Pharmacological treatment in adult patients with CRPS-I: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: Several pharmacological treatments have been proposed for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type-I (CRPS-I) in adults, but data regarding the efficacy of various agents for this disease is scarce. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to analyse the efficacy of the various pharmacological approaches in adults with CRPS-I. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from the inception date to 30 June 2021 to identify placebo-controlled or active-controlled RCTs using bisphosphonates, ketamine, CSs, anti-epileptics, NSAIDs/COXIBs, opiates, antidepressants, scavengers/magnesium sulphate or IVIGs for the treatment of CRPS-I. The primary outcomes included changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS) or numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain before and after treatment. RESULTS: We included 20 placebo-controlled or active-controlled RCTs (including a total of 818 adults with CRPS-I) that used bisphosphonates (n = 7), ketamine (n = 2), CSs (n = 2), anti-epileptics (n = 1), NSAIDs/selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2 (COXIBs) (n = 2), scavengers/magnesium sulphate (n = 5), or IVIGs (n = 1) to treat CRPS-I during a median follow-up of 26 weeks. Treatment with bisphosphonates showed a significant reduction in the values of the VAS/NRS pain scale compared with placebo or reference therapy (random effects weighted mean difference [WMD]: -23.8, 95% CI: -28.0 to -19.6; I2 = 36.4%). Treatment with ketamine also documented a reduction in the values of the VAS/NRS for pain (random effects WMD: -8.27, 95% CI: -12.9 to -3.70; I2 = 0%). Treatment with other agents did not reduce the values of the VAS/NRS assessments of pain. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis supports the recommendation of parenteral bisphosphonates as the first-line agent in the treatment of CRPS-I. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework registries, https://osf.io/et9gu/, osf.io/et9gu.

Denosumab for the Treatment of Mastocytosis-Related Osteoporosis: A Case Series.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of denosumab, an anti-RANKL monoclonal antibody for the treatment of bone loss in indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) patients intolerant to bisphosphonates. Four patients underwent upon informed consent a treatment with denosumab 60 mg administered subcutaneously every 6 months with the same regimen used for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at lumbar and femoral sites at baseline and after 1 year. C-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CTX), bone alkaline phosphatase (bALP) and tryptase serum level were determined at baseline and after 12 months with fasting blood samples withdrawals. BMD increased significantly at both sites during the 12 months; all the patients had an important decrease of serum CTX and of lesser extent of bALP serum levels. After denosumab treatment, a decrease in serum tryptase level was observed in all the patients. No adverse events or new fractures occurred. Denosumab seems to be a valid alternative for the treatment of bone loss in ISM. RANKL might be of key importance in the pathogenesis of ISM bone involvement.

Real-life short-term effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic treatments: a longitudinal cohort study.

Introduction: Randomized clinical trials have shown that anti-osteoporotic treatments can increase bone mineral density (BMD) and reduce the incidence of fragility fractures. However, data on the real-life effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic medications are still scarce. Methods: We conducted a cohort study on women at high risk of fracture. We retrieved clinical and densitometric data from the DeFRA database, which derives from the DeFRA tool, a web-based fracture risk assessment tool. Multivariable Cox regression survival models were employed to analyze the effectiveness of different anti-osteoporotic drugs on fracture. In sensitivity analyses, we conducted 1:1 propensity score matching analyses. Results: Data on 50,862 women were available. Among these, 3574 individuals had at least two consecutive visits. The crude fracture rate was 91.9/1000 person-year for non-treated patients. The crude fracture rate in bisphosphonate users was 72.1/1000 person-year, in denosumab users was 58.2/1000 person-year, and in teriparatide users was 19.3/1000 person-year. Overall, we found that bisphosphonate use was associated with a 30% lower risk of fracture compared to no treatment [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.98]. Treatment with denosumab and teriparatide were associated with 60% and 90% lower risk of fracture, respectively (aHR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.24-0.75 and aHR: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01-0.70). Bisphosphonate use was associated with a lower risk of fracture only after 1 year of treatment. Conclusion: In conclusion, we found that all anti-osteoporotic medications considered in the study effectively reduced the risk of fracture in the real-life. The effect of bisphosphonate on fracture risk was apparent only after the first year of treatment. Our findings do not support the use of bisphosphonates in patients at imminent risk of fracture.