Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
J Med Ethics ; 47(11): 740-743, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32220871

ABSTRACT

Hundreds of millions of rare biospecimens are stored in laboratories and biobanks around the world. Often, the researchers who possess these specimens do not plan to use them, while other researchers limit the scope of their work because they cannot acquire biospecimens that meet their needs. This situation raises an important and underexplored question: how should scientists allocate biospecimens that they do not intend to use? We argue that allocators should aim to maximise the social value of the research enterprise when allocating scarce biospecimens. We provide an ethical framework for assessing the social value of proposed research projects and describe how the framework could be implemented.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Humans
2.
J Med Ethics ; 43(10): 670-675, 2017 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28774956

ABSTRACT

Discussions of patient-centred care and patient autonomy in bioethics have tended to focus on the decision-making context and the process of obtaining informed consent, leaving open the question of how patients ought to be counselled in the daily maintenance of their health and management of chronic disease. Patient activation is an increasingly prominent counselling approach and measurement tool that aims to improve patients' confidence and skills in managing their own health conditions. The strategy, which has received little conceptual or ethical analysis, raises important questions about how clinicians ought to foster confidence and a sense of control in their patients without exposing them to blame, stigma and other harms. In this paper, we describe patient activation, discuss its relationship to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities, and make recommendations regarding its use and measurement.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/therapy , Decision Making/ethics , Healthcare Disparities/ethics , Informed Consent/ethics , Patient-Centered Care/ethics , Personal Autonomy , Physician-Patient Relations/ethics , Chronic Disease/psychology , Humans , Patient Participation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL