Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Am J Transplant ; 17(3): 712-723, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597148

ABSTRACT

An unbalanced microbiome may lead to disease by creating aberrant immune responses. A recent association of cellular rejection with the development of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) suggests the role of immune-mediated tissue injury. We hypothesized that developing IFTA correlates with altered urinary tract microbiomes (UMBs). UMBs at two serial time points, 1 and 6-8 months posttransplant, were assessed by 16S microbial ribosomal gene sequencing in 25 patients developing biopsy-proven IFTA compared to 23 transplant patients with normal biopsies and excellent function (TX) and 20 healthy nontransplant controls (HC). Streptococcus, the dominant genera in HC males, was lower in IFTA and TX males at 1 month compared to HCs. At 6-8 months, Streptococcus was further decreased in IFTA males, but normalized in TX. IFTA males and females had increases in number of genera per sample at 6-8 months. UMB composition varied substantially between individuals in all groups. Despite the wide variation in UMBs between individuals, IFTA was associated with a loss in dominant resident urinary microbes in males, and a parallel increase in nonresident, pathogenic bacteria in males and females. UMB changes may contribute to IFTA development by alteration of the host immune response.


Subject(s)
Atrophy/urine , Biomarkers/urine , Fibrosis/urine , Graft Rejection/urine , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Tubules/pathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/urine , Microbiota/genetics , Atrophy/etiology , Biopsy , Case-Control Studies , Female , Fibrosis/etiology , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/etiology , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Tubules/metabolism , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Transplant ; 17(8): 2103-2116, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28188669

ABSTRACT

We performed orthogonal technology comparisons of concurrent peripheral blood and biopsy tissue samples from 69 kidney transplant recipients who underwent comprehensive algorithm-driven clinical phenotyping. The sample cohort included patients with normal protocol biopsies and stable transplant (sTx) function (n = 25), subclinical acute rejection (subAR, n = 23), and clinical acute rejection (cAR, n = 21). Comparisons between microarray and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) signatures were performed and demonstrated a strong correlation between the blood and tissue compartments for both technology platforms. A number of shared differentially expressed genes and pathways between subAR and cAR in both platforms strongly suggest that these two clinical phenotypes form a continuum of alloimmune activation. SubAR is associated with fewer or less expressed genes than cAR in blood, whereas in biopsy tissues, this clinical phenotype demonstrates a more robust molecular signature for both platforms. The discovery work done in this study confirms a clear ability to detect gene expression profiles for sTx, subAR, and cAR in both blood and biopsy tissue, yielding equivalent predictive performance that is agnostic to both technology and platform. Our data also provide strong biological insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying these signatures, underscoring their logistical potential as molecular diagnostics to improve clinical outcomes following kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/genetics , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
3.
Am J Transplant ; 16(12): 3568-3572, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27588375

ABSTRACT

Homozygosity for apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) risk variants has emerged as an important predictor of renal disease in individuals of African descent over the past several years. Additionally, these risk variants may be important predictors of renal allograft failure when present in a living or deceased donor. Currently, there is no universal recommendation for screening of potential donors. We present a case of end-stage renal disease with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a living donor 7 years following donor nephrectomy. Genetic assessment revealed homozygosity for the G1 high-risk APOL1 variant.


Subject(s)
Apolipoprotein L1/genetics , Genetic Variation , Kidney Failure, Chronic/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Adult , Black or African American , Biomarkers , Female , Genotype , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Homozygote , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/metabolism , Kidney Failure, Chronic/pathology , Kidney Function Tests , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting
4.
Am J Transplant ; 16(1): 221-34, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26227106

ABSTRACT

We previously described early results of a nonchimeric operational tolerance protocol in human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical living donor renal transplants and now update these results. Recipients given alemtuzumab, tacrolimus/MPA with early sirolimus conversion were multiply infused with donor hematopoietic CD34(+) stem cells. Immunosuppression was withdrawn by 24 months. Twelve months later, operational tolerance was confirmed by rejection-free transplant biopsies. Five of the first eight enrollees were initially tolerant 1 year off immunosuppression. Biopsies of three others after total withdrawal showed Banff 1A acute cellular rejection without renal dysfunction. With longer follow-up including 5-year posttransplant biopsies, four of the five tolerant recipients remain without rejection while one developed Banff 1A without renal dysfunction. We now add seven new subjects (two operationally tolerant), and demonstrate time-dependent increases of circulating CD4(+) CD25(+++) CD127(-) FOXP3(+) Tregs versus losses of Tregs in nontolerant subjects (p < 0.001). Gene expression signatures, developed using global RNA expression profiling of sequential whole blood and protocol biopsy samples, were highly associative with operational tolerance as early as 1 year posttransplant. The blood signature was validated by an external Immune Tolerance Network data set. Our approach to nonchimeric operational HLA-identical tolerance reveals association with Treg immunophenotypes and serial gene expression profiles.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/analysis , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/immunology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/immunology , Kidney Transplantation , Transplantation Chimera/immunology , Transplantation Tolerance/immunology , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gene Expression Profiling , Genomics/methods , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Survival , Histocompatibility , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transplantation Chimera/genetics
5.
Am J Transplant ; 16(7): 1982-98, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26990570

ABSTRACT

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) is found in approximately 25% of 1-year biopsies posttransplant. It is known that IFTA correlates with decreased graft survival when histological evidence of inflammation is present. Identifying the mechanistic etiology of IFTA is important to understanding why long-term graft survival has not changed as expected despite improved immunosuppression and dramatically reduced rates of clinical acute rejection (AR) (Services UDoHaH. http://www.ustransplant.org/annual_reports/current/509a_ki.htm). Gene expression profiles of 234 graft biopsy samples were obtained with matching clinical and outcome data. Eighty-one IFTA biopsies were divided into subphenotypes by degree of histological inflammation: IFTA with AR, IFTA with inflammation, and IFTA without inflammation. Samples with AR (n = 54) and normally functioning transplants (TX; n = 99) were used in comparisons. A novel analysis using gene coexpression networks revealed that all IFTA phenotypes were strongly enriched for dysregulated gene pathways and these were shared with the biopsy profiles of AR, including IFTA samples without histological evidence of inflammation. Thus, by molecular profiling we demonstrate that most IFTA samples have ongoing immune-mediated injury or chronic rejection that is more sensitively detected by gene expression profiling. These molecular biopsy profiles correlated with future graft loss in IFTA samples without inflammation.


Subject(s)
Atrophy/mortality , Fibrosis/mortality , Gene Expression Profiling , Graft Rejection/mortality , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Kidney Tubules/pathology , Nephritis, Interstitial/mortality , Atrophy/genetics , Fibrosis/genetics , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/genetics , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/genetics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Tubules/metabolism , Nephritis, Interstitial/genetics , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
6.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2465-9, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26137963

ABSTRACT

The new national Kidney Allocation System of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN), effective as of December 4, 2014, was designed to improve the chances of transplanting the most highly sensitized patients on the waitlist, those with calculated panel reactive antibody values of 98%, 99% and 100%. Recently, it was suggested that these highly sensitized patients will experience inequitable access, given the reported high prevalence of antibodies to HLA-DP, and the fact that only about 1/3 of deceased donors are typed for HLA-DP antigens. Here we report that 320/2948 flow cytometric crossmatches performed for the Northwestern transplant program over the past 28 months were positive solely due to HLA-DP donor-specific antibodies (11%; 16.5% of patients with HLA antibodies-sensitized patients). We further show that 58/207 (12%) HLA-DR serologically matched donor-recipient pairs had a positive B cell flow crossmatch due to donor-specific HLA class II antibodies, and 2/34 (6%) serologic zero-HLA-A-B-DR mismatch had a positive flow crossmatch due to HLA-DSA. We therefore provide information regarding the necessity and importance of complete donor HLA typing including both chains of the HLA-DP antigen (encoded by HLA-DPA1 and HLA-DPB1) at the time of organ offer.


