Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 489: 116995, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862081

ABSTRACT

Identification of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) in a regulatory context requires a high level of evidence. However, lines of evidence (e.g. human, in vivo, in vitro or in silico) are heterogeneous and incomplete for quantifying evidence of the adverse effects and mechanisms involved. To date, for the regulatory appraisal of metabolism-disrupting chemicals (MDCs), no harmonised guidance to assess the weight of evidence has been developed at the EU or international level. To explore how to develop this, we applied a formal Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) approach within the European GOLIATH project. EKE captures expert judgment in a quantitative manner and provides an estimate of uncertainty of the final opinion. As a proof of principle, we selected one suspected MDC -triphenyl phosphate (TPP) - based on its related adverse endpoints (obesity/adipogenicity) relevant to metabolic disruption and a putative Molecular Initiating Event (MIE): activation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). We conducted a systematic literature review and assessed the quality of the lines of evidence with two independent groups of experts within GOLIATH, with the objective of categorising the metabolic disruption properties of TPP, by applying an EKE approach. Having followed the entire process separately, both groups arrived at the same conclusion, designating TPP as a "suspected MDC" with an overall quantitative agreement exceeding 85%, indicating robust reproducibility. The EKE method provides to be an important way to bring together scientists with diverse expertise and is recommended for future work in this area.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Organophosphates , Animals , Humans , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Expert Testimony , Organophosphates/toxicity , PPAR gamma/metabolism , PPAR gamma/agonists , Risk Assessment
2.
Environ Sci Technol ; 55(24): 16489-16501, 2021 12 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843233

ABSTRACT

Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are able to deregulate the hormone system, notably through interactions with nuclear receptors (NRs). The mechanisms of action and biological effects of many EDCs have mainly been tested on human and mouse but other species such as zebrafish and xenopus are increasingly used as a model to study the effects of EDCs. Among NRs, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a main target of EDCs, for which most experimental data have been obtained from human and mouse models. To assess interspecies differences, we tested known human PPARγ ligands on reporter cell lines expressing either human, mouse, zebrafish, or xenopus PPARγ. Using these cell lines, we were able to highlight major interspecies differences. Known hPPARγ pharmaceutical ligands modulated hPPARγ and mPPARγ activities in a similar manner, while xPPARγ was less responsive and zfPPARγ was not modulated at all by these compounds. On the contrary, human liver X receptor (hLXR) ligands GW 3965 and WAY-252623 were only active on zfPPARγ. Among environmental compounds, several molecules activated the PPARγ of the four species similarly, e.g., phthalates (MEHP), perfluorinated compounds (PFOA, PFOS), and halogenated derivatives of BPA (TBBPA, TCBPA), but some of them like diclofenac and the organophosphorus compounds tri-o-tolyl phosphate and triphenyl phosphate were most active on zfPPARγ. This study confirms or shows for the first time the h, m, x, and zfPPARγ activities of several chemicals and demonstrates the importance of the use of species-specific models to study endocrine and metabolism disruption by environmental chemicals.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Animals , Ligands , Mice , PPAR gamma , Zebrafish
3.
Environ Sci Technol ; 54(15): 9510-9518, 2020 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32650635

ABSTRACT

The environmental risk of natural and synthetic ligands of the nuclear progesterone receptor (nPR) has been pointed out, however there is still a lack of mechanistic information regarding their ability to interact with nuclear PR in aquatic species. To identify possible interspecies differences, we assessed in vitro the ability of manifold progestins to transactivate zebrafish (zf) and human (h) PRs, using two established reporter cell lines, U2OS-zfPR and HELN-hPR, respectively. Reference ligands highlighted some differences between the two receptors. The reference human agonist ligands promegestone and progesterone induced luciferase activity in both cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas the natural zebrafish progestin 17α,20ß-dihydroxy-4-pregnen-3-one activated zfPR but not hPR. The potent human PR antagonist mifepristone (RU486) blocked PR-induced luciferase in both cell models but with different potencies. In addition, a set of 22 synthetic progestins were screened on the two cell lines. Interestingly, all of the tested compounds activated hPR in the HELN-hPR cell line, whereas the majority of them acted as zfPR antagonists in U2OS-zfPR. Such zfPR-specific response was further confirmed in zebrafish liver cells. This study provides novel information regarding the activity of a large set of progestins on human and zebrafish PR and highlights major interspecies differences in their activity, which may result in differential effects of progestins between fish and humans.


Subject(s)
Progesterone , Progestins , Animals , Humans , Mifepristone/pharmacology , Receptors, Progesterone , Zebrafish
4.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 305: 12-21, 2016 08 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27245768

ABSTRACT

The effects of some progestins on fish reproduction have been recently reported revealing the hazard of this class of steroidal pharmaceuticals. However, their effects at the central nervous system level have been poorly studied until now. Notwithstanding, progesterone, although still widely considered primarily a sex hormone, is an important agent affecting many central nervous system functions. Herein, we investigated the effects of a large set of synthetic ligands of the nuclear progesterone receptor on the glial-specific expression of the zebrafish brain aromatase (cyp19a1b) using zebrafish mechanism-based assays. Progesterone and 24 progestins were first screened on transgenic cyp19a1b-GFP zebrafish embryos. We showed that progesterone, dydrogesterone, drospirenone and all the progesterone-derived progestins had no effect on GFP expression. Conversely, all progestins derived from 19-nortesterone induced GFP in a concentration-dependent manner with EC50 ranging from the low nM range to hundreds nM. The 19-nortestosterone derived progestins levonorgestrel (LNG) and norethindrone (NET) were further tested in a radial glial cell context using U251-MG cells co-transfected with zebrafish ER subtypes (zfERα, zfERß1 or zfERß2) and cyp19a1b promoter linked to luciferase. Progesterone had no effect on luciferase activity while NET and LNG induced luciferase activity that was blocked by ICI 182,780. Zebrafish-ERs competition assays showed that NET and LNG were unable to bind to ERs, suggesting that the effects of these compounds on cyp19a1b require metabolic activation prior to elicit estrogenic activity. Overall, we demonstrate that 19-nortestosterone derived progestins elicit estrogenic activity by inducing cyp19a1b expression in radial glial cells. Given the crucial role of radial glial cells and neuro-estrogens in early development of brain, the consequences of exposure of fish to these compounds require further investigation.


Subject(s)
Aromatase/metabolism , Neuroglia/drug effects , Progesterone Congeners/pharmacology , Zebrafish Proteins/metabolism , Androgens/pharmacology , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Aromatase/genetics , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Estradiol/pharmacology , Estrogens/pharmacology , Green Fluorescent Proteins/genetics , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Neuroglia/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Testosterone/pharmacology , Zebrafish , Zebrafish Proteins/genetics
5.
Sci Total Environ ; 948: 174889, 2024 Oct 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047839

ABSTRACT

Steroid receptors (SRs) are transcription factors activated by steroid hormones (SHs) that belong to the nuclear receptors (NRs) superfamily. Several studies have shown that SRs are targets of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs), widespread substances in the environment capable of interfering with the endogenous hormonal pathways and causing adverse health effects in living organisms and/or their progeny. Cell lines with SRs reporter gene are currently used for in vitro screening of large quantities of chemicals with suspected endocrine-disrupting activities. However, most of these cell lines express human SRs and therefore the toxicological data obtained are also extrapolated to non-mammalian species. In parallel, in vivo tests have recently been developed on fish species whose data are also extrapolated to mammalian species. As some species-specific differences in SRs activation by natural and synthetic chemicals have been recently reported, the aim of this review is to summarize those between human and fish SRs, as representatives of mammalian and non-mammalian toxicology, respectively. Overall, this literature study aims to improve inter-species extrapolation of toxicological data on EDCs and to understand which reporter gene cell lines expressing human SRs are relevant for the assessment of effects in fish and whether in vivo tests on fish can be properly used in the assessment of adverse effects on human health.


Subject(s)
Endocrine Disruptors , Fishes , Receptors, Steroid , Humans , Animals , Fishes/metabolism , Endocrine Disruptors/toxicity , Receptors, Steroid/metabolism , Species Specificity , Water Pollutants, Chemical/toxicity
6.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 14: 1235501, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37654569

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The action of environmental steroids on the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) has been pointed out with the risk to impair physiological immune and metabolic processes regulated by this nuclear receptor. However, there is still a lack of mechanistic information regarding their ability to interact with GR in aquatic species. Methods: To investigate ligand activation differences between hGR and zebrafish GR (zfGR), we tested several natural and synthetic steroids using reporter cell lines expressing hGR or zfGR. Results and discussion: Almost all the glucocorticoids tested (dexamethasone, cortisol, bimedrazol, medrol, cortivazol and fluticasone) are agonists of the two receptors with similar potencies. The dissociated glucocorticoids, RU24782 and RU24858 are agonists of both zfGR and hGR but with a better potency for the latter. On the other hand, the synthetic glucocorticoid forbimenol and the mineralocorticoid aldosterone are agonist on hGR but antagonist on zfGR. The other steroids tested, androgens and progestins, are all antagonists of both GRs with equal or lower potency on zfGR than on hGR. Surprisingly, the lower efficacy and potency on zfGR of aldosterone, forbimenol and the dissociated glucocorticoids is not related to their affinity for the receptors which would suggest that it could be related to less efficacious recruitment of coactivators by zfGR compared to hGR.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids , Receptors, Glucocorticoid , Humans , Animals , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Zebrafish , Aldosterone , Steroids , Pharmaceutical Preparations
7.
Toxicol In Vitro ; 88: 105554, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36641061

ABSTRACT

We report an interlaboratory evaluation of a recently developed androgen receptor (AR) transactivation assay using the UALH-hAR reporter cell line that stably expresses the luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of androgen receptor elements (AREs) with no glucocorticoid receptor (GR) crosstalk. Herein, a two-step prevalidation study involving three laboratories was conducted to assess performance criteria of the method such as transferability as well as robustness, sensitivity, and specificity. The first step consisted in the validation of the transfer of the cell line to participant laboratories through the testing of three reference chemicals: the AR agonist dihydrotestosterone, the AR antagonist hydroxyflutamide and the glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Secondly, a blinded study was conducted by screening a selection of ten chemicals, including four AR agonists, five AR antagonists, and one non-active chemical. All test compounds yielded the same activity profiles in all laboratories. The logEC50 (agonist assay) or logIC50 (antagonist assay) were in the same range, with intra-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.1-3.4% and interlaboratory CVs of 1-4%, indicating very good within- and between-laboratory reproducibility. Our results were consistent with literature and regulatory data (OECD TG458). Overall, this interlaboratory study demonstrated that the UALH-hAR assay is transferable, produces reliable, accurate and specific (anti)androgenic activity of chemicals, and can be considered for further regulatory validation.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Androgen Receptor Antagonists , Transcriptional Activation , Humans , Androgen Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Androgens , Cell Line , Receptors, Androgen/genetics , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
8.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 12: 665521, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34084152

ABSTRACT

The nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that regulates genes involved in xenobiotic metabolism in mammals. Many studies suggest that PXR may play a similar role in fish. The interaction of human PXR (hPXR) with a variety of structurally diverse endogenous and exogenous chemicals is well described. In contrast, little is known about the zebrafish PXR (zfPXR). In order to compare the effects of these chemicals on the PXR of these two species, we established reporter cell lines expressing either hPXR or zfPXR. Using these cellular models, we tested the hPXR and zfPXR activity of various steroids and pesticides. We provide evidence that steroids were generally stronger activators of zfPXR while pesticides were more potent on hPXR. In addition, some chemicals (econazole nitrate, mifepristone, cypermethrin) showed an antagonist effect on zfPXR, whereas no antagonist chemical has been identified for hPXR. These results confirm significant differences in the ability of chemicals to modulate zfPXR in comparison to hPXR and point out that zfPXR assays should be used instead of hPXR assays for evaluating the potential risks of chemicals on aquatic species.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/methods , Gene Expression Regulation/drug effects , Genes, Reporter , Pesticides/pharmacology , Pregnane X Receptor/metabolism , Steroids/pharmacology , Animals , Humans , In Vitro Techniques , Pregnane X Receptor/genetics , Zebrafish
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL