Using a bedside test to detect genetic susceptibility to aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss: Has the future arrived?

Aminoglycosides are among the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in hospitalised Australian adults and children. A proportion of individuals with an underlying genetic predisposition to aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss (AIHL) can develop bilateral sensorineural hearing loss that is immediate and profound after just a single standard dose of an aminoglycoside. A recent publication described the use of a rapid point-of-care test (POCT) in a neonatal nursery in the United Kingdom for real-time detection of infants at risk of AIHL, in whom exposure to aminoglycosides could then be avoided. This proof of concept study should provide a catalyst for further development of similar assays that would be suitable for Australia's genetically diverse population. The barriers to mitigating the impact of AIHL on Australian children are not primarily technical, but involve a lack of data on the prevalence of the MT-RNR1 mutations in our current neonatal and paediatric populations and intensive care nurseries.

Pediatric Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders: Parent Acceptance Influences Recovery.

OBJECTIVES: To assess how clinicians discuss the diagnosis of somatic symptom and related disorders (SSRDs) in patients admitted to a children's hospital and explore the effect of parent and patient acceptance of the diagnosis on recovery. STUDY DESIGN: In this cross-sectional study, we reviewed the electronic medical records of pediatric admissions diagnosed with SSRD over 18 months. All diagnostic discussions with patients and families were analysed to identify concepts used by clinicians within these discussions and the extent of parent and patient acceptance of the diagnosis. Recovery status up to 12 months after diagnosis was also identified. Acceptance and recovery were categorized as "full," "partial," or "none." RESULTS: Ninety-five of 123 (77.2%) patients (median age 14.3 years, range 7.3-18.3) had at least 1 diagnostic discussion recorded. Clinical explanations within the diagnostic discussion spanned a variety of concepts, with the most common being a description of somatization (62%). Full parent acceptance of the diagnosis of SSRD was more likely when discussions involved two parents (P = .002). Full acceptance of the diagnosis by at least 1 parent was associated with complete functional recovery in their children (OR 8.94, 95% CI 2.24, 35.9, P = .002). In contrast, there was no significant association between full acceptance by patients and their recovery. CONCLUSION: The influence of parent acceptance of the diagnosis of SSRD reinforces the importance of therapeutic engagement with families, as well as with children and adolescents.

Liberal Glucose Control in ICU Patients With Diabetes: A Before-and-After Study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility, biochemical efficacy, and safety of liberal versus conventional glucose control in ICU patients with diabetes. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label, sequential period study. SETTING: A 22-bed mixed ICU of a tertiary hospital in Australia. PATIENTS: We compared 350 consecutive patients with diabetes admitted over 15 months who received liberal glucose control with a preintervention control population of 350 consecutive patients with diabetes who received conventional glucose control. INTERVENTIONS: Liberal control patients received insulin therapy if glucose was greater than 14 mmol/L (target: 10-14 mmol/L [180-252 mg/dL]). Conventional control patients received insulin therapy if glucose was greater than 10 mmol/L (target: 6-10 mmol/L [108-180 mg/dL]). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We assessed separation in blood glucose, insulin requirements, occurrence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]), creatinine and white cell count levels, and clinical outcomes. The median (interquartile range) time-weighted average blood glucose concentration was significantly higher in the liberal control group (11.0 mmol/L [8.7-12.0 mmol/L]; 198 mg/dL [157-216 mg/dL]) than in the conventional control group (9.6 mmol/L [8.5-11.0 mmol/L]; 173 mg/dL [153-198 mg/dL]; p < 0.001). Overall, 132 liberal control patients (37.7%) and 188 conventional control patients (53.7%) received insulin in ICU (p < 0.001). Hypoglycemia occurred in 6.6% and 8.6%, respectively (p = 0.32). Among 314 patients with glycated hemoglobin A1c greater than or equal to 7%, hypoglycemia occurred in 4.1% and 9.6%, respectively (p = 0.053). Trajectories of creatinine and white cell count were similar in the groups. In multivariable analyses, we found no independent association between glucose control and mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or ICU-free days to day 30. CONCLUSIONS: In ICU patients with diabetes, during a period of liberal glucose control, insulin administration, and among patients with hemoglobin A1c greater than or equal to 7%, the prevalence of hypoglycemia was reduced, without negatively affecting serum creatinine, the white cell count response, or other clinical outcomes. (Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12615000216516).