Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of diffuse liver disease: a multiparametric predictive modelling algorithm can aid categorization of liver parenchyma.

BACKGROUND: Liver steatosis is common and tracking disease evolution to steatohepatitis and cirrhosis is essential for risk stratification and resultant patient management. Consequently, diagnostic tools allowing categorization of liver parenchyma based on routine imaging are desirable. The study objective was to compare established mono-factorial, dynamic single parameter and iterative multiparametric routine computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analyses to distinguish between liver steatosis, steatohepatitis, cirrhosis and normal liver parenchyma. METHODS: A total of 285 multi-phase contrast enhanced CT and 122 MRI studies with histopathological correlation of underlying parenchymal condition were retrospectively included. Parenchymal conditions were characterized based on CT Hounsfield units (HU) or MRI signal intensity (SI) measurements and calculated HU or SI ratios between non-contrast and contrast enhanced imaging time points. First, the diagnostic accuracy of mono-factorial analyses using established, static non-contrast HU and in- to opposed phase SI change cut-offs to distinguish between parenchymal conditions was established. Second, single dynamic discriminator analyses, with optimized non-contrast and enhancement HU and SI ratio cut-off values derived from the data, employing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas under the curve (AUCs) and the Youden index for maximum accuracy, were used for disease diagnosis. Third, multifactorial analyses, employing multiple non-contrast and contrast enhanced HU and SI ratio cut-offs in a nested, predictive-modelling algorithm were performed to distinguish between normal parenchyma, liver steatosis, steatohepatitis and cirrhosis. CT and MRI analyses were performed separately. RESULTS: No single CT or MRI parameter showed significant difference between all four parenchymal conditions (each P>0.05). Mono-factorial static-CT-discriminator analyses identified liver steatosis with 75% accuracy. Mono-factorial MRI analyses identified steatosis with 89% accuracy. Single-dynamic CT parameter analyses identified normal parenchyma with 72% accuracy and cirrhosis with 75% accuracy. Single-dynamic MRI parameter analyses identified fatty parenchyma with 90% accuracy. Multifactorial CT analyzes identified normal parenchyma with 84%, liver steatosis with 95%, steatohepatitis with 95% and cirrhosis with 80% accuracy. Multifactorial predictive modelling of MRI parameters identified normal parenchyma with 79%, liver steatosis with 89%, steatohepatitis with 92% and cirrhosis with 89% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Multiparametric analyses of quantitative measurements derived from routine CT and MRI, utilizing a predictive modelling algorithm, can help to distinguish between normal liver parenchyma, liver steatosis, steatohepatitis and cirrhosis.

The sylvian keyhole approach for surgical clipping of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: Technical nuance to the minipterional craniotomy.

Background: The minipterional (MPT) craniotomy is a workhorse approach for clipping of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms. Because it aims to reach the skull base, traction on the temporal muscle is required. As a result, patients may suffer from transient postoperative temporal muscle discomfort. The sylvian keyhole approach (SKA) represents an alternative craniotomy for the clipping of MCA aneurysms. The aims of this study are to describe the operative technique of the SKA and to discuss the benefits and disadvantages compared to the MPT craniotomy. Methods: In this technical note, we report the experience gained with the SKA. This experience was acquired with virtual reality, 3D-printed models, and anatomical dissections. We also present two clinical cases. Results: The SKA is centered on the distal sylvian fissure and tailored toward the specific MCA aneurysm. Traction to the temporal muscle is not necessary because access to the skull base is not sought. With the SKA, dissection of the MCA is performed from distal to proximal, aiming for a proximal control at the level of the M1-segment. The limen insulae was identified as a key anatomical landmark for approach selection. The SKA offers good surgical maneuverability when the aneurysm is located at the level or distal to the limen. The MPT craniotomy, however, remains the most appropriate approach when the aneurysm is located proximal to the limen. Conclusion: The SKA represents a feasible and innovative alternative approach to the MPT craniotomy for surgical clipping of unruptured MCA aneurysms located at the level or distal to the limen insulae.

Associations between fully-automated, 3D-based functional analysis of the left atrium and classification schemes in atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been linked to left atrial (LA) enlargement. Whereas most studies focused on 2D-based estimation of static LA volume (LAV), we used a fully-automatic convolutional neural network (CNN) for time-resolved (CINE) volumetry of the whole LA on cardiac MRI (cMRI). Aim was to investigate associations between functional parameters from fully-automated, 3D-based analysis of the LA and current classification schemes in AF. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive AF patients who underwent cMRI on 1.5T systems including a stack of oblique-axial CINE series covering the whole LA. The LA was automatically segmented by a validated CNN. In the resulting volume-time curves, maximum, minimum and LAV before atrial contraction were automatically identified. Active, passive and total LA emptying fractions (LAEF) were calculated and compared to clinical classifications (AF Burden score (AFBS), increased stroke risk (CHA2DS2VASc≥2), AF type (paroxysmal/persistent), EHRA score, and AF risk factors). Moreover, multivariable linear regression models (mLRM) were used to identify associations with AF risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients (age 61±9 years, 17% female) were analyzed. Active LAEF (LAEF_active) decreased significantly with an increase of AFBS (minimal: 44.0%, mild: 36.2%, moderate: 31.7%, severe: 20.8%, p<0.003) which was primarily caused by an increase of minimum LAV. Likewise, LAEF_active was lower in patients with increased stroke risk (30.7% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.002). AF type and EHRA score did not show significant differences between groups. In mLRM, a decrease of LAEF_active was associated with higher age (per year: -0.3%, p = 0.02), higher AFBS (per category: -4.2%, p<0.03) and heart failure (-12.1%, p<0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Fully-automatic morphometry of the whole LA derived from cMRI showed significant relationships between LAEF_active with increased stroke risk and severity of AFBS. Furthermore, higher age, higher AFBS and presence of heart failure were independent predictors of reduced LAEF_active, indicating its potential usefulness as an imaging biomarker.

Orthopaedic surgeons do not consult radiology reports. Fact or fiction?

PURPOSE: To find out how orthopaedic surgeons handle radiological reports and to identify ways to improve musculoskeletal radiology service and interdisciplinary communication. METHOD: An anonymised 14-question online survey was distributed among 27 orthopaedic departments in German-speaking parts of Europe. It was available to trainees and consultants between 22/10/2020 and 05/06/2021. The questionnaire collected information regarding the participants' habits of consulting radiology reports depending on the imaging modality, reasons for not reading reports and asked for improvement recommendations for the radiology service. RESULTS: 81 orthopaedists participated. 20% would never consult a plain radiograph report. In contrast, only 4% would never consult a CT report and no one claimed to never consult an MRI report. 43%, 67% and 86% would routinely consult radiology reports of radiographs, CT and MRI studies, respectively. Long time to report availability (24%), a general lack of time (19%) and too long texts (17%) were the most popular reasons for not consulting the reports. 62% of participants voted to sometimes disagree with the reports and in cases of opinion discrepancy 51% would always or often contact the radiologist. 64% preferred to be informed directly via phone about relevant unexpected findings. Most popular report improvement recommendations were more rapid report availability (24%), inclusion of significant images (19%) and inclusion of more angle and distance measurements (16%). In the free text column, a desire for direct interdisciplinary discussion of equivocal cases was often stated (30%). CONCLUSIONS: Concluding, this survey showed that orthopaedic surgeons routinely consult radiology reports. The participants expressed a desire for increased, direct interdisciplinary communication to solve equivocal cases and improve patient care.

Evaluation of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis on the basis of quantitative T1 mapping: Are acute inflammation, age and liver volume confounding factors?

PURPOSE: To evaluate potential confounding factors in the quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis using T1 relaxation times. METHODS: The study population is based on a radiology-information-system database search for abdominal MRI performed from July 2018 to April 2019 at our institution. After applying exclusion criteria 200 (59 ±â€¯16 yrs) remaining patients were retrospectively included. 93 patients were defined as liver-healthy, 40 patients without known fibrosis or cirrhosis, and 67 subjects had a clinically or biopsy-proven liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. T1 mapping was performed using a slice based look-locker approach. A ROI based analysis of the left and the right liver was performed. Fat fraction, R2*, liver volume, laboratory parameters, sex, and age were evaluated as potential confounding factors. RESULTS: T1 values were significantly lower in healthy subjects without known fibrotic changes (1.5 T MRI: 575 ±â€¯56 ms; 3 T MRI: 857 ±â€¯128 ms) compared to patients with acute liver disease (1.5 T MRI: 657 ±â€¯73 ms, p < 0.0001; 3 T MRI: 952 ±â€¯37 ms, p = 0.028) or known fibrosis or cirrhosis (1.5 T MRI: 644 ±â€¯83 ms, p < 0.0001; 3 T MRI: 995 ±â€¯150 ms, p = 0.018). T1 values correlated moderately with the Child-Pugh stage at 1.5 T (p = 0.01, ρ = 0.35). CONCLUSION: T1 mapping is a capable predictor for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Especially age is not a confounding factor and, hence, age-independent thresholds can be defined. Acute liver diseases are confounding factors and should be ruled out before employing T1-relaxometry based thresholds to screen for patients with liver fibrosis or cirrhosis.

Revisiting DCE-MRI: Classification of Prostate Tissue Using Descriptive Signal Enhancement Features Derived From DCE-MRI Acquisition With High Spatiotemporal Resolution.

METHODS: A retrospective study (from January 2016 to July 2019) including 75 subjects (mean, 65 years; 46-80 years) with 2.5-second temporal resolution DCE-MRI and PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions was performed. Fifty-four subjects had biopsy-proven prostate cancer (Gleason 6, 15; Gleason 7, 20; Gleason 8, 13; Gleason 9, 6), whereas 21 subjects had negative MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies. Voxel-wise analysis of contrast signal enhancement was performed for all time points using custom-developed software, including automatic arterial input function detection. Seven descriptive parameter maps were calculated: normalized maximum signal intensity, time to start, time to maximum, time-to-maximum slope, and maximum slope with normalization on maximum signal and the arterial input function (SMN1, SMN2). The parameters were compared with ADC using multiparametric machine-learning models to determine classification accuracy. A Wilcoxon test was used for the hypothesis test and the Spearman coefficient for correlation. RESULTS: There were significant differences (P < 0.05) for all 7 DCE-derived parameters between the normal peripheral zone versus PIRADS 4 or 5 lesions and the biopsy-positive versus biopsy-negative lesions. Multiparametric analysis showed better performance when combining ADC + DCE as input (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity, 97%/93%/100%) relative to ADC alone (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity, 94%/95%/95%) and to DCE alone (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity, 78%/79%/77%) in differentiating the normal peripheral zone from PIRADS lesions, biopsy-positive versus biopsy-negative lesions (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity, 68%/33%/81%), and Gleason 6 versus ≥7 prostate cancer (accuracy/sensitivity/specificity, 69%/60%/72%). CONCLUSIONS: Descriptive perfusion characteristics derived from high-resolution DCE-MRI using model-free computations show significant differences between normal and cancerous tissue but do not reach the accuracy achieved with solely ADC-based classification. Combining ADC with DCE-based input features improved classification accuracy for PIRADS lesions, discrimination of biopsy-positive versus biopsy-negative lesions, and differentiation between Gleason 6 versus Gleason ≥7 lesions.