The Relationship Between Governing Board Composition and Medicare Shared Savings Program Accountable Care Organizations Outcomes: an Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Early studies of Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) accountable care organizations (ACOs) suggested that physician leadership was an important driver of ACO success, but it is unknown whether the demographic and professional composition of current MSSP ACO governing boards is associated with ACOs' publicly reported outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether governing boards with higher physician participation and greater female involvement have better outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: All 2017 MSSP ACOs identified by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services ACO Public Use Files (PUF). MAIN MEASURES: We collected governing board composition from ACO websites in 2019. Outcome metrics included risk-standardized readmission and unplanned admissions rates. We used descriptive statistics and linear regression models to examine the association between board composition and outcomes. KEY RESULTS: Of the 339 ACOs that still existed in 2019 and had available data, 77% had physician-majority boards and 11.5% had no women on their boards. Eighty-nine percent reported a Medicare beneficiary on their board, of which about one-third had a woman representative. The average number of members on MSSP ACO boards was 12, with a mean of 67% physicians and 24% women. Board composition varied minimally by ACO characteristics, such as geographic region, number of beneficiaries, or type of participants. Higher levels of physician participation in ACO governing boards were associated with lower all-cause unplanned admission rates for patients with heart failure (p = - 0.26, p < 0.001) and for patients with multiple chronic conditions (p = - 0.28, p = 0.001). The number of women on the board was not associated with any outcome differences. CONCLUSIONS: MSSP ACO governing boards were predominately male and physician-led. Physician involvement may be important for achieving quality goals, while lack of female involvement showcases an opportunity to diversify boards.

Barriers to Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review with a Focus on Age.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an effective treatment for many hematologic malignancies, and its utilization continues to rise. However, due to the difficult logistics and high cost of HCT, there are significant barriers to accessing the procedure; these barriers are likely greater for older patients. Although numerous factors may influence HCT access, no formal analysis has detailed the cumulative barriers that have been studied thus far. We conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to better categorize the barriers to access and referral to HCT, with a focus on the subgroup of older patients. We searched for articles published in English from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between the database inception and January 31, 2020. We selected articles that met the following inclusion criteria: (1) study design: qualitative, cross-sectional, observational cohort, or mixed-method study designs; (2) outcomes: barriers related to patient and physician access to HCT; and (3) population: adults aged ≥18 years with hematologic malignancies within the United States. Abstracts without full text were excluded. QUALSYST methodology was used to determine article quality. Data on the barriers to access and referral for HCT were extracted, along with other study characteristics. We summarized the findings using descriptive statistics. We included 26 of 3859 studies screened for inclusion criteria. Twenty studies were retrospective cohorts and 4 were cross-sectional. There was 1 prospective cohort study and 1 mixed-method study. Only 1 study was rated as high quality, and 16 were rated as fair. Seventeen studies analyzed age as a potential barrier to HCT referral and access, with 16 finding older age to be a barrier. Other consistent barriers to HCT referral and access included nonwhite race (n = 16/20 studies), insurance status (n = 13/14 studies), comorbidities (n = 10/11 studies), and lower socioeconomic status (n = 7/8 studies). High-quality studies are lacking related to HCT barriers. Older age and nonwhite race were consistently linked to reduced access to HCT. To produce a more just health care system, strategies to overcome these barriers for vulnerable populations should be prioritized. Examples include patient and physician education, as well as geriatric assessment guided care models that can be readily incorporated into clinical practice.