimate, 46,654,042). The most common cancer types were breast cancer (8.4 per 100,000 deliveries), leukemia (8.4 per 100,000 deliveries), Hodgkin lymphoma (7.4 per 100,000 deliveries), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (5.4 per 100,000 deliveries), and thyroid cancer (4.0 per 100,000 deliveries). Patients with cancer were at significantly higher risk for any severe maternal morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 4.73-5.83) and maternal death (adjusted odds ratio, 67.5; 95% confidence interval, 45.1-101.4). Risks of hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 16.92; 95% confidence interval, 13.96-20.52), acute respiratory distress (adjusted odds ratio, 12.76; 95% confidence interval, 9.92-16.42), sepsis (adjusted odds ratio, 11.91; 95% confidence interval, 8.68-16.32), and embolism (adjusted odds ratio, 11.12; 95% confidence interval, 6.94-17.82) were particularly heightened among patients with cancer. Patients with leukemia, specifically, had the highest risk of adverse maternal outcomes (adjusted rate, 113 per 1000 deliveries; 95% confidence interval, 91-135 per 1000) when evaluating risk by cancer type. CONCLUSION: Patients with cancer are at markedly increased risk of maternal morbidity and all-cause mortality during delivery-associated hospitalization. Risk is distributed unevenly within this population, with certain cancer types carrying unique risks for specific morbidity events.

Maternal Cardiovascular Morbidity Events Following Preeclampsia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with preeclampsia are at high risk for long-term cardiovascular events, yet the short-term, acute cardiovascular complications that follow preeclampsia are understudied. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term, acute maternal cardiovascular morbidity events after delivery among patients with a diagnosis of preeclampsia versus those without this diagnosis. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the Premier inpatient database was used to examine a cohort of obstetric patients older than 18 years, who delivered from January 1, 2016, to September 30, 2020. A diagnosis of preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features during delivery hospitalization were the exposures of interest. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during delivery hospital admission. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events during a readmission within 90 days of delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 4,488,759 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 158,114 (3.5%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia without severe features, and 117,940 (2.6%) with preeclampsia with severe features. Adjusted odds of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events were higher in patients with preeclampsia and in those with preeclampsia with severe features compared with those without preeclampsia during delivery hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval {CI}] 1.87 [1.78-1.97] and 4.74 [4.44-5.05], respectively) and within 90 days (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.01 [1.83-2.21] and 2.32 [2.10-2.57], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with both preeclampsia and preeclampsia with severe features have higher rates of maternal cardiovascular morbidity events than those without preeclampsia. Future studies are necessary to examine which patients with preeclampsia are at highest risk for cardiovascular complications.

Novel Antithrombotic Agents in Pregnancy Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Agents.

Increasing rates of thromboembolic complications have required increasing use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents during and after pregnancy. Furthermore, thromboembolism is both a cause and a complication of severe maternal morbidity requiring intensive care. As a consequence, almost all patients admitted to intensive care units receive an anticoagulant or an antiplatelet agent (or both) for either treatment or prevention of thromboembolism. In this review, we summarize commonly used anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents and outline the potential role of newly developed (novel) antithrombotic agents for pregnant and postpartum patients.

