Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(43): 1584-1590, 2020 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33119562

ABSTRACT

CDC recommends a number of mitigation behaviors to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Those behaviors include 1) covering the nose and mouth with a mask to protect others from possible infection when in public settings and when around persons who live outside of one's household or around ill household members; 2) maintaining at least 6 feet (2 meters) of distance from persons who live outside one's household, and keeping oneself distant from persons who are ill; and 3) washing hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or, if soap and water are not available, using hand sanitizer containing at least 60% alcohol (1). Age has been positively associated with mask use (2), although less is known about other recommended mitigation behaviors. Monitoring mitigation behaviors over the course of the pandemic can inform targeted communication and behavior modification strategies to slow the spread of COVID-19. The Data Foundation COVID Impact Survey collected nationally representative data on reported mitigation behaviors during April-June 2020 among adults in the United States aged ≥18 years (3). Reported use of face masks increased from 78% in April, to 83% in May, and reached 89% in June; however, other reported mitigation behaviors (e.g., hand washing, social distancing, and avoiding public or crowded places) declined marginally or remained unchanged. At each time point, the prevalence of reported mitigation behaviors was lowest among younger adults (aged 18-29 years) and highest among older adults (aged ≥60 years). Lower engagement in mitigation behaviors among younger adults might be one reason for the increased incidence of confirmed COVID-19 cases in this group, which have been shown to precede increases among those >60 years (4). These findings underscore the need to prioritize clear, targeted messaging and behavior modification interventions, especially for young adults, to encourage uptake and support maintenance of recommended mitigation behaviors to prevent the spread of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Health Behavior , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Self Report , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Sex Transm Dis ; 46(8): e83-e85, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31295227

ABSTRACT

We examined 2016 United States market research to understand the demographics and sexual health testing behaviors of dating app users. Internet/app users were more likely to be young adults, male, nonwhite, of Hispanic ethnicity, and unmarried. Users also reported greater testing for sexually transmitted disease, human immunodeficiency virus, and pregnancy.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , Internet , Mobile Applications , Pregnancy Tests/psychology , Sexual Behavior/statistics & numerical data , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , HIV Infections/psychology , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Male , Marriage/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Risk-Taking , Sexual Behavior/ethnology , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Young Adult
3.
Sex Transm Dis ; 43(2 Suppl 1): S83-101, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26779691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the ubiquity of sex in the media, a culture of silence surrounds sexual health in the United States, serving as a barrier to sexually transmitted disease (STD) prevention, testing, and treatment. Campaigns can increase STD-related knowledge, communication, and protective behaviors. This review assesses the effectiveness of STD prevention and testing campaigns in the United States to inform the field on their use as a strategy for affecting behavior change. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify original research articles, published between 2000 and 2014, which report on US media campaigns promoting community- or population-level STD testing or prevention behaviors and are evaluated for impact on one or more behavioral outcomes. Titles and abstracts were independently reviewed by 2 researchers. RESULTS: The review yielded 26 articles representing 16 unique STD testing and/or prevention campaigns. Most campaigns were developed using formative research and social marketing or behavioral theory. Most campaigns (68.75%) used posttest-only or pretest-posttest designs without comparison groups for evaluation; only 5 campaigns used control groups, and these proved challenging (i.e., achieving necessary exposure and avoiding contamination). Nearly all campaigns found differences between exposed and unexposed individuals on one or more key behavioral outcomes. Several campaigns found dose-response relationships. Among evaluations with uncontaminated control groups whose campaigns achieved sufficient exposure, sustained campaign effects were observed among targeted populations. CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that campaigns can impact targeted STD-related behaviors and add to the evidence that greater exposure is associated with greater behavior change.


Subject(s)
Health Communication/methods , Sex Education/organization & administration , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Social Marketing , Evidence-Based Practice , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Sexual Behavior , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology , Social Stigma , United States/epidemiology
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(29): 745-7, 2016 Jul 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27466758

ABSTRACT

Zika virus has been identified as a cause of congenital microcephaly and other serious brain defects (1). CDC issued interim guidance for the prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus on February 5, 2016, with an initial update on April 1, 2016 (2). The following recommendations apply to all men and women who have traveled to or reside in areas with active Zika virus transmission* and their sex partners. The recommendations in this report replace those previously issued and are now updated to reduce the risk for sexual transmission of Zika virus from both men and women to their sex partners. This guidance defines potential sexual exposure to Zika virus as having had sex with a person who has traveled to or lives in an area with active Zika virus transmission when the sexual contact did not include a barrier to protect against infection. Such barriers include male or female condoms for vaginal or anal sex and other barriers for oral sex.(†) Sexual exposure includes vaginal sex, anal sex, oral sex, or other activities that might expose a sex partner to genital secretions.(§) This guidance will be updated as more information becomes available.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/prevention & control , Zika Virus Infection/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Pregnancy , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Abstinence , Travel/statistics & numerical data , United States , Zika Virus Infection/transmission
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 65(12): 323-5, 2016 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27032078

ABSTRACT

CDC issued interim guidance for the prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus on February 5, 2016. The following recommendations apply to men who have traveled to or reside in areas with active Zika virus transmission and their female or male sex partners. These recommendations replace the previously issued recommendations and are updated to include time intervals after travel to areas with active Zika virus transmission or after Zika virus infection for taking precautions to reduce the risk for sexual transmission. This guidance defines potential sexual exposure to Zika virus as any person who has had sex (i.e., vaginal intercourse, anal intercourse, or fellatio) without a condom with a man who has traveled to or resides in an area with active Zika virus transmission. This guidance will be updated as more information becomes available.


Subject(s)
Guidelines as Topic , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/prevention & control , Zika Virus Infection/prevention & control , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Condoms/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , Pregnancy , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Abstinence , Travel/statistics & numerical data , United States , Zika Virus Infection/transmission
6.
Health Promot Pract ; 17(5): 739-50, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27225216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Culturally appropriate efforts are needed to increase sexually transmitted disease (STD) testing and care among Black and Latino sexual-minority youth, who are at high risk for STDs. Get Yourself Tested, a national testing campaign, has demonstrated success among youth, but it has yet to be assessed for relevance or impact among this population. METHOD: This effort included (1) formative and materials-testing research through focus groups; (2) adaptation of existing Get Yourself Tested campaign materials to be more inclusive of Black and Latino sexual-minority youth; (3) a 3-month campaign in four venues of New York City, promoting STD testing at events and through mobile testing and online and social media platforms; (4) process evaluation of outreach activities; and (5) an outcome evaluation of testing at select campaign venues, using a preexperimental design. RESULTS: During the 3-month campaign period, the number of STD tests conducted at select campaign venues increased from a comparable 3-month baseline period. Although testing uptake through mobile vans remained low in absolute numbers, the van drew a high-prevalence sample, with positivity rates of 26.9% for chlamydia and 11.5% for gonorrhea. This article documents the process and lessons learned from adapting and implementing a local campaign for Black and Latino sexual-minority youth.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Hispanic or Latino , Sexual and Gender Minorities , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/ethnology , Adolescent , Adult , Cultural Competency , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Mass Screening , New York City/epidemiology , Program Evaluation , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Social Media , Young Adult
7.
Sex Transm Dis ; 42(11): 619-24, 2015 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26457487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The GYT: Get Yourself Tested campaign promotes sexually transmitted disease (STD) and HIV testing and communication with partners and providers among youth. We evaluated these behaviors in relation to campaign awareness among youth through a national survey. METHODS: We collected data from 4017 respondents aged 15 to 25 years through an online panel survey designed to be representative of the US population. The GYT campaign targeted 4 key behaviors: STD testing, HIV testing, talking to partners about testing, and talking to providers about testing. RESULTS: Respondents who were aware of the GYT campaign (24.4%) were more likely to report engaging in each of the 4 target behaviors. Associations remained significant when stratified by race and sex and when taking into account sexuality, sexual activity, age, insurance status, and use of campaign partner-provided services. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the GYT campaign is related to the 4 target behaviors promoted by the campaign, suggesting that health promotions campaigns oriented toward youth can be successful in increasing STD-related, health-seeking behavior, including among populations disproportionately affected by STD.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Health Promotion , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Sexual Partners/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Awareness , Communication , Female , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Program Evaluation , Risk-Taking , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/psychology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/transmission , Social Stigma , United States/epidemiology
8.
Sex Transm Dis ; 41(3): 151-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24521718

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Youth in the United States bear a disproportionate burden of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Stigma, misconceptions, and access challenges keep many from getting tested or treated. The GYT: Get Yourself Tested campaign was launched in 2009 to reduce stigma and promote STD communication and testing. This evaluation sought to assess the first 2 years of campaign engagement and associations with STD testing among youth. METHODS: Campaign engagement with select GYT on-the-ground events, social media sites, and STD testing locator tools was measured through process/media tracking metrics. Sexually transmitted disease testing patterns were assessed using data from Planned Parenthood affiliates (2008-2010) and national trend data from clinics participating in national infertility prevention activities (2003-2010). RESULTS: On-the-ground events reached an estimated 20,000 youth in 2009 and 52,000 youth in 2010. Across 2009 to 2010, GYT's Facebook page gained 4477 fans, Twitter feed gained 1994 followers, and more than 140,000 referrals were made to the STD testing locator. From April 2008 to 2010, there was a 71% increase in STD testing and a 41% increase in chlamydia testing at reporting Planned Parenthood affiliates (representing ∼118 health centers). Chlamydia case positivity rates during this period were stable at 6.6% (2008) and 7.3% (2010). Trend data indicate that testing was higher in spring 2009 and 2010 compared with other periods during those years; this pattern is commensurate with STD Awareness Month/GYT activities. CONCLUSIONS: Data quality is limited in a manner similar to many STD prevention efforts. Within these limitations, evidence suggests that GYT reaches youth and is associated with increased STD testing.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Mass Screening/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Communication , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Preventive Health Services/methods , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Program Evaluation , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/psychology , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Social Stigma , Television/statistics & numerical data , United States , Young Adult
9.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 855, 2014 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128911

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer claims the lives of 275,000 women each year; most of these deaths occur in low-or middle-income countries. In Kenya, cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality among women of reproductive age. Kenya's Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation has developed a comprehensive strategy to prevent cervical cancer, which includes plans for vaccinating preteen girls against human papillomavirus (HPV) by 2015. To identify HPV vaccine communication and mobilization needs, this research sought to understand HPV vaccine-related perceptions and concerns of male and female caregivers and community leaders in four rural communities of western Kenya. METHODS: We conducted five focus groups with caregivers (n = 56) and 12 key-informant interviews with opinion leaders to explore cervical cancer-related knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, as well as acceptability of HPV vaccination for 9-12 year-old girls. Four researchers independently reviewed the data and developed codes based on questions in interview guides and topics that emerged organically, before comparing and reconciling results through a group consensus process. RESULTS: Cervical cancer was not commonly recognized, though it was understood generally in terms of its symptoms. By association with cancer and genital/reproductive organs, cervical cancer was feared and stigmatized. Overall acceptability of a vaccine that prevents cervical cancer was high, so long as it was endorsed by trusted agencies and communities were sensitized first. Some concerns emerged related to vaccine safety (e.g., impact on fertility), program intent, and health equity. CONCLUSION: For successful vaccine introduction in Kenya, there is a need for communication and mobilization efforts to raise cervical cancer awareness; prompt demand for vaccination; address health equity concerns and stigma; and minimize potential resistance. Visible endorsement by government leaders and community influencers can provide reassurance of the vaccine's safety, efficacy and benefits for girls and communities. Involvement of community leadership, parents and champions may also be critical for combatting stigma and making cervical cancer relevant to Kenyan communities. These findings underscore the need for adequate planning and resources for information, education and communication prior to vaccine introduction. Specific recommendations for communication and social-marketing strategies are made.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Caregivers , Child , Communication , Female , Focus Groups , Health Promotion , Humans , Kenya , Male , Middle Aged , Parents , Vaccination
10.
Health Educ Res ; 29(6): 993-1004, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24584435

ABSTRACT

In an effort to inform communication efforts to promote sexual health equity in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sought to explore African-Americans' perceptions of the sexually transmitted disease (STD) problem in their communities, reactions to racially comparative STD data and opinions about dissemination of such information. Semi-structured triads and individual interviews were conducted with African-American adults (N = 158) in the Southeastern and Midwestern United States. Most participants believed that STDs are a problem in their communities but were unaware of the extent to which STDs disproportionately affect African Americans. Once informed about racial differences in STD rates, participants commonly reacted with shock, fear and despair; a minority raised questions about the information's source and credibility. Most felt it was critical to get the information out to African-American communities as a 'wake-up call' to motivate change, though some raised concerns about its dissemination. Findings suggest that information about racial differences in STD rates must be strategically crafted and delivered through targeted channels to be acceptable to African Americans. So as not to further harm communities burdened by other social/health inequities, alternative (strength-based) approaches should be considered for motivating positive change.


Subject(s)
Black or African American , Health Promotion/methods , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/ethnology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , United States
11.
Health Promot Pract ; 14(1): 96-104, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21965593

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: Annual chlamydia screening is recommended for sexually active women aged 25 years and younger, though less than half of eligible women are screened each year. If acceptable to young women, nontraditional testing venues and new communication technologies could promote efficiencies in sexually transmitted disease (STD) screening and facilitate screening by overcoming barriers at systems and patient levels. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore young women's technology use, preferences for STD-testing venues, attitudes toward nontraditional venues, and acceptability of test results delivery options. METHOD: A total of 80 ethnographic one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted with African American, Caucasian, and Latina women, aged 15 to 25 years, in 10 metropolitan areas of the United States. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using NVivo2. RESULTS: Alternative STD-testing venues and results delivery channels are valued by young women for their convenience and accessibility, but they must also offer privacy, confidentiality, and emotional/informational support to be acceptable. Assuring provider (or self) competence and valid/accurate test results is also important. CONCLUSIONS: Although new technologies have been embraced by young women for personal and social uses, they may not be as readily embraced for the provision of STD-related services. Additional social marketing efforts may be needed to promote acceptance of nontraditional STD-testing settings and results delivery methods.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Mass Screening/methods , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude to Health , Chlamydia Infections/diagnosis , Female , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Interviews as Topic , United States , Young Adult
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 53 Suppl 3: S143-52, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22080267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In April 2009, experts on sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) were convened to review updates on STD prevention and treatment in preparation for the revision of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) STD Treatment Guidelines. At this meeting, there was a discussion of important updates on human papillomavirus (HPV), genital warts, and cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Key questions were identified with assistance from an expert panel, and systematic reviews of the literature were conducted searching the English-language literature of the PubMed computerized database (US National Library of Medicine). The available evidence was reviewed, and new information was incorporated in the 2010 CDC STD Treatment Guidelines. RESULTS: Two HPV vaccines are now available, the quadrivalent HPV vaccine and the bivalent HPV vaccine; either vaccine is recommended routinely for girls aged 11 or 12 years. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine may be given to boys and men aged 9-26 years. A new patient-applied treatment option for genital warts, sinecatechins 15% ointment, is available and recommended for treatment of external genital warts. This product is a mixture of active ingredients (catechins) from green tea. Finally, updated counseling guidelines and messages about HPV, genital warts, and cervical cancer are included. CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript highlights updates to the 2010 CDC STD Treatment Guidelines for HPV and genital warts. Important additions to the 2010 STD Treatment Guidelines include information on prophylactic HPV vaccine recommendations, new patient-applied treatment options for genital warts, and counseling messages for patients on HPV, genital warts, cervical cancer screening, and HPV tests.


Subject(s)
Condylomata Acuminata/diagnosis , Condylomata Acuminata/drug therapy , Counseling/methods , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/drug therapy , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Catechin/therapeutic use , Condylomata Acuminata/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Papillomavirus Vaccines/immunology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , United States , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control
13.
Health Secur ; 19(3): 338-348, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34030469

ABSTRACT

Domestic travel creates a serious risk of spreading COVID-19, including novel strains of the virus. Motivating potential travelers to take precautions is critical, especially for those at higher risk for severe illness. To provide an evidence base for communication efforts, we examined the experiences and views of travelers during the summer of 2020 through a telephone survey of 1,968 US adults, conducted in English and Spanish, July 2 through July 16, 2020. The survey found that more than one-quarter (28%) of adults had traveled domestically in the prior 30 days, most commonly for "vacation" (43%), and less than half wore masks (46%) or practiced social distancing (47%) "all of the time." Although high-risk adults were significantly less likely to travel than non-high-risk adults (23% vs 31%; P < .001), they were no more likely to take precautions. Many travelers did not wear a mask or practice social distancing because they felt such actions were unnecessary (eg, they were outside or with friends and family). Although a substantial share of travelers (43% to 53%) trusted public health agencies "a great deal" for information about reducing risks while traveling, more travelers (73%) trusted their own healthcare providers. Findings suggest that outreach may be improved by partnering with providers to emphasize the benefits of layering precautions and provide targeted education to high-risk individuals. Messages that are empathetic to the need to reduce stress and convey how precautions can protect loved ones may be particularly resonant after more than a year of pandemic-related restrictions.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Behavior , Safety Management/methods , Self Care/statistics & numerical data , Travel/statistics & numerical data , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Distancing , Seasons , Self Care/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Travel/psychology
14.
Sex Transm Dis ; 36(3): 141-6, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19174731

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Because high-risk HPV is highly prevalent in the general population, usually transient, and rarely causes clinical symptoms, and because diagnostic and treatment options for HPV in men are lacking, partner notification is not useful for preventing transmission or protecting the health of male partners. METHODS: We conducted a nationally representative survey of clinicians in 7 specialties that perform cervical cancer screening. Providers were asked whether they recommend that women with an abnormal Pap or positive HPV test inform sex partners of the infection or refer partners to a clinician. RESULTS: A large proportion of providers in all 7 specialties encourage women with either an abnormal Pap or a positive HPV test to tell their sex partners to see a clinician, ranging from 48% to 73% across specialties. Providers who perform reflex HPV testing were more likely to recommend that patients with an ASCUS Pap inform their partners of test results if an HPV test was positive than if it was negative (66%-83% vs. 29%-50%); providers who perform adjunct HPV testing were more likely to recommend that patients with a normal Pap inform their partners if an HPV test was positive than if it was negative (72%-92% vs. 30%-52%). CONCLUSIONS: Most providers advise patients with cervical cancer screening tests suggestive of HPV infection to notify their sex partners and to refer them to a clinician. Guidelines are needed for providers to clarify any rationale for clinical evaluation of male partners, including that informing partners has a limited role in the control of HPV transmission or in preventing adverse health outcomes in the male partner.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Papillomaviridae/isolation & purification , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Partners , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vaginal Smears/methods , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/genetics , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Primary Health Care/methods , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Tumor Virus Infections/diagnosis , Tumor Virus Infections/transmission , Tumor Virus Infections/virology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology
15.
Health Secur ; 17(4): 307-323, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31433283

ABSTRACT

Travelers to areas with Zika virus transmission are at risk of infection and of transmitting the virus after returning home. While protective behaviors during and after travel can reduce these risks, information about traveler practices or underlying views is limited. We examined these issues using data from the first representative poll of travelers from US states to Zika-affected areas, including US territories and Miami, Florida, conducted December 1 to 23, 2016. We analyzed results among all travelers (n = 1,285) and 2 subgroups at risk for pregnancy-related complications: (1) travelers in households where someone was pregnant or considering pregnancy (n = 72), and (2) other travelers of reproductive age (n = 631). We also examined results among those with different levels of awareness and knowledge about Zika virus. Results show that in households where someone was pregnant or considering pregnancy, awareness of Zika in the destination, concern about infection, and adoption of protective behaviors was relatively high. That said, sizable shares of travelers as a whole did not know information about asymptomatic and sexual transmission or post-travel behaviors. Further, concern about getting infected during travel was low among travelers as a whole, including other travelers of reproductive age. Few travelers consistently adopted protective behaviors during or after travel. Even among travelers who were aware of Zika in their destination and knew how to protect themselves, adoption of protective behaviors was only slightly higher. Findings from this poll suggest communications may be more effective if tailored to different levels of true and perceived risk. To address gaps in knowledge about transmission and post-travel protective behaviors, messaging should include facts and acknowledge the complexities of novel information and social context. Consideration should also be given to emphasizing other benefits of Zika protective behaviors or prioritizing behaviors that are most feasible.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Travel , Zika Virus Infection/epidemiology , Zika Virus Infection/transmission , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Risk-Taking , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult , Zika Virus/immunology , Zika Virus/isolation & purification
16.
Health Educ Behav ; 34(3): 471-85, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17000622

ABSTRACT

Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the most common sexually transmitted virus in the United States, causing genital warts, cervical cell abnormalities, and cervical cancer in women. To inform HPV education efforts, 35 focus groups were conducted with members of the general public, stratified by gender, race/ethnicity, and urban/rural location. Focus groups explored participants' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about HPV and a hypothetical HPV vaccine as well as their communication preferences for HPV-related educational messages. Audience awareness and knowledge of HPV were low across all groups. This, along with an apparent STD-associated stigma, served as barriers to participants' hypothetical acceptance of a future vaccine. Although information about HPV's high prevalence and link to cervical cancer motivated participants to learn more about HPV, it also produced audience fear and anxiety. This research suggests that HPV- and HPV-vaccine-related education efforts must be approached with extreme caution. Other practical implications are discussed.


Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Public Opinion , United States
17.
Sex Health ; 14(6): 540-547, 2017 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648149

ABSTRACT

Background Several common global definitions of sexual health refer to physical, emotional and social well-being, with respect to sexuality, and also to the need for this well-being to be reflected for all individuals in relationships. How well sexual health definitions fit US youths' attitudes to sexual health, and associations between these attitudes, sexual behaviours and sexual health care were assessed. METHODS: In total, 4017 youth aged between 15 and 25 years via an online survey panel, weighted to be representative of the US population, were surveyed. Respondents reported their attitudes towards seven dimensions of sexual health that we abstracted from existing global definitions (emotional fulfillment, social connectedness, spirituality, overall pleasure, physical intimacy, mental fulfillment, reciprocal benefits). Respondents also reported on sexual health-related discussions with partners, sexual behaviours, and their use of sexual health care. Outcomes through weighted frequency estimates and ordinal regression models were reported. RESULTS: Youth generally construed all seven dimensions as important to sexual health, with the emotional dimension rated most favourably. Attitudes to the dimensions of overall pleasure, physical intimacy and spirituality were most consistently related to sexual health discussions and behaviours. The behaviours most consistently related to sexual health attitudes were going for a sexual health check-up, discussing birth control/pregnancy and discussing risk before sex without a condom. CONCLUSIONS: Youth construal of sexual health fits well with global sexual health definitions. Attitudes to dimensions of sexual health were related to some sexual health-related behaviours, especially healthcare use and complex discussions.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Sexual Behavior/psychology , Sexual Health , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
18.
J Soc Mark ; 5(1): 2-20, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31768236

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE ­: This study aims to explore peoples cognitive perceptions of HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) to inform decisions on message development with regard to message bundling, with limited research on the concept of bundling-related prevention messages and no studies that consider the bundling of HIV and other STD prevention messages. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH ­: Individual and small-group interviews were conducted with 158 African American men and women to explore perceptions of STDs and communication preferences. Open-ended questions and a pile-sort exercise were used to elicit individuals' judgments on similarities of 12 STDs, including HIV. Interview data were coded and analyzed for themes and patterns; pile sort data were analyzed using multidimensional scaling (MDS) and cluster analysis to visualize the set of relations identified from the piles. FINDINGS ­: STDs and HIV are associated with stigma, risk behaviors and personal responsibility. The card sorting activity revealed two primary dimensions by which people organized STDs: seriousness and curability. Potential clusters of STDs that correspond to participants described sorting strategies were identified and they may have implications for message bundling. Disaggregation of the data by sex and age revealed slight variations in the relationships of HIV and human papillomavirus (HPV) to other STDs. ORIGINALITY/VALUE ­: By identifying a set of cognitive attributes people use in organizing the overall semantic domain of STDs, ideas can be generated for how best to combine STD and HIV messages to meet public health communication goals.

19.
Soc Mar Q ; 20(2): 116-138, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31749662

ABSTRACT

Nine programs were funded across eight states in the United States to customize, implement, and evaluate local campaigns in support of the national Get Yourself Tested (GYT) campaign. Each program promoted chlamydia screening and treatment/referral to sexually active young women (aged 15-25 years) and their partners through accessible, free, or low-cost services. This article documents the strategies and outcomes of these local GYT campaigns, highlighting the diversity in which a national sexual health campaign is implemented at the local level and identifying challenges and successes. Nearly all (n = 7) programs involved target audience members in campaign development/implementation. Youth were linked to free or low-cost sexually transmitted disease testing through community centers, high schools and colleges, community and clinic events; online or text-based ordering of test kits; and community pickup locations. Sites used a combination of traditional and new media, on-the-ground activities, promotional products, and educational and social events to promote testing. With the exception of one site, all sites reported increases in the number of persons tested for chlamydia during campaign implementation, compared to baseline. Increases ranged from 0.5% to 128%. Successes included development of local partnerships, infrastructure, and capacity; use of peer leaders and involvement; and opportunities to explore new innovations. Challenges included use of social media/new technologies, timing constraints, limited organizational and evaluation capacity, and unforeseen delays/setbacks. Each of these issues is explored, along with lessons learned, with intent to inform future sexual health promotion efforts.

20.
Adv Child Dev Behav ; 42: 245-70, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22675908

ABSTRACT

Young children's self-regulation has increasingly been identified as an important predictor of their skills versus difficulties when navigating the social and academic worlds of early schooling. Recently, researchers have called for greater precision and more empirical rigor in defining what we mean when we measure, analyze, and interpret data on the role of children's self-regulatory skills for their early learning (Cole, Martin, & Dennis, 2004; Wiebe, Espy, & Charak, 2008). To address that call, this chapter summarizes our efforts to examine self-regulation in the context of early education with a clear emphasis on the need to consider the comprehensiveness and precision of measurement of self-regulation in order to best understand its role in early learning.


Subject(s)
Emotional Intelligence , Learning , Social Control, Informal , Attention , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Inhibition, Psychological , Internal-External Control , Male , Memory, Short-Term , Personality Assessment , Socialization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL