Assessment of reproductive outcomes of fresh versus cryopreserved ejaculated sperm samples-a retrospective analysis of 44 423 oocyte donation ICSI cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Does the use of frozen sperm affect live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative LBR (CLBR) compared to fresh sperm samples in oocyte donation ICSI cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Although there were slight decreases in pregnancy rates (PRs) and LBR, as well as CLBR per embryo replaced and per embryo transfer (ET), when frozen sperm samples were used compared to fresh ejaculates, their clinical impact was limited. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Sperm cryopreservation is part of the daily routine in reproduction clinics worldwide because of its many advantages in cycle planning. Nonetheless, there is a lack of agreement in terms of its impact on the outcomes of ICSI cycles. Previous studies showed conflicting conclusions and focused on different populations, which makes reaching consensus on the impact of sperm freezing-thawing complicated. Moreover, classical parameters are used to assess cycle success: pregnancy, live birth and miscarriage rates per ET. This study reports those measurements plus CLBR, which more accurately reflects the impact of the technique on the likelihood of achieving a newborn. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective multicenter observational cohort study, including data from 37 041 couples and 44 423 ICSI procedures from January 2008 to June 2022, was carried out. The group using frozen sperm included 23 852 transferred embryos and 108 661 inseminated oocytes, whereas the fresh sample group comprised 73 953 embryos replaced and 381 509 injected oocytes. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Outcomes measured per first ET and per ET were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test and Chi-squared test, as appropriate. Binary-logistics regression models were used to adjust the analyses according to clinically relevant co-variables. Kaplan-Meier curves plotted the CLBR per oocyte inseminated, per embryo replaced and per ET, and compared between groups using the Mantel-Cox test. Cox regressions were employed for the multivariate analyses of CLBR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The frozen sperm group showed a slightly lower biochemical (3.55% and 2.56%), clinical (3.68% and 3.54%) and ongoing (3.63% and 3.15%) PR compared to the cycles using fresh sperm, respectively, both per first ET and per ET. LBR was 4.57% lower per first ET and 3.95% lower per ET in the frozen sperm group than the fresh sperm group. There was also a subtle increase of 2.66% in biochemical miscarriage rate per ET when using frozen versus fresh sperm. All these differences remained statistically significant after the multivariate analysis (adjusted P ≤ 0.001). There were statistically significant differences in CLBR per embryo replaced and per ET but not per oocyte used (adjusted P = 0.071). Despite the statistical significance of the differences between the groups, those using frozen sperm required only 0.54 more oocytes injected, 0.45 more embryos transferred and 0.41 more ET procedures, on average, to achieve a live birth compared to the fresh samples. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective nature of the study subjects the data to biases or potential errors during annotation on the source clinical and cycle records. This study uses multivariate analyses to control biases as much as possible. Using the oocyte donation model also contributes to reducing heterogeneity in the oocyte quality factor. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The large sample sizes included in this study allowed for the detection of small changes in cycle success rates between groups. Although statistically significant, the decrease in PRs, LBR, and CLBR when using frozen sperm can be clinically overlooked in favor of the many benefits of sperm cryopreservation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Not applicable.

Changes in environmental exposures over decades may influence the genetic architecture of severe spermatogenic failure.

STUDY QUESTION: Do the genetic determinants of idiopathic severe spermatogenic failure (SPGF) differ between generations? SUMMARY ANSWER: Our data support that the genetic component of idiopathic SPGF is impacted by dynamic changes in environmental exposures over decades. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The idiopathic form of SPGF has a multifactorial etiology wherein an interaction between genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors leads to the disease onset and progression. At the genetic level, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) allow the analysis of millions of genetic variants across the genome in a hypothesis-free manner, as a valuable tool for identifying susceptibility risk loci. However, little is known about the specific role of non-genetic factors and their influence on the genetic determinants in this type of conditions. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Case-control genetic association analyses were performed including a total of 912 SPGF cases and 1360 unaffected controls. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: All participants had European ancestry (Iberian and German). SPGF cases were diagnosed during the last decade either with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (n = 547) or with idiopathic non-obstructive oligozoospermia (n = 365). Case-control genetic association analyses were performed by logistic regression models considering the generation as a covariate and by in silico functional characterization of the susceptibility genomic regions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: This analysis revealed 13 novel genetic association signals with SPGF, with eight of them being independent. The observed associations were mostly explained by the interaction between each lead variant and the age-group. Additionally, we established links between these loci and diverse non-genetic factors, such as toxic or dietary habits, respiratory disorders, and autoimmune diseases, which might potentially influence the genetic architecture of idiopathic SPGF. LARGE SCALE DATA: GWAS data are available from the authors upon reasonable request. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Additional independent studies involving large cohorts in ethnically diverse populations are warranted to confirm our findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Overall, this study proposes an innovative strategy to achieve a more precise understanding of conditions such as SPGF by considering the interactions between a variable exposome through different generations and genetic predisposition to complex diseases. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by the "Plan Andaluz de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (PAIDI 2020)" (ref. PY20_00212, P20_00583), the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Spanish National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation (ref. PID2020-120157RB-I00 funded by MCIN/ AEI/10.13039/501100011033), and the 'Proyectos I+D+i del Programa Operativo FEDER 2020' (ref. B-CTS-584-UGR20). ToxOmics-Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, Genetics, Oncology and Human Toxicology, is also partially supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Projects: UIDB/00009/2020; UIDP/00009/2020). The authors declare no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Semen cryopreservation for an oncological reason: a retrospective study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: How do cancer type and treatment affect semen quality before and after treatment, and what effect does it have in their clinical management of infertility? Also, what is the rate of patients using cryopreserved semen samples after treatment? DESIGN: Patients who cryopreserved spermatozoa for oncological reasons between 2000 and 2022 in IVI clinics in Spain were retrospectively reviewed. Semen parameters were analysed before and after treatment, and utilization and destruction rates were calculated. Total motile sperm count (TMSC) was used for assisted reproductive technology (ART) counselling. RESULTS: A total of 724 patients cryopreserved their semen during the study period. The semen parameters of the cancer patients' semen before and after treatment were heterogeneous, with significant differences between cancer type and semen parameters. The utilization rate was relatively low (0.4%), whereas the destruction rate was 23.1%. CONCLUSION: Cancer and antineoplastic treatment affect everyone differently. Therefore, sperm cryopreservation should be offered to all patients before starting treatment to ensure their reproductive future. Furthermore, in addition to considering the semen parameters defined by the World Health Organization, it is important to use TMSC in the diagnosis of men to choose appropriate ART according to type of cancer.

The ovarian stimulation regimen does not affect aneuploidy or blastocyst rate.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Could the total dose (<3000 IU or ≥3000 IU) and type of exogenous gonadotrophin (i.e. recombinant FSH and/or human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG]) influence aneuploidy and blastulation rates and produce different reproductive outcomes? DESIGN: This retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study included a total of 8466 patients undergoing IVF using autologous oocytes and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Participants were divided according to the dosage of total gonadotrophins and stratified by maternal age. RESULTS: The aneuploidy rates, pregnancy outcomes and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were similar among women who received total gonadotrophin dosages of <3000 or ≥3000 IU. No statistical differences were reported in the blastulation rate with lower or higher gonadotrophin dosages. Women receiving a higher amount of HMG during ovarian stimulation had a lower aneuploidy rate (P = 0.02); when stratified according to age, younger women with a higher HMG dosage had lower aneuploidy rates (P< 0.001), while no statistical differences were observed in older women with higher or lower HMG dosages. No significant differences were observed in IVF outcomes or CLBR. CONCLUSIONS: High doses of gonadotrophins were not associated with rate of aneuploidy. However, an increased fraction of HMG in younger women was associated with a lower aneuploidy rate. The study demonstrated that the total gonadotrophin dosage did not influence aneuploidy, reproductive outcomes or CLBR. The increased gonadotrophin and HMG dosages used for ovarian stimulation did not precede aneuploidy, and the use of HMG should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, according to the individual's characteristics and infertility type.

Oocyte rescue in-vitro maturation does not adversely affect chromosome segregation during the first meiotic division.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does rescue in-vitro maturation (IVM) in the presence or absence of cumulus cells, affect the progress of meiosis I, compared with oocytes that mature in vivo? DESIGN: This prospective study was conducted in a university-affiliated fertility centre. Ninety-five young oocyte donors (mean age 25.57 ± 4.47) with a normal karyotype and no known fertility problems were included. A total of 390 oocytes (116 mature metaphase II [MII] and 274 immature oocytes) were analysed. The immature oocytes underwent rescue IVM in the presence of cumulus cells (CC; IVM+CC; n = 137) or without them (IVM-CC; n = 137), and IVM rate was calculated. Chromosome copy number analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on all rescue IVM oocytes reaching MII as well as those that were mature at the time of initial denudation (in-vivo-matured oocytes [IVO]). RESULTS: Maturation rates were similar in IVM+CC and IVM-CC oocytes (62.8 versus 71.5%, P = 0.16). Conclusive cytogenetic results were obtained from 65 MII oocytes from the IVM+CC group, 87 from the IVM-CC group, and 99 from the IVO group. Oocyte euploidy rates for the three groups were similar, at 75.4%, 83.9% and 80.8%, respectively (P = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that culture of germinal vesicle and metaphase I oocytes in the presence of cumulus cells does not improve rates of IVM. In general, the process of rescue IVM does not appear to alter the frequency of oocytes with a normal chromosome copy number.

The combined effect of BMI and age on ART outcomes.

STUDY QUESTION: For a woman with infertility and overweight/obesity, can infertility treatment be postponed to first promote weight loss? SUMMARY ANSWER: Advice regarding a delay in IVF treatment to optimize female weight should consider female age, particularly in women over 38 years for whom only substantial weight loss in a short period of time (3 months) seems to provide any benefit. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Body weight excess and advanced age are both common findings in infertile patients, creating the dilemma of whether to promote weight loss first or proceed to fertility treatment immediately. Despite their known impact on fertility, studies assessing the combined effect of female age and BMI on cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) are still scarce and conflicting. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 14 213 patients undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle with autologous oocytes and subsequent embryo transfers, between January 2013 and February 2018 in 18 centres of a multinational private fertility clinic. BMI was subdivided into the following subgroups: underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25.0-29.9 kg/m2), and obesity (≥30.0 kg/m2). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The primary outcome was CLBR. The secondary outcome was time to pregnancy. To assess the influence of female age and BMI on CLBR, two multivariable regression models were developed with BMI being added in the models as either an ordinal categorical variable (Model 1) or a continuous variable (Model 2) using the best-fitting fractional polynomials. CLBR was estimated over 1-year periods (Model 1) and shorter timeframes of 3 months (Model 2). We then compared the predicted CLBRs according to BMI and age. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: When compared to normal weight, CLBRs were lower in women who were overweight (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86, 95% CI 0.77-0.96) and obese (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.87). A reduction of BMI within 1 year, from obesity to overweight or overweight to normal weight would be potentially beneficial up to 35 years old, while only a substantial reduction (i.e. from obesity to normal BMI) would be potentially beneficial in women aged 36-38 years. Above 38 years of age, even considerable weight loss did not compensate for the effect of age over a 1-year span but may be beneficial in shorter time frames. In a timeframe of 3 months, there is a potential benefit in CLBR if there is a loss of 1 kg/m2 in BMI for women up to 33.25 years and 2 kg/m2 in women aged 33.50-35.50 years. Older women would require more challenging weight loss to achieve clinical benefit, specifically 3 kg/m2 in women aged 35.75-37.25 years old, 4 kg/m2 in women aged 37.50-39.00 years old, and 5 kg/m2 or more in women over 39.25 years old. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by its retrospective design and lower number of women in the extreme BMI categories. The actual effect of individual weight loss on patient outcomes was also not evaluated, as this was a retrospective interpatient comparison to estimate the combined effect of weight loss and ageing in a fixed period on CLBR. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our findings suggest that there is potential benefit in weight loss strategies within 1 year prior to ART, particularly in women under 35 years with BMI ≥25 kg/m2. For those over 35 years of age, weight loss should be considerable or occur in a shorter timeframe to avoid the negative effect of advancing female age on CLBR. A tailored approach for weight loss, according to age, might be the best course of action. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. All authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Semen processing using magnetic-activated cell sorting before ICSI is deemed safe for obstetric and perinatal outcomes: a retrospective multicentre study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) a safe semen sample processing technique for newborns and mothers when used for semen processing prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles? DESIGN: This retrospective multicentre cohort study involved patients undergoing ICSI cycles with either donor or autologous oocytes from January 2008 to February 2020. They were divided into two groups: those who underwent standard semen preparation (reference group) and those who had an added MACS procedure (MACS group). A total of 25,356 deliveries were assessed in the case of cycles using donor oocytes, and 19,703 deliveries from cycles using autologous oocytes. Of these, 20,439 and 15,917, respectively, were singleton deliveries. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were retrospectively assessed. All means, rates and incidences were computed per live newborn in each study group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the main obstetric and perinatal morbidities affecting the mothers' and newborns' well-being between groups using either donated or autologous oocytes. There was a significant increase in the incidence of gestational anaemia in both subpopulations (donor oocytes P = 0.01; autologous oocytes P < 0.001). However, this incidence was within the estimated prevalence for gestational anaemia in the general population. There was a statistically significant decrease in preterm (P = 0.02) and very preterm (P = 0.01) birth rates in the MACS group in cycles using donor oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MACS during semen preparation before ICSI using either donor or autologous oocytes appears to be safe for the mothers' and newborns' well-being during pregnancy and birth. Nevertheless, a close follow-up of these parameters in the future is advised, especially concerning anaemia, in order to detect even smaller effect sizes.

Sperm aminopeptidase N identifies the potential for high-quality blastocysts and viable embryos in oocyte-donation cycles.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between human sperm aminopeptidase N (APN) and embryo development in humans? SUMMARY ANSWER: Human sperm APN could possibly become a new molecular biomarker for identifying the potential for high-quality and usable embryos. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The diagnosis of male fertility is one of the major concerns of reproductive medicine. Approximately 30-40% of men with otherwise normal fertility parameters are still unable to achieve pregnancy. The predictive clinical value of semen analysis to identify fertile or infertile males is limited; therefore, new diagnostic methodologies for sperm are urgently required. Sperm APN may be a relevant molecular marker due to its high concentration in sperm cells and its important roles in sperm physiology, such as its functions in motility, acrosome reaction and embryo development. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study included 81 couples who underwent oocyte-donation cycles at Clínica IVI Bilbao (Spain), yielding 611 embryos, between September 2014 and July 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was conducted in an assisted reproduction unit and an academic research laboratory. All the semen samples were examined and classified following World Health Organization guidelines. Spermatozoa were isolated from semen using the discontinuous colloidal silica gradient (45-90%) technique. Embryo quality and development were determined according to the Spanish Association of Reproduction Biology Studies (ASEBIR) criteria. Human sperm APN levels were analyzed by quantitative and semiquantitative flow cytometry. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The most well-developed and usable blastocysts were associated with low sperm APN levels. Semen samples that had lower APN levels generated more expanded, hatched and usable blastocysts and fewer early, arrested and non-usable blastocysts. The cumulative probability of having well-developed blastocysts increased by 1.38-fold at Day 5 and 1.90-fold at Day 6 of embryo development, and the likelihood of having usable embryos increased by 1.48-fold, when semen samples with low APN levels were used during the ICSI technique. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The data were obtained from a single fertility clinic. A multicentre study will be required to confirm the results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Human sperm APN has the potential to become a new molecular biomarker to help identify the potential for high-quality embryos and diagnose male infertility, especially when seminal parameters are close to the threshold values. It could be a crucial tool for couples for whom the number of usable blastocysts is critical for ART success. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by grants from the Basque Government (GIC15/165) and the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) (EHUA14/17). The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Perinatal outcomes in children born after fresh or frozen embryo transfer using donated oocytes.

STUDY QUESTION: Do children born after vitrified-thawed embryo transfers (ETs) using donated oocytes have worse perinatal outcomes when compared with fresh ET? SUMMARY ANSWER: No significant difference in birthweight and prematurity rates between fresh or frozen embryo transfers (FETs) in newborns after oocyte donation was found. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Autologous singletons born after fresh ET have been previously associated with higher rates of preterm birth and low birthweight, while FETs seem to confer a higher risk of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and macrosomia. However, studies comparing these outcomes using autologous oocytes are unable to adequately disentangle the putative detrimental consequences of embryo vitrification from the possible effects that ovarian stimulation and endometrial preparation may have on endometrial receptivity prior to ET. The oocyte donation model is, for this reason, a more appropriate setting to study these hypotheses; however so far, the information available regarding neonatal outcomes in this patient population is limited to either small and/or heterogeneous studies. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We performed a multicentre retrospective cohort study including 5848 singletons born between 2009 and February 2020 following oocyte donation and single blastocyst transfer, subdivided according to whether a fresh ET or FET was performed. We also performed two additional sensitivity analyses, subgrouping the sample according to the type of endometrial preparation (natural versus artificial) and whether the donated oocytes had previously been vitrified or not. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients with a first singleton livebirth after single blastocyst transfer were compared using multivariable regression analysis to account for potential confounding factors. The primary outcome was birthweight. Secondary outcomes were birthweight z-scores and percentiles, small/large for gestational age, gestational age at delivery, gender, prematurity (<37 weeks and <32 weeks), neonatal morbidity (Apgar scores and need for neonatal intensive care) and maternal morbidity (gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes and caesarean delivery). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no significant difference between the fresh ET and FET groups in terms of mean birthweight (3215 g versus 3200 g) and birthweight z-scores (0.03 versus 0.1), in both the unadjusted and confounder-adjusted models. However, artificial endometrial preparation was associated with a higher birthweight (3220 g versus 3105 g) and birthweight z-scores (0.06 versus -0.13) when compared with a transfer in a natural cycle. Although a 1-day statistically significant difference in gestational age at birth (275 versus 274 days) was detected, premature birth rates (<37 weeks) did not vary significantly between groups (9.9% and 11.2% for fresh ET and FET, respectively). No other statistically significant differences were found in the remaining neonatal and maternal outcomes studies between the fresh ET and FET groups. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This study is limited by its retrospective design and lack of information regarding congenital malformations. Moreover, the sample selection criteria that were used may limit the generalizability of our results. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Perinatal outcomes did not seem to be affected significantly by the embryo vitrification process in an oocyte donation model. Hence, other factors may contribute to the hindered perinatal outcomes described in ART, particularly the potential effect that ovarian stimulation and endometrial preparation may have on endometrial receptivity. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No specific funding was obtained for this study. All authors have no conflicts to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Standards in semen examination: publishing reproducible and reliable data based on high-quality methodology.

Biomedical science is rapidly developing in terms of more transparency, openness and reproducibility of scientific publications. This is even more important for all studies that are based on results from basic semen examination. Recently two concordant documents have been published: the 6th edition of the WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, and the International Standard ISO 23162:2021. With these tools, we propose that authors should be instructed to follow these laboratory methods in order to publish studies in peer-reviewed journals, preferable by using a checklist as suggested in an Appendix to this article.

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have no effect on endometrial receptivity after euploid embryo transfer.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the COVID-19 vaccination affect endometrial receptivity after single euploid embryo transfer, measured by sustained implantation rate? DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study analysing two groups of single euploid embryo transfers using own oocytes: one historical cohort of 3272 transfers 1 year before the pandemic; and one comprising 890 transfers in women previously vaccinated with mRNA vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. The main outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and sustained implantation rate (SIR) per embryo transfer. These outcomes were compared between non-vaccinated and vaccinated women, and women who had received one and two doses. Lastly, vaccinated women were divided into quartiles according to the time from last dose to embryo transfer. RESULTS: Similar CPR and SIR were found between non-vaccinated and vaccinated women, and the odds ratio for both outcomes was not statistically significant after being controlled for potential confounders (OR 0.937, 95% CI 0.695 to 1.265 and OR 0.910, 95% CI 0.648 to 1.227 respectively). Within the vaccinated group, women who had received one or two doses also had similar outcomes. In addition, no differences were found according to the time interval from vaccination to embryo transfer. CONCLUSION: The administration of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 had no effect on endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation, regardless of the number of doses and time interval from vaccination to embryo transfer. The potential negative effect of the vaccine on endometrial receptivity and reproductive outcomes is reassuring for patients in the process of undergoing assisted reproductive treatment.

IVF/ICSI cumulative live birth rates per consumed oocyte remain comparable regardless of sperm DNA fragmentation by TUNEL.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) affect reproductive success of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles measured as cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) in unselected couples? DESIGN: Clinical data from 1339 couples undergoing 2759 IVF/ICSI cycles using autologous oocytes with a SDF test by TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling (TUNEL) assay on their ejaculated spermatozoa were retrospectively evaluated. Main outcomes were calculated according to two different analyses: using 15% SDF as cut-off point (low ≤15% and high >15%); and categorizing participants based on four SDF ranges (<10%, 10- <20%, 20-30% and >30%). Live birth rate and CLBR per number of embryo transfers, per number of embryos replaced and consumed oocytes required to achieve the first live birth according to level of SDF were the main outcomes assessed. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in clinical pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate between both groups. No differences in LBR per embryo transfer were found for the first or for all embryo transfers when comparing ≤15% and >15% sperm DNA fragmentation or by SDF ranges. The CLBR according to the number of embryo transfers and the number of embryos replaced showed no statistically significant differences between different SDF groups. When the same number of oocytes were inseminated, similar CLBR were obtained regardless of the degree of male sperm DNA fragmentation. CONCLUSIONS: High SDF did not impair live birth rates of unselected males undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles with autologous oocytes per transfer or the cumulative probability of a live birth.

Cumulative live birth rates in donor oocyte ICSI cycles are not improved by magnetic-activated cell sorting sperm selection.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) for sperm selection increase cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) or improve clinical parameters of reproductive success in couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with donor oocytes? DESIGN: Retrospective multicentre observational study including data compiled from unselected couples who underwent ICSI cycles with donated oocytes in 15 Spanish IVIRMA fertility clinics (January 2008 to February 2020). Patients were divided into reference (standard semen processing, n = 40,157) and MACS (additional sperm selection step by MACS, n = 1,240) groups. CLBR were plotted on Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using the Mantel-Cox test. Proportions were compared with a generalized estimating equation model, and results were adjusted to clinically relevant variables. RESULTS: The MACS group showed a 27.1% CLBR after one embryo was transferred and 81.6% after four; the reference group had CLBR of 19.6% and 78.5%, respectively. CLBR in the MACS group was 4.2% after five oocytes were used and 75.5% after 15; for the reference group, CLBR were 7.8% and 78.3%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves showed statistically significant differences in CLBR per number of embryos transferred and per number of donated metaphase II oocytes between the two groups (both P < 0.0001), but not for CLBR per embryo transfer. No significant differences between groups were found for classical clinical outcomes such as pregnancy and live birth rates per embryo transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Although MACS sperm selection slightly increased the CLBR per embryo transferred compared with the reference group, this change was not clinically meaningful. MACS should not be recommended indiscriminately to all infertile patients undergoing ICSI with donated oocytes as a sperm processing add-on.

Predictive value of seminal oxidation-reduction potential analysis for reproductive outcomes of ICSI.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is seminal oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) clinically relevant to reproductive outcome? DESIGN: Prospective observational study including a total of 144 couples who had an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle between June 2018 and December 2020. The study included patients undergoing fresh ICSI cycles with autologous gametes. Cycles that had day 3 embryo transfers and cryopreservation cycles were excluded. There was no restriction on patients with severe male infertility; couples with unexplained infertility and unexplained male infertility were included, those with azoospermia were excluded. Semen analysis, seminal ORP as determined by means of the MiOXSYS system, sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) and reproductive outcomes (fertilization, blastocyst development, clinical pregnancy and live birth) were determined. RESULTS: Seminal ORP was significantly negatively correlated with fertilization rate (r = -0.267; P = 0.0012), blastocyst development rate (r = -0.432; P < 0.0001), implantation/clinical pregnancy (r = -0.305; P = 0.0003) and live birth (r = -0.366; P < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed significant predictive power for ORP for fertilization (≥80%; area under the curve [AUC] 0.652; P = 0.0012), blastocyst development rate (≥60%; AUC 0.794; P < 0.0001), implantation/clinical pregnancy (AUC 0.680; P = 0.0002) and live birth (AUC 0.728; P < 0.0001). Comparable results were obtained for SDF (fertilization: AUC 0.678; blastocyst development: AUC 0.777; implantation/clinical pregnancy: AUC 0.665; live birth: AUC 0.723). Normal sperm morphology showed the lowest predictive power for all reproductive outcome parameters. With male age as confounding factor, ORP (cut-off value of 0.51 mV/106 sperm/ml) has significant (P < 0.04667) effects on odds ratios for all reproductive outcome parameters. Multivariate logistic regression to investigate potential seminal and female confounding factors revealed that seminal ORP significantly (P < 0.0039; P < 0.0130) affects reproductive outcome. CONCLUSION: Seminal ORP is relevant for good fertilization, blastocyst development, implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth.

Switching to testicular sperm after a previous ICSI failure with ejaculated sperm significantly improves blastocyst quality without increasing aneuploidy risk.

PURPOSE: The use of testicular sperm is confined to patients with azoospermia, but there is evidence to support its use in males with poor semen parameters and/or previous intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) failures with ejaculated spermatozoa. We compared the aneuploidy rate and quality between embryos derived from ICSI cycles with ejaculated sperm (EJ-ICSI) and those from ICSI cycles using testicular spermatozoa (TT-ICSI) within the same couple. METHODS: Retrospective study of 27 couples who first underwent an EJ-ICSI cycle that did not result in a livebirth and afterwards a TT-ICSI cycle. Only the two closer cycles of each couple were included. Preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidies (PGT-A) was performed in both ICSI cycles and classic parameters of embryo quality were assessed until blastocyst-stage. RESULTS: A total of 375 embryos from 54 ICSI cycles were evaluated. Aneuploidy rate was measured by two different parameters. Patients undergoing TT-ICSI presented a similar aneuploidy rate as EJ-ICSI group: 30.7% (23.4-38.0) vs 26.8% (18.1-35.5) per inseminated oocytes (P>0.05), and 76.2% (66.2-86.2) vs 72.1% (59.1-85.2) per the total number of biopsied embryos (P>0.05), respectively. Further, the good-quality blastocyst rate per correctly fertilized oocyte was significantly higher in TT-ICSI group (33.6% (30.4-36.9)) than EJ-ICSI group (24.2% (20.3-28.0)) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to testicular sperm for ICSI yielded better-quality blastocysts without affecting the chromosomal load of the embryos in non-azoospermic couples with a previous unsuccessful ICSI using ejaculated sperm. This strategy is a good option for couples seeking a livebirth who do not want to use donor sperm.

Do donor spermatozoa improve reproductive outcomes after oocyte donation failure? A retrospective analysis of cumulative live birth rates per donor oocyte consumed.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do donor spermatozoa improve IVF outcomes after first oocyte donation failure? DESIGN: Retrospective, multicentre study including couples undergoing oocyte donation cycles using autologous or donor spermatozoa after a failed first attempt. Male partners were further characterized as normozoospermic or oligoasthenoteratospermic, i.e. fewer than 5 million motile progressive spermatozoa in the ejaculate. The main outcomes measured were live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer, LBR per number of embryos transferred, and cumulative LBR (CLBR) considering oocytes consumed in the previous donation cycles. RESULTS: Analysis comprised 6065 cycles of oocyte donation failure; among these, subgroup analyses by sperm quality comprised 4113 cycles with severe male factor and 1150 cycles with suboptimal/normal spermatozoa. Sperm replacement in the first cycle after failure increased LBR per embryo transfer (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.7-2.8, P < 0.001) and per number of embryos transferred (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.9-3.1, P < 0.001) for normospermic and oligoasthenoteratospermic men. Replacement by the third cycle after failure was less beneficial (LBR per embryo transfer: OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.9-2.1, P = 0.16; LBR per embryos transferred: OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.9-2.0, P = 0.186). Kaplan-Meier curves of CLBR per oocyte fertilized with autologous or donor spermatozoa were statistically different (P < 0.001) and demonstrate how each additional oocyte may affect success based on sperm source (donor/autologous). CONCLUSIONS: Donor spermatozoa improved outcomes when used after an initial failed oocyte donation cycle. The CLBR curves can be used to determine the cumulative chances of live birth using either autologous or donor spermatozoa, providing guidance on when to replace spermatozoa.

TESE-ICSI outcomes per couple in vasectomized males are negatively affected by time since the intervention, but not other comorbidities.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does time since vasectomy (as obstructive interval) and the presence of different male comorbidities adversely affect the likelihood of achieving a newborn for vasectomized males undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)? DESIGN: This retrospective study included 364 couples with vasectomized males undergoing TESE-ICSI cycles with autologous oocytes at IVI Valencia. The main outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Subjects were divided according to the male risk factor evaluated into quartiles (obstructive interval, body mass index [BMI]) or groups (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia). The reproductive outcomes were calculated per embryo transfer, per ovarian stimulation completed, and per couple. RESULTS: The average obstructive interval was 11.3 years. The LBR was 34.4% (95% CI 30.1-38.6) per embryo transfer, 27.8% (95% CI 24.1-31.5) per ovarian stimulation and 46.2% (95% CI 41.8-51.3) per couple. When considering obstructive interval, a significantly lower LBR per couple (P = 0.04) was found in the group with the longest obstruction time: Q1 42.1% (95% CI 33.5-50.7), Q2 49.1% (95% CI 36.1-62.1), Q3 56.3% (95% CI 46.7-65.9) and Q4 37.2% (95% CI 26.5-47.9) but the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was not affected (P = 0.63). LBR per ovarian stimulation of males with hypertension was significantly lower (P = 0.04) than healthy males: 13.5% (95% CI 2.5-24.5) and 28.6% (95% CI 24.7-32.5), respectively. The group of diabetic vasectomized males had a significantly higher CLBR (P = 0.02). The remaining risk factors assessed (smoking, dyslipidaemia and a high BMI) did not affect LBR compared with their healthy counterparts. CONCLUSION: Time since vasectomy appears to negatively influence the LBR when assessed per couple. The CLBR was not affected by the obstructive interval or the presence of other male comorbidities apart from diabetes, which had a significant effect.

The effect of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation on embryo ploidy and cumulative live birth rates.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does late-follicular phase progesterone elevation have a deleterious effect on embryo euploidy, blastocyst formation rate and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR)? DESIGN: A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study including infertile patients aged 18-40 years who underwent ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) followed by a freeze-all strategy and euploid embryo transfer between August 2017 and December 2019. The sample was stratified according to the progesterone concentrations on the day of trigger: normal (≤1.50 ng/ml) and high (>1.50 ng/ml). Moreover, sensitivity analyses were performed to determine whether different conclusions would have been drawn if different cut-offs had been adopted. The primary outcome was the embryo euploidy rate. Secondary outcomes were the blastocyst formation rate, the number of euploid blastocysts and CLBR. RESULTS: Overall 1495 intracytoplasmic sperm injection PGT-A cycles were analysed. Late-follicular phase progesterone elevation was associated with significantly higher late-follicular oestradiol concentrations (2847.56 ± 1091.10 versus 2240.94 ± 996.37 pg/ml, P < 0.001) and significantly more oocytes retrieved (17.67 ± 8.86 versus 12.70 ± 7.00, P < 0.001). The number of euploid embryos was significantly higher in the progesterone elevation group (2.32 ± 1.74 versus 1.86 ± 1.42, P = 0.001), whereas the blastocyst formation rate (47.1% [43.7-50.5%] versus 51.0% [49.7-52.4%]), the embryo euploidy rate (48.3% [44.9-51.7%] versus 49.1% [47.7-50.6%], the live birth rate in the first frozen embryo transfer (34.1% versus 31.1%, P = 0.427) and CLBR (38.9% versus 37.0%, P = 0.637) were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Euploidy rate and CLBR do not significantly differ among PGT-A cycles with and without late-follicular progesterone elevation in a freeze-all approach.

The position of the euploid blastocyst in the uterine cavity influences implantation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the position of the euploid blastocyst in the uterine cavity upon transfer, measured as distance in millimetres (mm) from the fundus (DFF) to the air bubble, influence implantation potential? DESIGN: A total of 507 single/double euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles at blastocyst stage were included retrospectively between March 2017 and November 2018 at a single centre. The patients were on average 33.3 years old. The FET were performed in natural cycles (n = 151) or hormone replacement therapy cycles (n = 356). RESULTS: Of the 507 transfers, 370 (73.0%) resulted in a pregnancy, defined as human chorionic gonadotrophin concentration over 15 mIU/ml, and 341 (67.3%) in a clinical pregnancy, with an implantation rate of 62.0% and ongoing pregnancy rate of 59.6% (302/507). When comparing the number of embryos transferred, the pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were significantly higher after double-embryo transfer (DET) (P = 0.002: P < 0.001 and P = 0.002). The quality of the blastocyst in the single-embryo transfer group had a positive effect on the pregnancy rate (A versus B, P = 0.016; A versus C, P = 0.003) and clinical pregnancy rate (A versus C, P = 0.013). After performing a multivariate logistic regression analysis to consider the effect of all explanatory variables, a negative effect between DFF and pregnancy (P = 0.001), clinical pregnancy (P = 0.001) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.030) was found. When all variables remained constant, an increase of 1 mm of DFF changed the odds of pregnancy by 0.882, of clinical pregnancy by 0.891 and of ongoing pregnancy by 0.925. No significant effect of DFF was found on the miscarriage outcome (P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: The depth of blastocyst replacement inside the uterine cavity may influence the pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and ongoing pregnancy rates and should be considered as an important factor to improve the success of IVF cycles.

Minimal ovarian stimulation is an alternative to conventional protocols for older women according to Poseidon's stratification: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether minimal ovarian stimulation (mOS) is as effective as conventional ovarian stimulation (cOS) for older women belonging to different groups according to the Poseidon criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Observational retrospective multicentre cohort including women from Poseidon's groups 2 and 4 that underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). We performed a mixed-effects logistic regression model, adding as a random effect the patients and the stimulation cycle considering the dependence of data. Survival curves were employed as a measure of the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The primary outcomes were live birth rate per embryo transfer and CLBR per consecutive embryo transfer and oocyte consumed until a live birth was achieved. RESULTS: A total of 2002 patients underwent 3056 embryo transfers (mOS = 497 and cOS = 2559). The live birth rates per embryo transfer in mOS and cOS showed no significant difference in both Poseidon's groups. Likewise, the logistic regression showed similar live birth rates between the two protocols in Poseidon's groups 2 (OR 1.165, 95% CI 0.77-1.77; p = 0.710) and 4 (OR 1.264 95% CI 0.59-2.70; p = 0.387). However, the survival curves showed higher CLBR per oocyte in women that received mOS (Poseidon group 2: p < 0.001 and Poseidon group 4: p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Minimal ovarian stimulation is a good alternative to COS as a first-line treatment for patients belonging to Poseidon's groups 2 and 4. The number of oocytes needed to achieve a live birth seems inferior in mOS strategy than cOS.