Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(10): 558-563, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770181

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a leading cause of disability and sick leave among workers. Although MSDs are associated with physical exposures, there are gender differences in the prevalence and related disability. This study aimed to compare self-reported physical work exposures by gender for people within the same occupational group. METHODS: We used cross-sectional data from 65 281 asymptomatic workers aged 18-69 years from the CONSTANCES cohort study (France). We compared 27 physical exposures between men and women in the same occupational groups ('Profession et Categorie Sociale' group) using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Men and women performing the same job often reported different levels of exposure. 38 of 365 occupational groups had a gender difference in reported exposure for 10 or more of 27 physical exposures, with men reporting higher exposures in 79% of these jobs. Women reported higher exposures in nursing and other healthcare professions. The probability that a random man had an exposure value higher than a random woman varied widely, from 8% to 92%, and was highly dependent on occupational groups and the specific exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women working in the same jobs reported different physical exposures for some jobs and some exposures. Further research should further define and explore these reported differences to improve prevention and research.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Female , Humans , Male , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , France/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupations , Risk Factors , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged
2.
J Occup Rehabil ; 33(4): 750-756, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36935460

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Machine learning (ML) methods showed a higher accuracy in identifying individuals without cancer who were unable to return to work (RTW) compared to the classical methods (e.g. logistic regression models). We therefore aim to discuss the value of these methods in relation to RTW for cancer survivors. METHODS: Breast cancer (BC) survivors who were working at diagnosis within the CONSTANCES cohort were included in the study. RTW was assessed five years after the BC diagnosis (early retirement was considered as non-RTW). Age and occupation at diagnosis, and physical occupational job exposures assessed using the Job Exposure Matrix, JEM-CONSTANCES, were evaluated as predictors of RTW five years after BC diagnosis. The following four ML methods were used: (i) k-nearest neighbors; (ii) random forest; (iii) neural network; and (iv) elastic net. RESULTS: The training sample included 683 BC survivors (RTW: 85.7%), and the test sample 171 (RTW: 85.4%). The elastic net method had the best results despite low sensitivity (accuracy = 76.6%; sensitivity = 31.7%; specificity = 90.8%), and the random forest model was the most accurate (= 79.5%) but also the least sensitive (= 14.3%). CONCLUSION: This study takes a first step towards opening up new possibilities for identifying the occupational determinants of cancer survivors' RTW. Further work, including a larger sample size, and more predictor variables, is now needed.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Cancer Survivors , Humans , Female , Return to Work , Survivors , Occupations
3.
J Occup Rehabil ; 2023 Nov 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37932500

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common worldwide and gender differences exist in terms of prevalence and disability. MSDs are a leading cause of sick leave and physical work exposures. To assess the association between physical exposures assessed by the gender-specific CONSTANCES Job-Exposure Matrix (JEM) and musculoskeletal pain in six areas: neck pain, shoulder pain, elbow/arm pain, hand/wrist pain, low back pain, knee/leg pain; and to compare the results with those obtained using the non-gendered CONSTANCES JEM and with individual self-report exposures. METHODS: We included 48,736 male and 63,326 female workers from the CONSTANCES cohort (France). The association between 27 physical exposures and musculoskeletal self-reported pain in six body areas was assessed using logistic regression. We conducted the analysis with three types of exposures: (1) individual self-reported exposures; (2) gender-specific CONSTANCES JEM; (3) non-gendered CONSTANCES JEM, and adjusted for age and Body Mass Index (BMI). Analyses were stratified by gender. RESULTS: The associations to the gender-specific and non-gendered JEM were similar. The odds ratios using individual self-reported exposures were comparable to the JEM-based associations, with the exceptions of the exposures 'change tasks', 'rest eyes' and 'reach behind'. In some comparisons, there were differences in the direction and/or significance of effects between genders (regardless of whether the JEM used was gender-specific or not). CONCLUSION: The gender-specific and non-gendered JEMs gave similar results, hence, developing physical work exposures JEMs that are gender-specific may not be essential. However, when predicting musculoskeletal pain, it seems relevant to stratify the analysis by gender.

4.
Occup Environ Med ; 2022 Sep 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36126974

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light a new occupational health threat. We aimed to evaluate the association between COVID-19 infection and work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 assessed by a job-exposure matrix (JEM), in a large population cohort. We also estimated the population-attributable fraction among exposed subjects. METHODS: We used the SAPRIS-SERO sample of the CONSTANCES cohort, limited to subjects actively working, and with a job code available and a questionnaire on extra work activities. The following outcomes were assessed: COVID-19 diagnosis was made by a physician; a seropositivity to the ELISA-S test ('serology strict') and ELISA-S test intermediate with positive ELISA-NP or a positive neutralising antibodies SN ('serology large'). Job exposure was assessed using Mat-O-Covid, an expert-based JEM with an Index used as a continuous variable and a threshold at 13/1000. RESULTS: The sample included 18 999 subjects with 389 different jobs, 47.7% were men with a mean age of 46.2 years (±9.2 years). The Mat-O-Covid index taken as a continuous variable or with a threshold greater than 13/1000 was associated with all the outcomes in bivariable and multivariable logistic models. ORs were between 1.30 and 1.58, and proportion of COVID-19 attributable to work among exposed participants was between 20% and 40%. DISCUSSION: Using the Mat-O-Covid JEM applied to a large population, we found a significant association between work exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 infection, though the estimation of attributable fraction among exposed people remained low to moderate. Further studies during other exposed periods and with other methods are necessary.

5.
Scand J Work Environ Health ; 49(8): 549-557, 2023 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37669536

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to construct and evaluate a gender-specific job exposure matrix (JEM) for 27 physical work exposures, based on self-report. METHODS: We constructed a JEM using questionnaire data on current physical exposures from 29 381 male and 35 900 female asymptomatic workers aged 18-69 years in the French CONSTANCES cohort study. We excluded workers with musculoskeletal pain to reduce potential reporting bias. We grouped 27 self-reported physical exposures using the French national job codes and stratified by gender. We compared individual and group-based exposures using the performance indicators Cohen's kappa (κ), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). RESULTS: JEM validation showed fair-to-moderate agreement (κ 0.21-0.60) for most physical exposures for both genders except for 'reach behind' (poor), 'bend neck' (poor), 'finger pinch' (poor), standing' (good), 'use computer screen' (good), and 'use keyboard or scanner' (good). We found the highest AUC for 'standing' (men 0.85/ women 0.87), 'kneel/squat' (men 0.80/women 0.81), 'use computer screen' (men/women 0.81), and 'use keyboard or scanner' (men 0.82/ women 0.84). The AUC was <0.60 for only three exposures: 'bend neck' (men 0.58/women 0.57), 'finger pinch' (men 0.56/ women 0.55), and 'reach behind' (men 0.54/ women 0.51). CONCLUSION: The constructed JEM validation measures were comparable for men and women for all exposures. Further research will examine the predictive ability of this gender-specific JEM for musculoskeletal disorders and the relevance of gender-stratification in this process, knowing accuracy of each exposure.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Humans , Male , Female , Cohort Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , France , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35565128

ABSTRACT

Background. We aimed to assess the validity of the Mat-O-Covid Job Exposure Matrix (JEM) on SARS-CoV-2 using compensation data from the French National Health Insurance compensation system for occupational-related COVID-19. Methods. Deidentified compensation data for occupational COVID-19 in France were obtained between August 2020 and August 2021. The case acceptance was considered as the reference. Mat-O-Covid is an expert-based French JEM on workplace exposure to SARS-CoV-2. Bi- and multivariable models were used to study the association between the exposure assessed by Mat-O-Covid and the reference, as well as the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios. Results. In the 1140 cases included, there was a close association between the Mat-O-Covid index and the reference (p < 0.0001). The overall predictivity was good, with an AUC of 0.78 and an optimal threshold at 13 per thousand. Using Youden's J statistic resulted in 0.67 sensitivity and 0.87 specificity. Both positive and negative likelihood ratios were significant: 4.9 [2.4−6.4] and 0.4 [0.3−0.4], respectively. Discussion. It was possible to assess Mat-O-Covid's validity using data from the national compensation system for occupational COVID-19. Though further studies are needed, Mat-O-Covid exposure assessment appears to be accurate enough to be used in research.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Exposure , COVID-19/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Workplace
7.
Ann Work Expo Health ; 66(1): 113-118, 2022 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34145882

ABSTRACT

Procode is a free of charge web-tool that allows automatic coding of occupational data (free-texts) by implementing Complement Naïve Bayes (CNB) as a machine-learning technique. The paper describes the algorithm, performance evaluation, and future goals regarding the tool's development. Almost 30 000 free-texts with manually assigned classification codes of French classification of occupations (PCS) and French classification of activities (NAF) were used to train CNB. A 5-fold cross-validation found that Procode predicts correct classification codes in 57-81 and 63-83% cases for PCS and NAF, respectively. Procode also integrates recoding between two classifications. In the first version of Procode, this operation, however, is only a simple search function of recoding links in existing crosswalks. Future focus of the project will be collection of the data to support automatic coding to other classification and to establish a more advanced method for recoding.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure , Bayes Theorem , Humans , Industry , Machine Learning , Occupations
8.
J Ment Health Policy Econ ; 14(2): 95-105, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21881165

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Most published data on out-of-pocket spending on mental health originate from the United States, where insurance payments for mental health have traditionally been much less generous than benefits for other health care services. Given the difference in the structure of health care funding in Europe, it is clearly important to obtain similar information on out-of-pocket expenditure in different European countries. AIM OF THE STUDY: To estimate out-of-pocket costs paid by people who receive mental health care in six European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Spain). METHODS: Of the 8,796 participants in a cross-sectional survey conducted in these six European countries, 1,128 reported having consulted a professional for a mental health problem in the year preceding the interview and provided information on how many times in the past year they consulted each type of provider, and the money they and their family members had paid out-of-pocket for their mental health care. In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, information on mental health status was collected using the CIDI 3.0. Descriptive statistics on out-of-pocket expenditure and share of income across countries were generated. Two-part models were employed to identify the relationship between the different covariates, notably the types of providers consulted, and out-of-pocket expenditure. RESULTS: Overall, 41.0% of those who used services for a mental health problem paid something for the care they received. This represented a minority of respondents in all countries except Belgium (87.9%) and Italy (61.7%). The financial burden of these costs relative to income was found to be low (1.2%), ranging from 0.4% in Germany to 2.3% in France. Out-of-pocket expenditure differed according to the type of providers consulted, with non-physician health professionals and medical specialists being more often associated with significant expenditure. DISCUSSION AND LIMITATIONS: Although the study is limited principally by data collection from self-report, it is the first of its kind, to our knowledge, and suggests that out-of-pocket costs for mental health care in Europe are relatively low compared to the United States. However, differences between countries exist, which may be partially due to differences in coverage for specialized care. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICIES: Consultations with non-physician mental health professionals such as psychologists are expensive for patients, since they are reimbursed to a lesser extent than consultations with physicians, or not reimbursed at all. This limits their role and increases the burden on psychiatrists. IMPLICATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Monitoring out-of-pocket spending on mental health, preferably on the basis of administrative data when available, is essential in the current context of cost containment policy, where out-of-pocket spending may be expected to increase.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , Young Adult
9.
Can J Psychiatry ; 55(5): 289-94, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20482955

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the 12-month prevalence of common mental disorders among francophones in Canada, France, and Belgium. This is the first article in a 2-part series comparing mental disorders and service use prevalence of French-speaking populations. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from the Canadian Community Health Survey: Mental Health and Well-Being (CCHS 1.2) in 2002 and the European Study of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders-Mental Health Disability (ESEMeD) from 2001 to 2003, where comparable questionnaires were administered to representative samples of adults in Canada, France, and Belgium. In Canada, francophone respondents living in Quebec (n = 7571) and outside Quebec (n = 500) completed the French version of the CCHS 1.2 questionnaire. Francophone respondents in Belgium (n = 389) and in France (n = 1436) completed the French version of the ESEMeD population survey questionnaire. Major depressive episodes (MDEs), specific anxiety disorders (ADs), and alcohol abuse and (or) dependence disorders' rates were assessed. RESULTS: The overall prevalence rate for the presence of any MDE, AD, or alcohol abuse and (or) dependence was similar in all francophone populations studied in Canada and Europe and averaged 8.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Mental disorders were equally distributed in all francophone populations studied. Cross-national comparisons continue to be instrumental in providing information useful for the creation of appropriate policies and programs for specific subsets of populations.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Adult , Alcoholism/diagnosis , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Belgium , Canada , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , France , Health Surveys , Humans , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Can J Psychiatry ; 55(5): 295-304, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20482956

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare 12-month and lifetime service use for common mental disorders in 4 francophone subsamples using data from national mental health surveys in Canada, Quebec, France, and Belgium. This is the second article in a 2-part series comparing mental disorders and service use prevalence of French-speaking populations. METHODS: Comparable World Mental Health-Composite International Diagnostic Interviews (WMH-CIDI) were administered to representative samples of adults (aged 18 years and older) in Canada during 2002 and in France and Belgium from 2001 to 2003. Two groups of francophone adults in Canada, in Quebec (n = 7571) and outside Quebec (n = 500), and respondents in Belgium (n = 389) and France (n = 1436) completed the French version of the population survey. Prevalence rates of common mental health service use were examined for major depressive episodes and specific anxiety disorders (that is, agoraphobia, social phobia, and panic disorder). RESULTS: Overall, most francophones with mental disorders do not seek treatment. Canadians consulted more mental health professionals than their European counterparts, with the exception of psychiatrists. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of service use are similar among francophone populations. Variations that exist may be accounted for by differences in health care resources, health care systems, and health insurance coverage.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Belgium , Canada , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Female , France , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Language , Male , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data
11.
Eur J Public Health ; 20(2): 151-6, 2010 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19793837

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: French public health policies aimed at reducing smoking were reinforced in France between 1999 and 2004 to decrease tobacco consumption. The consequences of these policies are of particular interest to teachers who play a role model for young people. Depression and alcohol problems were particularly studied as they may influence smoking behaviour. METHODS: Two large cross-sectional health surveys conducted in 1999 (N = 2931) and 2005 (N = 3702) included teachers, aged 20-59 years. Smoking status, socio-demographic characteristics, history of depressive episode in the previous year and problems with alcohol were collected using self-administered postal questionnaires. RESULTS: From 1999 to 2005, the prevalence of smoking decreased significantly from 25.7 to 18.2% for men (P < 0.001), from 20.0 to 16.5% (P < 0.001) for women; and the proportion of never-smokers increased. In smokers, the number of cigarettes consumed per day decreased significantly. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant decrease of the risk of being a smoker in 2005 compared with 1999 [odds ratio (OR) = 0.68 for men; OR = 0.78 for women]. Risk factors of smoking were: men aged 20-34 years (OR = 1.81), CAGE score > or =2, (OR = 1.95 for men, 2.12 for women) history of a major depressive episode in the previous 12 months (OR = 1.46 for men, 1.44 for women). CONCLUSION: Anti-smoking policies resulted in a decrease of teachers' tobacco consumption between 1999 and 2005. However, people with more difficulties in quitting smoking, in particular people with depressive episodes or problems with alcohol, might benefit from comprehensive programmes, including training of health professionals.


