Pharmacological Means of Pain Control during Separator Placement: A Systematic Review.

AIM: To assess the effectiveness of adjuvant analgesics/anesthetics in pain control after separator placement compared with no medication. BACKGROUND: Separator placement to create space for cementing bands is the first clinical procedure done in orthodontics. Pain in this stage can negatively affect patient compliance and trust in the clinician. To date, there is no universally accepted regimen for pain control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. One hundred and thirty-two potentially relevant studies were found. A total of eight randomized clinical trials including 642 subjects were selected. Data were extracted into customized forms, and selected studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute. RESULTS: Results showed the use of analgesics led to lower reported pain scores at almost all time intervals. NSAIDs resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pain compared to a control group. CONCLUSION: According to the available literature, the use of analgesics is effective in controlling orthodontic pain due to separators. Acetaminophen and ibuprofen show a stable analgesic effect. CLINICAL IMPLICATION: Acetaminophen 650 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg taken 1 hour prior to separator placement can reduce pain associated with the procedure.

Correlation between Temporomandibular Joints and Nasal Cavity Width in Growing Patients after Rapid Maxillary Expansion.

AIM: The study tests the correlation between the enlargement of the nasal cavity width, interglenoid fossa distance, and intercondylar distance after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for 25 patients presenting a bilateral crossbite (11 males, 14 females, and mean age 11.6 ± 1.6 years) at baseline (T0) and at 6 months after RME (T2), T1 being the end of expander activation. Images were digitized for linear measurements using specific software. Values were compared at the nasal width, interglenoid fossa distance, and intercondylar distance to test the correlation in the transverse dimension. RESULTS: At T0, a correlation already existing between the interglenoid fossa distance and the intercondylar distance persisted at T2. The correlation between the nasal cavity width and interglenoid fossa distance nonexistent at T0 ended toward statistically significant at T2. Additionally, the lateral position of the condyles was not correlated with the nasal cavity width neither at T0 or T2. CONCLUSION: A correlation between the interglenoid fossa distance and intercondylar distance was exhibited 6 months after RME. The correlation between the nasal cavity width and interglenoid fossa distance was close to significant at T2.

Effect of Rapid Maxillary Expansion on Condyle-fossa Relationship in Growing Patients.

AIM: This study tests whether rapid maxillary expansion (RME) exerts long term effects on interglenoid fossa distance and condyle fossa relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive growing patients aged 8 to 13 years were allocated either to the RME group or control group. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed at baseline and at 6 months. Specific software was used to determine fixed landmarks. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) models were used, with time by group interaction, using age as a covariate. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with a mean age of 11.4 ± 1.5 years were included. There was an overall significant group by time interaction (p = 0.012, effect size 0.59). Change in the lateral position of the glenoid fossa, the primary outcome, was reached (p = 0.008, effect size 0.258). Change in the laterolateral position of the center of the condyle, and the co-primary outcome was also significant (p = 0.011, effect size = 0.24). Nasal cavity width increased (p = 0.065, effect size = 0.14). There was an initial asymmetry in the horizontal position of the condyles that was carried on with no effect of RME. CONCLUSION: Rapid maxillary expansion (RME) produces a significant increase in the interglenoid fossa distance and displacement of the mandibular condyles at 6 months in growing patients compared to a control group. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The current study shows that RME is effective during growth, widening the interglenoid fossa distance and the lateral positions of the condyles and eventually enlarging the nasal cavity, without causing asymmetry.