ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Honey has been recorded as having healing properties at a low cost. Many studies have been conducted related to Manuka honey, but studies about Indonesian randu honey are still limited. We report the use of Indonesian randu honey as a wound dressing on non-pressure chronic skin ulcers in uncontrolled T2DM patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old man with uncontrolled T2DM came with an unrecovered wound. A thorough inspection revealed several exposed bones, tendons, muscles, and meniscus in the left lower leg region. It was supposed to be amputated, but he declined. He received insulin, debridement, STSG, and a combination of Indonesian randu honey dressing and VAC on the exposed wound before and after the debridement and STSG. There was skin graft lysis, and we intended to do another surgery, but he preferred to be an outpatient. As an outpatient, he received honey wound dressing and insulin. After 1.5 years, the wound was fully closed, and he could walk with the help of a walking stick. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: Treatment for multiple exposed bones, tendons, and muscles in uncontrolled T2DM patient are complex. Studies reported that Indonesian honey could provide an antibacterial effect, cost-efficiency, speed up wound healing with no side effects, and no physical-chemical properties differences compared to Manuka honey. CONCLUSION: Using Indonesian randu honey as wound dressing could stimulate wound healing with no side effects in chronic wounds with uncontrolled T2DM that were supposed to be amputated. However, it took several months for the wound to fully close.
ABSTRACT
Background: Sepsis is one of the main causes in burn victim's mortality. The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) provides an ideal environment to accelerate wound healing. We compare the use of normal saline (NS), intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT and silver sulfadiazine in wound healing process. Method: This study involved 6 Yorkshire pigs; each pig was induced with 20 burns on the flank area. Burns were divided into 4 treatment groups: NS gauze, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine dressing. Burns were evaluated on day 1,3,7,14, and 21 for its morphology and bacterial colonization and on day 14 and 21 for the remaining burn surface area. Result: Wound that received NPWT therapy appeared better in both granulation and crust formation. Remaining burn surface area (mm2) on day 14 in NS group, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine were 107.43 ± 83.43, 178.07 ± 74.83, 146.10 ± 69.1, 126.03 ± 83.22, respectively(p = 0.457); on day 21 in NS group, intermittent NPWT, continuous NPWT, and silver sulfadiazine were 13.16 ± 16.86, 59.49 ± 20.72, 54.79 ± 46.59, 48.95 ± 39.84, respectively(p=0.169). There were no significant differences in each treatment group bacterial colonization(p>0.05). There were no significant correlation between bacterial colonization and remaining burn surface area (p>0.05). Conclusion: While morphologically, the wound in NPWT treatment groups appeared better in granulation and crust formation, the remaining wound surface area and the number of bacterial colonization were not significantly difference compared to standard therapy (silver sulfadiazine and NS gauze). There were no significant correlation between the amount of bacterial colonization and remaining wound surface area on every treatment group.
ABSTRACT
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Delta variant (B.1.617.2) has been responsible for the current increase in Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infectivity rate worldwide. We compared the impact of the Delta variant and non-Delta variant on the COVID-19 outcomes in patients from Yogyakarta and Central Java provinces, Indonesia. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we ascertained 161 patients, 69 with the Delta variant and 92 with the non-Delta variant. The Illumina MiSeq next-generation sequencer was used to perform the whole-genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2. Results: The mean age of patients with the Delta variant and the non-Delta variant was 27.3 ± 20.0 and 43.0 ± 20.9 (p = 3 × 10-6). The patients with Delta variant consisted of 23 males and 46 females, while the patients with the non-Delta variant involved 56 males and 36 females (p = 0.001). The Ct value of the Delta variant (18.4 ± 2.9) was significantly lower than that of the non-Delta variant (19.5 ± 3.8) (p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in the hospitalization and mortality of patients with Delta and non-Delta variants (p = 0.80 and 0.29, respectively). None of the prognostic factors were associated with the hospitalization, except diabetes with an OR of 3.6 (95% CI = 1.02-12.5; p = 0.036). Moreover, the patients with the following factors have been associated with higher mortality rate than the patients without the factors: age ≥65 years, obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease with the OR of 11 (95% CI = 3.4-36; p = 8 × 10-5), 27 (95% CI = 6.1-118; p = 1 × 10-5), 15.6 (95% CI = 5.3-46; p = 6 × 10-7), 12 (95% CI = 4-35.3; p = 1.2 × 10-5), and 6.8 (95% CI = 2.1-22.1; p = 0.003), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that age ≥65 years, obesity, diabetes, and hypertension were the strong prognostic factors for the mortality of COVID-19 patients with the OR of 3.6 (95% CI = 0.58-21.9; p = 0.028), 16.6 (95% CI = 2.5-107.1; p = 0.003), 5.5 (95% CI = 1.3-23.7; p = 0.021), and 5.8 (95% CI = 1.02-32.8; p = 0.047), respectively. Conclusions: We show that the patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant have a lower Ct value than the patients infected by the non-Delta variant, implying that the Delta variant has a higher viral load, which might cause a more transmissible virus among humans. However, the Delta variant does not affect the COVID-19 outcomes in our patients. Our study also confirms that older age and comorbidity increase the mortality rate of patients with COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The growth of children with Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) can be affected by many factors, including the environment, nutrient intake, and surgery. Our study compared the long-term (i.e., at least 3 years of follow-up) growth outcomes in HSCR children after transabdominal Soave and Duhamel and transanal endorectal pull-through (TEPT) surgeries. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in children <18 years of age diagnosed histopathologically with HSCR who underwent pull-through between January 1, 2012-December 31, 2015 in our institution. The postoperative anthropometric data were obtained prospectively through interviews during the outpatient clinic appointment or by telephone. RESULTS: We recruited 21 patients (Soave: 7 vs. Duhamel: 4 vs. TEPT: 10; p = 0.06). There were no significant differences between the three surgical methods in terms of preoperative and postoperative nutritional status categories (p = 0.52). Concerning the changes in nutritional status, after Soave surgery, it was improved, steady, and worsened in 28.6%, 57.1%, and 14.3% of the children, respectively. The nutritional status of the Duhamel group was worsened and steady in 25% and 75% of the children, respectively, while in the TEPT group, it was improved and steady in 40% and 60% of the children, respectively. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: While some HSCR children show an improvement in their nutritional status after Soave and TEPT procedures, the overall nutritional status is similar among different procedures. Further multicenter studies with a larger sample size are important to clarify our findings.