ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Research on health systems resilience has focused primarily on the theoretical development of the concept and its dimensions. There is an identified knowledge gap in the research on how to build resilience in health systems in practice and 'what works' in different contexts. The aim of this study is to identify practical strategies for building resilient health systems from the empirical research on health systems resilience. METHODS: A scoping review included empirical research on health systems resilience from peer-reviewed literature. The search in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Global Health was conducted during January to March 2021 for articles published in English between 2013 to February 2021. A total of 1771 articles were screened, and data was extracted from 22 articles. The articles included empirical, applied research on strategies for resilience, that observed or measured resilience during shocks or chronic stress through collection of primary data or analysis of secondary data, or if they were a review study of empirical research. A narrative summary was done by identifying action-oriented strategies, comparing them, and presenting them by main thematic areas. RESULTS: The results demonstrate examples of strategies used or recommended within nine identified thematic areas; use of community resources, governance and financing, leadership, surveillance, human resources, communication and collaboration, preparedness, organizational capacity and learning and finally health system strengthening. CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasize the importance of improved governance and financing, empowered middle-level leadership, improved surveillance systems and strengthened human resources. A re-emphasized focus on health systems strengthening with better mainstreaming of health security and international health regulations are demonstrated in the results as a crucial strategy for building resilience. A lack of strategies for recovery and lessons learnt from crises are identified as gaps for resilience in future.
Subject(s)
Government Programs , Medical Assistance , Delivery of Health Care , Humans , Leadership , OrganizationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To survey the awareness and observation of delirium, and interventions used for delirium in Swedish intensive care units (ICUs) and to examine the influence of hospital categories and staff education on the afore-mentioned. DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to all Swedish adult patient ICUs (n=82) and completed by 55 units. RESULTS: The reported prevalence of delirium was 9.4%. Assessment of delirium was performed by 62% of the ICUs, commonly by observing symptoms. Most of the suggested non-pharmacologic interventions were reported to be used by at least 85% of the units. Drugs were used by 96%, most commonly haloperidol, propofol and benzodiazepines. Written pharmacological guidelines existed in 26% of the units, while 9% had non-pharmacological guidelines. Regular observation of delirium was more common in larger hospitals than in smaller ones and education was associated with reporting a higher prevalence of delirium. CONCLUSION: As in other countries, this study demonstrated that the awareness of delirium in ICUs is low with a lack of implementation of validated screening tools for its diagnosis. Emphasis should be placed on education and implementation of these tools to improve the quality of care for ICU patients.