Subject(s)
Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Health Policy/trends , Smoking/epidemiology , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Attitude to Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking Prevention , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
12.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 45(2): 189-99, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381424

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Few studies have explored the prevalence of psychiatric disorders (PD) among university students. This article aims to study 12-month prevalence of PD in university students, their socio-economic correlates, impairment in daily life and help-seeking behaviours. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of randomly selected first-year students aged 18-24 years, enrolled in one of the six universities in south-eastern France in 2005-2006. We used the WHO CIDI-Short Form to derive DSM-IV diagnoses and the Sheehan disability scale to evaluate impairment. We studied their correlates with multiple logistic regressions. RESULTS: The 12-month prevalence of major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety disorders (AD) and substance use disorders (SUD) were 8.9% (95% CI: 7.2-10.9), 15.7% (95% CI: 13.5-18.2) and 8.1% (95% CI: 6.7-9.8), respectively. MDD was associated with precarious economic situation (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.03-3.23), AD with a precarious job or unemployment of the father (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.04-4.14) and SUD with higher educational level of father (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.28-3.67) or having a paid job (OR = 1.82; 95% CI: 1.06-3.13). "Marked" or "extreme" impairment (score > or =7 for at least one of the domains in the Sheehan scale) was noted for 51.7% of students presenting a PD and was even more frequent in the presence of MDD/AD comorbidity. Only 30.5% of the students with a PD had sought professional help in the past 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new results regarding university students suggesting a link between precarious economic situations and MDD. The frequent impairment arising from PD alongside low rates of help-seeking suggests that PD could be one of the factors in academic failure in first year of university. These results should be used to improve prevention and care of PD in university students in France.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Students/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Educational Status , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychology , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors , Students/psychology , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities , White People , Young Adult
13.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 45(10): 989-98, 2010 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19798457

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of religious advisors in mental health problems in six European countries and to compare it to data from the USA. METHODS: Data were derived from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) study, a cross-sectional study, conducted in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. 21,425 individuals, 18 and older, were interviewed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. Findings were compared to the National Comorbidity Survey (NCS) and replication of the NCS (NCS-R) in the US. RESULTS: In ESEMeD, 0.6% of individuals (0.3% exclusively) sought help from religious advisors concerning mental health problems during the previous year, compared to 2.6% in NCS and 3.4% (for human services) in NCS-R in the US. Among those using any form of service, 6.9% consulted religious advisors (12.2% in Germany to 2.1% in Spain) compared to 18.8% in the US. Being younger (less than 25 years old), being older (more than 64) and religiosity are associated with the use of religious advisors, whereas being a student is associated with a lower probability. CONCLUSIONS: Seeking help from religious advisors for mental health problems varies dramatically among ESEMeD countries. Except for Germany, organised religion in the ESEMeD countries could not be considered as an alternative.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/therapy , Pastoral Care/methods , Religion , Adolescent , Adult , Comorbidity , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiologic Studies , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/supply & distribution , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
14.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 45(12): 1149-59, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19885632

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study are: first, to compare two short diagnostic instruments, CIDI-SF and CIS-R, with respect to the structured clinical interview for non-patient (SCID-I/NP) for anxiety and depressive disorders; and second, to evaluate the influence of four languages, Italian, Romanian, Spanish and French, on the concordance tests. METHODS: A total of 120 participants from Italy and Romania, 119 from Spain and 141 from France (N = 500) were recruited randomly in a local primary care research centre (GPs or medical centres). The instruments were administered during a unique session: the lay instruments by students in psychology and the SCID by experienced psychiatrists. Kappa, sensitivity/specificity/negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV), ROC curve (AUC) and the Youden Index (Y) were calculated. RESULTS: Results were better for the CIDI-SF than the CIS-R for anxious disorders, depressive disorders and any of them. The results were identical to that obtained by the CIDI 3.0 for the three categories and constant across the languages except for depressive disorders in Romania and France. CONCLUSIONS: CIDI-SF is a cost-effective instrument and could be easily integrated into health surveys; its performance values are better across languages than values proposed by the CIS-R and could be increased by inclusion of few additional information.


Subject(s)
Health Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys/methods , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Language , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Romania/epidemiology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Spain/epidemiology , Translations
15.
Can J Psychiatry ; 54(11): 767-76, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19961665

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the psychometric properties of the Dominic Interactive (DI) in school-aged children in a different cultural environment than Quebec. METHODS: In a large French region, 100 schools and 25 children (aged 6 to 11 years) per school were randomly selected. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires to children (DI), parents (sociodemographic characteristics, mental health services use), and teachers (child school achievement). DI psychometric properties were assessed by examining: the distribution of each DI diagnosis; comorbidity between diagnoses; alpha coefficients measuring internal consistency; and correlates of psychopathologies with sociodemographic status and health care services use. Estimates of DI properties were compared with those from a sample of community children in Quebec. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 1274 children (54.4%). The internal consistency of each DI diagnosis of the French version was reasonable, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.62 to 0.89. The psychometric properties and comorbidity were consistent with the version from Quebec. CONCLUSIONS: The satisfactory psychometric properties of the DI along with other demonstrated advantages of this instrument (children enjoy the activity, parents approve of it, and it is cost-effective) and its cultural adaptability support the consideration of the DI for epidemiologic studies in diverse cultures.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Psychological Tests , Child , Child Welfare , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , France , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Parents , Psychometrics , Quebec , Reproducibility of Results , Sex Factors
16.
BMC Public Health ; 9: 370, 2009 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19799781

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Teachers, as professional voice users, are at particular risk of voice disorders. Among contributing factors, stress and psychological tension could play a role but epidemiological data on this problem are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate prevalence and cofactors of voice disorders among teachers in the French National Education system, with particular attention paid to the association between voice complaint and psychological status. METHODS: The source data come from an epidemiological postal survey on physical and mental health conducted in a sample of 20,099 adults (in activity or retired) selected at random from the health plan records of the national education system. Overall response rate was 53%. Of the 10,288 respondents, 3,940 were teachers in activity currently giving classes to students. In the sample of those with complete data (n = 3,646), variables associated with voice disorders were investigated using logistic regression models. Studied variables referred to demographic characteristics, socio-professional environment, psychological distress, mental health disorders (DSM-IV), and sick leave. RESULTS: One in two female teachers reported voice disorders (50.0%) compared to one in four males (26.0%). Those who reported voice disorders presented higher level of psychological distress. Sex- and age-adjusted odds ratios [95% confidence interval] were respectively 1.8 [1.5-2.2] for major depressive episode, 1.7 [1.3-2.2] for general anxiety disorder, and 1.6 [1.2-2.2] for phobia. A significant association between voice disorders and sick leave was also demonstrated (1.5 [1.3-1.7]). CONCLUSION: Voice disorders were frequent among French teachers. Associations with psychiatric disorders suggest that a situation may exist which is more complex than simple mechanical failure. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify the comorbidity between voice and psychological disorders.


Subject(s)
Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Voice Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Mental Healing , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Sick Leave/statistics & numerical data , Stress, Psychological , Young Adult
17.
BMC Public Health ; 9: 333, 2009 Sep 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19744328

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited information on the covariates of burnout syndrome in French teachers is available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative contributions of individual and contextual factors on the three burnout dimensions: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. METHODS: The source data come from an epidemiological postal survey on physical and mental health conducted in 2005 among 20,099 education workers (in activity or retired) selected at random from the health plan records of the national education system. The response rate was 52.4%. Teachers in activity currently giving classes to students who participated in the survey (n = 3,940) were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire including the Maslach Burnout Inventory. 2,558 teachers provided complete data (64.9%). Variables associated with high emotional exhaustion (highest quartile of score), high depersonalization (highest quartile), and reduced personal accomplishment (lowest quartile) were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Studied variables referred to demographic characteristics, socio-professional environment, job dissatisfaction, experienced difficulties at work, and teaching motivations. RESULTS: Different variables were associated with each burnout dimension. Female teachers were more susceptible to high emotional exhaustion and reduced personal accomplishment, whereas male teachers were more susceptible to high depersonalization. Elementary school teachers were more susceptible to high emotional exhaustion, but less susceptible to high depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment than their higher school level counterparts. Experienced difficulties with pupils were associated with all three dimensions. A socio-economically underprivileged school neighbourhood was also related to high emotional exhaustion and high depersonalization. CONCLUSION: Programs to enhance teaching environment might be an interesting approach to try to prevent burnout. It would be useful to take the different dimensions into account in planning the intervention.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/psychology , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Burnout, Professional/classification , Cross-Sectional Studies , Data Collection , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , France , Humans , Italy , Male , Marital Status , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching/classification
18.
Addiction ; 103(4): 598-603, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18261191

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To describe trends of responses to the Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilt, Eye-opener (CAGE) questionnaire during a period of declining alcohol consumption, in a country with no temperance history. DESIGN: Two random-sample surveys, conducted in 1991 and 2005, respectively. SETTING: The adult population of Ile-de-France. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1183 subjects in 1991 and 5382 subjects in 2005. MEASUREMENTS: Responses to CAGE questions, obtained by face-to-face interviews in 1991 and by telephone in 2005. RESULTS: were standardized on the 2005 population structure. FINDINGS: The proportion of subjects giving at least two positive answers has increased by 4.2 times; the biggest increase was observed for the Guilt question (4.8 times) and the smallest for the Eye-opener question (2.6 times). Several increases were higher for women than for men: 12.9 times versus 3.3 times for two or more positive answers, 9.8 times versus 3.8 times for the Guilt question. Increases did not vary consistently by age. CONCLUSION: These paradoxical trends do not support the use of CAGE in general population surveys. They confirm previous reports suggesting that CAGE was sensitive to community temperance level. They might reflect the emergence of a temperance movement in France, with stronger impact among women. This movement might be responsible for the fall in alcohol consumption.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/trends , Cross-Cultural Comparison , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Interviews as Topic/methods , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Temperance/trends
20.
Obstet Gynecol ; 109(6): 1277-85, 2007 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17540798

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the frequencies of reported symptoms by oral contraceptive pill (OCP) composition among French women. METHODS: A population-based cohort of 2,863 women studied between 2000 and 2004 was used to compare the frequency of reported symptoms (weight gain, nausea, breast tenderness, lower frequency of menstrual periods, breakthrough bleeding, painful and heavy periods, swollen legs) by type of OCPs (classified by estrogen dosage, progestin component, and sequence of administration). RESULTS: Results show little variation in the frequency of symptoms by type of OCPs, with the exception of progestin-only pills being associated with higher frequencies of breakthrough bleeding and lower frequencies of menstrual periods. We found no decrease in the reporting of symptoms with the reduction of estrogen dosage, nor with the use of third-generation OCPs compared with second-generation OCPs. Likewise, we found little variation by sequence of administration of OCPs (monophasic versus triphasic). CONCLUSION: In the absence of sufficient evidence-based data to support the existence of differences in the tolerance profile of low-dose combined OCPs, future well-designed randomized trials are needed to guide providers in their choice of OCPs. However, research should also assess the effectiveness of counseling on the tolerance of OCPs, an intervention that may prove to be more rewarding than basing the choice of OCPs on their theoretical properties.


Subject(s)
Contraception/methods , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/adverse effects , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/adverse effects , Menstruation Disturbances/chemically induced , Patient Compliance , Adolescent , Adult , Body Weight/drug effects , Cohort Studies , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/administration & dosage , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Edema/chemically induced , Estrogens/administration & dosage , Ethinyl Estradiol , Female , France , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Logistic Models , Menstruation/drug effects , Nausea/chemically induced , Progestins/administration & dosage , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL