Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 89
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Cell ; 169(7): 1303-1314.e18, 2017 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28602352

ABSTRACT

Cytoplasmic dynein-1 binds dynactin and cargo adaptor proteins to form a transport machine capable of long-distance processive movement along microtubules. However, it is unclear why dynein-1 moves poorly on its own or how it is activated by dynactin. Here, we present a cryoelectron microscopy structure of the complete 1.4-megadalton human dynein-1 complex in an inhibited state known as the phi-particle. We reveal the 3D structure of the cargo binding dynein tail and show how self-dimerization of the motor domains locks them in a conformation with low microtubule affinity. Disrupting motor dimerization with structure-based mutagenesis drives dynein-1 into an open form with higher affinity for both microtubules and dynactin. We find the open form is also inhibited for movement and that dynactin relieves this by reorienting the motor domains to interact correctly with microtubules. Our model explains how dynactin binding to the dynein-1 tail directly stimulates its motor activity.


Subject(s)
Cytoplasmic Dyneins/chemistry , Multiprotein Complexes/chemistry , Animals , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Cytoplasmic Dyneins/metabolism , Cytoplasmic Dyneins/ultrastructure , Dimerization , Dynactin Complex/chemistry , Dynactin Complex/metabolism , Humans , Mice , Microtubules/chemistry , Microtubules/metabolism , Models, Molecular , Molecular Motor Proteins/chemistry , Molecular Motor Proteins/metabolism , Multiprotein Complexes/metabolism , Multiprotein Complexes/ultrastructure , Sf9 Cells , Spodoptera , Swine
2.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 82(1): 35-47, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35725297

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Recent insights supporting the safety of live-attenuated vaccines and novel studies on the immunogenicity of vaccinations in the era of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in paediatric patients with autoimmune/inflammatory rheumatic diseases (pedAIIRD) necessitated updating the EULAR recommendations. METHODS: Recommendations were developed using the EULAR standard operating procedures. Two international expert committees were formed to update the vaccination recommendations for both paediatric and adult patients with AIIRD. After a systematic literature review, separate recommendations were formulated for paediatric and adult patients. For pedAIIRD, six overarching principles and seven recommendations were formulated and provided with the level of evidence, strength of recommendation and Task Force level of agreement. RESULTS: In general, the National Immunisation Programmes (NIP) should be followed and assessed yearly by the treating specialist. If possible, vaccinations should be administered prior to immunosuppressive drugs, but necessary treatment should never be postponed. Non-live vaccines can be safely given to immunosuppressed pedAIIRD patients. Mainly, seroprotection is preserved in patients receiving vaccinations on immunosuppression, except for high-dose glucocorticoids and B-cell depleting therapies. Live-attenuated vaccines should be avoided in immunosuppressed patients. However, it is safe to administer the measles-mumps-rubella booster and varicella zoster virus vaccine to immunosuppressed patients under specific conditions. In addition to the NIP, the non-live seasonal influenza vaccination should be strongly considered for immunosuppressed pedAIIRD patients. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended for paediatricians, paediatric rheumatologists, national immunisation agencies, general practitioners, patients and national rheumatology societies to attain safe and effective vaccination and optimal infection prevention in immunocompromised pedAIIRD patients.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Autoimmune Diseases , Rheumatic Diseases , Adult , Humans , Child , Vaccines, Attenuated/therapeutic use , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Vaccination/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 62(5): 1926-1935, 2023 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36104094

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Clinicians concerned about long-term safety of biologics in JIA may consider tapering or stopping treatment once remission is achieved despite uncertainty in maintaining drug-free remission. This analysis aims to (i) calculate how many patients with JIA stop biologics for remission, (ii) calculate how many later re-start therapy and after how long, and (iii) identify factors associated with re-starting biologics. METHODS: Patients starting biologics between 1 January 2010 and 7 September 2021 in the UK JIA Biologics Register were included. Patients stopping biologics for physician-reported remission, those re-starting biologics and factors associated with re-starting, were identified. Multiple imputation accounted for missing data. RESULTS: Of 1451 patients with median follow-up of 2.7 years (IQR 1.4, 4.0), 269 (19%) stopped biologics for remission after a median of 2.2 years (IQR 1.7, 3.0). Of those with follow-up data (N = 220), 118 (54%) later re-started therapy after a median of 4.7 months, with 84% re-starting the same biologic. Patients on any-line tocilizumab (prior to stopping) were less likely to re-start biologics (vs etanercept; odds ratio [OR] 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.7), while those with a longer disease duration prior to biologics (OR 1.1 per year increase; 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2) or prior uveitis were more likely to re-start biologics (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.3, 4.9). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis identified factors associated with successful cessation of biologics for remission in JIA as absence of uveitis, prior treatment with tocilizumab and starting biologics earlier in the disease course. Further research is needed to guide clinical recommendations.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Juvenile , Biological Products , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Biological Therapy
4.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(6): 1391-1397, 2020 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605484

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the occurrence of newly diagnosed uveitis in children with JIA receiving MTX, etanercept, adalimumab and infliximab. METHODS: This on-drug analysis included patients within UK JIA registries (British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study and Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases) with non-systemic disease, registered at MTX or biologic start with no history of uveitis. Follow-up began from date of first treatment, continuing until first uveitis, discontinuation of registered drug, most recent follow-up up or death, whichever came first. Hazard ratios comparing risk of uveitis between drugs were calculated using propensity-adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 2294 patients were included (943 MTX, 304 adalimumab/infliximab, 1047 etanercept). There were 44 reported cases of uveitis (27 MTX, 16 etanercept, 1 adalimumab). Unadjusted hazard ratio showed a reduced risk of uveitis in biologic cohorts compared with MTX. After adjusting for propensity deciles, there was no significant difference in the risk of uveitis between patients receiving etanercept or MTX [hazard ratio 0.5 (0.2-1.1)]. Fully adjusted comparisons were not possible for adalimumab/infliximab as there were too few events. CONCLUSIONS: In this first paper to compare the rate of new onset uveitis across the three main anti-TNF therapies used in JIA, a new diagnosis of uveitis is less common among patients starting biologics compared with MTX, although this did not reach statistical significance. The suggested protective effect of etanercept is likely explained by confounding, whereby patients in the MTX cohort are younger and earlier in disease, and therefore at greater risk of developing uveitis compared with etanercept patients.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects , Uveitis/chemically induced , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Etanercept/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Infliximab/adverse effects , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Registries , Risk Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Uveitis/epidemiology
5.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(1): 94-102, 2019 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30137641

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To investigate real-world short-term outcomes among patients with systemic JIA starting tocilizumab or anakinra. Methods: This analysis included all systemic JIA patients within the UK Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study starting tocilizumab or anakinra between 2010 and 2016. Disease activity was assessed at baseline and one year. At one year the following outcomes were assessed: minimal disease activity, clinically inactive disease, 90% ACR Paediatric response (ACRPedi90). Univariable logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with these outcomes. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results: Seventy-six systemic JIA patients were included (54 tocilizumab; 22 anakinra). More patients starting anakinra as their first biologic compared with tocilizumab (86% vs 63%; P = 0.04), with shorter disease duration (1 vs 2 years; P = 0.003) and higher frequency of prior macrophage activation syndrome (37% vs 8%; P = 0.004). Overall, at one year, 42% achieved ACRPedi90, 51% minimal disease activity, and 39% clinically inactive disease, with similar responses seen between the two drugs. Response was not associated with baseline disease characteristics. Fifteen (20%) patients stopped biologic treatment by one year. Treatment survival was better with tocilizumab (89% at one year vs 59% anakinra; P = 0.002), with three stopping for anakinra injection-related problems. Conclusion: In this real-world cohort of patients with systemic JIA receiving tocilizumab or anakinra, approximately half achieved a minimal disease state by one year. Treatment responses appeared similar between the two therapies albeit with better persistence observed with tocilizumab.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Logistic Models , Male , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(2): 331-335, 2019 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30358861

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Rituximab (RTX) may be a treatment option for children and young people with JIA, although it is not licensed for this indication. The aim of this study was to describe RTX use and outcomes among children with JIA. Methods: This analysis included all JIA patients within the UK Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study starting RTX. Disease activity was assessed at RTX start and at follow-up. The total number of courses each patient received was assessed. Serious infections and infusion reactions occurring following RTX were reported. Results: Forty-one JIA patients starting RTX were included, the majority with polyarthritis: polyarthritis RF negative [n = 14 (35%)], polyarthritis RF positive [n = 13 (33%)] and extended oligoarthritis [n = 9 (23%)]. Most were female (80%) with a median age of 15 years [interquartile range (IQR) 12-16] and a median disease duration of 9 years (IQR 5-11). The median improvement in the clinical Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (cJADAS; three-variable 71-joint JADAS) from RTX start was 9 units (n = 7; IQR -14-2). More than half reported more than one course of RTX. The median time between each course was 219 days (IQR 198-315). During follow-up, 17 (41%) patients reported switching to another biologic, including tocilizumab (n = 8), abatacept (n = 6) and TNF inhibitor (n = 3). Three patients (7%) reported a serious infection on RTX (rate of first serious infection 6.2/100 person-years). Four patients (10%) reported an infusion reaction. Conclusions: This real-world cohort of children with JIA, the majority with polyarticular or extended oligoarticular JIA, showed RTX may be an effective treatment option for children who do not respond to TNF inhibitor, with a low rate of serious infections on treatment.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Biological Products/adverse effects , Child , Cohort Studies , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injection Site Reaction/etiology , Male , Opportunistic Infections/chemically induced , Registries , Rituximab/adverse effects , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30851113

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This analysis aims to calculate MTX monotherapy persistence and describe the occurrence of and factors associated with the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) with MTX. METHODS: Patients with JIA starting MTX monotherapy from two UK studies were included. Patient characteristics, treatment details and ADR occurrence were collected at treatment start, 6 months, 1 year and annually. The following groups of ADRs were included: gastrointestinal, elevated liver enzymes, leukopenia, drug hypersensitivity, rash, needle phobia and any events leading to permanent MTX discontinuation. Treatment exposure was calculated from MTX start until MTX monotherapy cessation, last follow-up or 31 December 2017 (cut-off), whichever came first. Survival analysis assessed the time on MTX monotherapy and the time to the first ADR on MTX monotherapy within 2 years. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics associated with any ADR and gastrointestinal ADRs. RESULTS: A total of 577 patients started MTX. At 2 years, 310 (54%) were no longer on MTX monotherapy. Reasons included ineffectiveness (60%; 161/185 started a biologic), adverse event (25%), remission (8%) and patient/family decision (3%). Over this time, 212 (37%) patients experienced one or more ADR; commonly gastrointestinal (68%) or elevated liver enzymes (26%). Lower physician global assessment and older age predicted any ADR and gastrointestinal ADR, respectively. Patients with polyarticular RF and JIA had reduced odds of both any ADR and a gastrointestinal ADR. CONCLUSION: After 2 years, more than half the patients were no longer on MTX monotherapy, while more than one-third experienced one or more ADR, most commonly gastrointestinal. Research focusing on identifying which children will respond and/or experience ADRs is crucial to inform treatment decisions and management planning.

8.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 58(7): 1188-1195, 2019 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30668879

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the paediatric rheumatology (PR) services in Europe, describe current delivery of care and training, set standards for care, identify unmet needs and inform future specialist service provision. METHODS: An online survey was developed and presented to national coordinating centres of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) (country survey) and to individual PR centres (centre and disease surveys) as a part of the European Union (EU) Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe project. The survey contained components covering the organization of PR care, composition of teams, education, health care and research facilities and assessment of needs. RESULTS: Response rates were 29/35 (83%) for country surveys and 164/288 (57%) for centre surveys. Across the EU, approximately one paediatric rheumatologist is available per million population. In all EU member states there is good access to specialist care and medications, although biologic drug availability is worse in Eastern European countries. PR education is widely available for physicians but is insufficient for allied health professionals. The ability to participate in clinical trials is generally high. Important gaps were identified, including lack of standardized clinical guidelines/recommendations and insufficient adolescent transition management planning. CONCLUSION: This study provides a comprehensive description of current specialist PR service provision across Europe and did not reveal any major differences between EU member states. Rarity, chronicity and complexity of diseases are major challenges to PR care. Future work should facilitate the development, dissemination and implementation of standards of care, treatment and service recommendations to further improve patient-centred health care across Europe.


Subject(s)
Child Health Services/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Rheumatology/organization & administration , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Biomedical Research/statistics & numerical data , Child , Child Health Services/standards , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Drug Monitoring/methods , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Education, Medical/organization & administration , Education, Medical/standards , Europe , Health Care Surveys , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Rheumatology/education , Rheumatology/standards , Standard of Care , Transition to Adult Care/organization & administration , Transition to Adult Care/standards
9.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(12): 1710-1719, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30269054

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab in patients with active systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Patients (2-19 years) entered two phase III studies and continued in the long-term extension (LTE) study. Efficacy assessments were performed every 3 months, including adapted JIA American College of Rheumatology (aJIA-ACR) criteria, Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS) and ACR clinical remission on medication criteria (CRACR). Efficacy analyses are reported as per the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS: 144 of the 177 patients (81%) enrolled in the core study entered the LTE. Overall, 75 patients (42%) completed and 102 (58%) discontinued mainly for inefficacy (63/102, 62%), with higher discontinuation rates noted in the late responders group (n=25/31, 81%) versus early responders (n=11/38, 29%). At 2 years, aJIA-ACR 50/70/90 response rates were 62%, 61% and 54%, respectively. CRACR was achieved by 20% of patients at month 6; 32% at 2 years. A JADAS low disease activity score was achieved by 49% of patients at 2 years. Efficacy results were maintained up to 5 years. Of the 128/177 (72.3%) patients on glucocorticoids, 20 (15.6%) discontinued and 28 (22%) tapered to 0.150 mg/kg/day. Seven patients discontinued canakinumab due to CR. There were 13 macrophage activation syndrome (three previously reported) and no additional deaths (three previously reported). No new safety findings were observed. CONCLUSION: Response to canakinumab treatment was sustained and associated with substantial glucocorticoid dose reduction or discontinuation and a relatively low retention-on-treatment rate. No new safety findings were observed on long-term use of canakinumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT00886769, NCT00889863, NCT00426218 and NCT00891046.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Adolescent , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
10.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(3): 319-327, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29021237

ABSTRACT

Innovative research in childhood rheumatic diseases mandates international collaborations. However, researchers struggle with significant regulatory heterogeneity; an enabling European Union (EU)-wide framework is missing. The aims of the study were to systematically review the evidence for best practice and to establish recommendations for collaborative research. The Paediatric Rheumatology European Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) project enabled a scoping review and expert discussion, which then informed the systematic literature review. Published evidence was synthesised; recommendations were drafted. An iterative review process and consultations with Ethics Committees and European experts for ethical and legal aspects of paediatric research refined the recommendations. SHARE experts and patient representatives vetted the proposed recommendations at a consensus meeting using Nominal Group Technique. Agreement of 80% was mandatory for inclusion. The systematic literature review returned 1319 records. A total of 223 full-text publications plus 22 international normative documents were reviewed; 85 publications and 16 normative documents were included. A total of 21 recommendations were established including general principles (1-3), ethics (4-7), paediatric principles (8 and 9), consent to paediatric research (10-14), paediatric databank and biobank (15 and 16), sharing of data and samples (17-19), and commercialisation and third parties (20 and 21). The refined recommendations resulted in an agreement of >80% for all recommendations. The SHARE initiative established the first recommendations for Paediatric Rheumatology collaborative research across borders in Europe. These provide strong support for an urgently needed European framework and evidence-based guidance for its implementation. Such changes will promote research in children with rheumatic diseases.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/methods , Pediatrics/organization & administration , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Rheumatology/organization & administration , Biological Specimen Banks/standards , Biomedical Research/organization & administration , Biomedical Research/standards , Child , Consensus , Ethics, Research , Europe , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Pediatrics/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic
11.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 57(1): 140-151, 2018 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29069424

ABSTRACT

Objective: Timely access to holistic multidisciplinary care is the core principle underpinning management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Data collected in national clinical audit programmes fundamentally aim to improve health outcomes of disease, ensuring clinical care is equitable, safe and patient-centred. The aim of this study was to develop a tool for national audit of JIA in the UK. Methods: A staged and consultative methodology was used across a broad group of relevant stakeholders to develop a national audit tool, with reference to pre-existing standards of care for JIA. The tool comprises key service delivery quality measures assessed against two aspects of impact, namely disease-related outcome measures and patient/carer reported outcome and experience measures. Results: Eleven service-related quality measures were identified, including those that map to current standards for commissioning of JIA clinical services in the UK. The three-variable Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score and presence/absence of sacro-iliitis in patients with enthesitis-related arthritis were identified as the primary disease-related outcome measures, with presence/absence of uveitis a secondary outcome. Novel patient/carer reported outcomes and patient/carer reported experience measures were developed and face validity confirmed by relevant patient/carer groups. Conclusion: A tool for national audit of JIA has been developed with the aim of benchmarking current clinical practice and setting future standards and targets for improvement. Staged implementation of this national audit tool should facilitate investigation of variability in levels of care and drive quality improvement. This will require engagement from patients and carers, clinical teams and commissioners of JIA services.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Referral and Consultation , Adolescent , Arthritis, Juvenile/physiopathology , Caregivers , Child , Clinical Audit , Disease Management , Humans , Injections, Intra-Articular , Patient-Centered Care , Quality Improvement , Reproducibility of Results , Rheumatology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , United Kingdom
12.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 76(4): 639-646, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27802961

ABSTRACT

To develop standards and recommendations for transitional care for young people (YP) with juvenile-onset rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (jRMD). The consensus process involved the following: (1) establishing an international expert panel to include patients and representatives from multidisciplinary teams in adult and paediatric rheumatology; (2) a systematic review of published models of transitional care in jRMDs, potential standards and recommendations, strategies for implementation and tools to evaluate services and outcomes; (3) setting the framework, developing the process map and generating a first draft of standards and recommendations; (4) further iteration of recommendations; (5) establishing consensus recommendations with Delphi methodology and (6) establishing standards and quality indicators. The final consensus derived 12 specific recommendations for YP with jRMD focused on transitional care. These included: high-quality, multidisciplinary care starting in early adolescence; the integral role of a transition co-ordinator; transition policies and protocols; efficient communications; transfer documentation; an open electronic-based platform to access resources; appropriate training for paediatric and adult healthcare teams; secure funding to continue treatments and services into adult rheumatology and the need for increased evidence to inform best practice. These consensus-based recommendations inform strategies to reach optimal outcomes in transitional care for YP with jRMD based on available evidence and expert opinion. They need to be implemented in the context of individual countries, healthcare systems and regulatory frameworks.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/therapy , Rheumatic Diseases/therapy , Transition to Adult Care , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Communication , Documentation , Humans , Organizational Policy , Patient Care Team , Time Factors , Young Adult
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 22(10): 1720-7, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27648582

