GEICAM Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain.

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in Spain. During the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, patients with BC still require timely treatment and follow-up; however, hospitals are overwhelmed with infected patients and, if exposed, patients with BC are at higher risk for infection and serious complications if infected. Thus, health care providers need to evaluate each BC treatment and in-hospital visit to minimize pandemic-associated risks while maintaining adequate treatment efficacy. Here we present a set of guidelines regarding available options for BC patient management and treatment by BC subtype in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Owing to the lack of evidence about COVID-19 infection, these recommendations are mainly based on expert opinion, medical organizations' and societies' recommendations, and some published evidence. We consider this a useful tool to facilitate medical decision making in this health crisis situation we are facing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This work presents a set of guidelines regarding available options for breast cancer (BC) patient management and treatment by BC subtype in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Owing to the suddenness of this health crisis, specialists have to make decisions with little evidence at hand. Thus, these expert guidelines may be a useful tool to facilitate medical decision making in the context of a worldwide pandemic with no resources to spare.

Multicenter phase II study of fixed sequences of capecitabine combined with oxaliplatin or irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of fixed sequences of capecitabine/oxaliplatin followed by capecitabine/irinotecan in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with histologically confirmed, previously untreated, nonresectable, locally advanced or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. Patients were treated as follows: capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily) on days 1-14 and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 2-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1, followed by capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 twice daily) on days 1-14 and irinotecan (240 mg/m2 1.5-hour intravenous infusion) on day 1. Each combination was administered every 21 days during 4 consecutive cycles followed by the alternating sequence to a maximum of 16 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 35 eligible patients have been included in this ongoing study. Response rate (complete responses plus partial responses) was 37.1%. With a median follow-up of 9.5 months, the median time to disease progression and overall survival were 7.4 months and 16.4 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with only 6% of the patients developing grade 3/4 neurotoxicity. However, the low number of patients treated beyond 4 cycles limits the interpretation of the data. CONCLUSION: The preliminary results from this ongoing study suggest the feasibility of this strategy, which resulted in promising antitumor activity with less neurotoxicity.

Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent, active against metastatic melanoma. Combinations of chemotherapy and biological response modifiers have been associated with increased antitumour activity. A multicentre phase II study was performed to assess the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma. Previously untreated patients received temozolomide administered orally at a dose of 150 mg/m/day for 5 days every 4 weeks, in combination with interferon given continuously subcutaneously twice a week at a dose of 10 MU/m. Treatment continued until disease progression or for a maximum of 12 months. RESULTS: From June 1999 to August 2002, 27 eligible patients were included in the study at six centres. Median age was 59 (28-77) years; 17 male and 10 female patients were recruited; the median Karnofsky performance score was 90 (70-100); three patients had received prior adjuvant interferon; the majority of patients had fewer than three involved sites. A total of 96 cycles were administered; there were one complete response, four partial response and five stable disease (overall response rate: 18.5%, 95% confidence interval: 6.3-38.1). All responses were seen in patients with exclusively lymph node and pulmonary disease [M1a (one patient); M1b (four patients)]. The median response duration was 6.9 months. One patient remains in complete remission at 4 years. The median time to progression and the median survival were 1.87 and 9.5 months, respectively. Haematological toxicity was neutropenia G-IV: 1, G-III: 4, thrombocytopenia G-III: 2, and anaemia G-III: 2. Predominant non-haematological toxicity was hepatotoxicity G-III: 4. Other toxicities were mild or moderate. Dose reduction was required for nine cycles of interferon, one of temozolomide and two of both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide in combination with interferon is a well-tolerated palliative regimen that has moderate activity against metastatic melanoma. Further evaluation of this regimen in comparative studies or in combination with other drugs is warranted.

Prognostic value of serum S-100B in malignant melanoma.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Although there is no established tumor marker of proven value for patients with melanoma, high serum levels of S-100B protein have been found in patients with melanoma and distant metastases. This study was performed to assess the prognostic value of this marker. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: Serum S-100B protein was measured by means of the LIA-mat System 300 (Sangtec S-100B LIA, AB Sangtec Medical, Bromma, Sweden) in 85 patients with melanoma. RESULTS: Mean serum S-100B protein was 0.075 microg/L (range, 0.001-0.470) in 66 patients with non-metastatic melanoma (stage I-III) versus 0.441 microg/L (range, 0.001-16.840) in 19 patients with metastatic melanoma (stage IV) (P <0.001, Mann Whitney U test). The median follow-up time was 329 days. Serum levels above 0.150 microg/L were found in 10 of patients with non-metastatic melanoma (15.2%) and in 17 of 19 patients with metastatic disease (89.4%). Median survival was 256 days for the 27 patients with serum S-100B levels above 0.150 microg/L versus 561 days for the 58 patients with normal values (P <0.3973). CONCLUSION: Serum S-100B is a useful tumor marker in melanoma.