Knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of health care providers regarding the recommendation and use of long-acting reversible contraceptive devices for adolescent patients.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of healthcare providers in a region in southwestern Colombia regarding the recommendation and use of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods for adolescents. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. An online exploratory survey was designed to assess healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Valle del Cauca hospitals. For the development of this the questionnaire, a literature search and validation of the instrument's appearance were conducted. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 115 people. Knowledge: 62.6% and 33% of the participants did not consider themselves capable of correctly placing an intrauterine device (IUD) or a subdermal implant, respectively. However, 73.9% of the participants had adequate theoretical knowledge. Attitudes: 64.3% of the participants considered that adolescents can acquire contraceptive methods without limitations. Short-acting reversible methods were the least recommended. Perceptions: For IUDs, 40.8% and 16.5% of the participants imposed a minimum age and minimum parity requirement for their use, respectively. Side effects were the main reason for not recommending in health institutions with a lower level of complexity. CONCLUSION: Healthcare providers had positive attitudes and adequate theoretical knowledge concerning to the effectiveness of LARCs. The main areas for improvement were practical knowledge about the insertion and proper use of the devices, indications for referral to gynaecologists for the insertion procedure, and concerns about side effects.

Our research explores healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives for adolescents. While attitudes were positive, practical knowledge gaps on device, placement and referral indications emerged. Read the full findings to uncover more about LARCs in adolescent healthcare.

Six and twelve-month respiratory outcomes in a cohort of severe and critical COVID-19 survivors: A prospective monocentric study in Latin America.

Introduction: Severe COVID-19 can result in long-term sequelae known as "chronic COVID," characterized by a wide range of persistent physical and mental symptoms. Chest imaging and pulmonary function test alterations have been observed in recovered patients. Most studies focus on up to a 3-month follow-up after symptom onset or hospital discharge, with few reports on long-term follow-up and limited evidence regarding disease progression in Latin America. Methods: This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and changes in pulmonary function, imaging, and quality of life in severe and critical COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission in a high-complexity hospital in Latin America. A prospective cohort of survivors underwent clinical, radiological, pulmonary function, and quality of life assessments 6 and 12 months post-discharge. Results: One hundred twelve patients were included, all of whom attended the 6-month follow-up, and 99 returned for the 12-month follow-up. Most subjects had no previous respiratory symptoms or significant medical history. At the end of the follow-up period, 74% of the patients showed interstitial infiltrates in chest tomography and a higher frequency of fibroatelectatic tracts and parenchymal bands. Pulmonary function tests returned to normal ranges, except for carbon monoxide diffusion, but no altered scores were reported in the questionnaires. Conclusion: Despite residual radiological findings, most parameters studied in severe and critical COVID-19 survivors improved over the 12-month follow-up period. Regardless of the imaging abnormalities, the improvement in variables such as symptomatic relief and normal pulmonary function suggests that these alterations are transient. Carbon monoxide diffusion did not normalize by the end of the follow-up, which is consistent with the abnormalities reported in multiple studies, indicating a potential disease-related pattern.