Subject(s)
HLA-DP alpha-Chains/immunology , HLA-DP beta-Chains/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Organ Transplantation , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , Resource Allocation/standards , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , Flow Cytometry , Histocompatibility/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Isoantibodies/immunology , Tissue Donors , United States
7.
Am J Transplant ; 15(9): 2421-30, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25930984

ABSTRACT

The presence of donor-specific HLA antibodies before or after transplantation may have different implications based on the antibody strength. Yet, current approaches do not provide information regarding the true antibody strength as defined by antigen-antibody dissociation rate. To assess currently available methods, we compared between neat mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, C1q MFI values, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-treated samples, as well as titration studies and peak MFI values of over 7000 Luminex-based single-antigen HLA antibody data points. Our results indicate that neat MFI values do not always accurately depict antibody strength. We further showed that EDTA treatment (6%) does not always remove all inhibitory factors compared with C1q or titration studies. In this study of patients presenting with multiple antibody specificities, a prozone effect was observed in 71% of the cohort (usually not affecting all antibody specificities within a single serum sample, though). Similar to titration studies, the C1q assay was able to address the issue of potential inhibition; however, its limitation is its low sensitivity and inability to detect the presence of weak antibodies. Titration studies are the only method among the approaches used in this study to provide information suggesting antigen-antibody dissociation rates and are, therefore, likely to provide better indication of true antibody strength.


Subject(s)
Complement C1q/immunology , Fluorescence , HLA Antigens/immunology , Isoantibodies/blood , Kidney Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adult , Antibody Specificity , Female , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Male , Prognosis
8.
Am J Transplant ; 15(4): 923-30, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25778447

ABSTRACT

Defining HLA mismatch acceptability of organ transplant donors for sensitized recipients has traditionally been based on serologically defined HLA antigens. Now, however, it is well accepted that HLA antibodies specifically recognize a wide range of epitopes present on HLA antigens and that molecularly defined high resolution alleles corresponding to the same low resolution antigen can possess different epitope repertoires. Hence, determination of HLA compatibility at the allele level represents a more accurate approach to identify suitable donors for sensitized patients. This approach would offer opportunities for increased transplant rates and improved long term graft survivals.


Subject(s)
HLA Antigens/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Immune Tolerance , Transplantation Immunology , Alleles , Autoantibodies/immunology , HLA Antigens/genetics , Humans , Tissue Donors
9.
Am J Transplant ; 14(12): 2821-9, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25395386

ABSTRACT

A culturally sensitive educational intervention that encouraged sun protection behaviors among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) was developed and the short-term efficacy was evaluated. Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latino and non-Hispanic Black patients, who received a transplant 2-24 months prior to the study, were randomized into two study groups: intervention versus standard of care. Electronic reminders tailored to the weather conditions were sent every 2 weeks by text message or email. Self-reported surveys and biologic measurements were obtained prior to the intervention and 6 weeks later. Among the 101 study participants, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge, recognition of personal risk of developing skin cancer, willingness to change sun protection behavior and self-reported performance of sun protection in participants receiving the intervention in comparison with those receiving standard of care (p < 0.05). The pigment darkening of the sun-exposed forearm and sun damage of the forearm and sunburns/skin irritation from the sun were significantly less in participants receiving the intervention (p < 0.05). Providing sun protection education at the beginning of summer with reminders tailored to weather conditions helped KTRs adopt sun protection practices. This sun protection program for KTRs may be incorporated into the care provided by the nephrologist or transplant surgeon.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation , Patient Education as Topic , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Sunburn/prevention & control , Transplant Recipients/education , Adult , Aged , Culture , Ethnicity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/pathology , Transplant Recipients/psychology , Young Adult
10.
Am J Transplant ; 12(11): 2901-8, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22822723

ABSTRACT

Although previous consensus recommendations have helped define patients who would benefit from simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK), there is a current need to reassess published guidelines for SLK because of continuing increase in proportion of liver transplant candidates with renal dysfunction and ongoing donor organ shortage. The purpose of this consensus meeting was to critically evaluate published and registry data regarding patient and renal outcomes following liver transplantation alone or SLK in liver transplant recipients with renal dysfunction. Modifications to the current guidelines for SLK and a research agenda were proposed.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation/methods , Liver Transplantation/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Consensus , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Male , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States
12.
Am J Transplant ; 11(6): 1218-25, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21645254

ABSTRACT

In 2007, a previously uninfected kidney transplant recipient tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Clinical information of the organ donor and the recipients was collected by medical record review. Sera from recipients and donor were tested for serologic and nucleic acid-based markers of HIV and HCV infection, and isolates were compared for genetic relatedness. Routine donor serologic screening for HIV and HCV infection was negative; the donor's only known risk factor for HIV was having sex with another man. Four organs (two kidneys, liver and heart) were transplanted to four recipients. Nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donor sera and posttransplant sera from all recipients were positive for HIV and HCV. HIV nucleotide sequences were indistinguishable between the donor and four recipients, and HCV subgenomic sequences clustered closely together. Two patients subsequently died and the transplanted organs failed in the other two patients. This is the first recognized cotransmission of HIV and HCV from an organ donor to transplant recipients. Routine posttransplant HIV and HCV serological testing and NAT of recipients of organs from donors with suspected risk factors should be considered as routine practice.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/transmission , Hepatitis C/transmission , Organ Transplantation/adverse effects , Tissue Donors , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Risk Factors
14.
Transplant Proc ; 51(3): 729-733, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30979457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: TruGraf v1 is a well-validated DNA microarray-based test that analyzes blood gene expression profiles as an indicator of immune status in kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. METHODS: In this study, investigators assessed clinical utility of the TruGraf test in patient management. In a retrospective study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients at 7 transplant centers, and in a prospective observational study they were performed in 45 subjects at 5 transplant centers. RESULTS: When queried regarding whether or not the TruGraf test result impacted their decision regarding patient management, in 168 of 192 (87.5%) cases the investigator responded affirmatively. The prospective study indicated that TruGraf results supported physicians' decisions on patient management 87% (39/45) of the time, and in 93% of cases physicians indicated that they would use serial TruGraf testing in future patient management. A total of 21 of 39 (54%) reported results confirmed their decision that no intervention was needed, and 17 of 39 (44%) reported that results specifically informed them that a decision not to perform a surveillance biopsy was correct. CONCLUSIONS: TruGraf is the first and only noninvasive test to be evaluated for clinical utility in determining rejection status of patients with stable renal function and shows promise of providing support for clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary surveillance biopsies with a high degree of confidence. TruGraf is an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patient health by avoiding painful and invasive biopsies, reducing health care costs, and enabling frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm immune quiescence.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Kidney Transplantation , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Biopsy , Decision Making , Female , Graft Rejection/blood , Graft Rejection/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Physicians , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
15.
Transplant Proc ; 51(3): 722-728, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30979456

ABSTRACT

TruGraf v1 is a laboratory-developed DNA microarray-based gene expression blood test to enable proactive noninvasive serial assessment of kidney transplant recipients with stable renal function. It has been previously validated in patients identified as Transplant eXcellence (TX: stable serum creatinine, normal biopsy results, indicative of immune quiescence), and not-TX (renal dysfunction and/or rejection on biopsy results). TruGraf v1 is intended for use in subjects with stable renal function to measure the immune status as an alternative to invasive, expensive, and risky surveillance biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, simultaneous blood tests and clinical assessments were performed in 192 patients from 7 transplant centers to evaluate TruGraf v1. The molecular testing laboratory was blinded to renal function and biopsy results. RESULTS: Overall, TruGraf v1 accuracy (concordance between TruGraf v1 result and clinical and/or histologic assessment) was 74% (142/192), and a result of TX was accurate in 116 of 125 (93%). The negative predictive value for TruGraf v1 was 90%, with a sensitivity 74% and specificity of 73%. Results did not significantly differ in patients with a biopsy-confirmed diagnosis vs those without a biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: TruGraf v1 can potentially support a clinical decision enabling unnecessary surveillance biopsies with high confidence, making it an invaluable addition to the transplant physician's tool kit for managing patients. TruGraf v1 testing can potentially avoid painful and risky invasive biopsies, reduce health care costs, and enable frequent assessment of patients with stable renal function to confirm the presence of immune quiescence in the peripheral blood.


Subject(s)
Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Graft Rejection/diagnosis , Kidney Transplantation , Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis/methods , Adult , Biopsy , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Transplant Recipients
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL