Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: What have we learnt from the OPTIMEV study?

The OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'évaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study has provided some important and innovative information for the management of lower extremity isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (distal DVT). Indeed, if distal deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) therapeutic management is nowadays still debated, before the OPTIMEV study, the clinical relevance of these DVT itself was questioned. Via the publication of 6 articles, between 2009 and 2022, assessing risk factors, therapeutic management, and outcomes of 933 patients with distal DVT we were able to demonstrate that: - When distal deep veins are systematically screened for suspicion of DVT, distal DVT are the most frequent clinical presentation of the venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). This is also true in case of combined oral contraceptive related VTE. - Distal DVT share the same risk factors as proximal DVT and constitute two different clinical expressions of the same disease: the VTE disease. However, the weight of these risk factors differs: distal DVT are more often associated with transient risk factors whereas proximal DVT are more associated with permanent risk factors. - Deep calf vein and muscular DVT share the same risk factors, short and long-term prognoses. - In patients without history of cancer, risk of unknown cancer is similar in patients with a first distal or proximal DVT. - After 3years and once anticoagulation has been stopped, distal DVT recur twice less as proximal DVT and mainly as distal DVT; However, in cancer patients, prognosis of distal and proximal DVT appear similar in terms of death and VTE recurrence.

Assessment of primary lymphedema and post-thrombotic lower limb edema patient's pathway.

OBJECTIVES: To assess: (1) lower limb primary lymphedema or post-thrombotic syndrome patient's pathway in terms of health care professional use and (2) if aetiology of edema has an impact on this pathway. METHODS: Ancillary survey of the transversal prospective CHROEDEM pilot study. Forty patients with either lower limb primary lymphedema or post-thrombotic syndrome were invited to participate. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of primary lymphedema patients and 50% of post-thrombotic patients benefited from a multidisciplinary management (P=0.10) including the general practitioner, the vascular medicine physician and either a physiotherapist (particularly in case of primary lymphedema), a registered nurse (particularly in case of post-thrombotic syndrome). Main ambulatory health care professionals' correspondent of hospital-based vascular medicine physicians were general practitioners (80%) in post-thrombotic patients, and general practitioners (60%) and physiotherapists (45%) in primary lymphedema patients. Pharmacists were also involved in patient education. CONCLUSION: Management of primary lymphedema and post-thrombotic related chronic edema is usually multidisciplinary. General practitioners and vascular medicine physicians are the cornerstones of this management, that also involves the physiotherapist in case of primary lymphedema and in a lesser extent the registered nurse and the pharmacist. This suggests that these five healthcare professional should play a key role in case of development of standardized patient pathways for primary lymphedema and post-thrombotic syndrome.

[Roles of the general practitioner and the vascular medicine physician for patient education concerning venous thromboembolism: The patient's perspective]. / Évaluation par le patient du rôle du médecin traitant et du médecin vasculaire dans l'information médicale des patients souffrant d'une maladie thromboembolique veineuse.

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (pulmonary embolism and deep-vein thrombosis) is a frequent, serious but also chronic disease. Studies reported that both general practitioners (GPs) and vascular medicine physicians (VMPs) report participating in patient education concerning venous thromboembolic disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of GPs and VMPs in venous thromboembolic disease patient education, examining the patient's perspective. METHOD: Phone survey of the French patients recruited in the CACTUS trial assessing anticoagulant treatment in case of first distal deep-vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Among the 103 participating patients, 92% (n=95) reported being satisfied by information provided by the GP and VMP. Information was considered as necessary in 96% of cases (n=99). Eighty-five percent of patients (n=88) felt they did not need complementary information. The VMP would have spent more time on education as compared with the GP (an entire consultation in 93.2% vs. 38.8% of cases respectively) the information provided by the VMP being also clearer and more complete. More than 75% of patients reported that no physician warned them about risks of anticoagulants, long-term complications of venous thromboembolic disease or its prevention. CONCLUSION: In CACTUS, patients reported being satisfied by information provided by their managing physicians and information provided by the VMP was clearer and more complete. Important education messages may not have been delivered suggesting the need for a standardization of venous thromboembolic disease patient's education.

[Distal deep-venous thrombosis: diagnostic and therapeutic issues]. / Les thromboses veineuses distales: problématique de leur diagnostic et de leur traitement.

PURPOSE: Compression ultrasonography is the reference test for the diagnosis of distal deep venous thrombosis of lower limbs. However, the ways it is performed and the related treatments are very heterogeneous between various countries. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: In USA, Canada and Netherlands, compression ultrasonography is restricted to proximal limbs considering that this test is inadequate to explore the distal veins. The strategy consisting of a clinical approach, including the clinical probability and/or a follow-up ultrasonography has demonstrated its efficacy and safety (extension rate to proximal veins of 1.2% at three months and absence of fatal pulmonary embolism). In France, Italy and Spain, lower limb ultrasonography testing includes the examination of calf veins in a so called "complete testing". This procedure leads to the diagnosis of a large number of distal deep venous thrombosis (45-56%) among the 14 to 36% of deep vein thrombosis diagnosed in the setting of clinical suspicion. Recent diagnosis strategy studies have shown that both strategies are effective, but the complete ultrasound strategy doubles the number of anticoagulation treatments. Justification of inappropriate anticoagulation is not evident owing to the relatively low risk of proximal venous-thrombosis extension, the rate of severe hemorrhagic events at three months and the cost excess. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: Prospective comparative clinical trials are necessary in distal-venous thrombosis and ongoing Cactus study addresses this therapeutic dilemma.

[Calf vein thrombosis: to treat or not to treat? Epidemiology, management and problematics]. / Thromboses veineuses profondes distales des membres inférieurs: to treat or not to treat? Epidémiologie, prise en charge et problématique.

Calf vein thrombosis corresponds to infrapopliteal deep vein thrombosis which accounts for roughly 50% of all cases of deep vein thrombosis and shares the same risk factors as proximal deep vein thrombosis. The complication rate and proper management remain debated. Recent studies suggest that the risk of proximal extension of calf vein thrombosis is 1 to 5% and that the risk of postthrombotic syndrome is 3%. In France, calf vein thrombosis is usually treated with compression stockings associated with a six week to three month regimen of anticoagulation therapy in patients presenting a transient triggering factor or longer otherwise. However, the benefit of such treatment, in terms of the hemorragic risk incurred, remains uncertain. The randomized double blind trial CACTUS (compression stocking + placebo versus compression stocking + heparin, for six weeks) that will start in September 2007, should provide answers the following question: should calf vein thrombosis be treated with anticoagulants?

Long-term outcomes of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: the OPTIMEV study.

Essentials Clinical significance of cancer-related isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) is unknown. We studied patients with iDDVT, with and without cancer, and proximal DVT with cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a much poorer prognosis than iDDVT patients without cancer. Cancer-related iDDVT patients have a similar prognosis to cancer-related proximal DVT patients. SUMMARY: Background Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (infra-popliteal DVT without pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event and, in the absence of cancer, is usually considered to be a minor form of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT is unknown. Methods Using data from the observational, prospective multicenter OPTIMEV cohort, we compared, at 3 years, the incidences of death, VTE recurrence and major bleeding in patients with cancer-related iDDVT with those in cancer patients with isolated proximal DVT (matched 1:1 on age and sex) and patients with iDDVT without cancer (matched 1:2 on age and sex). Results As compared with patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT (n = 92), those with cancer-related iDDVT (n = 92) had a similar risk of death (40.8% per patient-year (PY) vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 1.0, 95% CI[0.7-1.4]) and of major bleeding (3.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY, aCHR = 0.9 [0.3-3.2]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.4% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 1.8 [0.7-4.5]). As compared with patients with iDDVT without cancer (n = 184), those with cancer-related iDDVT had a nine times higher risk of death (3.5% per PY vs. 38.3% per PY; aHR = 9.3 [5.5-15.9]), a higher risk of major bleeding (1.8% per PY vs. 3.6% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [0.6-6.1]) and a higher risk of VTE recurrence (5.0% per PY vs. 11.5% per PY; aCHR = 2.0 [1.0-3.7]). The results remained similar in the subgroup of patients without history of VTE. Conclusion Patients with cancer-related iDDVT seem to have a prognosis that is similar to that of patients with cancer-related isolated proximal DVT and a dramatically poorer prognosis than patients with iDDVT without cancer. This underlines the high clinical significance of cancer-related iDDVT and the need for additional studies.

Long-term risk of venous thromboembolism recurrence after isolated superficial vein thrombosis.

Essentials Long-term risk of recurrence of isolated superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is under-studied. We analyzed data from a cohort of first SVT and proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) without cancer. The risk of recurrence as DVT or pulmonary embolism is twice lower in SVT patients. However, overall risk of recurrence is similar between SVT and proximal DVT patients. Click to hear Dr Decousus' perspective on superficial vein thrombosis SUMMARY: Background Isolated superficial vein thrombosis (iSVT) (without concomitant deep vein thrombosis [DVT] or pulmonary embolism [PE]) is a frequent event, but available data on long-term outcomes are scarce and retrospective. Therefore, we aimed to determine prospectively the risk and type of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence after iSVT and compare them with those of proximal DVT. Methods Using data from the prospective, multicenter, observational, OPTIMEV study, we assessed, at 3 years and after anticoagulants were stopped, the incidence and the type of VTE recurrence (iSVT/DVT/PE) of patients with a first objectively confirmed iSVT without cancer (n = 285), and compared these with those of patients with a first proximal DVT without cancer (n = 262). Results As compared with proximal DVT patients, iSVT patients had a similar overall incidence of VTE recurrence (5.4% per patient-year [PY] versus 6.5% per PY, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-1.6), but iSVT recurred six times more often as iSVT (2.7% versus 0.6%, aHR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-27.1) and 2.5 times less often as deep-VTE events (2.5% versus 5.9%, aHR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9). Varicose vein status did not influence the risk or the type of VTE recurrence. Saphenian junction involvement by iSVT was not associated with a higher risk of recurrence (5.2% per PY versus 5.4% per PY), but was associated with recurrence exclusively as deep-VTE events. Conclusion In patients with a first iSVT without cancer, after stopping anticoagulants, the incidence of deep-VTE recurrence is half that of DVT patients, but the overall risk of recurrence is similar. Ssaphenian junction involvement seems to influence the risk of deep-VTE recurrence, whereas varicose vein status has no impact or a low impact on VTE recurrence.

[Management of pulmonary embolism: A 2015 update]. / Prise en charge de l'embolie pulmonaire en 2015.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent, serious and multifactorial disease, the incidence of which increases with advanced age. In the absence of pathognomonic clinical signs or symptoms, diagnostic management lies in the evaluation of clinical pre-test probability followed by a laboratory or an imaging test. So far, multidetector computed tomography angiography is the diagnostic test of choice to make a positive diagnosis of PE. Anticoagulants at therapeutic dose for at least 3 months constitute the cornerstones of PE therapeutic management. Duration of anticoagulant treatment is modulated according to the presence of transient (surgery, plaster immobilization, bed rest/hospitalization) and chronic/persistent (age, cancer, clinical or biological thrombophilia…) risk factors of PE. Thrombolysis is usually prescribed only for cases of severe PE with arterial hypotension. Arrival of new oral anticoagulants, which have recently been shown to be as effective and as safe as vitamin K antagonist, should simplify and ease ambulatory management of PE and favor more prolonged treatments with anticoagulant for cases of unprovoked PE or PE provoked by a chronic/persistent risk factor.

Low incidence of cancer after venous thromboembolism: An update from the French OPTIMEV Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown lower rates of cancer following venous thromboembolism (VTE) than previously described. OBJECTIVES: To reassess the risk of cancer in patients with clinical symptoms of VTE with or without confirmed VTE. PATIENTS: We used data from OPTIMEV, a French prospective multicenter observational study of patients presenting to hospital and community vascular medicine specialists with suspected VTE. Patients with confirmed VTE (1565) and matched controls without VTE (1847) were followed for 3 years (2006-2009). The main outcome was occurrence of cancer at 3 years, and death was a censoring event. RESULTS: A total of 5.0% [4.0-6.3] of patients with VTE and 3.8% [3.0-4.9] without VTE developed cancer during follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.2 [0.9-1.8] for patients with confirmed VTE (P=0.22). The overall standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was 1.4 [1.1-1.6] for our population, VTE+ and VTE-, compared with the general population, statistically significant (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found a lower occurrence of cancer after VTE than previously described, with no significant difference between patients whether VTE was confirmed or not. Our results (low incidence and no difference between patients VTE+ or VTE-) provide no argument in favor of an extensive screening for cancer in case of VTE.

Comparative evolution of carotidynia on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.

Carotidynia is rare and associates neck pain with tenderness to palpation usually over the carotid bifurcation, the diagnosis of which is based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ultrasounds (US) are also frequently used but their accuracy in predicting the course of the disease is unknown. We are reporting the case of a 52-year-old man who presented a typical carotidynia. Clinical symptoms, ultrasound and MRI imaging evolution were closely correlated. Our case suggest that after a first MRI to set a positive diagnosis of carotidynia and exclude differential diagnoses, US which is more widely available and less expensive could constitute the imaging of reference for the follow-up.

[Management of venous thromboembolism: A 2015 update]. / Prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse en 2015.

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) constitute venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Venous thromboembolic disease is a common, serious, and multifactorial disease, the incidence of which increases with age. Risk factors, whether transient (surgery, plaster immobilization, bed rest/hospitalization) or chronic/persistent (age, cancer, clinical or biological thrombophilia, etc.), modulate the duration of treatment. In the absence of pathognomonic clinical sign or symptom, diagnostic management relies in the evaluation of the clinical pre-test probability followed by a laboratory or an imaging testing. So far, compression ultrasound and multidetector computed tomography angiography are the best diagnostic tests to make a positive diagnosis of DVT or PE, respectively. Anticoagulants at therapeutic dose for at least 3months constitute the cornerstone of VTE management. Availability of new direct oral anticoagulants, which have recently been shown to be as effective and as safe as vitamin K antagonist in clinical trials, should facilitate ambulatory management of VTE and favour extended treatments for individuals with unprovoked VTE or VTE provoked by a chronic/persistent risk factor.

[Home care for acute pulmonary embolism: Feasibility and general practitioner acceptability]. / Évaluation de l'acceptabilité du point de vue du médecin traitant et de la faisabilité de la prise en charge ambulatoire de l'embolie pulmonaire.

BACKGROUND: In France, initial management of pulmonary embolism (PE) is performed in the hospital setting. The latest international guidelines suggest that PE at low risk of mortality can be treated in the ambulatory care setting. This means that ambulatory care pathways and general practitioner (GP) opinions concerning such a change in practice need to be determined. OBJECTIVES: To determine: (1) rate of patients eligible for an ambulatory management of their PE and reasons for hospitalization of PE at low risk of mortality; (2) acceptability for GPs of PE home care and patient's desired care pathway. METHODS: Two-part prospective observational study conducted in Montpellier University Hospital from May 2012 to August 2013: (1) in-hospital study including all consecutive patients with non-hospital acquired PE; (2) telephonic survey on PE patient's ambulatory care pathway conducted among GPs. RESULTS: In-hospital study: 99.1% (n=211) of included patients were hospitalized and only 14.1% (n=30) had all criteria for home care. Patient's pathway survey: 68.3% (n=112) of GPs, particularly those aged 40-54 years and those who had already managed patients alone after hospital discharge, were in favour of home care for PE. One hundred and thirty-nine (84.8%) GPs wanted a collaborative management with an expert thrombosis physician and an outpatient follow-up visit at one week. CONCLUSION: Few patients managed at Montpellier University Hospital are eligible for ambulatory management of their PE. GPs have a favorable opinion of home care for PE if it is conducted in collaboration with an expert thrombosis physician.

[Therapeutic indications for percutaneous laser in patients with vascular malformations and tumors]. / Indications thérapeutiques du laser percutané dans les malformations vasculaires et les tumeurs vasculaires.

Lasers are increasingly used to treat vascular abnormalities. Indeed, this technique is non-invasive and allows a specific treatment. The aim of this review is to present some biophysical principles of the lasers, to describe the different sorts of lasers available for treatment in vascular medicine indications. Three principal lasers exist in vascular medicine: the pulsed-dye laser, for the treatment of superficial pink lesions, the NdYAG-KTP laser for purple and bigger lesions, and the NdYAG long pulse laser for even deeper and bigger vascular lesions. In vascular malformations, port wine stains can also be treated by pulsed-dye laser, KTP or NdYAG when they are old and thick. Telangiectasias are good indications for the three sorts of lasers, depending on their depth, color and size. Microcystic lymphatic malformations can be improved by laser treatment. Arterio-venous malformations constitute a contraindication of laser treatment. In vascular tumors, involuted infantile hemangiomas constitute an excellent indication of pulsed-dye laser treatment. Controlled studies are necessary to evaluate and to compare the efficacy of each laser, in order to determine their optimal indications and optimal parameters for each machine.

Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a first isolated distal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (i.e. without proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism) represents half of all cases of lower limb DVT. Its clinical significance and management are controversial. Data on long-term follow-up are scarce, especially concerning risk and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. METHODS: Using data from the OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'évaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we compared, 3 years after an index VTE event and after discontinuation of anticoagulants, (i) the incidence and type of recurrence in patients without cancer with a first iDDVT vs. a first isolated proximal DVT (iPDVT) and (ii) predictors of recurrence after iDDVT. RESULTS: Compared with patients with iPDVT (n = 259), patients with an iDDVT (n = 490) had a lower annualized incidence of overall VTE recurrence (5.2% [95% confidence interval 3.6-7.6] vs. 2.7% [1.9-3.8], respectively; P = 0.02) but a similar incidence of pulmonary embolism recurrence (1.0% [0.5-2.3] vs. 0.9% [0.5-1.6], respectively; P = 0.83). An age of > 50 years, unprovoked character of index iDDVT, and involvement of more than one vein in one or both legs each independently tripled the risk of recurrence, with the latter then being ≥ 3% per patient-year. Neither muscular vein nor deep-calf vein location of iDDVT nor clot diameter with compression influenced the risk of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: After stopping anticoagulants, patients with iDDVT have a significantly lower risk of overall VTE recurrence than did patients with iPDVT but a similar risk of serious recurrent VTE. Age > 50 years, unprovoked iDDVT, and number of thrombosed veins (more than one) influenced the risk of recurrence and may help to define patients at significant risk of recurrence.

Impact of anatomical location of lower limb venous thrombus on the risk of subsequent cancer.

After a proximal deep-vein thrombosis (P-DVT), the risk of diagnosis of a previously unsuspected cancer is high. Isolated distal DVT (iD-DVT; i.e. infra-popliteal DVT without pulmonary embolism [PE]) and isolated superficial-vein thrombosis (iSVT; i.e. without concomitant DVT and PE) are at least as frequent as P-DVT but their association with subsequent cancer is uncertain. We exploited data from the OPTIMEV prospective, observational, multicentre study to i) compare the risk of subsequent cancer three years after a first objectively confirmed iSVT, iD-DVT and iP-DVT in patients without a prior history of cancer or of venous thromboembolism, ii) assess predictors of subsequent cancer in cases of iD-DVT. The overall cumulative rates of cancer among the 304 patients with iSVT, 536 patients with iD-DVT, and 327 patients with iP-DVT were similar (3.4% 95% confidence interval [1.8-6.2], 3.9% [2.5-5.9] and 3.9% [2.3-6.8], respectively), regardless of whether the index venous thromboembolic event was unprovoked or associated with a major transient risk factor. Neither anatomical (muscular vs deep-calf DVT) nor ultrasound scan characteristics (number of thrombosed veins, clot diameter under compression) seemed strongly associated with the risk of cancer in cases of iD-DVT. In patients managed in routine practice, all the different clinical expressions of lower limb venous thromboembolism are associated with a similar risk of subsequent cancer. From a clinical practice point of view, this suggests that cancer screening, without discussing the necessity, or not, of such screening, should not differ between a deep-proximal, deep-distal or superficial location of thrombosis.