Nivolumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma in France: interim results of the observational, real-world WITNESS study.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab is the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) in patients resistant to prior antiangiogenic therapy. WITNESS is an ongoing, prospective, observational study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with aRCC treated in real life (or routine practice) in France (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03455452). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study includes adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of aRCC who have initiated nivolumab after 1-2 prior lines of antiangiogenic therapy. Endpoints include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of treatment (DOT), duration of response (DOR), overall response rate (ORR), subgroup analyses, and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Results after a median follow-up of 12.3 months are presented here. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients with aRCC were included, of whom 38.2% had a Karnofsky score <80, 77.8% received nivolumab as second-line therapy, and 69.5% had undergone a previous nephrectomy. In the overall population, median OS was 20.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.6-25.0] months and median PFS was 5.2 (95% CI 4.5-5.9) months. ORR was 34.5%, median DOT was 3.8 months, and median DOR was 16.5 months. Nivolumab was effective in different subgroups including patients with bone or glandular metastases and those receiving baseline corticosteroids. Moreover, effectiveness was observed irrespective of prior nephrectomy and line of treatment. No new safety signals were identified; TRAEs of any grade were reported in 32.0% of patients, grade ≥3 and serious TRAEs in 11.1% each, and TRAEs leading to discontinuation in 8.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results of the ongoing WITNESS study confirm the real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab monotherapy in previously treated patients with aRCC. Treatment benefits were similar to those observed in the pivotal phase III CheckMate 025 randomized clinical trial, despite a broader, real-life study population.

Advanced soft-tissue sarcoma in elderly patients: patterns of care and survival.

BACKGROUND: There are no data regarding the management of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients ≥75 years old diagnosed with metastatic or unresectable STS between 1991 and 2011 in 11 French and American centers. RESULTS: The study included 361 patients. Of these, 223 patients (62%) received systemic therapy, whereas 123 patients (34%) were managed with best supportive care (BSC) only. Patients who received BSC were more likely to be ≥80 years, with performance status (PS) ≥ 2, Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 10, and metastatic disease. The median progression-free survival of patients treated with systemic therapy was 4 months (95% CI: 2.9-5.1). Thirty-six patients (16%) stopped chemotherapy because of toxicity. Median overall survival (OS) of patients managed with specific therapy was 10.9 months (95% CI: 8.3-13.5) versus 5.3 months (95% CI: 3.6-7.1) for patients managed with BSC (P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 80 years, PS ≥ 2, and number of metastatic sites were the only independent factors associated with OS. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of elderly patients with advanced STS were denied chemotherapy. Further efforts are needed to define better the optimal care for fit and unfit elderly patients with STS.

Chemotherapy in patients with desmoid tumors: a study from the French Sarcoma Group (FSG).

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the role of chemotherapy (CT) in patients with recurrent and/or unresectable desmoid tumors (DTs) are scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of patients with DT who were treated with CT in centers from the French Sarcoma Group were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients entered the study. The two most common locations were extremities (35.5%) and internal trunk (32.5%). Twelve patients (19.5%) were diagnosed with Gardner syndrome. Thirty-seven patients (54.7%) received previously one or more lines of systemic therapies (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: 43.5%, antiestrogens: 43.5% and imatinib: 30.5%). Combination CT was delivered in 44 cases (71%) and single agent in 18 patients (29%), respectively. Thirteen patients (21%) received an anthracycline-containing regimen. The most frequent nonanthracycline regimen was the methotrexate-vinblastine combination (n=27). Complete response, partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were observed in 1 (1.6%), 12 (19.4%), 37 (59.6%) and 12 (19.4%) patients, respectively. The response rate was higher with anthracycline-containing regimens: 54% versus 12%, P=0.0011. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 40.8 months. The sole factor associated with improved PFS was the nonlimb location: 12.1 months (95% confidence interval 5.6-18.7) versus not reached, P=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: CT has significant activity in DT. Anthracycline-containing regimens appear to be associated with a higher response rate.

[Mediastinal sarcoidosis in an oncologic context: role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration]. / Sarcoïdose médiastinale dans un contexte oncologique : apport de la ponction aspiration guidée par échoendoscopie.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcoidosis and sarcoid reactions have been previously reported in association with cancer. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a minimally invasive test for investigating mediastinal lymph nodes PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 54 patients undergoing EUS-FNA in a cancer institute for suspected metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes showed by CT-imaging or positron emission tomography (PET). Patients with non-caseating granuloma identified by EUS-FNA were included RESULTS: EUS-FNA identified non-caseating granuloma in seven out of the 54 included patients. Most of them had positive PET. One patient had a prior history of sarcoidosis before the diagnosis of cancer. Another patient developed micrometastasis associated with sarcoid-like reaction. There was no adverse outcome associated with the EUS-FNA procedure CONCLUSIONS: Sarcoidosis must be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with a history of malignancy who develop mediastinal lymphadenopathy. EUS-FNA is a safe and minimally invasive test to obtain tissue diagnosis.