Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 50
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Endocr Pract ; 27(7): 649-660, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34090820

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS: TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION: TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.


Subject(s)
Endocrinology , Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , United States
2.
Endocr Pract ; 23(9): 1150-1155, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28920749

ABSTRACT

This commentary summarizes the history and reclassification of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclei (NIFTP). It reviews the salient histopathologic features that are based on immunohistochemical and molecular profiles and serve as inclusion and exclusion criteria. The authors also provide their own point of view regarding the practical issues and possible concerns that may be raised by both clinicians and patients based on the diagnosis of NIFTP. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists EFVPTC = encapsulated FVPTC FNA = fine-needle aspiration FVPTC = follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma NIFTP = noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features PTC = papillary thyroid carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/pathology , Carcinoma, Papillary/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Adenocarcinoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Endocrinologists , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis
3.
Endocr Pract ; 2017 Jul 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28704097

ABSTRACT

This commentary summarizes the history and reclassification of noninvasive follicular thyroid tumor with papillary like nuclei (NIFTP). The salient histopathologic features, which are based on immunohistochemical and molecular profiles and serve as inclusion and exclusion criteria are reviewed. The authors also provide their own point of view regarding the practical issues and possible concerns that may be raised by both clinicians and patients based on the diagnosis of NIFTP.

4.
Endocr Pract ; 23(8): 1006-1021, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786720

ABSTRACT

Clinical practice guideline (CPG), clinical practice algorithm (CPA), and clinical checklist (CC, collectively CPGAC) development is a high priority of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE). This 2017 update in CPG development consists of (1) a paradigm change wherein first, environmental scans identify important clinical issues and needs, second, CPA construction focuses on these clinical issues and needs, and third, CPG provide CPA node/edge-specific scientific substantiation and appended CC; (2) inclusion of new technical semantic and numerical descriptors for evidence types, subjective factors, and qualifiers; and (3) incorporation of patient-centered care components such as economics and transcultural adaptations, as well as implementation, validation, and evaluation strategies. This third point highlights the dominating factors of personal finances, governmental influences, and third-party payer dictates on CPGAC implementation, which ultimately impact CPGAC development. The AACE/ACE guidelines for the CPGAC program is a successful and ongoing iterative exercise to optimize endocrine care in a changing and challenging healthcare environment. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ACC = American College of Cardiology ACE = American College of Endocrinology ASeRT = ACE Scientific Referencing Team BEL = best evidence level CC = clinical checklist CPA = clinical practice algorithm CPG = clinical practice guideline CPGAC = clinical practice guideline, algorithm, and checklist EBM = evidence-based medicine EHR = electronic health record EL = evidence level G4GAC = Guidelines for Guidelines, Algorithms, and Checklists GAC = guidelines, algorithms, and checklists HCP = healthcare professional(s) POEMS = patient-oriented evidence that matters PRCT = prospective randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Checklist , Endocrinology , Humans , Reference Standards , Societies, Medical , United States
5.
Endocr Pract ; 22(2): 262-70, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26848631

ABSTRACT

Hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism can be readily diagnosed and can be treated in a safe, cost-effective manner. Professional organizations have given guidance on how and when to employ thyroid-stimulating hormone testing for the detection of thyroid dysfunction. Most recently, the United States Preventive Services Task Force did not endorse screening for thyroid dysfunction based on a lack of proven benefit and potential harm of treating those with thyroid dysfunction, which is mostly subclinical disease. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) is concerned that this may discourage physicians from testing for thyroid dysfunction when clinically appropriate. Given the lack of specificity of thyroid-associated symptoms, the appropriate diagnosis of thyroid disease requires biochemical confirmation. The Thyroid Scientific Committee of the AACE has produced this White Paper to highlight the important difference between screening and case-based testing in the practice of clinical medicine. We recommend that thyroid dysfunction should be frequently considered as a potential etiology for many of the nonspecific complaints that physicians face daily. The application and success of safe and effective interventions are dependent on an accurate diagnosis. We, therefore, advocate for an aggressive case-finding approach, based on identifying those persons most likely to have thyroid disease that will benefit from its treatment.


Subject(s)
Mass Screening/standards , Thyroid Diseases/diagnosis , Thyroid Function Tests/standards , Endocrinology/standards , Endocrinology/trends , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Preventive Medicine/standards , Preventive Medicine/trends , Prognosis , Severity of Illness Index , Thyroid Diseases/classification , Thyroid Function Tests/methods , United States
6.
Endocr Pract ; 22(11): 1319-1326, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27482609

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Hypothyroidism requires life-long thyroid hormone replacement therapy in most patients. Oral levothyroxine (LT4) is an established safe and effective treatment for hypothyroidism, but some issues remain unsettled. METHODS: The Italian Association of Clinical Endocrinologists appointed a panel of experts to provide an updated statement for appropriate use of thyroid hormone formulations for hypothyroidism replacement therapy. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists' protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines was followed. RESULTS: LT4 is the first choice in replacement therapy. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) should be maintained between 1.0 and 3.0 mIU/L in young subjects and at the upper normal limit in elderly or fragile patients. Achievement of biochemical targets, patient well-being, and adherence to treatment should be addressed. In patients with unstable serum TSH, a search for interfering factors and patient compliance is warranted. Liquid or gel formulations may be considered in subjects with hampered LT4 absorption or who do not allow sufficient time before or after meals and LT4 replacement. Replacement therapy with LT4 and L-triiodothyronine (LT3) combination is generally not recommended. A trial may be considered in patients with normal values of serum TSH who continue to complain of symptoms of hypothyroidism only after co-existent nonthyroid problems have been excluded or optimally managed. LT3 should be administered in small (LT4:LT3 ratio, 10:1 to 20:1) divided daily doses. Combined therapy should be avoided in elderly patients or those with cardiac risk factors and in pregnancy. CONCLUSION: LT4 therapy should be aimed at resolution of symptoms of hypothyroidism, normalization of serum TSH, and improvement of quality of life. In selected cases, the use of liquid LT4 formulations or combined LT4/LT3 treatment may be considered to improve adherence to treatment or patient well-being. ABBREVIATIONS: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists FT3 = free triiodothyronine FT4 = free thyroxine LT3 = levotriiodothyronine LT4 = levothyroxine MeSH = medicine medical subject headings QoL = quality of life TSH = thyroid-stimulating hormone.


Subject(s)
Endocrinologists/standards , Hormone Replacement Therapy/standards , Hypothyroidism/drug therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , Thyrotropin/administration & dosage , Thyroxine/administration & dosage , Triiodothyronine/administration & dosage , Humans
7.
Endocr Pract ; 22(5): 622-39, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27167915

ABSTRACT

Thyroid nodules are detected in up to 50 to 60% of healthy subjects. Most nodules do not cause clinically significant symptoms, and as a result, the main challenge in their management is to rule out malignancy, with ultrasonography (US) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy serving as diagnostic cornerstones. The key issues discussed in these guidelines are as follows: (1) US-based categorization of the malignancy risk and indications for US-guided FNA (henceforth, FNA), (2) cytologic classification of FNA samples, (3) the roles of immunocytochemistry and molecular testing applied to thyroid FNA, (4) therapeutic options, and (5) follow-up strategy. Thyroid nodule management during pregnancy and in children are also addressed. On the basis of US features, thyroid nodules may be categorized into 3 groups: low-, intermediate-and high-malignancy risk. FNA should be considered for nodules ≤10 mm diameter only when suspicious US signs are present, while nodules ≤5 mm should be monitored rather than biopsied. A classification scheme of 5 categories (nondiagnostic, benign, indeterminate, suspicious for malignancy, or malignant) is recommended for the cytologic report. Indeterminate lesions are further subdivided into 2 subclasses to more accurately stratify the risk of malignancy. At present, no single cytochemical or genetic marker can definitely rule out malignancy in indeterminate nodules. Nevertheless, these tools should be considered together with clinical data, US signs, elastographic pattern, or results of other imaging techniques to improve the management of these lesions. Most thyroid nodules do not require any treatment, and levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive therapy is not recommended. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) should be the first-line treatment option for relapsing, benign cystic lesions, while US-guided thermal ablation treatments may be considered for solid or mixed symptomatic benign thyroid nodules. Surgery remains the treatment of choice for malignant or suspicious nodules. The present document updates previous guidelines released in 2006 and 2010 by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), American College of Endocrinology (ACE) and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AME).


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Techniques, Endocrine/standards , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Endocrinology/standards , Female , Humans , Italy , Pregnancy , Thyroid Nodule/classification , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , United States
8.
Endocr Pract ; 22(4): 476-501, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27031655

ABSTRACT

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) and American College of Endocrinology (ACE) convened their first Workshop for recommendations to optimize Clinical Practice Algorithm (CPA) development for Latin America (LA) in diabetes (focusing on glycemic control), obesity (focusing on weight loss), thyroid (focusing on thyroid nodule diagnostics), and bone (focusing on postmenopausal osteoporosis) on February 28, 2015, in San Jose, Costa Rica. A standardized methodology is presented incorporating various transculturalization factors: resource availability (including imaging equipment and approved pharmaceuticals), health care professional and patient preferences, lifestyle variables, socio-economic parameters, web-based global accessibility, electronic implementation, and need for validation protocols. A standardized CPA template with node-specific recommendations to assist the local transculturalization process is provided. Participants unanimously agreed on the following five overarching principles for LA: (1) there is only one level of optimal endocrine care, (2) hemoglobin A1C should be utilized at every level of diabetes care, (3) nutrition education and increased pharmaceutical options are necessary to optimize the obesity care model, (4) quality neck ultrasound must be part of an optimal thyroid nodule care model, and (5) more scientific evidence is needed on osteoporosis prevalence and cost to justify intervention by governmental health care authorities. This 2015 AACE/ACE Workshop marks the beginning of a structured activity that assists local experts in creating culturally sensitive, evidence-based, and easy-to-implement tools for optimizing endocrine care on a global scale.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Culture , Endocrinology/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Consensus , Costa Rica , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Endocrinology/education , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Humans , Latin America , Obesity/diagnosis , Obesity/therapy , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , United States
9.
Endocr Pract ; 21(12): 1403-14, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26642101

ABSTRACT

This document represents the official position of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the American College of Endocrinology. Where there were no randomized controlled trials or specific U.S. FDA labeling for issues in clinical practice, the participating clinical experts utilized their judgment and experience. Every effort was made to achieve consensus among the committee members. Position statements are meant to provide guidance, but they are not to be considered prescriptive for any individual patient and cannot replace the judgment of a clinician.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure , Consensus , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Insulin/therapeutic use , Lipid Metabolism/drug effects , Obesity/complications , Obesity/metabolism , Obesity/physiopathology , Obesity/therapy , Prediabetic State/metabolism , Prediabetic State/pathology , Prediabetic State/physiopathology , Prediabetic State/therapy , United States
11.
Endocr Pract ; 20(7): 692-702, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25057098

ABSTRACT

In 2010, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) published an update to the original 2004 guidelines. This update hybridized strict evidence-based medicine methods with subjective factors and improved the efficiency of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) production, clinical applicability, and usefulness. Current and persistent shortcomings involving suboptimal implementation and protracted development timelines are addressed in the current 2014 update. The major advances include 1) formulation of an organizational educational strategy, represented by the AACE Council on Education, to address relevant teaching and decision-making tools for clinical endocrinologists, and to generate specific clinical questions to drive CPG, clinical algorithm (CA), and clinical checklist (CC) development; 2) creation and prioritization of printed and online CAs and CCs with a supporting evidence base; 3) focus on clinically relevant and question-oriented topics; 4) utilization of "cascades," where there can be more than 1 recommendation for 1 clinical question; and 5) incorporation of performance metrics to validate, optimize, and effectively update CPG, CAs, and CCs. Efforts continue to translate these clinical tools to electronic formats that can be integrated into a paperless healthcare delivery system, as well as applying them to diverse clinical settings by incorporating transcultural factors.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Checklist , Endocrinology , Humans , Time Factors
12.
Endocr Pract ; 20(4): 352-9, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24246343

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) could have a more consistent and meaningful impact on clinician behavior if they were delivered as electronic algorithms that provide patient-specific advice during patient-physician encounters. We developed a computer-interpretable algorithm for U.S. and European users for the purpose of diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules that is based on the "AACE, AME, ETA Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules," a narrative, evidence-based CPG. METHODS: We initially employed the guideline-modeling language GuideLine Interchange Format, version 3, known as GLIF3, which emphasizes the organization of a care algorithm into a flowchart. The flowchart specified the sequence of tasks required to evaluate a patient with a thyroid nodule. PROforma, a second guideline-modeling language, was then employed to work with data that are not necessarily obtained in a rigid flowchart sequence. Tallis-a user-friendly web-based "enactment tool"- was then used as the "execution engine" (computer program). This tool records and displays tasks that are done and prompts users to perform the next indicated steps. The development process was iteratively performed by clinical experts and knowledge engineers. RESULTS: We developed an interactive web-based electronic algorithm that is based on a narrative CPG. This algorithm can be used in a variety of regions, countries, and resource-specific settings. CONCLUSION: Electronic guidelines provide patient-specific decision support that could standardize care and potentially improve the quality of care. The "demonstrator" electronic thyroid nodule guideline that we describe in this report is available at http://demos.deontics.com/trace-review-app (username: reviewer; password: tnodule1). The demonstrator must be more extensively "trialed" before it is recommended for routine use.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Algorithms , Humans , Internet , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis
15.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1228834, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37654563

ABSTRACT

Clinicians seeking guidance for evaluating and managing thyroid nodules currently have several resources. The principal ones are narrative clinical guidelines and clinical risk calculators. This paper will review the strengths and weaknesses of both. The paper will introduce a concept of computer interpretable guideline, a novel way of transforming narrative guidelines in to a clinical decision support tool that can provide patient specific recommendations at the point of care. The paper then describes an experience of developing an interactive web based computer interpretable guideline for thyroid nodule management, called Thyroid Nodule Management App (TNAPP). The advantages of this approach and the potential barriers for widespread adaptation are discussed.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Nodule , Humans , Thyroid Nodule/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/therapy , Acclimatization , Computers , Electronics , Risk Assessment
19.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 164(6): 1166-1171, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33048614

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Endocrine surgery is an expanding field within otolaryngology. We hypothesized that a novel endocrine surgery fellowship model for in-practice otolaryngologists could result in expert-level training. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative clinical study with chart review. SETTING: Urban community practice and academic medical center. METHODS: Two board-certified general otolaryngologists collaborated with a senior endocrine surgeon to increase their endocrine surgery expertise between March 2015 and December 2017. The senior surgeon provided intensive surgical training to both surgeons for all of their endocrine surgeries. Both parties collaborated with endocrinology to coordinate medical care and receive referrals. All patients undergoing endocrine surgery during this time frame were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 235 endocrine surgeries were performed. Of these, 198 thyroid surgeries were performed, including 98 total thyroidectomies (48%), 90 lobectomies (45%), and 10 completion thyroidectomies (5%). Sixty cases demonstrated papillary thyroid carcinoma, 11 follicular thyroid carcinoma, and 4 medullary thyroid carcinoma. Neck dissections were performed in 14 of the cases. Thirty-seven parathyroid explorations were performed. There were no reports of permanent hypoparathyroidism. Thirteen patients (5.5%) developed temporary hypoparathyroidism. Six patients (2.5%) developed postoperative seroma. Three patients (1.3%) developed postoperative hematomas requiring reoperation. One patient (0.4%) developed permanent vocal fold paralysis, and 3 patients (1.3%) had temporary dysphonia. Thirty-five of 37 (94.5%) parathyroid explorations resulted in biochemical resolution of the patient's primary hyperparathyroidism. CONCLUSION: This is the first description of a new fellowship paradigm where a senior surgeon provides fellowship training to attending surgeons already in practice.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Surgical Procedures/education , Fellowships and Scholarships , Models, Educational , Otolaryngology/education , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Qualitative Research , Retrospective Studies , Thyroidectomy/education
20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35026973

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The first edition of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules was published in 2006 and updated in 2010 and 2016. The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi multidisciplinary thyroid nodules task force was charged with developing a novel interactive electronic algorithmic tool to evaluate thyroid nodules. METHODS: The Thyroid Nodule App (termed TNAPP) was based on the updated 2016 clinical practice guideline recommendations while incorporating recent scientific evidence and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic procedures and surgical overtreatment. This manuscript describes the algorithmic tool development, its data requirements, and its basis for decision making. It provides links to the web-based algorithmic tool and a tutorial. RESULTS: TNAPP and TI-RADS were cross-checked on 95 thyroid nodules with histology-proven diagnoses. CONCLUSION: TNAPP is a novel interactive web-based tool that uses clinical, imaging, cytologic, and molecular marker data to guide clinical decision making to evaluate and manage thyroid nodules. It may be used as a heuristic tool for evaluating and managing patients with thyroid nodules. It can be adapted to create registries for solo practices, large multispecialty delivery systems, regional and national databases, and research consortiums. Prospective studies are underway to validate TNAPP to determine how it compares with other ultrasound-based classification systems and whether it can improve the care of patients with clinically significant thyroid nodules while reducing the substantial burden incurred by those who do not benefit from further evaluation and treatment.


Subject(s)
Endocrinology , Thyroid Neoplasms , Thyroid Nodule , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thyroid Nodule/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL