ABSTRACT
Latina immigrant women are vulnerable to traumatic stress and sexual health disparities. Without autonomy over their reproductive health and related decision-making, reproductive justice is elusive. We analyzed behavioral health data from 175 Latina immigrant participants (M age = 35; range = 18-64) of the International Latino Research Partnership (ILRP) study. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to compare immigrant mothers of minor children to those without, regarding their psychological and reproductive health, and correlates of past exposure to sexual trauma. Over one third (38%) of ILRP participants had minor children, and 58% had citizenship in their host country. The rate for sexual assault was 30 and 61%, respectively, for physical assault; these rates were similarly high for women with and without minor children. Women who reported sexual assault scored significantly higher for depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and substance-abuse screens. Odds of experiencing sexual assault was highest for women who experienced physical assault (odds ratio = 10.74), and for those from the Northern Triangle (odds ratio = 8.41). Subgroups of Latina migrant mothers are vulnerable to traumatic stress and related sexual and mental health risks. Given these findings, we frame the implications in a reproductive justice framework and consider consequences for caregiver-child well-being.
Trasfondo: Las mujeres latinas inmigrantes son vulnerables al estrés traumático y a las disparidades de salud sexual. Sin autonomía sobre su salud reproductiva y las decisiones que se deben tomar al respecto, la justicia reproductiva es difícil de alcanzar. Métodos: Analizamos información sobre las actitudes con respecto a la salud de parte de 175 inmigrantes latinas participantes (edad promedio 35; entre 18 y 64) del estudio de Investigación Conjunta Internacional de Asuntos Latinos (ILRP). Usamos estadísticas descriptivas y deductivas para comparar las madres inmigrantes de niños menores con aquellas sin ellos, sin tomar en cuenta su salud sicológica y reproductiva, y correlacionar el haber estado expuestas a trauma sexual en el pasado. Resultados: Más de un tercio (38%) de las participantes del grupo de ILRP tenían niños menores, y 58% tenían ciudadanía en el país donde residían. El promedio en cuanto a la agresión sexual fue de 30% y 61% en el caso de agresión física; estos promedios fueron similarmente altos tanto para mujeres con niños pequeños como mujeres sin niños pequeños. Las mujeres que reportaron agresión sexual tuvieron puntajes significativamente más altos en el caso de depresión, trastorno por estrés postraumático (PTSD) y exámenes de detección de abuso de sustancias. Las posibilidades de experimentar agresión sexual fue lo más alto para mujeres que experimentaron agresión física (OR = 10.74), y para aquellas del Triángulo del Norte (OR = 8.41). Conclusiones: Los subgrupos de madres latinas inmigrantes son vulnerables al estrés traumático y los relacionados riesgos de salud sexual y mental. Dados estos resultados, colocamos las implicaciones dentro de un marco de trabajo de justicia reproductiva y consideramos las consecuencias para el bienestar de quien le presta cuidados al niño.
Contexte Les femmes immigrées latinas sont vulnérables au stress traumatique et aux disparités de santé sexuelle. Sans autonomie quant à leur santé reproductive et les décisions qui y sont liées, leur justice reproductive est insaisissable. Méthodes Nous avons analysé des données de santé comportementale de 175 participantes immigrées (moyenne d'âge 35 ans; éventail de 18 à 64 ans) de l'étude du partenariat de recherche international International Latino Research Partnership (ILRP). Nous avons utilisé des statistiques descriptives et déductives pour comparer les mères immigrées d'enfants mineurs à celles sans enfants, pour ce qui concerne leur santé psychologique et reproductive, ainsi que les corrélats d'exposition à un trauma sexuel dans le passé. Résultats Plus d'un tiers (38%) des participantes ILRP avaient des enfants mineurs et 58% détenaient la citoyenneté dans leur pays d'accueil. Le taux de violences sexuelles était de 30% et de 61% pour les aggressions physiques. Ces taux étaient aussi élevés chez les femmes avec ou sans enfants mineurs. Les femmes ayant déclaré des violences sexuelles ont fait état de scores bien plus élevés pour la dépression, le TSPT et la toxicomanie. Les probabilités de faire face à des violences sexuelles étaient les plus élevées chez les femmes ayant vécu une aggression physique (OR = 10,74), et pour celles du Triangle du Nord de l'Amérique centrale (OR = 8,41). Conclusions Des sous-groupes de mères migrantes latinas sont vulnérables au stress traumatique et à des risques de santé mentale qui y sont liés. Au vu de ces résultats, nous encadrons les implications dans une structure de justice de reproduction et considérons les conséquences pour le bien-être mère-enfant.
Subject(s)
Emigration and Immigration , Mothers/psychology , Sexual Health/ethnology , Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders , Adult , Female , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Humans , Infant , Infant Welfare , Mental Health/ethnology , Reproductive Health/ethnology , Risk Factors , Social Justice , Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders/ethnology , Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders/psychology , United States , Vulnerable Populations/ethnology , Vulnerable Populations/psychologySubject(s)
Mental Health , Psychiatry , Climate Change , Humans , Organizations , Psychiatry/educationABSTRACT
Refugee children are often exposed to adversities and traumatic experiences that can harm the mental health and well-being of refugee children. These include human trafficking and exploitation and dangers in detention centers and refugee camps. All these adverse events can be traumatic and contribute to poor mental health, including posttraumatic stress, anxiety, depression, and substance use disorders. Therefore, the assessment of refugee children and adolescents should include screening and identification for these experiences, provision of evidence-based trauma treatment, and social supports to promote their well-being and thriving.
Subject(s)
Refugees , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Refugees/psychology , Anxiety , Mental Health , Human RightsABSTRACT
To reduce child mental health disparities, it is imperative to improve the precision of targets and to expand our vision of social determinants of health as modifiable. Advancements in clinical research informatics and please state accurate measurement of child mental health service use and quality. Participatory action research promotes representation of underserved groups in informatics research and practice and may improve the effectiveness of interventions by informing research across all stages, including the identification of key variables, risk and protective factors, and data interpretation.
Subject(s)
Health Equity , Mental Health Services , Humans , Child , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Medical Informatics , Biomedical Research , Healthcare Disparities , Child Health ServicesABSTRACT
Poor sleep during adolescence is a public health concern that may be especially important to address among youth in juvenile correctional facilities, who tend to experience greater mental health challenges, substance use disorders, and traumatic stress exposure. However, evidence for addressing sleep in correctional settings is limited. Using de-identified composite clinical cases, this paper describes challenges and opportunities for addressing sleep disorders (i.e. insomnia) and promoting sleep health (i.e. improving duration, regularity, and behaviors) among adolescents in long-term juvenile correctional facilities. These clinical cases highlight common presenting problems and underscore the need for integrated sleep and mental health interventions as well as adaptations to enhance feasibility and efficacy of behavioral sleep treatment and sleep health promotion in juvenile correctional contexts. We conclude by summarizing clinical, research, and policy implications for addressing adolescent sleep problems and promoting sleep health and well-being in these contexts.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Latinxs experience a longer duration of untreated depression and anxiety. LEP Latinxs have difficulty accessing mental healthcare due to insufficient Spanish-speaking behavioral/mental health clinicians to meet demand. These under-resourced healthcare systems are less likely to be the site for the implementation of innovations. Digital interventions can provide an effective option for overcoming these barriers; yet, when digital evidence-based treatments are available, uptake and engagement is often low. This manuscript presents the protocol for the SUPERA (SUpport from PEeRs to expand Access) study which will evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based, Spanish language, digital cognitive-behavioral therapy (dCBT) intervention (i.e., SilverCloud) in safety-net primary care clinics for LEP Latinx patients with depression or anxiety. METHODS: We will conduct an effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial (Type 2) design comparing engagement and clinical outcomes in two modalities of dCBT delivery (peer-supported vs. unsupported). We will also compare provider-level outreach (using a clinic patient registry) versus inreach (traditional provider referral) to compare rates of initiation, completion, and cost. Participants will be 426 LEP Latinx adults ≥18 years of age, PHQ-9 ≥ 10 or GAD-7 ≥ 8, with access to the internet via smartphone, and not currently receiving individual psychotherapy. We will collect baseline, post-intervention (8 weeks), and follow up (3 months) data. CONCLUSION: The long-term goal of this research is to aid in the implementation of digital mental health interventions that can be sustainably implemented in low-resourced settings, while reducing the reliance on professionals, overcoming workforce deficits, and increasing relevance for diverse populations.
Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Depression , Adult , Humans , Depression/therapy , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Anxiety/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , LanguageABSTRACT
There is, in the content of the Journal, an embarrassment of riches, and picking a "best" seems to demand a certain qualification: is the "best" the most interesting, most surprising, most educational, most important, most provocative, most enjoyable? How to choose? We are hardly unbiased and can admit to a special affection for the ones that we and the authors worked hardest on, modifying version after version into shape. Acknowledging these biases, here are the 2023 articles that we think deserve your attention or at least a second read.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We assess whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) varies in prevalence, diagnostic criteria endorsement, and type and frequency of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) among a nationally representative US sample of 5071 non-Latino whites, 3264 Latinos, 2178 Asians, 4249 African Americans, and 1476 Afro-Caribbeans. METHODS: PTSD and other psychiatric disorders were evaluated using the World Mental Health-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI) in a national household sample that oversampled ethnic/racial minorities (n=16,238) but was weighted to produce results representative of the general population. RESULTS: Asians have lower prevalence rates of probable lifetime PTSD, whereas African Americans have higher rates as compared with non-Latino whites, even after adjusting for type and number of exposures to traumatic events, and for sociodemographic, clinical, and social support factors. Afro-Caribbeans and Latinos seem to demonstrate similar risk to non-Latino whites, adjusting for these same covariates. Higher rates of probable PTSD exhibited by African Americans and lower rates for Asians, as compared with non-Latino whites, do not appear related to differential symptom endorsement, differences in risk or protective factors, or differences in types and frequencies of PTEs across groups. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be marked differences in conditional risk of probable PTSD across ethnic/racial groups. Questions remain about what explains risk of probable PTSD. Several factors that might account for these differences are discussed, as well as the clinical implications of our findings. Uncertainty of the PTSD diagnostic assessment for Latinos and Asians requires further evaluation.
Subject(s)
Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Black or African American/psychology , Black or African American/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Asian/psychology , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/psychology , Female , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/ethnology , Middle Aged , Patient Acuity , Prevalence , Racial Groups/psychology , Risk Factors , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Mobile crisis response (MCR) is a community-based intervention designed to provide de-escalation and relief to individuals experiencing a behavioral health or substance use-related crisis wherever they are, including at home, at work, at school, or in the community. Often it is the first, or only, option for youth who experience barriers to accessing traditional mental health care in the community. Elevated rates of mental health needs and suicidality among children and adolescents in the United States make availability of quality MCR increasingly important. Studies suggest that an estimated 70% to 80% of children with mental health disorders do not receive care, and minoritized children are even less likely to access community-based behavioral health care services.1 MCR can act as a bridge for securing treatment for children in acute distress. However, until recently, few studies have demonstrated the outcomes of MCR services for children and adolescents or more specifically for minoritized youth.
ABSTRACT
Adolescent substance use is an important public health issue, with 15% of eighth graders (ages 13-14) reporting past-year cannabis use, 26% reporting alcohol use, and 23% reporting vaping nicotine in recent national surveys.1 Among youth and young adults in need of mental health services, co-occurring substance misuse is a topic of particular importance. This is particularly evident in special populations, such as youth in juvenile detention, youth living in rural communities, and youth in residential or foster care. Accurate drug use identification is necessary to determine substance use needs and sequelae in youth. Ideally, this is accomplished through a combination of self-report and toxicological biospecimen analysis, such as the use of hair toxicology. Yet, the consistency between self-reported substance use and robust toxicological analysis is understudied and has not been researched in large, diverse samples of youth. This has implications for both public health research and clinical practice. Of particular importance for research on health disparities in substance abuse problems and treatment is the likely possibility that reporting validity often varies by race/ethnicity and by other important subgroupings.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Substance-Related Disorders , Young Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Self Report , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Ethnicity , Alcohol DrinkingABSTRACT
Racialized trauma can come directly from other people or can be experienced within a wider system. It can come as the result of a direct experience when racism is enacted on you, vicariously-such as when you see videos of other people facing racism-and/or transmitted intergenerationally. More and more, research in child and adolescent psychiatry has supported that race-related stress and racialized violence has systemic roots and psychological and physiological consequences. The term "emotion regulation" is generally used to describe a person's ability to effectively manage and respond to an emotional experience and to adapt to the demands of their environment. At the time of writing this editorial, youth of color have witnessed a pandemic in which their families and communities have been disproportionately impacted and devastated, the death of George Floyd and other racialized violence against unarmed people of color, murder of their elders in grocery stores and churches, their peers shot by assault weapons while attending school, all compounded by discrimination against sexual and gender minority people in some regions, climate change heating up our earth, and immigrant children separated from parents or dying at the border. What will be the response of the adults around them to protect them? What is the role of emotion regulation skills for youth experiencing race-related stress and trauma in a dysregulated world?
Subject(s)
Crime Victims , Emigrants and Immigrants , Racism , Adult , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Aged , Racism/psychology , Violence/psychology , Crime Victims/psychology , EmotionsABSTRACT
Antiracism can be defined as the practice of opposing racism and promoting racial equity and justice. Within health care, antiracism also includes acknowledging and addressing the structural injustices resulting in health inequities. Racism plays a role in how the United States accepts and welcomes refugees and asylum seekers.1 From an intersectional perspective, children are innately in positions of disadvantage, with unaccompanied immigrant minors (UIMs) experiencing an even greater toll due to the lack of direct parental physical care. This editorial discusses antiracist care of UIMs and the need for institutional and structural support to sustain this important clinical work.
Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants , Racism , Refugees , Child , Humans , United States , Minors , AntiracismABSTRACT
Purpose: Unaccompanied immigrant children (UIC) experience significant mental health concerns, particularly posttraumatic stress. This is a vulnerable population, yet little systematic research has examined the effectiveness of evidence-based models such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to meet their needs. Integrating religious beliefs and spirituality into therapy could elucidate better understandings of traumatic stress, and posttraumatic cognitions when working with UIC with strong faith traditions/beliefs. Methods: We report on modifications made to a pre-existing treatment, consisting of integrating religious and spiritual themes, to engage and work with UIC participants in a pilot study of Mindfulness-Based CBT. Thematic analysis of therapy notes evaluated the implementation process for integrating religious and spiritual themes. Three composite vignettes illustrate how religiosity and spirituality were salient for UIC participants in this pilot study, and how these were integrated into therapy to address posttraumatic cognitions and symptoms. We assessed changes in PTSD symptom severity and posttraumatic cognitions for UIC and in comparison, to non-UIC participants using the Child PTSD Symptom Scale and the Posttraumatic Cognitions Inventory. Results: Religiosity and spirituality were important for coping and conceptualizations of trauma, served as facilitators for engaging UIC in therapy, and related to improving posttraumatic cognitions and symptoms. Conclusion: Religious identity and spirituality can be important for meaning making, trauma cognitions and symptoms, and can be important to explore in therapy with unaccompanied immigrant children and adolescents. Clinical Trial Registration: Not applicable.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disproportionally affects low-income, racial and ethnic minoritized communities, where prevalence is high, yet access to evidence-based treatments (EBTs) is low. As such, there is a need to identify effective, feasible, and scalable interventions for PTSD. Stepped care approaches that include brief, low-intensity treatments are one approach to improving access yet have not been developed for adults with PTSD. Our study aims to test the effectiveness of a step one PTSD treatment in primary care while gathering information on implementation to maximize sustainability in the setting. METHODS: This study will be conducted in integrated primary care in the largest safety net hospital in New England using a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation design. Eligible trial participants are adult primary care patients who meet full or subthreshold criteria for PTSD. Interventions include Brief clinician-administered Skills Training in Affective and Interpersonal Regulation (Brief STAIR) versus web-administered STAIR (webSTAIR) during a 15-week active treatment period. Participants complete assessments at baseline (pre-treatment), 15 weeks (post-treatment), and 9 months (follow-up) post-randomization. We will assess feasibility and acceptability post-trial using surveys and interviews with patients, study therapists, and other key informants, and will assess the preliminary effectiveness of interventions in terms of PTSD symptom change and functioning. CONCLUSION: This study will provide evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of brief, low-intensity interventions in safety net integrated primary care, with the aim of including these interventions in a future stepped care approach to PTSD treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04937504.
Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
The primary objective of this article is to consider the impact of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic on pediatric anxiety from both a clinical and system-of-care lens. This includes illustrating the impact of the pandemic on pediatric anxiety disorders and consideration of factors important for special populations, including children with disabilities and learning differences. We consider the clinical, educational, and public health implications for addressing mental health needs like anxiety disorders and how we might promote better outcomes, particularly for vulnerable children and youth.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adolescent , Humans , Child , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Anxiety/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study is a non-randomized pragmatic trial to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the Primary Care Intervention for Posttraumatic stress disorder (PCIP) (Srivastava et al., 2021), an Integrated Behavioral Health Care treatment for PTSD in adolescents. METHOD: Following routine clinic procedures, youth who were suspected of having trauma-related mental health symptoms were referred by their primary care providers to integrated care social workers for evaluation. The integrated care social workers referred the first 23 youth whom they suspected of having PTSD to the research study. Twenty youth consented to the study and 19 completed the pre-assessment (17 female; mean age = 19.32, SD = 2.11; range 14-22 years). More than 40% identified as Black and a third as Hispanic/Latinx. PCIP mechanisms and clinical outcomes were assessed pre- and post-treatment, and at one-month follow-up. Participants and therapists completed post-treatment qualitative interviews to assess feasibility and acceptability, and treatment sessions were audio recorded to assess fidelity. RESULTS: Findings suggest high acceptability, satisfaction, and feasibility of the PCIP delivered in "real-life" safety net pediatric primary care. Integrated care social workers had high treatment fidelity. Despite the small sample size, there was significant improvement in symptom scores of anxiety (g = 0.68, p = 0.02) and substance use (g = 0.36, p = 0.04) from pre to post, and depression symptoms (g = 0.38, p = 0.04) from pre to follow-up. Qualitative data from patients who completed exit interviews and integrated social workers indicated high satisfaction with the treatment, with some participants reporting that the integrated intervention was more acceptable and less stigmatizing than seeking mental health care outside of primary care. CONCLUSIONS: The PCIP may improve treatment engagement and access for vulnerable youth. Promising findings of high acceptability, feasibility, and initial clinical effectiveness suggest that PCIP warrants larger-scale study as part of routine care in pediatric integrated care.
Subject(s)
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Humans , Female , Adolescent , Child , Young Adult , Adult , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Health Services , Anxiety Disorders , Primary Health CareABSTRACT
Objective: To document the experience of 14 academic child and adolescent psychiatry programs in transitioning to and managing telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal was to understand how programs adopted and sustained telehealth during the pandemic. Telehealth was defined as services delivered via videoconferencing and telephony. Method: In this descriptive study, faculty from 14 programs completed online surveys about the use of both telehealth and in-person services from February 2020 to June 2021. Survey questions addressed telehealth practices (e.g., policies, support resources), monthly service utilization, telehealth modality (videoconferencing vs. telephony), and missed appointments. Results: Programs varied in the proportion of appointments delivered by telehealth prior to the pandemic (February 2020; 0-27%). By May 2020 all programs were providing a majority of visits via telehealth (64-100%). In June 2021, all programs continued to provide services via telehealth (41% to 100%) and reported that they would continue to do so moving forward. Programs addressed many challenges to telehealth provision during the study period, including adding interpreter services, technological support for providers and patients, and formalizing safety and training requirements. Conclusion: Academic child and adolescent psychiatry programs provided outpatient services primarily via telehealth throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and reported that they planned to continue utilizing telehealth in combination with in-person services moving forward. Academic programs should therefore address logistical, technological, and financial barriers to the sustained use of telehealth.
ABSTRACT
In 2020, we wrote to you of our dedication and vision for JAACAP "to be antiracist at every level."1 Over the last 3 years, we have pursued initiatives "to reshape the Journal to pursue this vision."2,3 In this article, we provide an update on these goals and initiatives (Figure 1). With the launching of our new open access journal, JAACAP Open,4 in late 2022, we now extend these initiatives to both scientific journals in the JAACAP family and aspire to be a leader among mental health journals in our intentional pursuit of antiracist policies and practices.
Subject(s)
Editorial Policies , Writing , HumansABSTRACT
A National Academy of Medicine report published in 1993 defined disparities in health care as "a difference in access or treatment provided to members of different racial or ethnic groups that is not justified by the underlying health conditions or treatment preferences of the groups."1 Disparities in access to and quality of mental health services have persisted for racially minoritized children and for many rural communities in the United States. The global pandemic has taken an enormous toll on the mental health and well-being of youth and their families and has exacerbated preexisting needs.2 The rapid expansion of telehealth capacity, providing services via text, telephone, or video, has provided access to a spectrum of services for individuals and expert consultation for partners in low-resource communities. Telehealth has demonstrated effectiveness for lowering the barriers to seeking treatment in rural communities for youth with suicidality, depression, and anxiety.3 However, disenfranchised, low-income populations lacking sufficient in-person care or internet broadband to support telepsychiatry services or who encounter other barriers, such as underinsurance or no insurance and limited cultural and linguistic matched services, continue to have poor access to care and are at risk for disparate outcomes.4 In the midst of a pandemic and an accelerated child and adolescent mental health emergency in the United States, disparities in access to services presents a crisis within a crisis. Is the services landscape shifting to address the need?