Decisional Conflict Regarding Disease-Modifying Treatment Choices Among Patients with Mid-Stage Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Purpose: Shared decision-making is critical in multiple sclerosis (MS) due to the uncertainty of the disease trajectory over time and the large number of treatment options with differing efficacy, safety and administration characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess patients' decisional conflict regarding the choice of a disease-modifying therapy and its associated factors in patients with mid-stage relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: A multicenter, non-interventional study was conducted. Adult patients with a diagnosis of RRMS (2017 revised McDonald criteria) and disease duration of 3 to 8 years were included. The level of uncertainty experienced by a patient when faced with making a treatment choice was assessed using the 4-item Decisional Conflict Scale. A battery of patient-reported and clinician-rated measures was administered to obtain information on symptom severity, illness perception, illness-related uncertainty, regret, MS knowledge, risk taking behavior, preferred role in the decision-making process, cognition, and self-management. Patients were recruited during routine follow-up visits and completed all questionnaires online using electronic tablets at the hospital. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 201 patients were studied. Mean age (Standard deviation) was 38.7 (8.4) years and 74.1% were female. Median disease duration (Interquartile range) was 6.0 (4.0-7.0) years. Median EDSS score was 1.0 (0-2.0). Sixty-seven (33.3%) patients reported a decisional conflict. These patients had lower MS knowledge and more illness uncertainty, anxiety, depressive symptoms, fatigue, subjective symptom severity, a threatening illness perception, and poorer quality of life than their counterparts. Lack of decisional conflict was associated with MS knowledge (Odds ratio [OR]=1.195, 95% CI 1.045, 1.383, p=0.013), self-management (OR=1.049, 95% CI 1.013, 1.093, p=0.018), and regret after a healthcare decision (OR=0.860, 95% CI 0.756, 0.973, p=0.018) in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Decisional conflict regarding the selection of a disease-modifying therapy was a common phenomenon in patients with mid-stage RRMS. Identifying factors associated with decisional conflict may be useful to implement preventive strategies that help patients better understand their condition and strengthen their self-management resources.

Assessing illness-related uncertainty in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A psychometric analysis of the Mishel Uncertainty of Illness Scale.

A multicenter study involving 204 adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) assessed the dimensionality and item characteristics of the Mishel-Uncertainty of Illness Scale (MUIS), a generic self-assessment tool. Mokken analysis identified two dimensions in the MUIS with an appropriate item and overall scale scalability after excluding nonclassifiable items. A refined 12-item MUIS, employing a grade response model, effectively discriminated uncertainty levels among RRMS patients (likelihood ratio test p-value = .03). These findings suggest the potential value of the 12-item MUIS as a reliable measure for assessing uncertainty associated with the course of illness in RRMS.

Functional and Prognostic Assessment in Comatose Patients: A Study Using Somatosensory Evoked Potentials.

Aim: The functional prognosis of patients after coma following either cardiac arrest (CA) or acute structural brain injury (ABI) is often uncertain. These patients are associated with high mortality and disability. N20 and N70 somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) are used to predict prognosis. We evaluated the utility of SSEP (N20-N70) as an early indicator of long-term prognosis in these patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients (n = 120) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of coma after CA (n = 60) or ABI (n = 60). An SSEP study was performed, including N20 and N70 at 24-72 h, after coma onset. Functional recovery was assessed 6-12 months later using the modified Glasgow scale (mGS). The study was approved by our local research ethics committee. Results: In the CA and ABI groups, the absence of N20 (36% of CA patients and 41% of ABI patients; specificity = 100%) or N70 (68% of CA patients and 78% of ABI patients) was a strong indicator of poor outcome. Conversely, the presence of N70 was an indicator of a good outcome (AC: specificity = 84.2%, sensitivity = 92.7%; ABI: specificity = 64.2% sensitivity = 91.3%). Conclusion: Somatosensory evoked potentials are useful early prognostic markers with high specificity (N20) and sensitivity (N70). Moreover, N70 has additional potential value for improving the prediction of good long-term functional outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [2018/01/001].

The Added Value of Somatosensory Potential N70 in Neurological Prognosis After Coma by Acute Brain Structural Injury: A Retrospective Study.

Background: Coma after acute brain structural injury (ABI) are associated with high mortality and disability. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) N20 and N70 are used to predict prognosis. Purpose: We assessed the utility of SSEP (N20-N70) as an early indicator of long-term functional prognosis in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a diagnosis of coma after ABI (n=60). An SSEP study including N20 and N70 was performed 24-72 hours after coma onset. Functional recovery was evaluated 6 to 12 months later using the Modified Glasgow Scale (mGS). The study was approved by our local research ethics committee. Results: The absence of N20 (41% specificity=100%) or N70 (78%) was a strong indicator of a poor outcome. In contrast, the presence of N70 was an indicator of a good outcome (specificity=64.2% sensitivity=91.3%). Conclusion: SSEP N20 and N70 are useful early prognostic markers with high specificity (N20) and sensitivity (N70). N70 has potential additional value for improving the prediction of good functional outcomes in the long term.

Oligoclonal IgM bands are a promising biomarker for long-term cognitive outcomes in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The presence of lipid-specific oligoclonal IgM bands (LS-OCMB) in cerebrospinal fluid is associated with a more severe clinical multiple sclerosis (MS) course. OBJECTIVE: To investigate LS-OCMB as a prognostic biomarker of cognitive long-term outcomes in MS. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients underwent neuropsychological assessment. Cognitive performance between LS-OCMB- and LS-OCMB+ patients was compared adjusting by age, education, anxiety-depression, disease duration, and disability. RESULTS: LS-OCMB+ patients of ∼13 years of disease duration performed worse on Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: LS-OCMB+ perform worse on information processing speed and working memory (SDMT), suggesting that LS-OCMB could be a useful biomarker for long-term cognitive outcomes.

Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in a Spanish population.

OBJECTIVE: Pivotal trial have shown that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) receiving ocrelizumab had better outcomes. However, data on ocrelizumab in clinical practice are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary safety profile and effectiveness of ocrelizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including consecutive patients from nine public hospitals in south-eastern Spain who received ocrelizumab after it was approved. RESULTS: A total of 228 MS patients were included (144 with relapsing-remitting MS [RRMS], 25 secondary progressive MS [SPMS], and 59 primary progressive MS [PPMS]). Median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 1-32). No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) status at year 1 was achieved in 91.2% of the relapsing MS (RMS) population, while disability progression was detected in 37.5% of the PPMS patients (median follow-up period, 19 months). The most common adverse events reported were infusion-related reactions and infections, with the most common infections being urinary tract infections followed by upper respiratory infections and COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: The preliminary results in our real-world setting show that ocrelizumab presented excellent results in suppressing disease activity with a favorable and consistent safety profile.

COVID-19 and multiple sclerosis: A description of two cases on alemtuzumab.

BACKGROUND: Alemtuzumab is a treatment for highly active multiple sclerosis (MS). Immunosuppression is considered a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection and there is still lack of evidence to guide MS practice. METHODS/RESULTS: We describe the clinical and immunological evolution of two MS patients under alemtuzumab treatment who were affected by COVID-19, one of them only one week after receiving her last dose, and both recovered without sequelae. CONCLUSION: In selected patients (young, without comorbidities, and with high activity), MS itself could be more dangerous than COVID-19, so we should consider continuing MS treatment as previously planned, including alemtuzumab.

Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: The ALBACOVID registry.

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread worldwide since December 2019. Neurologic symptoms have been reported as part of the clinical spectrum of the disease. We aimed to determine whether neurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and to describe their main characteristics. METHODS: We systematically reviewed all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital in a Spanish population during March 2020. Demographic characteristics, systemic and neurologic clinical manifestations, and complementary tests were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 841 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (mean age 66.4 years, 56.2% men), 57.4% developed some form of neurologic symptom. Nonspecific symptoms such as myalgias (17.2%), headache (14.1%), and dizziness (6.1%) were present mostly in the early stages of infection. Anosmia (4.9%) and dysgeusia (6.2%) tended to occur early (60% as the first clinical manifestation) and were more frequent in less severe cases. Disorders of consciousness occurred commonly (19.6%), mostly in older patients and in severe and advanced COVID-19 stages. Myopathy (3.1%), dysautonomia (2.5%), cerebrovascular diseases (1.7%), seizures (0.7%), movement disorders (0.7%), encephalitis (n = 1), Guillain-Barré syndrome (n = 1), and optic neuritis (n = 1) were also reported, but less frequent. Neurologic complications were the main cause of death in 4.1% of all deceased study participants. CONCLUSIONS: Neurologic manifestations are common in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In our series, more than half of patients presented some form of neurologic symptom. Clinicians need to maintain close neurologic surveillance for prompt recognition of these complications. The mechanisms and consequences of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 neurologic involvement require further studies.

Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges as manifestation of pneumococcal meningoencephalitis.

Periodic Lateralized Epileptiform Discharges (PLEDs) are usually seen in the context of destructive structural lesions of the cortex, more frequently in acute ischemic stroke and less common in tumours and meningoencephalitis, specially herpes simplex virus. Its origin and prognosis are uncertain but it is known that PLEDs are linked to epilectic seizures, including status epilepticus.We report on a 75-year old woman with pneumococcal meningoencephalitis who presented altered level of consciousness, acute focal deficits, convulsive seizures and PLEDs in left hemisphere. The finding of PLEDs on the electroencephalogram is related to focal lesions of heterogeneous origin, which up to date, have not been documented in pneumococcal infections of the central nervous system. Our case highlights the importance of identifying and addressing any modifiable etiologic factors of PLEDs.

[Occipital neuralgia secondary to vasculitis of the occipital artery. Diagnosis using colour duplex]. / Neuralgia occipital secundaria a vasculitis de la arteria occipital. Diagnóstico mediante dúplex color.

TITLE: Neuralgia occipital secundaria a vasculitis de la arteria occipital. Diagnostico mediante duplex color.

Los ojos de búho / Owl eyes

El infarto medular es una entidad infrecuente cuyo diagnóstico es eminentemente clínico, aunque requiere de la realización de pruebas complementarias para descartar otra patología espinal. La mayoría de los pacientes refieren dolor intenso adyacente a nivel del infarto, generalmente precediendo de forma inmediata a los síntomas neurológicos. Presentamos el caso de una mujer de 53 años que acude a Urgencias por una clínica que sugería un síndrome medular agudo, siendo rápidamente diagnosticada de un infarto medular, evitando pruebas invasivas al objetivar en la RM el signo de los "ojos de búho" (AU)

Medullary infarction is rare and its diagnosis is mainly clinical, although it requires further tests to rule out other spinal diseases. Most patients complain of intense pain adjacent to the level of infarct, usually immediately preceding neurological symptoms. We present a case of a 53 year old woman who arrived at the Emergency department with symptoms that suggested acute medullary syndrome. She was rapidly diagnosed with a medullary infarct as the MRI showed the "owl eyes" sign and thus invasive tests were avoided (AU)

Neuralgia occipital secundaria a vasculitis de la arteria occipital. Diagnóstico mediante dúplex color / Occipital neuralgia secondary to vasculitis of the occipital artery. Diagnosis using colour duplex

No disponible