Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Med Genet ; 61(10): 983-991, 2024 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39227160

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 2015 American College of Medical Genetics/Association of Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) variant classification framework specifies that case-control observations can be scored as 'strong' evidence (PS4) towards pathogenicity. METHODS: We developed the PS4-likelihood ratio calculator (PS4-LRCalc) for quantitative evidence assignment based on the observed variant frequencies in cases and controls. Binomial likelihoods are computed for two models, each defined by prespecified OR thresholds. Model 1 represents the hypothesis of association between variant and phenotype (eg, OR≥5) and model 2 represents the hypothesis of non-association (eg, OR≤1). RESULTS: PS4-LRCalc enables continuous quantitation of evidence for variant classification expressed as a likelihood ratio (LR), which can be log-converted into log LR (evidence points). Using PS4-LRCalc, observed data can be used to quantify evidence towards either pathogenicity or benignity. Variants can also be evaluated against models of different penetrance. The approach is applicable to balanced data sets generated for more common phenotypes and smaller data sets more typical in very rare disease variant evaluation. CONCLUSION: PS4-LRCalc enables flexible evidence quantitation on a continuous scale for observed case-control data. The converted LR is amenable to incorporation into the now widely used 2018 updated Bayesian ACMG/AMP framework.


Subject(s)
Genetic Variation , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Case-Control Studies , Phenotype , Penetrance , Genetic Predisposition to Disease
2.
J Med Genet ; 61(4): 305-312, 2024 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38154813

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.


Subject(s)
Laboratories , Neoplasms , Humans , Workflow , State Medicine , Genomics , United Kingdom
3.
J Med Genet ; 60(7): 669-678, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36572524

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe national patterns of National Health Service (NHS) analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) genes in England using individual-level data submitted to the National Disease Registration Service (NDRS) by the NHS regional molecular genetics laboratories. DESIGN: Laboratories submitted individual-level patient data to NDRS against a prescribed data model, including (1) patient identifiers, (2) test episode data, (3) per-gene results and (4) detected sequence variants. Individualised per-laboratory algorithms were designed and applied in NDRS to extract and map the data to the common data model. Laboratory-level MMR activity audit data from the Clinical Molecular Genetics Society/Association of Clinical Genomic Science were used to assess early years' missing data. RESULTS: Individual-level data from patients undergoing NHS MMR germline genetic testing were submitted from all 13 English laboratories performing MMR analyses, comprising in total 16 722 patients (9649 full-gene, 7073 targeted), with the earliest submission from 2000. The NDRS dataset is estimated to comprise >60% of NHS MMR analyses performed since inception of NHS MMR analysis, with complete national data for full-gene analyses for 2016 onwards. Out of 9649 full-gene tests, 2724 had an abnormal result, approximately 70% of which were (likely) pathogenic. Data linkage to the National Cancer Registry demonstrated colorectal cancer was the most frequent cancer type in which full-gene analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: The NDRS MMR dataset is a unique national pan-laboratory amalgamation of individual-level clinical and genomic patient data with pseudonymised identifiers enabling linkage to other national datasets. This growing resource will enable longitudinal research and can form the basis of a live national genomic disease registry.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms , State Medicine , Humans , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Laboratories , Genomics
4.
BMJ Open ; 14(2): e080678, 2024 Feb 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38355192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Analysis of routinely collected electronic health data is a key tool for long-term condition research and practice for hospitalised patients. This requires accurate and complete ascertainment of a broad range of diagnoses, something not always recorded on an admission document at a single point in time. This study aimed to ascertain how far back in time electronic hospital records need to be interrogated to capture long-term condition diagnoses. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study of routinely collected hospital electronic health record data. SETTING: Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (UK)-linked data held by the PIONEER acute care data hub. PARTICIPANTS: Patients whose first recorded admission for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation (n=560) or acute stroke (n=2142) was between January and December 2018 and who had a minimum of 10 years of data prior to the index date. OUTCOME MEASURES: We identified the most common International Classification of Diseases version 10-coded diagnoses received by patients with COPD and acute stroke separately. For each diagnosis, we derived the number of patients with the diagnosis recorded at least once over the full 10-year lookback period, and then compared this with shorter lookback periods from 1 year to 9 years prior to the index admission. RESULTS: Seven of the top 10 most common diagnoses in the COPD dataset reached >90% completeness by 6 years of lookback. Atrial fibrillation and diabetes were >90% coded with 2-3 years of lookback, but hypertension and asthma completeness continued to rise all the way out to 10 years of lookback. For stroke, 4 of the top 10 reached 90% completeness by 5 years of lookback; angina pectoris was >90% coded at 7 years and previous transient ischaemic attack completeness continued to rise out to 10 years of lookback. CONCLUSION: A 7-year lookback captures most, but not all, common diagnoses. Lookback duration should be tailored to the conditions being studied.


Subject(s)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Stroke , Humans , Electronic Health Records , Retrospective Studies , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Hospitals
5.
Med Sci (Basel) ; 9(1)2021 02 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33557238

ABSTRACT

Recent large national and international cohorts describe the baseline characteristics and outcome of hospitalised patients with COVID-19, however there is limited granularity to these reports. We aimed to provide a detailed description of a UK COVID-19 cohort, focusing on management and outcome. We performed a retrospective single-centre analysis of clinical management and 28-day outcomes of consecutive adult inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 from 31 January to 16 April 2020 inclusive. In total, 316 cases were identified. Most patients were elderly (median age 75) with multiple comorbidities. One quarter were admitted from residential or nursing care. Mortality was 84 out of 316 (26.6%). Most deaths occurred in patients in whom a ceiling of inpatient treatment had been determined and for whom end of life care and specialist palliative care input was provided where appropriate. No deaths occurred in patients aged under 56 years. Decisions to initiate respiratory support were individualised after consideration of patient wishes, premorbid frailty and comorbidities. In total, 59 (18%) patients were admitted to intensive care, of which 31 (10% overall cohort) required intubation. Multiple logistic regression identified associations between death and age, frailty, and disease severity, with age as the most significant factor (odds ratio 1.07 [95% CI 1.03-1.10] per year increase, p < 0.001). These findings provide important clinical context to outcome data. Mortality was associated with increasing age. Most deaths were anticipated and occurred in patients with advance decisions on ceilings of treatment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Academic Medical Centers , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , State Medicine , Tertiary Care Centers , United Kingdom
6.
J Clin Pathol ; 71(8): 713-720, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29472252

ABSTRACT

AIMS: We sought to use PCR followed by high-resolution melting analysis to develop a single closed-tube screening panel to screen for Lynch syndrome. This comprises tests for microsatellite instability (MSI), MLH1 methylation promoter and BRAF mutation. METHODS: For MSI testing, five mononucleotide markers (BAT25, BAT26, BCAT25, MYB, EWSR1) were developed. In addition, primers were designed to interrogate Region C of the MLH1 promoter for methylation (using bisulphite-modified DNA) and to test for mutations in codon 600 of BRAF. Two separate cohorts from Nottingham (n=99, 46 with MSI, 53 being microsatellite stable (MSS)) and Edinburgh (n=88, 45 MSI, 43 MSS) were tested. RESULTS: All the cases (n=187) were blind tested for MSI and all were correctly characterised by our panel. The MLH1 promoter and BRAF were tested only in the Nottingham cohort. Successful blinded analysis was performed on the MLH1 promoter in 97 cases. All MSS cases showed a pattern of non-methylation while 41/44 cases with MSI showed full methylation. The three cases with MSI and a non-methylated pattern had aberrations in MSH2 and MSH6 expression. BRAF mutation was detected in 61% of MSI cases and 11% of MSS cases.Finally, 12 cases were blind screened by using the whole panel as a single test. Of these, five were identified as MSS, four as MSI/non-LS and three as MSI/possible LS. These results were concordant with the previous data. CONCLUSION: We describe the Nottingham Lynch Syndrome Test (N_LyST). This is a quick, simple and cheap method for screening for Lynch syndrome.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , DNA Methylation , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Microsatellite Instability , MutL Protein Homolog 1/genetics , Mutation , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , HCT116 Cells , Humans , Phenotype , Predictive Value of Tests , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Reproducibility of Results , Workflow
8.
Biochim Biophys Acta ; 1628(1): 22-9, 2003 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12850269

ABSTRACT

Connexin32 (Cx32) is the predominant gap junction protein expressed in adult rat hepatocytes. This study investigated transcriptional regulation of the rat Cx32 gene in MH(1)C(1) rat hepatoma cells using transient expression assays in conjunction with promoter mutagenesis and 5' nested deletion analysis. Site-directed mutagenesis of the -736 and -187 hepatocyte nuclear factor-1 (HNF-1) sites, the -196 and -116 Sp1 sites, and the -729 and -329 Yin Yang 1 (YY1) sites all significantly reduced promoter activity. We have defined the contribution of each individual site to promoter activity in the intact cell. A novel upstream region of the Cx32 promoter (-1042 to -758) was cloned and shown to contain negative regulatory elements. The transcription factors HNF-1 and Sp1 have important functional roles in the transcriptional regulation of basal and cell-specific Cx32 expression. The multifunctional transcription factor YY1 is also implicated.


Subject(s)
Connexins/genetics , Connexins/physiology , DNA-Binding Proteins , Gene Expression Regulation , Nuclear Proteins , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Animals , Binding Sites , Gene Deletion , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1 , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-alpha , Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 1-beta , Hepatocytes/metabolism , Luciferases/metabolism , Models, Genetic , Mutagenesis, Site-Directed , Mutation , Plasmids/metabolism , Rats , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sp1 Transcription Factor/metabolism , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Transfection , Tumor Cells, Cultured , Gap Junction beta-1 Protein
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL