ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Accumulating evidence suggests an important role for psychosocial work factors in injury, but little is known about the interaction between psychosocial factors and previous injury experience on subsequent injury risk. We examined the relationships between psychosocial work factors and new or recurrent injury among hospital workers. METHODS: We studied 492 hospital workers including 116 cases with baseline injury and 376 injury-free referents at baseline over follow-up. Job strain, total support, effort-reward imbalance, overcommitment, and musculoskeletal injury at baseline were examined in logistic regression models as predictors of new or recurrent injury experienced during a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: The overall cumulative incidence of injury over follow-up was 35.6 % (51.7 % for re-injury among baseline injury cases; 30.6 % for new injury among referents). Significantly increased risks with baseline job strain (OR 1.26; 95 % CI 1.02-1.55) and effort-reward imbalance (OR 1.42; 95 % CI 1.12-1.81) were observed for injury only among the referents. Overcommitment was associated with increased risk of injury only among the cases (OR 1.58; 95 % CI 1.05-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: The effects of psychosocial work factors on new or recurrent injury risk appear to differ by previous injury experience, suggesting the need for differing preventive strategies in hospital workers.
Subject(s)
Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Work/psychology , Workload/psychology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Injuries/psychology , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , RewardABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study measured violence (physical assault, robbery, or weapon confrontation) in taxi drivers, and determined socio-demographic/work factors associated with violence. METHODS: In 2010, 130 taxi drivers, working in a large city in the Western US, were administered a survey evaluating workplace violence events. RESULTS: The study population was male (94%), mean age 45, married (54%), foreign-born (55%), with 24% speaking Arabic at home. Drivers drove at night (51%), for an average of 9.7 years and 41 hr/week. Almost half reported a history of violence during their driving careers: physical assault, weapon confrontation, or robbery. In the prior 12 months, 12% were physically assaulted, 8% robbed, and 6% confronted with a weapon. Night drivers reported more assaults over their lifetime compared to day drivers (mean = 1.64 [sd 4.29] vs. mean = 0.53 [sd 1.05], P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Taxi drivers experience violence at work. Strategies are needed to prevent violence especially in night drivers.
Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , San Francisco/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to compare job demand-control (JDC) and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) models in examining the association of job stress with work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and to evaluate the utility of a combined model. METHODS: This study analyzed cross-sectional survey data obtained from a nationwide random sample of 304 intensive-care unit (ICU) nurses. Demographic and job factors were controlled in the analyses using logistic regression. RESULTS: Both JDC and ERI variables had strong and statistically significant associations with work-related musculoskeletal symptoms. Effort-reward imbalance had stronger associations than job strain or iso-strain with musculoskeletal symptoms. Effort-reward imbalance alone showed similar or stronger associations with musculoskeletal symptoms compared to combined variables of the JDC and ERI models. CONCLUSIONS: The ERI model appears to capture the magnitude of the musculoskeletal health risk among nurses associated with job stress at least as well and possibly better than the JDC model. Our findings suggest that combining the two models provides little gain compared to using effort-reward imbalance only.
Subject(s)
Critical Care Nursing , Models, Theoretical , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Professional Autonomy , Reward , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workload/psychologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nursing is known as an occupation with high risk of musculoskeletal injury. Nurses' perceptions about the risk of injury may have a role in preventing such injury. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate how nurses perceived the risk of musculoskeletal injury from work and identify factors associated with their risk perception. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study using a postal survey, 361 critical care nurses reported on risk perception, physical workload, psychosocial job factors, safety climate, musculoskeletal symptoms, and safe work behavior. RESULTS: Of all critical care nurse respondents, 83% perceived that they were more likely than not to have a musculoskeletal injury within 1 year. On average, nurses perceived the risk of musculoskeletal injury as lower to themselves than to coworkers. This more positive perception of risk to self had stronger correlations with symptom experiences. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that higher risk perception of injury was associated with greater job strain, greater physical workload, lack of availability of lifting devices or lifting teams, and more symptoms. DISCUSSION: Study findings indicated that most critical care nurses were concerned about their ergonomic job risks. Their risk perceptions about musculoskeletal injury risk were affected by physical work exposures, psychosocial job stressors, and experience with musculoskeletal symptoms, but not by perceived workplace safety climate. The findings underscore the need for management efforts to improve physical and psychosocial working conditions and create a safe work environment.
Subject(s)
Critical Care , Musculoskeletal System/injuries , Nurse's Role , Nurses/psychology , Occupational Injuries/etiology , Self Concept , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Moving and Lifting Patients , Occupational Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Factors , WorkloadABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to identify the correlates of heavy smoking (defined as more than one pack of cigarettes per day) in building trades construction workers. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: This study used cross-sectional data from the MassBUILT smoking cessation intervention study at Massachusetts building trades unions with the sample of 763 smokers. MEASURES: Data collected included information about smoking behavior, individual, psychological, interpersonal, and occupational factors obtained through self-reported questionnaires. RESULTS: Approximately 21% of smokers were heavy smokers. Significant factors related to heavy smoking were: older age (ORĀ =Ā 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06-1.14), male gender (ORĀ =Ā 4.55; 95% CI: 1.62-12.79), smoking the first cigarette of the day within 30Ā min of waking (ORĀ =Ā 4.62; 95% CI: 2.81-7.59), smoking initiation at earlier age (ORĀ =Ā 0.93; 95% CI: 0.87-1.00), higher temptation to smoke (ORĀ =Ā 1.55; 95% CI: 1.17-2.05), household smoking (ORĀ =Ā 1.90; 95% CI: 1.18-3.06) or living alone (ORĀ =Ā 4.11; 95% CI: 1.70-9.92), and exposure to chemicals at work (ORĀ =Ā 1.61; 95% CI: 1.06-2.53). CONCLUSION: Addressing the influence of these factors on heavy smoking could lead to the development of targeted, multiple components in comprehensive cessation strategies for blue-collar smokers.
Subject(s)
Construction Industry , Occupational Health Services/organization & administration , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Smoking/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Labor Unions , Male , Massachusetts , Occupational Health Services/methods , Occupational Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Smoking/psychology , Smoking Cessation/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Nicotiana , Young AdultABSTRACT
This study describes health and safety concerns and self-care strategies of San Francisco taxi drivers. Focus groups and a written cross-sectional survey were done in a convenience sample of taxi drivers working in San Francisco. Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed in English, and independently coded to identify major health and safety themes, using thematic content analysis. Strategies to manage health and safety issues are the focus of this analysis. Five focus groups were held in 2009 with 36 participants. Major health and safety themes included stress, body pain, danger, vulnerable employment status, and concerns related to unhealthy working conditions. Self-care strategies included diffusion/decompression to manage stress, maintaining a positive attitude, maintaining power and control, and practicing proactive self-care. Creative self-care strategies were described by taxi drivers to keep healthy and safe at work. These data will inform future self-care interventions to reduce health and safety risks of taxi driving.
Subject(s)
Automobile Driving , Occupational Health , Safety , Self Care , Adult , Aged , Attitude , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dangerous Behavior , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain , San Francisco , Stress, Psychological , Urban Population , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Blue-collar workers smoke at higher rates than white-collar workers and the general population. Occupational factors may contribute to smoking behavior in this group. However, little is known about the role of occupational factors in explaining cigarette-smoking patterns. METHODS: This study used cross-sectional data from the MassBUILT smoking cessation intervention study. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association of occupational factors with current cigarette smoking among 1,817 building trades workers. RESULTS: Current cigarette smoking was significantly associated with the following occupational factors: union commitment (OR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.00-1.12); exposure to dust (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.15-1.95), exposure to chemicals (OR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.11-1.79); and concern about exposure to occupational hazards (OR = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the need to explicate the pathways by which occupational factors may contribute to current smoking behavior among building trades workers. Smoking cessation programs for this population should consider work-related occupational factors along with individual approaches.
Subject(s)
Construction Industry/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Workplace , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dust , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hotel room cleaners have physically demanding jobs that place them at high risk for shoulder pain. Psychosocial work factors may also play a role in shoulder pain, but their independent role has not been studied in this group. METHODS: Seventy-four percent (941 of 1,276) of hotel room cleaners from five Las Vegas hotels completed a 29-page survey assessing health status, working conditions, and psychosocial work factors. For this study, 493 of the 941 (52%) with complete data for 21 variables were included in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent reported shoulder pain in the prior four weeks. Room cleaners with effort-reward imbalance (ERI) were three times as likely to report shoulder pain (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.95-4.59, P = 0.000) even after adjustment for physical workload and other factors. After adjustment for physical workload, job strain and iso-strain were not significantly associated with shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: ERI is independently associated with shoulder pain in hotel room cleaners even after adjustment for physical workload and other risk factors.
Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/psychology , Occupational Exposure , Shoulder Pain/etiology , Shoulder Pain/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patient handling is a major risk factor for musculoskeletal (MS) injury among nurses. The aims of the study were to describe nurses' work behaviors related to safe patient handling and identify factors influencing their safe work behaviors, including the use of lifting equipment. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a mailed questionnaire with a nationwide random sample of 361 critical care nurses. Nurses reported on the physical, psychosocial, and organizational characteristics of their jobs and on their MS symptoms, risk perception, work behaviors, and demographics. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were used to identify significant factors. RESULTS: More than half of participants had no lifting equipment on their unit, and 74% reported that they performed all patient lift or transfer tasks manually. Significant factors for safer work behavior included better safety climate, higher effort-reward imbalance, less overcommitment, greater social support, and day shift work. Physical workload, personal risk perception, or MS symptom experiences were not associated with safe work behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Safe work behaviors are best understood as socio-cultural phenomena influenced by organizational, psychosocial, and job factors but, counter to extant theories of health behaviors, do not appear to be related to personal risk perception. Management efforts to improve working conditions and enhance safety culture in hospitals could prove to be crucial in promoting nurses' safe work behavior and reducing risk of MS injury.
Subject(s)
Accidents, Occupational/prevention & control , Critical Care , Moving and Lifting Patients/methods , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health , Analysis of Variance , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ergonomics/methods , Female , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Lifting , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/nursing , Occupational Exposure , Risk Factors , Safety Management , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Psychiatric health care providers have high rates of workplace violence victimization, yet little is known about the strategies used by facilities to reduce violence. This study compared workplace violence prevention (WVP) programs in psychiatric units and facilities in California and New Jersey. Information was collected through interviews, a facility walk-through, and a review of written policies and training material. A similar proportion of hospitals in both states had WVP training programs. A higher proportion of hospitals in California had written WVP policies, and a higher proportion of New Jersey hospitals had implemented environmental and security modifications to reduce violence. Legislation is one of many potential approaches to increase workplace violence prevention programs in health care settings.
Subject(s)
Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Preventive Health Services/organization & administration , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Psychiatric Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Violence/prevention & control , Workplace/psychology , Workplace/statistics & numerical data , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Environment , Humans , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Program Development , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Violence/psychology , Violence/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Hospital violence is a growing concern, yet little is known about existing programs. This study compared workplace violence programs in high-risk emergency departments among a representative sample of 116 hospitals in California and 50 hospitals in New Jersey. METHODS: Information was collected through interviews, a facility walk-through, and review of written policies, procedures, and training material. Programs were scored on the components of training, policies and procedures, security, and environmental approaches. RESULTS: California had significantly higher scores for training and policies and procedures, but there was no difference for security and environmental approaches. Program component scores were not highly correlated. For example, hospitals with a strong training program were not more likely to have strong policies and procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Most hospitals in California and New Jersey had implemented a workplace violence prevention program, but important gaps were found.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Program Development , Violence/prevention & control , Workplace , California , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Interviews as Topic , New JerseyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Assessing the physical demands of the heterogeneous jobs in hospitals requires appropriate and validated assessment methodologies. METHODS: As part of an integrated assessment, we adapted Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA), using it in a work sampling mode facilitated by a hand-held personal digital assistant, expanding it with selected items from the UC Computer Use Checklist, and developed a scoring algorithm for ergonomics risk factors for the upper (UB) and lower body (LB). RESULTS: The inter-rater reliability kappa was 0.54 for UB and 0.66 for LB. The scoring algorithm demonstrated significant variation (ANOVA p<0.05) by occupation in anticipated directions (administrators ranked lowest; support staff ranked highest on both scores). A supplemental self-assessment measure of spinal loading correlated with high strain LB scores (r=0.30; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a scoring algorithm incorporating a revised REBA schema adding computer use items, appropriate for ergonomics assessment across a range of hospital jobs.
Subject(s)
Documentation/methods , Ergonomics , Personnel, Hospital , Physical Exertion/physiology , Workload , Algorithms , Humans , Posture , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We sought to better use qualitative approaches in occupational health research and integrate them with quantitative methods. METHODS: We systematically reviewed, selected, and adapted qualitative research methods as part of a multisite study of the predictors and outcomes of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital workers in two large urban tertiary hospitals. RESULTS: The methods selected included participant observation; informal, open-ended, and semistructured interviews with individuals or small groups; and archival study. The nature of the work and social life of the hospitals and the foci of the study all favored using more participant observation methods in the case study than initially anticipated. CONCLUSIONS: Exploiting the full methodological spectrum of qualitative methods in occupational health is increasingly relevant. Although labor-intensive, these approaches may increase the yield of established quantitative approaches otherwise used in isolation.
Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Health/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital , Qualitative Research , Hospitals, Urban , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the high rate of work-related injuries among hospital nurses, there is limited understanding of factors that serve to motivate or hinder nurses return to work following injury. OBJECTIVES: Perspectives of nurses with work related injuries, as they relate to obstacles and motivations to return to work, consequences of injury, and influences of work climate were documented. METHODS: This was a sub-study of nurses taken from a larger investigation of hospital workers. A purposive sample of 16 nurses was interviewed. Analysis was carried out using grounded theory as the research method. RESULTS: Nurses' responses fell into four concepts: organizational influences, personal conditions, costs and losses, and employee health as influenced by workers' compensation systems. Conceptualization of these concepts resulted in key categories: injury as an expected consequence of hospital work; nursing alone versus nursing together; the impact of injury on professional, family, and social roles; and nurses' understanding of and involvement with the workers' compensation system. DISCUSSION: The findings provide new perspective into features that support or hinder nurses' with injuries return to work and corroborate existing occupational health research. Consideration of these findings by hospital and employee health managers may help promote more effective return to work programs within the hospital setting.
Subject(s)
Motivation , Musculoskeletal Diseases/mortality , Nurses/psychology , Occupational Health/standards , Return to Work/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal System/injuries , Qualitative Research , Safety Management/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In 1998, the California Department of Health Services invited all healthcare facilities in California (n = 2,532) to participate in a statewide, voluntary sharps injury surveillance project. The objectives were to determine whether a low-cost sharps registry could be established and maintained, and to evaluate the circumstances surrounding sharps injuries in California. RESULTS: Approximately 450 facilities responded and reported a total of 1,940 sharps-related injuries from January 1998 through January 2000. Injuries occurred in a variety of healthcare workers (80 different job titles). Nurses sustained the highest number of injuries (n = 658). In hospital settings (n = 1,780), approximately 20% of the injuries were associated with drawing venous blood, injections, or assisting with a procedure such as suturing. As expected, injuries were caused by tasks conventionally related to specific job classifications. The overall results approximate those reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Surveillance System for Health Care Workers and the University of Virginia's Exposure Prevention Information Network. CONCLUSION: These data further support findings from previous studies documenting the complex and persistent nature of sharps-related injuries in healthcare workers. In the future, mandated reporting using standardized forms and consistent application of decision rules would facilitate a more thorough analysis of injury events.
Subject(s)
Health Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Sentinel Surveillance , Adult , California/epidemiology , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Data Collection , Female , Health Facilities/standards , Home Care Agencies/standards , Home Care Agencies/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/standards , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Registries , Skilled Nursing Facilities/standards , Skilled Nursing Facilities/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In 1999, licensed health care facilities in California (N = 2532) were invited to participate in a survey about occupational bloodborne pathogens exposure surveillance activities, recordkeeping methods, and use of safety-enhanced sharps devices. RESULTS: A total of 1274 facilities responded to the survey from January 1999 through August 1999 (response rate = 50%). Sharps-related injuries were recorded for multiple departments on various forms in diverse manners. Only 66% of hospitals, 37% of home health agencies, and 33% of skilled nursing facilities reported sharps injuries on a mandated sharps injury log. More than 70% of facilities stated that they used some type of safety device or needleless system, but this figure varied by type of device and facility type. Eighty-four percent of general acute care hospitals, 28% of home health agencies and skilled nursing facilities each had evaluated at least 1 safety-enhanced device. Almost 90% of all facilities expressed a need for educational materials on topics such as device selection and evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of surveillance and recordkeeping activities does not exist across facility types. Standards and regulations demand complex recordkeeping activities. Increased funding for distribution of educational materials and on-site training should accompany changes in mandated reporting activities when appropriate. Increased testing and evaluation of devices across facility types are necessary to ensure that safety-enhanced devices are protective of health care workers and patients.
Subject(s)
Home Care Agencies/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Skilled Nursing Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Wounds, Stab/epidemiology , California/epidemiology , Humans , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Occupational Exposure , Pilot Projects , Registries , Wounds, Stab/etiology , Wounds, Stab/prevention & controlABSTRACT
PROBLEM: This study evaluated injured construction workers' perceptions of workplace safety climate, psychological job demands, decision latitude, and coworker support, and the relationship of these variables to the injury severity sustained by the workers. METHODS: Injury severity was assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), which evaluates functional limitations. Worker perceptions of workplace variables were determined by two instruments: (a) the Safety Climate Measure for Construction Sites and (b) the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ). RESULTS: The overall model explained 23% of the variance in injury severity, with unique contributions provided by union status, the Safety Climate Score, and Psychological Job Demands. A positive significant correlation was found between injury severity and the Safety Climate Scores (r = .183, P = .003), and between the Safety Climate Scores and union status (r = .225, P < .001). DISCUSSION: There were statistically significant differences between union and nonunion workers' responses regarding perceived safety climate on 5 of the 10 safety climate items. Union workers were more likely than nonunion workers to: (a) perceive their supervisors as caring about their safety; (b) be made aware of dangerous work practices; (c) have received safety instructions when hired; (d) have regular job safety meetings; and (e) perceive that taking risks was not a part of their job. However, with regard to the 49-item JCQ, which includes Coworker Support, the responses between union and nonunion workers were very similar, indicating an overall high degree of job satisfaction. However, workers who experienced their workplace as more safe also perceived the level of management (r = -.55, P < .001) and coworker (r = -.31, P < .001) support as being higher. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The findings of this study underscore the critical need for construction managers to alert workers to dangerous work practices and conditions more frequently, and express concern and praise workers for safe work in a manner that is culturally acceptable in this industry. Workplace interventions that decrease the incidence and severity of injuries, but that are flexible enough to meet a variety of potentially competing imperatives, such as production deadlines and client demands, need to be identified.
Subject(s)
Accidental Falls , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Industry/standards , Safety/standards , Social Support , Accidents, Occupational , Female , Humans , Job Description , Labor Unions , Male , Statistics as Topic , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Despite the institution of explicit safety practices in construction, there continue to be exceedingly high rates of morbidity and mortality from work-related injury. This study's purpose was to identify, compare and contrast views of construction managers from large and small firms regarding construction safety practices. A complementary analysis was conducted with construction workers. METHODS: A semi-structured interview guide was used to elicit information from construction managers (n = 22) in a series of focus groups. Questions were designed to obtain information on direct safety practices and indirect practices such as communication style, attitude, expectations, and unspoken messages. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Managers identified a broad commitment to safety, worker training, a changing workplace culture, and uniform enforcement as key constructs in maintaining safe worksites. Findings indicate that successful managers need to be involved, principled, flexible, and innovative. Best practices, as well as unsuccessful injury prevention programs, were discussed in detail. Obstacles to consistent safety practice include poor training, production schedules and financial constraints. CONCLUSIONS: Construction managers play a pivotal role in the definition and implementation of safety practices in the workplace. In order to succeed in this role, they require a wide variety of management skills, upper management support, and tools that will help them instill and maintain a positive safety culture. Developing and expanding management skills of construction managers may assist them in dealing with the complexity of the construction work environment, as well as providing them with the tools necessary to decrease work-related injuries.
Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/psychology , Facility Design and Construction , Occupational Health , Safety Management , Adult , Focus Groups , Humans , Labor Unions , Qualitative Research , WorkplaceABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: The purpose of this study was to identify perceptions of management safety practices from the viewpoint of union and nonunion construction workers. A complementary investigation was conducted with construction managers. METHODS: A semi-structured interview guide was used to elicit information from 64 workers (95% male) in ten focus groups. Questions were designed to elicit information about management practices that facilitate or discourage safe working conditions, including communication style, attitude, expectations, and unspoken messages. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Workers identified management commitment to safety, concern for workers, congruence between spoken messages and practice, professionalism, and communication skills as key qualities in successful managers. Workers provided vivid examples of excellent and poor management strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Construction managers play a pivotal role in the definition and implementation of safety practices in the workplace and workers look to them for guidance and modeling. Given the high rates of injury in construction, deeply imbedded protective policies that rely on input from a broad range of stakeholders, including construction workers, should be developed.
Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/psychology , Facility Design and Construction , Labor Unions , Occupational Health , Safety Management , Adult , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Qualitative Research , WorkplaceABSTRACT
The prevalence of asthma among working adults continues to rise each year. The California Department of Health Services conducts surveillance of work related asthma (WRA) to classify each work related exposure using Doctor's First Reports of Occupational Illness and Injury (DFRs). Using a cross-sectional, descriptive, comparative design, additional interviews were conducted and medical records were reviewed to explore workers' and providers' perceptions of follow up care. Two cohorts were compared: workers with WRA who belonged to a large, single HMO (n = 79) and workers with WRA who underwent follow up outside this HMO (n = 76). The interview asked about providers seen, tests ordered, and the impact of asthma on work. The HMO clients were significantly more likely than the non-HMO clients to see occupational medicine specialists (p = .004) and have pulmonary function testing (p = .049) during initial treatment. Twenty-four percent of clients currently working reported missed workdays caused by asthma in the past 6 months. The findings indicate management of WRA varies by health care system in California.