ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) has demonstrated clinically relevant reductions in blood pressure (BP) among individuals with uncontrolled hypertension despite lifestyle intervention and medications. The safety and effectiveness of alcohol-mediated RDN have not been formally studied in this indication. METHODS: TARGET BP I is a prospective, international, sham-controlled, randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded trial investigating the safety and efficacy of alcohol-mediated RDN. Patients with office systolic BP (SBP) ≥150 and ≤180 mm Hg, office diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP ≥135 and ≤170 mm Hg despite prescription of 2 to 5 antihypertensive medications were enrolled. The primary end point was the baseline-adjusted change in mean 24-hour ambulatory SBP 3 months after the procedure. Secondary end points included mean between-group differences in office and ambulatory BP at additional time points. RESULTS: Among 301 patients randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control, RDN was associated with a significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP at 3 months (mean±SD, -10.0±14.2 mm Hg versus -6.8±12.1 mm Hg; treatment difference, -3.2 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.3 to 0.0]; P=0.0487). Subgroup analysis of the primary end point revealed no significant interaction across predefined subgroups. At 3 months, the mean change in office SBP was -12.7±18.3 and -9.7±17.3 mm Hg (difference, -3.0 [95% CI, -7.0 to 1.0]; P=0.173) for RDN and sham, respectively. No significant differences in ambulatory or office diastolic BP were observed. Adverse safety events through 6 months were uncommon, with one instance of accessory renal artery dissection in the RDN group (0.7%). No significant between-group differences in medication changes or patient adherence were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol-mediated RDN was associated with a modest but statistically significant reduction in 24-hour ambulatory SBP compared with sham control. No significant differences between groups in office BP or 6-month major adverse events were observed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02910414.
Subject(s)
Antihypertensive Agents , Blood Pressure , Hypertension , Kidney , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/surgery , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Aged , Kidney/innervation , Prospective Studies , Ethanol/adverse effects , Ethanol/administration & dosage , Ethanol/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Sympathectomy/adverse effects , Sympathectomy/methods , Renal Artery/innervationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative is a single-arm, prospective, multicenter study to assess outcomes associated with early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Between July 2016 and February 2019, 35 sites participated and enrolled into the study. All centers agreed to treat patients with AMICS using a standard protocol emphasizing invasive hemodynamic monitoring and rapid initiation of MCS. Inclusion and exclusion criteria mimicked those of the "SHOCK" trial with an additional exclusion criteria of intra-aortic balloon pump counter-pulsation prior to MCS. RESULTS: A total of 171 consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients had an average age of 63 years, 77% were male, and 68% were admitted with AMICS. About 83% of patients were on vasopressors or inotropes, 20% had a witnessed out of hospital cardiac arrest, 29% had in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 10% were under active cardiopulmonary resuscitation during MCS implantation. In accordance with the protocol, 74% of patients had MCS implanted prior to PCI. Right heart catheterization was performed in 92%. About 78% of patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction with average door to support times of 85 ± 63 min and door to balloon times of 87 ± 58 min. Survival to discharge was 72%. Creatinine ≥2, lactate >4, cardiac power output (CPO) <0.6 W, and age ≥ 70 years were predictors of mortality. Lactate and CPO measurements at 12-24 hr reliably predicted overall mortality postindex procedure. CONCLUSION: In contemporary practice, use of a shock protocol emphasizing best practices is associated with improved outcomes.
Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Heart-Assist Devices , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Aged , Female , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Shock, Cardiogenic/diagnosis , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate safety and effectiveness of the iCAST Covered Stent for treatment of iliac artery atherosclerotic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The iCARUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00593385) was a single-arm, prospective, multicenter study that enrolled 152 per protocol subjects at 25 sites in the United States and Germany. Subjects with multiple lesions and/or stents were eligible. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of death within 30 days, target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 9 months, or restenosis at 9 months after procedure. Secondary endpoints included major adverse vascular events (MAVEs), primary patency, freedom from TLR, and clinical success. RESULTS: Device and acute procedural success were achieved in 98.7% and 92.7% of cases, respectively. MAVE rate was 4.6% at 30 days. The 9-month primary composite endpoint rate was 8.1% (10/123), which was below the performance goal of 16.57%. Nine-month primary patency, defined as continuous flow without revascularization, bypass, or target limb amputation, was 96.4%. Freedom from TLR at 9 months and 3 years was 97.2% and 86.6%, respectively. Early clinical success was seen in 88.7% of subjects at 30 days with sustained clinical benefit in 72.4% of subjects at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The iCARUS study demonstrated that the iCAST Covered Stent was safe and effective for treatment of atherosclerotic iliac artery lesions with sustained clinical benefit out to 3 years.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Iliac Artery , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Stents , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Angioplasty, Balloon/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon/mortality , Female , Germany , Humans , Iliac Artery/diagnostic imaging , Iliac Artery/physiopathology , Limb Salvage , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Progression-Free Survival , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Risk Factors , Time Factors , United States , Vascular PatencyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To validate 3 angiographic scoring systems for peripheral artery calcification using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) as the gold standard. METHODS: The study employed preprocedure angiography and IVUS data from 47 patients (median age 72 years; 34 men) in the 55-patient JetStream G3 Calcium Study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01273623) to validate the 3 angiographic scoring systems [Peripheral Academic Research Consortium (PARC), Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS), and the DEFINITIVE Ca++ trial]. Preprocedure angiograms were analyzed using conventional quantitative vessel analysis software in 2 orthogonal views. Calcium length was evaluated by markers placed beside the artery during the procedure; calcium deposit(s) were assessed as being on one or both sides of the vessel wall. The 3 calcium scoring systems used these 2 basic angiographic elements to evaluate calcium severity. Based on these criteria, calcium severity varied from none to focal, mild, moderate, or severe in PARC; grade 0 to 4 in PACSS; and none, moderate, or severe in the DEFINITIVE Ca++ system. Calcium location on IVUS was classified as superficial, deep, or mixed. Lesion length was the segment between the most normal looking proximal and distal reference sites. Superficial, deep, and calcium length were based on motorized IVUS pullback. RESULTS: IVUS detected calcium in 44/47 (93.6%) lesions, and angiography detected calcium in 26/47 (55.3%) lesions (p<0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of angiography relative to IVUS were 59%, 100%, 100%, and 14%, respectively. With increasing severity of angiographic calcium, there was a stepwise increase in the prevalence of IVUS superficial calcium and the maximum arc and length of superficial calcium. Using PARC criteria, with increasing severity of calcification, IVUS maximum calcium arc increased from 120° for none to 305° for severe (p<0.001); the length of calcium increased from 7 to 68 mm (p<0.001). Though a similar trend was seen in IVUS superficial calcium, it was not observed in IVUS deep calcium. Similar observations were seen when using the PACSS and DEFINITIVE Ca++ scoring systems. CONCLUSION: IVUS confirmed that the PARC, PACSS, and DEFINITIVE Ca++ calcium scoring systems can be used to classify the degree of calcium in peripheral artery disease, especially superficial calcium.
Subject(s)
Angiography/methods , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness IndexABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized CABANA study was to evaluate periprocedural clinical outcomes in high surgical risk patients with carotid artery stenosis treated with the Carotid WALLSTENT plus FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection System by a diverse group of clinicians. BACKGROUND: There is a need for additional evidence evaluating carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed by operators with various experience and training levels. METHODS: The study enrolled symptomatic (≥50% carotid artery stenosis) and asymptomatic (≥80% carotid stenosis) patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy. Study centers were grouped into three tiers based on previous CAS experience while individual operators were grouped by their CAS training. The primary endpoint was the 30-day composite of major adverse events [MAEs; including stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI)]. Individual event rates were evaluated across the overall study, and by center experience and physician training tier. RESULTS: Of 1,097 enrolled patients, 1,025 were evaluable for 30-day MAE rate. The stroke rate (3.3%) was a major contributing factor in the overall MAE rate (4.6%). Mortality was 1.3% and the MI rate was 0.5%. There was no statistically significant association between MAE rates among the center experience tiers (P = 0.61) nor among the operator training categories (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: CAS with the Carotid WALLSTENT and FilterWire EZ yielded a low 30-day MAE rate that did not differ significantly across operator experience and training levels. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00741091.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty/instrumentation , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty/adverse effects , Angioplasty/mortality , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carotid Stenosis/diagnosis , Carotid Stenosis/mortality , Embolic Protection Devices , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke/etiology , Stroke/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reduction in distal vascular volume in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant predictor of 30- and 90-day mortality. The likely cause of this is pulmonary arterial obstruction. The effect of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PM-CDT) on the occlusions of these pulmonary artery (PA) branches is not known. OBJECTIVES: The RESCUE study evaluated PM-CDT with the Bashir endovascular catheter in patients with acute intermediate-risk PE. This analysis assessed PA occlusions using core laboratory data before and after PM-CDT therapy. METHODS: The baseline and 48-hour post-treatment contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography angiography of PE patients with right ventricular dilatation enrolled in the RESCUE trial were used. The primary analysis was the change in the number of segmental and proximal PA branches with total or subtotal (>65%) occlusions after 48 hours compared to baseline using McNemar's test. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients enrolled across 18 United States sites comprised this analysis. At 48 hours post-PM-CDT, the number of segmental PA branches with total or subtotal occlusions decreased from 40.5% to 11.7% (P < 0.0001). Proximal PA branch total or subtotal occlusions decreased from 28.7% to 11.0% (P < 0.0001). The reduction in segmental artery occlusions correlated significantly with the magnitude of reduction in right ventricular/left ventricular ratio (correlation coefficient of 0.287 [95% CI: 0.102-0.452]; P= 0.0026), whereas that in the proximal PA arteries did not (correlation coefficient of 0.132 [95% CI: 0.059-0.314] P= 0.173). CONCLUSIONS: PM-CDT with the Bashir catheter was associated with a significant reduction in total and subtotal occlusion of segmental and proximal PAs.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT: The American Heart Association scientific statement on cardiogenic shock and the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative have provided the impetus to advance knowledge and development of national guidelines for cardiogenic shock. We evaluate the current state of knowledge surrounding cardiogenic shock and limitations to the development of national guidelines.
Subject(s)
American Heart Association , Shock, Cardiogenic , Humans , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , United StatesABSTRACT
We present a case of a 56-year-old patient with a symptomatic right coronary artery to pulmonary artery fistula who underwent coil embolization. Post-procedure, the patient developed ventricular fibrillation that was refractory to antiarrhythmic medications and numerous attempts at defibrillation. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
ABSTRACT
Infective endocarditis of the mitral valve that is refractory to medical therapy requires surgical debridement. However, patients who are high risk for surgery have limited options. We report 3 cases of refractory infective endocarditis involving the mitral valve that were treated with percutaneous mechanical aspiration with an embolic protection system. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) has been associated with rapid recovery of right ventricular (RV) function. The Bashir catheter was developed for enhanced thrombolysis in large vessels such as the pulmonary arteries (PAs) with lower doses of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tPA infused using a pharmacomechanical (PM) CDT device called the Bashir endovascular catheter in patients with intermediate-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: Patients with symptoms of acute PE with computed tomographic evidence of RV dilatation were enrolled. The Bashir catheter was used to deliver 7 mg tPA into each PA over 5 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was the core laboratory-assessed change in computed tomographic angiography-derived RV/left ventricular (LV) diameter ratio at 48 hours, and the primary safety endpoint was serious adverse events (SAEs) including major bleeding at 72 hours. RESULTS: At 18 U.S. sites, 109 patients were enrolled. The median device placement time was 15 minutes. At 48 hours after PM-CDT, the RV/LV diameter ratio decreased by 0.56 (33.3%; P < 0.0001). PA obstruction as measured by the refined modified Miller index was reduced by 35.9% (P < 0.0001). One patient (0.92%) had 2 SAEs: a retroperitoneal bleed (procedure related) and iliac vein thrombosis (device related). Two other procedure-related SAEs were epistaxis and non-access site hematoma with anemia. CONCLUSIONS: PM-CDT with the Bashir endovascular catheter is associated with a significant reduction in RV/LV diameter ratio and a very low rate of adverse events or major bleeding in patients with intermediate-risk acute PE. The notable finding was a significant reduction in PA obstruction with low-dose tPA. (Recombinant tPA by Endovascular Administration for the Treatment of Submassive PE Using CDT for the Reduction of Thrombus Burden [RESCUE]; NCT04248868).
Subject(s)
Pulmonary Embolism , Tissue Plasminogen Activator , Humans , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Hemorrhage/chemically inducedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A prospective nonrandomized multicenter registry of 160 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted during the 3-month period from March to May 2005. METHODS: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) was performed with the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System (ev3, Inc., Plymouth, MN, USA) as part of an investigational device exemption from the Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: The primary end-point of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after CAS was observed in nine patients (5.6%), including death in four patients (2.5%), nonfatal stroke in five patients (3.1%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in one patient (0.6%). A secondary end-point of technical success (defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%) was achieved in 156 of 160 patients (97.5%). The only independent predictor of death or stroke at 30 days was baseline stenosis severity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CAS with distal embolic protection using the SpideRX™ Embolic Protection System is a reasonable alternative for revascularization of some high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis.
Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Carotid Arteries/pathology , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carotid Stenosis/pathology , Carotid Stenosis/prevention & control , Confidence Intervals , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Significant progress has been made in the percutaneous coronary intervention technique from the days of balloon angioplasty to modern-day metallic drug-eluting stents (DES). Although metallic stents solve a temporary problem of acute recoil following balloon angioplasty, they leave behind a permanent problem implicated in very late events (in addition to neoatherosclerosis). BRS were developed as a potential solution to this permanent problem, but the promise of these devices has been tempered by clinical trials showing increased risk of safety outcomes, both early and late. This is not too dissimilar to the challenges seen with first-generation DES in which refinement of deployment technique, prolongation of dual antiplatelet therapy, and technical iteration mitigated excess risk of very late stent thrombosis, making DES the treatment of choice for coronary artery disease. This white paper discusses the factors potentially implicated in the excess risks, including the scaffold consideration and deployment technique, and outlines patient and lesion selection, implantation technique, and dual antiplatelet therapy considerations to potentially mitigate this excess risk with the first-generation thick strut Absorb scaffold (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois). It remains to be seen whether these considerations together with technical iterations will ultimately close the gap between scaffolds and metal stents for short-term events while at the same time preserving options for future revascularization once the scaffold bioresorbs.
Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Drug-Eluting Stents , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation , Prosthesis Design , Clinical Decision-Making , Consensus , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Restenosis/etiology , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Diffusion of Innovation , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Patient Selection , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: Endovascular treatment of calcified femoral-popliteal disease is challenging. We sought to evaluate the mechanism of lumen gain when using the JETSTREAM Atherectomy System to treat calcified peripheral artery lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: The JETSTREAM Calcium Study was a prospective, single-arm, multicentre study to evaluate the JETSTREAM Atherectomy System for severely calcified femoral-popliteal artery lesions, i.e., patients with claudication and lesions with superficial calcium >90° and >5 mm in length as determined by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The 2.1 mm catheter was used in this study without distal protection. Fifty-five patients underwent angiographic screening: 26 (45%) met IVUS inclusion criteria. Angiographic calcium was moderate in eight cases and severe in 14, with no available data for four cases. Visual diameter stenosis was 86±9% pre-treatment, 37±13% post atherectomy, and 10±6% post adjunctive treatment (adjunctive PTA+stenting in eight and adjunct PTA alone in 16). IVUS showed lumen area increased from 6.6±3.7 mm2 to 10.0±3.6 mm2 (p=0.001): calcium reduction was responsible for 86±23% of the lumen increase. Although the superficial calcium arc did not change (151±70° to 146±71°, p=0.83), the arc of reverberation increased (23±20° to 65±40°, p=0.006), indicating device-related modification of calcium. Adjunctive balloon angioplasty was performed in 62% of the lesions, and stent implantation in 31%. In 11 cases with adjunctive balloon dilation, the MLA increased from 7.1 (6.4, 7.8) mm2 post atherectomy to 11.9 (10.3, 13.5) mm2 post balloon (p<0.001) without flow-limiting dissection. No major adverse events occurred up to 30 days post procedure in either the study group or the patients who were excluded from the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The JETSTREAM Atherectomy System increased lumen dimensions in moderately or severely calcified femoral-popliteal lesions by removing superficial calcium without major complications.
Subject(s)
Atherectomy/methods , Femoral Artery/diagnostic imaging , Peripheral Arterial Disease/therapy , Popliteal Artery/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Vascular Calcification/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Angioplasty, Balloon/instrumentation , Atherectomy/instrumentation , Constriction, Pathologic , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnostic imaging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Severity of Illness Index , Stents , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Access Devices , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
Optical coherent reflectometry, a forward-looking, fiberoptic-guided device was used in 72 patients to direct radiofrequency energy across the central intraluminal portion of 75 chronic total occlusions in peripheral arteries (iliac, femoral, and popliteal) that failed attempts with conventional guidewires. The system was successful in crossing 76% of the chronic total occlusions with no clinical perforations or distal embolizations, and complications consisted of a single dissection greater than or equal to grade C.
Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/surgery , Catheter Ablation , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Fiber Optic Technology , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST), the composite primary endpoint of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or ipsilateral stroke thereafter did not differ between carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid stenosis. A secondary aim of this randomised trial was to compare the composite endpoint of restenosis or occlusion. METHODS: Patients with stenosis of the carotid artery who were asymptomatic or had had a transient ischaemic attack, amaurosis fugax, or a minor stroke were eligible for CREST and were enrolled at 117 clinical centres in the USA and Canada between Dec 21, 2000, and July 18, 2008. In this secondary analysis, the main endpoint was a composite of restenosis or occlusion at 2 years. Restenosis and occlusion were assessed by duplex ultrasonography at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months and were defined as a reduction in diameter of the target artery of at least 70%, diagnosed by a peak systolic velocity of at least 3·0 m/s. Studies were done in CREST-certified laboratories and interpreted at the Ultrasound Core Laboratory (University of Washington). The frequency of restenosis was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and was compared during a 2-year follow-up period. We used proportional hazards models to assess the association between baseline characteristics and risk of restenosis. Analyses were per protocol. CREST is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00004732. FINDINGS: 2191 patients received their assigned treatment within 30 days of randomisation and had eligible ultrasonography (1086 who had carotid artery stenting, 1105 who had carotid endarterectomy). In 2 years, 58 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting (Kaplan-Meier rate 6·0%) and 62 who had carotid endarterectomy (6·3%) had restenosis or occlusion (hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·63-1·29; p=0·58). Female sex (1·79, 1·25-2·56), diabetes (2·31, 1·61-3·31), and dyslipidaemia (2·07, 1·01-4·26) were independent predictors of restenosis or occlusion after the two procedures. Smoking predicted an increased rate of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (2·26, 1·34-3·77) but not after carotid artery stenting (0·77, 0·41-1·42). INTERPRETATION: Restenosis and occlusion were infrequent and rates were similar up to 2 years after carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Subsets of patients could benefit from early and frequent monitoring after revascularisation. FUNDING: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Abbott Vascular Solutions.
Subject(s)
Carotid Arteries , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Endarterectomy, Carotid/methods , Stents , Aged , Carotid Stenosis/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Magnetic Resonance Angiography , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Stroke/complications , Time Factors , Tomography Scanners, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The CASES-PMS (Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study) multicenter, prospective, single-arm, surveillance study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of carotid artery stenting (CAS) when performed by physicians with varied experience in CAS utilizing a formal training program. Whether the excellent results achieved at 30 days would be sustained to 1 year was the subject of the current investigation. BACKGROUND: Previously, the pivotal SAPPHIRE (Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection of Patients with High Risk for Endarterectomy) trial demonstrated that CAS was not inferior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) when performed by physicians experienced in carotid stenting. METHODS: High surgical-risk patients with de novo atherosclerotic or post-endarterectomy restenotic lesions in native carotid arteries were enrolled at participating centers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria matched those of the SAPPHIRE trial. The primary end point was a composite of 30-day major adverse events (MAE) including death, any stroke, or myocardial infarction. RESULTS: A total of 1,492 patients were enrolled at 73 sites. The primary end point of 30-day MAE was 5.0%, meeting criteria for noninferiority to the prespecified objective performance criteria (OPC) established by the SAPPHIRE trial. The 1-year cumulative percentage of MAE was 12.5% by Kaplan-Meier analysis. All strokes to 30 days plus ipsilateral stroke between 31 and 360 days with CASES-PMS (5.4%) was similar to the rate seen with the SAPPHIRE trial stent cohort (4.9%). There were no significant differences in outcomes at 1 year by symptom status and high-risk status. CONCLUSIONS: With the formalized training program utilized in this study, physicians with varied experience in carotid stenting can achieve similar short- and longer-term results to the highly experienced SAPPHIRE Investigators. (Carotid Artery Stenting With Emboli Protection Surveillance-Post-Marketing Study [CASES-PMS]; NCT00231231).
Subject(s)
Carotid Arteries , Carotid Artery Diseases/prevention & control , Embolism/prevention & control , Stents , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carotid Stenosis/therapy , Clinical Competence , Endarterectomy, Carotid , Female , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Product Surveillance, Postmarketing , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We report the first clinical studies of intracardiac ST-segment monitoring in ambulatory humans to alert them to significant ST-segment shifts associated with thrombotic occlusion. BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in door-to-balloon times, delays in symptom-to-door times of 2 to 3 h remain. Early alerting of the presence of acute myocardial infarction could prompt patients to seek immediate medical evaluation. METHODS: Intracardiac monitoring was performed in 37 patients at high risk for acute coronary syndromes. The implanted monitor continuously evaluated the patients' ST segments sensed from a conventional pacemaker right ventricle apical lead, and alerted patients to detected ischemic events. RESULTS: During follow-up (median 1.52 years, range 126 to 974 days), 4 patients had ST-segment changes of ≥3 SDs of their normal daily range, in the absence of an elevated heart rate. This in combination with immediate hospital monitoring led to angiogram and/or intravascular ultrasonography, which confirmed thrombotic coronary occlusion/ruptured plaque. The median alarm-to-door time was 19.5 min (6, 18, 21, and 60 min, respectively). Alerting for demand-related ischemia at elevated heart rates, reflective of flow-limiting coronary obstructions, occurred in 4 patients. There were 2 false-positive ischemia alarms related to arrhythmias, and 1 alarm due to a programming error that did not prompt cardiac catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Shifts exceeding 3 SD from a patient's daily intracardiac ST-segment range may be a sensitive/specific marker for thrombotic coronary occlusion. Patient alerting was associated with a median alert-to-door time of 19.5 min for patients at high risk of recurrent coronary syndromes who typically present with 2- to 3-h delays.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/prevention & control , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnosis , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory/methods , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/instrumentation , Myocardial Ischemia/diagnosis , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/prevention & control , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/methods , Equipment Design , Equipment Safety , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Myocardial Ischemia/prevention & control , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Rupture, SpontaneousABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a novel vascular closure device, the Angio-Seal Evolution (EVCD), in patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization (CATH) and intervention (PCI) via a retrograde femoral artery access. BACKGROUND: Successful use of current-generation vascular closure devices is highly dependent on operator methodology. To reduce dependence on operator technique, the EVCD was modified to automate the closure process, specifically the compaction of the extravascular collagen sponge that creates a sandwich under pressure against the intra-arterial anchor. METHODS: This was a prospective ten-site registry including 1,004 patients undergoing 1,010 procedures with in-laboratory closure using the EVCD after CATH and PCI. The primary outcome measure was the rate of major vascular complications, and secondary outcomes were deployment success, time to hemostasis and in-hospital rates of minor vascular complications through 30 days. Clinical trial identifier NCT 00817349. RESULTS: There were 575 CATH (56.9%) and 435 PCI (43.1%) closures. Overall deployment success was 99.7%; 99.8% for CATH and 99.5% for PCI. Major vascular complications occurred in 0.4% including 0.2% in CATH and 0.7% in PCI. Minor vascular complications occurred in 2.4%, with 0.5% for CATH and 4.9% for PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Automation of the anchor-collagen closure of femoral artery access sites with the Angio-Seal ECVD resulted in excellent efficacy and safety after routine cardiac catheterization and intervention.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostatic Techniques/instrumentation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/adverse effects , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/epidemiology , Equipment Design , Female , Femoral Artery , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Hemostatic Techniques/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Multivariate Analysis , Registries/standards , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new nitinol stent positioning system to assist in the placement of aorto-ostial coronary stents. BACKGROUND: The stenting of aorto-ostial lesions is technically challenging. METHODS: We report the first clinical series using the Ostial Pro to assist in the precise placement of stents in coronary aorto-ostial lesions. These results were compared to matched cases performed without the ostial positioning system. RESULTS: The Ostial Pro is a simple nitinol device with self-expanding legs that are advanced just distal to the tip of the guiding catheter. The nitinol legs prevent the entry of the guiding catheter into the target vessel and align the tip of the guiding catheter. Using the Ostial Pro positioning device, angiographic and clinical success was achieved in 30/30 (100%) cases. Excellent stent positioning was confirmed by angiography (n = 30) and intravascular ultrasound (n = 28). The final true ostial dimension was larger than the stented segment minimum luminal diameter in 30/30 cases. In a matched consecutive cohort of 30 consecutive coronary aorto-ostial stent cases placed without the Ostial Pro, we observed an ostial stent malpositioning in 18/30 (60%) of cases (p < 0.0001 vs. cases performed with Ostial Pro). CONCLUSIONS: 1) The Ostial Pro is a new FDA-cleared nitinol device that is simple to use and effective in allowing the precise placement of stent(s) at the aorto-ostial location; 2) this approach appears to provide an efficient means to assure accurate stent placement and minimal residual stenosis in these difficult-to-treat lesions.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Coronary Artery Bypass/instrumentation , Coronary Stenosis/surgery , Stents , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Equipment Design , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of carotid artery stenting with a unique distal embolic protection system in high-risk patients with severe carotid stenosis. BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that some patients with carotid stenosis and serious comorbid conditions are at high risk for carotid endarterectomy, and may be safely treated by carotid artery stenting. METHODS: A prospective non-randomized multicenter registry of 419 patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy was conducted between April 2004 and October 2004. Carotid artery stenting was performed with the Protégé Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent and the SPIDER Embolic Protection System (ev3 Inc., Plymouth, Minnesota). Aspirin and clopidogrel were prescribed at least 24 h before and three months after revascularization. The primary outcome was the combined incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 30 days after intervention, including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. A secondary outcome was the technical success, defined as successful deployment of all devices, filter retrieval, and final diameter stenosis <50%. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 408 of 419 patients (97.4%). The primary end point was observed in 26 patients (6.2%), including death in 8 (1.9%), nonfatal stroke in 14 (3.3%), and nonfatal myocardial infarction in 4 (1%). Independent predictors of death or stroke at 30 days included duration of filter deployment, symptomatic carotid stenosis, and baseline renal insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: For some patients with severe carotid stenosis and high-risk features for carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection is a reasonable alternative for revascularization.