Implementation of a standardized digital rectal exam to improve the accuracy of rectocele diagnosis.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The standardized evaluation of posterior compartment prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system is limited. The primary objective of this study is to develop and validate the interexaminer reliability of a new system for assessing the posterior vaginal wall for the presence of a rectocele. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of women presenting to an academic urogynecology clinic. Subjects underwent a routine pelvic examination that included a standard POP-Q followed by two Standardized Digital Rectal Exams (SDRE) by two different providers, each blinded to the other's results. The SDRE measures the distance from the leading edge of a posterior bulge to the hymen with a finger in the distal rectum - first visually and then an actual measured distance using a marked cotton swab (Q-tip measurement). Correlations between examiners for the SDRE and the POP-Q were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (ρ). RESULTS: Eight attending and fellow urogynecologists examined 50 subjects. Mean age was 57.3 years, mean BMI 30.9 kg/m(2), with an overall median POP-Q stage 2 (range 0-3), and median posterior POP-Q stage 1 (range 0-3). Overall, 54 % of women had a noteworthy rectocele by typical digital rectal exam. Interexaminer correlations with SDRE for both the visual assessment (ρ = 0.697, p < 0.0001) and the Q-tip measurement (ρ = 0.767, p = p < 0.001) were strong. The intraexaminer visual assessment and the Q-tip measurement were highly correlated (ρ = 0.934, p = <0.001). CONCLUSION: This standardized rectal examination provides a consistent method for the reporting of distal rectoceles that can lend additional information to the POP-Q exam.

Randomized trial of a web-based tool for prolapse: impact on patient understanding and provider counseling.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Effective patient/provider communication is important to ensure patient understanding, safety, and satisfaction. Our hypothesis was that interactive patient/provider counseling using a web-based tool (iPad application) would have a greater impact on patient satisfaction with understanding prolapse symptoms compared with standard counseling (SC). METHODS: Women with complaints of seeing/sensing a vaginal bulge were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Participants completed pre- and postvisit Likert scale questionnaires on satisfaction with prolapse knowledge and related anxiety. After new patient histories and physical examinations, study participants were randomized to SC or SC with iPad. Ninety participants were required to detect a 30% difference in satisfaction with prolapse knowledge between the two groups. RESULTS: Ninety women were randomized to SC (n = 44) or SC with iPad (n = 46). At baseline, 47% of women were satisfied with their understanding of bulge symptoms (50% SC vs. 43.5% SC with iPad, p = 0.5). After counseling, 97% of women reported increased satisfaction with understanding of bulge symptoms (p < 0.0001), with no difference between groups [42/44 (95.5%) SC vs. 45/46 (97.8%) SC with iPad, p = 0.5]. Baseline anxiety was high: 70% (65.9% SC vs. 73.9% SC with iPad, p = 0.4). After counseling, anxiety decreased to 30% (p < 0.0001), with improvement in both groups (31.8% SC vs. 28.3% SC with iPad™, p = 0.7). Counseling times were similar between groups (9.5 min., SC vs. 8.9 min., SC with iPad, p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Interactive counseling was associated with increased patient satisfaction with understanding bulge symptoms and decreased anxiety whether a web-based tool was used or not.

Unrecognized bladder perforation leading to severe progressive cellulitis and candidal infection.

BACKGROUND: Retropubic midurethral slings are a minimally invasive surgical procedure used in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and are typically associated with high cure rates and low complication rates. Bladder perforation is a known intraoperative complication that, if left unrecognized, can have significant morbidity. CASE: A 47-year-old underwent a retropubic midurethral sling, anterior colporrhaphy, and cystoscopy. She developed a suprapubic wound cellulitis that progressed to involve the right trunk and flank as well as persistent fever for more than 48 hours despite broad-spectrum antibiotics. Upon return to the operating room, the patient was found to have an unrecognized bladder perforation with mesh in the bladder. Wound culture was remarkable for Candida parapsilosis and Escherichia coli. CONCLUSION: Unrecognized bladder perforation and nonbacterial causes of infection should be considered in patients with severe progressing cellulitis despite broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage after retropubic midurethral sling placement.