ABSTRACT
Cereblon is the direct binding target of the immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) that are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma (MM), the second most frequent hematologic malignancy. Patients respond well to initial treatment with IMiDs, but virtually all patients develop drug resistance over time, and the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. We identified an as yet undescribed DNA hypermethylation in an active intronic CRBN enhancer. Differential hypermethylation in this region was found to be increased in healthy plasma cells, but was more pronounced in IMiD-refractory MM. Methylation significantly correlated with decreased CRBN expression levels. DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNTMi) in vitro experiments induced CRBN enhancer demethylation, and sensitizing effects on lenalidomide treatment were observed in 2 MM cell lines. Thus, we provide first evidence that aberrant CRBN DNA methylation is a novel mechanism of IMiD resistance in MM and may predict IMiD response prior to treatment.
Subject(s)
Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Immunomodulating Agents/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases/genetics , DNA Methylation/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Enhancer Elements, Genetic/drug effects , Humans , Introns/drug effects , Multiple Myeloma/geneticsABSTRACT
Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment that enables tumor development. One of the mechanisms of immune evasion used by MM cells is the inhibition of natural killer (NK) cell effector functions; thus, the restoration of NK cell antitumor activity represents a key goal to increase tumor cell recognition, avoid tumor escape and potentially enhancing the effect of other drugs. In this study, we evaluated the ability of the investigational medicine NKTR-255, an IL-15 receptor agonist, to engage the IL-15 pathway and stimulate NK cells against MM cells. We observed that incubation with NKTR-255 was able to tilt the balance toward an activated phenotype in NK cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with MM, with increased expression of activating receptors on the surface of treated NK cells. This resulted in an enhanced degranulation, cytokine release, and anti-tumor cytotoxicity when the NK cells were exposed to both MM cell lines and primary MM cells. We further evaluated the in vivo effect of NKTR-255 in fully humanized immunocompetent mice subcutaneously engrafted with H929 MM cells. Compared with placebo, weekly injection of the mice with NKTR-255 increased the number of circulating NK cells in peripheral blood and delayed tumor growth. Finally, we observed that combination of NKTR-255 with the anti-CD38 antibody, daratumumab, was effective against MM cells in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, our data suggest a significant impact of NKTR-255 in inducing NK cell function against MM cells with important translational implications.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Animals , Mice , Interleukin-15/metabolism , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Polymers/metabolism , Polymers/pharmacology , Polymers/therapeutic use , Leukocytes, Mononuclear , Cell Line, Tumor , Immunologic Factors/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Killer Cells, Natural , Tumor MicroenvironmentABSTRACT
This phase Ib, non-randomized, open-label study evaluates the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib and prednisone in patients with naïve or ruxolitinib-resistant myelofibrosis (MF). A total of 15 patients with primary or secondary MF received the study treatment; 13 patients had received prior ruxolitinib treatment (86.7%). Eight patients completed seven cycles (53.3%) and six patients completed twelve cycles of treatment (40%). All the patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) during the study (the most common AEs were hyperglycemia, asthenia, and thrombocytopenia), and 14 patients registered at least one treatment-related AE (the most common treatment-related AEs were hyperglycemia (22.2%; three grade 3 cases). Five treatment-related serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in two patients (13.3%). No deaths were registered throughout the study. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Four out of fifteen (27%) patients experienced a 100% spleen size reduction at Cycle 7, and two additional patients achieved a >50% spleen size reduction, representing an overall response rate of 40% at Cycle 7. In conclusion, the tolerability of this combination was acceptable, and hyperglycemia was the most frequent treatment-related AE. Ruxolitinib in combination with nilotinib and prednisone showed relevant clinical activity in patients with MF. This trial was registered with EudraCT Number 2016-005214-21.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) are the backbone of various treatment regimens in multiple myeloma. We recently described the first in-patient point mutations affecting the 20S subunit PSMB5 underlying PI resistance. Notably, in vivo, the incidence of mutations in PSMB5 and other proteasome encoding genes is too low to explain the development of resistance in most of the affected patients. Thus, additional genetic and epigenetic alterations need to be explored. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We performed DNA methylation profiling by Deep Bisulfite Sequencing in PSMB5, PSMC2, PSMC5, PSMC6, PSMD1, and PSMD5, a subset of proteasome subunits that have hitherto been associated with PI resistance, recruited from our own previous research, the literature, or a meta-analysis on the frequency of somatic mutations. Methylation was followed up on gene expression level and by dual-luciferase reporter assay. The KMS11 cell line served as a model to functionally test the impact of demethylating agents. RESULTS: We identified PSMD5 promoter hypermethylation and subsequent epigenetic gene silencing in 24% of PI refractory patients. Hypermethylation correlated with decreased expression and the regulatory impact of this region was functionally confirmed. In contrast, patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, along with peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD138+ plasma cells from healthy donors, generally show unmethylated profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Under the selective pressure of PI treatment, multiple myeloma cells acquire methylation of the PSMD5 promoter silencing the PSMD5 gene expression. PSMD5 acts as a key orchestrator of proteasome assembly and its downregulation was described to increase the cell's proteolytic capacity. PSMD5 hypermethylation, therefore, represents a novel mechanism of PI tolerance in multiple myeloma.