ABSTRACT

Severe infections are emerging as major risk factors for death among children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). In particular, children with refractory JIA treated with long-term, multiple, and often combined immunosuppressive and antiinflammatory agents, including the new biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), are at increased risk for severe infections and death. We investigated 4 persons with JIA who died during 1994-2013, three of overwhelming central venous catheter-related bacterial sepsis caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococus or α-hemolytic Streptococcus infection and 1 of disseminated adenovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection). All 4 had active JIA refractory to long-term therapy with multiple and combined conventional and biological DMARDs. Two died while receiving high-dose systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, and after recent exposure to anti-tumor necrosis factor-α biological DMARDs, and 2 during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation procedure. Reporting all cases of severe infections and especially deaths in these children is of paramount importance for accurate surveillance.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/complications , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Sepsis/etiology , Adenovirus Infections, Human/etiology , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Arthritis, Juvenile/mortality , Bacteremia/etiology , Bacteremia/mortality , Child , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/etiology , Fatal Outcome , Female , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Staphylococcal Infections/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Viremia/etiology
14.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 55(7): 1225-34, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27016664

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The medical management of JIA has advanced significantly over the past 10 years. It is not known whether these changes have impacted on outcomes. The aim of this analysis was to identify and describe trends in referral times, treatment times and 1-year outcomes over a 10-year period among children with JIA enrolled in the Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study. METHODS: The Childhood Arthritis Prospective Study is a prospective inception cohort of children with new-onset inflammatory arthritis. Analysis included all children recruited in 2001-11 with at least 1 year of follow-up, divided into four groups by year of diagnosis. Median referral time, baseline disease pattern (oligoarticular, polyarticular or systemic onset) and time to first definitive treatment were compared between groups. Where possible, clinical juvenile arthritis disease activity score (cJADAS) cut-offs were applied at 1 year. RESULTS: One thousand and sixty-six children were included in the analysis. The median time from symptom onset and referral to first paediatric rheumatology appointment (22.7-24.7 and 3.4-4.7 weeks, respectively) did not vary significantly (∼20% seen within 10 weeks of onset and ∼50% within 4 weeks of referral). For oligoarticular and polyarticular disease, 33.8-47 and 25.4-34.9%, respectively, achieved inactive disease by 1 year, with ∼30% in high disease activity at 1 year. A positive trend towards earlier definitive treatment reached significance in oligoarticular and polyarticular pattern disease. CONCLUSION: Children with new-onset JIA have a persistent delay in access to paediatric rheumatology care, with one-third in high disease activity at 1 year and no significant improvement over the past 10 years. Contributing factors may include service pressures and poor awareness. Further research is necessary to gain a better understanding and improve important clinical outcomes.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/therapy , Referral and Consultation/trends , Rheumatology/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Time-to-Treatment/trends , Arthritis, Juvenile/diagnosis , Arthritis, Juvenile/pathology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Rheumatology/methods , Treatment Outcome
15.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 55(9): 1556-65, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26732349

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to describe patients starting first-line biologics for JIA, to describe characteristics over time among patients starting etanercept, and to describe patterns of second biologic prescribing. METHODS: The British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study, and the Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases study are ongoing prospective observational cohorts, collecting data on patients starting biologic therapy for JIA. Patients registered from 1 January 2010 starting their first biologic were compared between therapies. Patients starting etanercept before 2010 were included to analyse changes in etanercept prescribing. The pathway of patients starting a second biologic was recorded in all patients. RESULTS: To 26 August 2014, 931 patients were recruited starting a first-line biologic (142 Biologics for Children with Rheumatic Diseases; 789 British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Etanercept Cohort Study). From 2010, patients with systemic JIA (sJIA) were almost exclusively prescribed anakinra or tocilizumab. Choice between anti-TNF therapies was largely driven by history of chronic anterior uveitis (CAU). When investigating trends in patients starting etanercept over time, disease duration at etanercept start, patients with sJIA, a history of CAU, and those who received concomitant oral corticosteroids decreased over time. Patients who started a second biologic from 1 January 2010 showed a similar stratification. CONCLUSION: Although etanercept remains the most common biologic prescribed for JIA, there has been a clear shift towards the use of alternative biologics, largely driven by disease subtype and history of CAU. This channelling of children towards specific therapies should be considered carefully in future studies and in clinical guidelines and ongoing research.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Clinical Decision-Making , Drug Substitution , Female , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Interleukin 1 Receptor Antagonist Protein/therapeutic use , Male , Prospective Studies , Registries
16.
BMC Med Educ ; 16(1): 277, 2016 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27765034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Structured examination routines have been developed as educational resources for musculoskeletal clinical skills teaching, including Gait-Arms-Legs-Spine (GALS), Regional Examination of the Musculoskeletal System (REMS) and paediatric GALS (pGALS). In this study, we aimed to assess the awareness and use of these examination routines in undergraduate medical teaching in UK medical schools and UK postgraduate clinical practice. METHODS: Electronic questionnaires were distributed to adult and paediatric musculoskeletal teaching leads at UK medical schools and current UK doctors in training. RESULTS: Responses were received from 67 tutors representing teaching at 22/33 [67 %] of all UK medical schools, and 70 trainee doctors across a range of postgraduate training specialities. There was widespread adoption, at responding medical schools, of the adult examination routines within musculoskeletal teaching (GALS: 14/16 [88 %]; REMS: 12/16 [75 %]) and assessment (GALS: 13/16 [81 %]; REMS: 12/16 [75 %]). More trainees were aware of GALS (64/70 [91 %]) than REMS (14/67 [21 %]). Of the 39 trainees who used GALS in their clinical practice, 35/39 [90 %] reported that it had improved their confidence in musculoskeletal examination. Of the 17/22 responding medical schools that included paediatric musculoskeletal examination within their curricula, 15/17 [88 %] used the pGALS approach and this was included within student assessment at 4 medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the widespread adoption of these examination routines in undergraduate education and significant uptake in postgraduate clinical practice. Further study is required to understand their impact upon clinical performance.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Undergraduate/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Physical Examination , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching , United Kingdom
17.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 54(7): 1294-301, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25661469

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Young people with inflammatory arthritis can have severe disease warranting biologic therapy. They face complex treatment decisions, with profound consequences. This study aimed to explore the influence of individuals outside the care team (trusted others) on the treatment decisions made by young people, in particular their decisions about biologic therapies. METHODS: Young people (16-25 years of age) with inflammatory arthritis and experience of treatment decision making were recruited from three NHS Hospital Trusts. Twenty-five were interviewed, plus 11 trusted others identified by young people as being involved in their decision making, as well as 6 health professionals. The data were analysed using coding, memoing and mapping techniques and the findings were tested through a series of focus groups. RESULTS: Young people initially emphasized their decisional autonomy, typically describing people other than health professionals as limited in influence. However, discussions revealed the involvement--in deliberation and enactment--of a range of other people. This cast of trusted others was small and largely consistent; mothers played a particularly prominent role, providing cognitive, practical and emotional support. Members of the wider cast of trusted others were involved in more limited but still significant ways. CONCLUSION: Young people claim autonomy but other people enable this. The network of relationships in which they are embedded is distinctive and evolving. Mothers play a supporting role well into early adulthood; in contrast, partners are involved in far more limited ways. As such, the applicability of adult models of decision making is unclear. This must be taken into account if the support provided by professionals is to be optimally tailored to young people's needs.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Decision Making , Health Personnel/psychology , Parents/psychology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/drug therapy , Trust/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Arthritis, Juvenile/psychology , Arthritis, Psoriatic/drug therapy , Arthritis, Psoriatic/psychology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/psychology , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/psychology , State Medicine , United Kingdom , Young Adult
18.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 79(3): 379-94, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24750505

ABSTRACT

The development of biological agents with specific immunological targets has revolutionized the treatment of a wide variety of paediatric diseases where traditional immunosuppressive agents have been partly ineffective or intolerable. The increasing requirement for pharmaceutical companies to undertake paediatric studies has provided impetus for studies of biologics in children. The assessment of biological agents in children to date has largely relied upon randomized controlled trials using a withdrawal design, rather than a parallel study design. This approach has been largely used due to ethical concerns, including use of placebo treatments in children with active chronic disease, and justified on the basis that treatments have usually already undergone robust assessment in related adult conditions. However, this study design limits the reliability of the data and can confuse the interpretation of safety results. Careful ongoing monitoring of safety and efficacy in real-world practice through national and international biologics registries and robust reporting systems is crucial. The most commonly used biological agents in children target tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. These agents are most frequently used in paediatric rheumatic diseases. This review discusses the development and assessment of biologics within paediatric rheumatology with reference to the lessons learned from use in other subspecialties.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Biological Products , Drug Discovery/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Autoimmune Diseases/immunology , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Biological Products/adverse effects , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Child , Humans , Research Design , Treatment Outcome
19.
BMC Med Educ ; 15: 171, 2015 Oct 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26449878

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Children present commonly with musculoskeletal (MSK) problems, due to a spectrum of causes including potentially life threatening disease, to doctors in varied health care settings. However, doctors involved in the care of children report a lack of confidence in their paediatric musculoskeletal (pMSK) clinical skills and many have little exposure to pMSK teaching. There is no current guidance on the pMSK clinical skills and knowledge required for medical students. The objective of this study was to achieve consensus amongst experts on the learning outcomes for a pMSK curriculum for medical students. METHODS: This was a two-phase study. In Phase one, pMSK educational topics and categories were identified from UK medical students and experts (recruited from pMSK medicine, child health, education and primary care) utilising focus groups and interviews. These themes and concepts informed the structure of learning outcomes that were presented to a Delphi panel in Phase two, with the aim of achieving consensus on the final content of the curriculum. RESULTS: In Phase 1 participants identified pMSK skills, knowledge and attitudes relevant for medical students. This content was translated into learning outcomes. In Phase 2, the proposed outcomes were submitted to scrutiny by a two-iteration Delphi process with experts in the field. The agreed learning outcomes (n = 45) were either generic to child health or specific to pMSK medicine, and related to history taking and examination, knowledge about normal development, key clinical presentation and conditions, approaches to investigation and referral pathways. DISCUSSION: This study has identified evidence and consensu based content for a pMSK curriculum for medical students, derived from key stakeholders and to be integrated into medical student pMSK teaching. CONCLUSION: It is envisaged that implementation of this content will equip graduating doctors with relevant and important skills and knowledge to assess children with MSK presentations, and facilitate early diagnosis and referral to specialist care.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical/standards , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Child , Clinical Competence , Consensus , Curriculum , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal System , Pediatrics/education , United Kingdom
20.
Immunology ; 142(2): 227-36, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24405357

ABSTRACT

Children with systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA), the most severe subtype of JIA, are at risk from destructive polyarthritis and growth failure, and corticosteroids as part of conventional treatment can result in osteoporosis and growth delay. In children where there is failure or toxicity from drug therapies, disease has been successfully controlled by T-cell-depleted autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). At present, the immunological basis underlying remission after ASCT is unknown. Immune reconstitution of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, natural killer T cells and monocytes, in parallel with T-cell receptor (TCR) diversity by analysis of the ß variable region (TCRVb) complementarity determining region-3 (CDR3) using spectratyping and sequencing, were studied in five children with sJIA before and after ASCT. At time of follow up (mean 11.5 years), four patients remain in complete remission, while one child relapsed within 1 month of transplant. The CD8(+) TCRVb repertoire was highly oligoclonal early in immune reconstitution and re-emergence of pre-transplant TCRVb CDR3 dominant peaks was observed after transplant in certain TCRVb families. Further, re-emergence of pre-ASCT clonal sequences in addition to new sequences was identified after transplant. These results suggest that a chimeric TCR repertoire, comprising T-cell clones developed before and after transplant, can be associated with clinical remission from severe arthritis.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Juvenile/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphocyte Depletion , Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Arthritis, Juvenile/therapy , Child , Clone Cells/immunology , Clone Cells/metabolism , Female , Humans , Male , T-Lymphocytes/cytology , Transplantation, Autologous
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL