ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of natriuretic peptide (NP)-guided therapy compared to clinically-guided therapy in reducing mortality and hospital admissions in chronic heart failure (HF) patients. Methods: Randomised clinical trials (RCT) were selected through a systematic review. Four meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of overall mortality, HF-related mortality, overall hospital admissions, and HF-related hospital admissions. Heterogeneity between studies and publication bias were also assessed. Results: Nine RCTs were found with a total of 1914 patients. NP-guided therapy significantly reduced overall mortality and HF-related hospital admissions. No significant results were found for HF-related mortality and overall hospital admissions. Some clinical heterogeneity regarding interventions performed was found between studies. Publication bias was found for HF-related and overall hospital admissions. Conclusions: NP-guided therapy seems to improve outcomes compared to clinically-guided therapy. However, heterogeneity found between interventions might reduce the generalisation of these results. Specific interventions of the clinical trials should be examined when making recommendations regarding NP-guided therapy. © 2017 Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Published by Masson Doyma México S.A. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Resumen Objetivo: Evaluar la eficacia de la terapia guiada por el péptido natriurético (PN) en comparación con la terapia guiada clínicamente para reducir la mortalidad y la hospitalización de la insuficiencia cardiaca (IC) crónica. Métodos: Los ensayos clínicos aleatorizados fueron seleccionados a través de una revisión sistemática. Cuatro metaanálisis se realizaron para los resultados de mortalidad general, mortalidad por IC, hospitalización general y la hospitalización por IC. Se evaluó la heterogeneidad entre los estudios y el sesgo de publicación. Resultados: Nueve ensayos clínicos aleatorizados se encontraron con un total de 1,914 pacientes. La terapia guiada con el PN reduce significativamente la mortalidad general y la hospitalización por IC. No se encontraron resultados significativos para la mortalidad por IC y la hospitalización general. El sesgo de publicación se encontró para las hospitalizaciones por IC y globales. Conclusiones: La terapia guiada por PN parece mejorar los resultados en comparación con la terapia guiada clínicamente. Sin embargo, la heterogeneidad encontrada entre las intervenciones podría reducir la generalización de estos resultados. Las intervenciones específicas de los ensayos clínicos deben ser analizadas al hacer recomendaciones con respecto a la terapia de guiada por PN. © 2017 Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez. Publicado por Masson Doyma México S.A. Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Subject(s)
Humans , Biomarkers/metabolism , Natriuretic Peptides/metabolism , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Chronic Disease , Publication Bias , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Discussion Forums , Societies/ethics , Societies/policies , Health Systems/legislation & jurisprudence , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Organizational Culture , Societies/analysis , Societies/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Systems/organization & administration , Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & controlABSTRACT
No disponible