ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced (CE) ultrasound using Sonazoid (SNZ-CEUS) by comparing with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for differentiating benign and malignant renal masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 306 consecutive patients (from 7 centers) with renal masses (40 benign tumors, 266 malignant tumors) diagnosed by both SNZ-CEUS, CE-CT or CE-MRI were enrolled between September 2020 and February 2021. The examinations were performed within 7 days, but the sequence was not fixed. Histologic results were available for 301 of 306 (98.37%) lesions and 5 lesions were considered benign after at least 2 year follow-up without change in size and image characteristics. The diagnostic performances were evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and compared by McNemar's test. RESULTS: In the head-to-head comparison, SNZ-CEUS and CE-MRI had comparable sensitivity (95.60 vs. 94.51%, P = 0.997), specificity (65.22 vs. 73.91%, P = 0.752), positive predictive value (91.58 vs. 93.48%) and negative predictive value (78.95 vs. 77.27%); SNZ-CEUS and CE-CT showed similar sensitivity (97.31 vs. 96.24%, P = 0.724); however, SNZ-CEUS had relatively lower than specificity than CE-CT (59.09 vs. 68.18%, P = 0.683). For nodules > 4 cm, CE-MRI demonstrated higher specificity than SNZ-CEUS (90.91 vs. 72.73%, P = 0.617) without compromise the sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: SNZ-CEUS, CE-CT, and CE-MRI demonstrate desirable and comparable sensitivity for the differentiation of renal mass. However, the specificity of all three imaging modalities is not satisfactory. SNZ-CEUS may be a suitable alternative modality for patients with renal dysfunction and those allergic to gadolinium or iodine-based agents.
Subject(s)
Contrast Media , Ferric Compounds , Iron , Kidney Neoplasms , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Oxides , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Ultrasonography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Adult , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore therapeutic results of local microwave ablation for hepatic metastasis and the factors influencing the survival after percutaneous microwave ablation therapy. METHODS: From July 1995 to June 2005 128 patients with 282 hepatic metastases nodules with the primary diseases of upper gastrointestinal tumor (n = 26), colorectal tumor (n = 44), breast carcinoma (n = 19), pulmonary carcinoma (n = 15), and malignant tumor in other part of the body (n = 24), underwent percutaneous microwave ablation therapy and were followed up for 29.7 +/- 19.9 months (1 - 103 months). The largest diameter of the metastatic nodules was 3.5 +/- 1.6 cm (0.7 - 8.6 cm). Sixty-four cases had 140 nodules
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Catheter Ablation/methods , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/secondary , Catheter Ablation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lower extremity bursae are very vulnerable to injury during strenuous physical exercises. Understanding the imaging characteristics of normal bursae is essential for early diagnosis of morphological abnormalities. Therefore, we evaluated the normal range of lower extremity bursae in healthy young men using high-resolution ultrasound (HR-US) imaging. METHODS: Bursae in the lower extremities were examined by HR-US in 290 Chinese healthy young men with a median age of 18 years (range, 18-23 years). The bilateral suprapatellar bursa (SPB), deep infrapatellar bursa (DIPB), popliteal bursa (PB), and retrocalcaneal bursa (RCB) were imaged and measured for analysis. RESULTS: The HR-US identification rates of the SPB, DIPB, PB, and RCB were 89.0% (517/580), 55.0% (319/580), 29.4% (171/580), and 49.5% (287/580), respectively. With the assumption that the bursae were normal in 95% of the study participants, the length and width values at the maximal cross-section of the SPB, DIPB, PB, and RCB were ≤18.00 and 6.09 mm, 8.10 and 2.11 mm, 7.67 and 3.93 mm, and 7.82 and 2.04 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Using HR-US imaging, we were able to analyze lower extremity bursae with high detection rates in healthy young men. The normal ranges of lower extremity bursa dimensions in healthy young men measured by HR-US in this study could be used as reference values for evaluation of bursa abnormalities in the lower extremity.