Associations between Anemia and Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with Pyelonephritis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if pregnant patients with both pyelonephritis and anemia are at an increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared with those with pyelonephritis without anemia. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients with antepartum pyelonephritis-associated hospitalizations from October 2015 to December 2018 were included. International Classification of Diseases codes were used to identify pyelonephritis, anemia, maternal comorbidities, and severe maternal morbidities. The primary outcome was a composite of severe maternal morbidity, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control criteria. Univariate statistical methods, weighted to account for complex survey methods in the NRD, were used to assess for associations between anemia, baseline characteristics, and patient outcomes. Weighted logistic and Poisson regressions were used to assess for associations between anemia and outcomes, adjusting for clinical comorbidities and other confounding factors. RESULTS: In total, 29,296 pyelonephritis admissions were identified, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 55,135 admissions. Of these, 11,798 (21.3%) were anemic. The rate of severe maternal morbidity was higher among anemic patients than nonanemic patients (27.8% vs. 8.9%, respectively, p < 0.001), and remained higher after adjustment (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 2.86 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67, 3.06]). Rates of individual components of severe maternal morbidities, including acute respiratory distress syndrome (4.0% vs. 0.6%, aRR 3.97 [95% CI: 3.10, 5.08]), sepsis (22.5% vs. 7.9%, aRR 2.64 [95% CI: 2.45, 2.85]), shock (4.5% vs. 0.6%, aRR 5.48 [95% CI: 4.32, 6.95]), and acute renal failure (2.9% vs. 0.8%, aRR 1.99 [95% CI: 1.55, 2.55]) were all higher for anemic pyelonephritis. The mean length of stay was also longer (25% average increase, 95% CI: 22%, 28%). CONCLUSION: Among pregnant patients with pyelonephritis, those with anemia are at greater risk of severe maternal morbidity and longer hospital stay. KEY POINTS: · Anemia is associated with longer stays for pyelo.. · Anemic pyelo patients have increased morbidity.. · Anemic pyelo patients have increased sepsis risk..

Pregnancy-Associated Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy has increased in the adult population. Studies from the H1N1 influenza pandemic suggest that ECMO deployment in pregnancy is associated with favorable outcomes. With increasing numbers of pregnant women affected by COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) and potentially requiring this life-saving therapy, we sought to compare comorbidities, costs, and outcomes between pregnancy- and nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy among reproductive-aged female patients. STUDY DESIGN: We used the 2013 to 2019 National Readmissions Database. Diagnosis and procedural coding were used to identify ECMO deployment, potential indications, comorbid conditions, and pregnancy outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality during the patient's initial ECMO stay. Secondary outcomes included length of stay and hospital charges/costs, occurrence of thromboembolic or bleeding complications during ECMO hospitalization, and mortality and readmissions up to 330 days following ECMO stay. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to model the associations between pregnancy status and outcomes. RESULTS: The sample included 324 pregnancy-associated hospitalizations and 3,805 nonpregnancy-associated hospitalizations, corresponding to national estimates of 665 and 7,653 over the study period, respectively. Pregnancy-associated ECMO had lower incidence of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.75) and bleeding complications (aOR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.93). Length of stay was significantly shorter (adjusted rate ratio (aRR): 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) and total hospital costs were less (aRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.75-0.93). Differences in the incidence of thromboembolic events (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.78-1.38) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy had lower incidence of in-hospital death, bleeding complications, total inpatient cost, and length of stay when compared with nonpregnancy-associated ECMO therapy without increased thromboembolic complications. Pregnancy-associated ECMO therapy should be offered to eligible patients. KEY POINTS: · Pregnancy-related ECMO use was compared with nonpregnant use.. · Outcomes were equal or favored pregnancy-related deployment.. · These data may be useful when considering ECMO use in pregnancy..

Racial and Rural-Urban Disparities in Maternal Cardiac Disease Care in North Carolina: A Call to Action.

Background: Cardiac disease is a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity (SMM). We sought to estimate the effects of race and rural-urban status on cardiac-specific severe maternal morbidity ("cardiac SMM") in North Carolina. Methods: This retrospective study used the 2019 North Carolina State Inpatient Database (SID). Diagnosis codes were used to identify births, comorbidities, modified World Health Organization (mWHO) cardiac category, and outcomes. Hospital-level data were obtained from publicly available sources and the SID datasets. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiac SMM. Results: Of 106,778 births, 369 had mWHO category I-II disease, and 366 had mWHO category II/III-IV disease. Individuals with cardiac disease had higher rates of cardiac SMM (10.4% versus 0.27% versus 0.13% for mWHO II/III-IV, mWHO I/II, and no disease, respectively). Among patients with mWHO II/III-IV disease, 60.0% of rural residents delivered at hospitals with advanced cardiac capabilities versus 80.8% of urban residents; there were no statistically significant differences in cardiac SMM rates (11.3% versus 10.1% for rural versus urban individuals, P = NS). In contrast, there were pronounced disparities in cardiac SMM among Black individuals compared with White individuals (0.28% versus 0.13%, P < .001), especially among individuals with mWHO II/III-IV disease (23.71% versus 5.41%, P < .001). Limitations: Cardiac disease and outcomes were identified based on diagnosis and procedure codes. Identifying complications subsequent to the delivery hospitalization was not possible. Conclusions: In North Carolina, there is a pronounced racial disparity in cardiac SMM during delivery hospitalizations, which is driven by patients with mWHO II/III-IV disease.

Comparison of severe maternal morbidity in pregnancy by modified World Health Organization Classification of maternal cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: To compare rates of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) for pregnant patients with a cardiac diagnosis classified by the modified World Health Organization (mWHO) classification to those without a cardiac diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study using the 2015-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database identified hospitalizations, comorbidities, and outcomes using diagnosis and procedure codes. The primary exposure was cardiac diagnosis, classified into low-risk (mWHO class I and II) and moderate-to-high-risk (mWHO class II/III, III, or IV). The primary outcome was SMM or death during the delivery hospitalization; secondary outcomes included cardiac-specific SMM during delivery hospitalizations and readmissions after the delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: A weighted national estimate of 14,995,122 delivery admissions was identified, including 46,541 (0.31%) with mWHO I-II diagnoses and 37,330 (0.25%) with mWHO II/III-IV diagnoses. Patients with mWHO II/III-IV diagnoses experienced SMM at the highest rates (22.8% vs 1.6% for no diagnosis; with adjusted relative risk (aRR) of 5.67 [95% CI: 5.36-6.00]). The risk of death was also highest for patients with mWHO II/III-IV diagnoses (0.3% vs <0.1% for no diagnosis; aRR 18.07 [95% CI: 12.25-26.66]). Elevated risk of SMM and death persisted to 11 months postpartum for those patients with mWHO II/III-IV diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide database, SMM is highest among individuals with moderate-to-severe cardiac disease based on mWHO classification. This risk persists in the year postpartum. These results can be used to enhance pregnancy counseling.

Maternal and Fetal Outcomes Associated With Infective Endocarditis in Pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but serious infection that complicates pregnancy. Little is known about IE management and outcomes in this population. METHODS: The National Readmissions Database was used to obtain data between October 2015 and October 2018. Billing codes identified admissions for IE in female patients of reproductive age. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared between patients with maternity-associated and nonmaternity-associated IE and obstetric patients who delivered with and without IE. Weighted regressions were used to examine outcomes in adjusted models. RESULTS: We identified 12 602 reproductive-aged female patients with a diagnosis of IE, of which 382 (weighted national estimate, 748) were maternity-associated. Of these cases, 117 (weighted national estimate, 217) occurred during a delivery admission. Compared with patients with nonmaternity-associated IE, maternity-associated infection was associated with younger age (mean, 29.0 vs 36.6 years; P < .001), Medicaid coverage (72.5% vs 47.2%; P < .001), and drug use (76.2% vs 59.8%; P < .001). Mortality was comparable (8.1% vs 10.6%; adjusted rate ratio [aRR], 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: .71-1.48). Compared with patients who delivered without IE, IE complicating delivery was associated with worse maternal and fetal outcomes, including maternal mortality (17.2% vs <0.01%; aRR, 323.32; 95% CI: 127.74-818.37) and preterm birth (55.7% vs 10.1%; aRR, 3.61; 95% CI, 2.58-5.08). CONCLUSIONS: Maternity-associated IE does not appear to confer additional risk for adverse outcome over nonmaternity-associated infection. Patients who deliver with IE have worse maternal and fetal outcomes than those whose deliveries are not complicated by IE.

Infective endocarditis and solid organ transplantation: Only worse outcomes during initial transplantation hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis (IE) among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is unknown. METHODS: We used data from the 2013-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). IE- and SOT-associated hospitalizations were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes. Outcomes included inpatient mortality, length of stay, and inpatient costs. Adjusted analyses were performed using weighted regression models. RESULTS: A total of 99,052 IE-associated hospitalizations, corresponding to a weighted national estimate of 193,164, were included for analysis. Of these, 794 (weighted n = 1,574) were associated with transplant history (SOT-IE). Mortality was not significantly different between SOT-IE and non-SOT-IE (17.2% vs. 15.8%, adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.71, 1.03]), and fewer SOT-IE patients underwent valve repair or replacement than non-SOT-IE (12.5% vs. 16.2%, aRR 0.82, 95% CI [0.71, 0.95]). We then compared outcomes of patients diagnosed with IE during their index transplant hospitalization (index-SOT-IE) to patients without IE during their transplant hospitalization (index-SOT). Index-SOT-IE occurred most frequently among heart transplant recipients (45.1%), and was associated with greater mortality (27.1% vs. 2.3%, aRR 6.07, 95% CI [3.32, 11.11]). CONCLUSION: Dual diagnosis of SOT and IE was associated with worse outcomes among SOT recipients during index hospitalization, but not overall among patients with IE.

Postpartum Pyelonephritis and Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity.

OBJECTIVE: Pyelonephritis is the most common nonobstetric cause for hospitalization during pregnancy. The maternal and obstetric complications associated with antepartum pyelonephritis are well described. However, it is not clear whether these risks extend into the postpartum period. The primary objective of this study was to describe the morbidity associated with postpartum pyelonephritis, by comparing the morbidity associated with pyelonephritis in the postpartum period to morbidity seen during pregnancy or delivery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), an all-payor sample of discharges from approximately 60% of U.S. hospitalizations. Discharges between October 2015 and December 2018 were included. Maternity-associated hospitalizations, diagnosis of pyelonephritis, comorbid conditions, and incidence of severe maternal morbidity were identified using International Classification of Disease-10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes. Bivariate statistics, weighted to account for the complex survey methods in the NRD, were used to evaluate the association between antepartum, delivery, and postpartum hospital stays associated with pyelonephritis and maternal morbidity. Weighted regression models were used to evaluate the association between admission timing and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 32,850 pyelonephritis admissions were identified, corresponding to a national estimate of 61,837 admissions. Of these, 1,465 (2.4%) were postpartum, 55,056 (89.0%) were antepartum, and 5,317 (8.6%) involved a delivery stay. Rates of severe maternal morbidity were higher in the postpartum group than the antepartum or delivery hospitalization groups (59.5 vs. 12.9 and 15.8%, respectively, p < 0.001); when compared with antepartum hospitalizations, the adjusted relative risk for composite severe maternal morbidity for postpartum hospitalizations was 4.68 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.33, 5.05). Most of this difference was driven by rates of sepsis (53.2 vs. 11.0 vs. 10.9%). CONCLUSION: Though relatively uncommon, postpartum hospitalizations for pyelonephritis are associated with higher rates of severe maternal morbidity, driven by differential rates of sepsis, than are antepartum or delivery-associated hospitalizations.

ACC-AHA Diagnostic Criteria for Hypertension in Pregnancy Identifies Patients at Intermediate Risk of Adverse Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes among patients who are normotensive, hypertensive by Stage I American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) criteria, and hypertensive by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective first trimester cohort study between 2007 and 2010 at three institutions in Baltimore, MD, was conducted. Blood pressure at 11 to 14 weeks' gestation was classified as (1) normotensive (systolic blood pressure [SBP] <130 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <80 mm Hg); (2) hypertensive by Stage I ACC-AHA criteria (SBP 130-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg); or (3) hypertensive by ACOG criteria (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg). Primary outcomes included preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, and preterm birth. RESULTS: Among 3,422 women enrolled, 2,976 with delivery data from singleton pregnancies of nonanomalous fetuses were included. In total, 20.2% met hypertension criteria (Stage I ACC-AHA n = 254, 8.5%; ACOG n = 347, 11.7%). The Stage I ACC-AHA group's risk for developing preeclampsia was threefold higher than the normotensive group (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.40-5.70). The Stage I ACC-AHA group had lower preeclampsia risk than the ACOG group but the difference was not significant (aRR 0.87, 95% CI 0.55-1.37). The Stage I ACC-AHA group was more likely than the normotensive group to deliver preterm (aRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02-2.01) and deliver an SGA neonate (aRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.12). The Stage I ACC-AHA group was less likely to deliver preterm compared with the ACOG group (aRR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93), but differences in SGA were not significant (aRR 1.31, 95% CI 0.84-2.03). CONCLUSION: Pregnant patients with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension in the first trimester had higher rates of preeclampsia, preterm birth, and SGA neonates compared with normotensive women. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were numerically lower in the Stage I ACC-AHA group compared with the ACOG group, but these comparisons only reached statistical significance for preterm birth. Optimal pregnancy management for first trimester Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension requires active study. KEY POINTS: · Women with first trimester American College of Cardiology-American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) Stage I hypertension were more likely to develop preeclampsia, deliver preterm, and deliver a small-for-gestational age neonate than normotensive women.. · Women with first trimester American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) hypertension (consistent with stage II ACC-AHA hypertension) had the highest numeric rate of adverse outcomes; however, compared with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension, there was only statistically significant difference for preterm delivery.. · The risk profile for pregnant women with Stage I ACC-AHA hypertension and women with hypertension by conventional ACOG criteria may be more similar than previously understood..

Use of Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Who Take Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Before Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous rt-PA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) is effective in improving outcomes in ischemic stroke; however, there are few data on the use of rt-PA in patients who are receiving a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC). METHODS: Using data from the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines-Stroke Registry, we examined the outcomes of use of thrombolytic therapy in patients with ischemic stroke who received anticoagulation with NOACs versus those on warfarin (international normalized ratio <1.7) or not on anticoagulation from 1289 registry hospitals between October 2012 and March 2015. RESULTS: Of 42 887 patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous rt-PA within 4.5 hours, 251 were taking NOACs (dabigatran 87, rivaroxaban 129, and apixaban 35) before their stroke, 1500 were taking warfarin, and 41 136 were on neither. Patients on NOACs or warfarin were older, had more comorbid conditions, and experienced more severe strokes than did those who were not on anticoagulation (median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 12, 13, and 9, respectively). Unadjusted rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage in the NOAC, warfarin, and none groups were 4.8%, 4.9%, and 3.9%, respectively (P=0.11). In comparison with those not on anticoagulation, the adjusted odds ratio for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage for those on NOACs was 0.92 (95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.65) and for those on warfarin the adjusted odds ratio was 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.10). There were also no significant differences in the risk for life-threatening/serious systemic hemorrhage, any rt-PA complication, in-hospital mortality, and modified Rankin Scale at discharge across 3 groups. Similar results were also found after propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Although experience of using rt-PA in patients with ischemic stroke on a NOAC is limited, these preliminary observations suggest that rt-PA appears to be reasonably well tolerated without prohibitive risks for adverse events among selected NOAC-treated patients. Future studies should evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous rt-PA in patients with ischemic stroke who are taking NOACs.

Intravenous tPA (Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator) in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke Taking Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Preceding Stroke.

Background and Purpose- Although there are no trials or large cohorts to inform clinical care, current guidelines caution against giving intravenous tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) to patients with acute ischemic stroke who are taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). We performed a literature review of intravenous tPA in patients treated with NOACs preceding stroke. Methods- A literature search of PubMed was performed encompassing January 2010 to March 2018. Patient characteristics, timing of last medication intake, laboratory testing, use of reversal, and outcomes ≤3 months after discharge were summarized. Results- We identified 55 studies with 492 NOAC patients receiving tPA (dabigatran, 181; rivaroxaban, 215; apixaban, 40; and unspecified NOAC, 56). Among patients with complete data, the median time from the last NOAC intake to symptom onset was 8 hours (interquartile range, 2.5-14.5), with 55.2% (80/145) within 12 hours. Few patients underwent sensitive laboratory tests, such as thrombin time, diluted thrombin time, or anti-Xa assays before tPA administration. The overall observed rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and favorable outcomes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≤1; modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; or neurological improvement in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, ≥8 points) were 4.3% (20/462), 11.3% (48/423), and 43.7% (164/375), respectively. Among dabigatran-treated patients, reversal with idarucizumab was associated with fewer symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (4.5% [2/44] versus 7.4% [8/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.12-2.92), death (4.5% [2/44] versus 12.0% [13/108]; unadjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.08-1.61), and more favorable outcomes (79.1% [34/43] versus 39.2% [29/74]; unadjusted odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 2.45-14.00), although the differences were not statistically significant for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and death. Conclusions- These preliminary observations suggest that tPA may be reasonably well tolerated without prohibitive risks of bleeding complications in selected patients on NOACs. Reversal of anticoagulant effects by idarucizumab for dabigatran-treated patients before tPA is an emerging strategy that was associated with more favorable outcomes.

Unexplained Variation for Hospitals' Use of Inpatient Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Facilities After an Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Rehabilitation is recommended after a stroke to enhance recovery and improve outcomes, but hospital's use of inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) or skilled nursing facility (SNF) and the factors associated with referral are unknown. METHODS: We analyzed clinical registry and claims data for 31 775 Medicare beneficiaries presenting with acute ischemic stroke from 918 Get With The Guidelines-Stroke hospitals who were discharged to either IRF or SNF between 2006 and 2008. Using a multilevel logistic regression model, we evaluated patient and hospital characteristics, as well as geographic availability, in relation to discharge to either IRF or SNF. After accounting for observed factors, the median odds ratio was reported to quantify hospital-level variation in the use of IRF versus SNF. RESULTS: Of 31 775 patients, 17 662 (55.6%) were discharged to IRF and 14 113 (44.4%) were discharged to SNF. Compared with SNF patients, IRF patients were younger, more were men, had less health-service use 6 months prestroke, and had fewer comorbid conditions and in-hospital complications. Use of IRF or SNF varied significantly across hospitals (median IRF use, 55.8%; interquartile range, 34.8%-75.0%; unadjusted median odds ratio, 2.59; 95% confidence interval, 2.44-2.77). Hospital-level variation in discharge rates to IRF or SNF persisted after adjustment for patient, clinical, and geographic variables (adjusted median odds ratio, 2.87; 95% confidence interval, 2.68-3.11). CONCLUSIONS: There is marked unexplained variation among hospitals in their use of IRF versus SNF poststroke even after accounting for clinical characteristics and geographic availability. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02284165.

Economic Outcomes With Anatomical Versus Functional Diagnostic Testing for Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: PROMISE (PROspective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) found that initial use of at least 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography (CTA) versus functional diagnostic testing strategies did not improve clinical outcomes in stable symptomatic patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring noninvasive testing. OBJECTIVE: To conduct an economic analysis for PROMISE (a major secondary aim of the study). DESIGN: Prospective economic study from the U.S. perspective. Comparisons were made according to the intention-to-treat principle, and CIs were calculated using bootstrap methods. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01174550). SETTING: 190 U.S. centers. PATIENTS: 9649 U.S. patients enrolled in PROMISE between July 2010 and September 2013. Median follow-up was 25 months. MEASUREMENTS: Technical costs of the initial (outpatient) testing strategy were estimated from Premier Research Database data. Hospital-based costs were estimated using hospital bills and Medicare cost-charge ratios. Physician fees were taken from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. Costs were expressed in 2014 U.S. dollars, discounted at 3% annually, and estimated out to 3 years using inverse probability weighting methods. RESULTS: The mean initial testing costs were $174 for exercise electrocardiography; $404 for CTA; $501 to $514 for pharmacologic and exercise stress echocardiography, respectively; and $946 to $1132 for exercise and pharmacologic stress nuclear testing, respectively. Mean costs at 90 days were $2494 for the CTA strategy versus $2240 for the functional strategy (mean difference, $254 [95% CI, -$634 to $906]). The difference was associated with more revascularizations and catheterizations (4.25 per 100 patients) with CTA use. After 90 days, the mean cost difference between the groups out to 3 years remained small. LIMITATION: Cost weights for test strategies were obtained from sources outside PROMISE. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography angiography and functional diagnostic testing strategies in patients with suspected CAD have similar costs through 3 years of follow-up. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.