ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Amivantamab plus lazertinib (amivantamab-lazertinib) has shown clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in patients with previously untreated or osimertinib-pretreated EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor)-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In a phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned, in a 2:2:1 ratio, patients with previously untreated EGFR-mutated (exon 19 deletion or L858R), locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC to receive amivantamab-lazertinib (in an open-label fashion), osimertinib (in a blinded fashion), or lazertinib (in a blinded fashion, to assess the contribution of treatment components). The primary end point was progression-free survival in the amivantamab-lazertinib group as compared with the osimertinib group, as assessed by blinded independent central review. RESULTS: Overall, 1074 patients underwent randomization (429 to amivantamab-lazertinib, 429 to osimertinib, and 216 to lazertinib). The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-lazertinib group than in the osimertinib group (23.7 vs. 16.6 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58 to 0.85; P<0.001). An objective response was observed in 86% of the patients (95% CI, 83 to 89) in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and in 85% of those (95% CI, 81 to 88) in the osimertinib group; among patients with a confirmed response (336 in the amivantamab-lazertinib group and 314 in the osimertinib group), the median response duration was 25.8 months (95% CI, 20.1 to could not be estimated) and 16.8 months (95% CI, 14.8 to 18.5), respectively. In a planned interim overall survival analysis of amivantamab-lazertinib as compared with osimertinib, the hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05). Predominant adverse events were EGFR-related toxic effects. The incidence of discontinuation of all agents due to treatment-related adverse events was 10% with amivantamab-lazertinib and 3% with osimertinib. CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab-lazertinib showed superior efficacy to osimertinib as first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MARIPOSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04487080.).
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Amivantamab has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions who have had disease progression during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Phase 1 data showed the safety and antitumor activity of amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (chemotherapy). Additional data on this combination therapy are needed. METHODS: In this phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions who had not received previous systemic therapy to receive intravenous amivantamab plus chemotherapy (amivantamab-chemotherapy) or chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were allowed to cross over to receive amivantamab monotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients underwent randomization (153 to receive amivantamab-chemotherapy and 155 to receive chemotherapy alone). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 11.4 months and 6.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.53; P<0.001). At 18 months, progression-free survival was reported in 31% of the patients in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group and in 3% in the chemotherapy group; a complete or partial response at data cutoff was reported in 73% and 47%, respectively (rate ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68; P<0.001). In the interim overall survival analysis (33% maturity), the hazard ratio for death for amivantamab-chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.09; P = 0.11). The predominant adverse events associated with amivantamab-chemotherapy were reversible hematologic and EGFR-related toxic effects; 7% of patients discontinued amivantamab owing to adverse reactions. CONCLUSIONS: The use of amivantamab-chemotherapy resulted in superior efficacy as compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; PAPILLON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04538664.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Disease Progression , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Exons/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Pemetrexed/administration & dosage , Pemetrexed/adverse effects , Pemetrexed/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy confers a modest benefit over surgery alone for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early-phase trials, nivolumab-based neoadjuvant regimens have shown promising clinical activity; however, data from phase 3 trials are needed to confirm these findings. METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with stage IB to IIIA resectable NSCLC to receive nivolumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy or platinum-based chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary end points were event-free survival and pathological complete response (0% viable tumor in resected lung and lymph nodes), both evaluated by blinded independent review. Overall survival was a key secondary end point. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. RESULTS: The median event-free survival was 31.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 30.2 to not reached) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy and 20.8 months (95% CI, 14.0 to 26.7) with chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.63; 97.38% CI, 0.43 to 0.91; P = 0.005). The percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 24.0% (95% CI, 18.0 to 31.0) and 2.2% (95% CI, 0.6 to 5.6), respectively (odds ratio, 13.94; 99% CI, 3.49 to 55.75; P<0.001). Results for event-free survival and pathological complete response across most subgroups favored nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy alone. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the hazard ratio for death was 0.57 (99.67% CI, 0.30 to 1.07) and did not meet the criterion for significance. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 83.2% of those in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and 75.4% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group underwent surgery. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 33.5% of the patients in the nivolumab-plus-chemotherapy group and in 36.9% of those in the chemotherapy-alone group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in significantly longer event-free survival and a higher percentage of patients with a pathological complete response than chemotherapy alone. The addition of nivolumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not increase the incidence of adverse events or impede the feasibility of surgery. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb; CheckMate 816 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02998528.).
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Platinum Compounds , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Humans , Ipilimumab/adverse effects , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Platinum Compounds/adverse effects , Platinum Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Aim: We assessed relative efficacy and safety of amivantamab versus mobocertinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion (exon20ins) mutations who progressed on prior platinum-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: This matching-adjusted indirect comparison used patient-level data from CHRYSALIS (NCT02609776) and aggregate data from a mobocertinib trial (NCT02716116) to match populations on all clinically relevant confounders. Results: While both agents had similar efficacy for time-to-event outcomes, objective response rate was significantly higher for amivantamab. 15 of 23 any-grade treatment-related adverse events reported for mobocertinib were significantly less common for amivantamab versus only two for mobocertinib. Conclusion: Results suggest that amivantamab has an improved response rate with similar survival and a more favorable safety profile versus mobocertinib in EGFR exon20ins non-small-cell lung cancer.
Subject(s)
Aniline Compounds , Antibodies, Bispecific , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Indoles , Lung Neoplasms , Pyrimidines , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Exons , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Platinum , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Herein, we describe a catalyst-free thia-Diels-Alder cycloaddition for the chemoselective labeling of fully deprotected phosphonodithioester-peptides in solution with fluorophores functionalized with an exocyclic diene. The reaction was optimized on the model tripeptide 1 containing a lysine residue, which enabled its rapid and straightforward labeling with three different fluorophores (fluorescein, lissamine rhodamine B, and squaraine) in very mild conditions (H2O/iPrOH, 37 °C, 1 h). The reaction was then successfully applied to the chemoselective labeling of fully deprotected apelin-13 with squaraine dye. The resulting fluorescent ligand 18 exhibited a high affinity (0.17 ± 0.03 nM) for apelinR. It enabled the development of time-resolved FRET-based competition assays for high-throughput screening and drug discovery. Thanks to its fluorogenic properties, ligand 18 was also successfully involved in the live-cell optical imaging of apelinR in no-wash conditions.
Subject(s)
Fluorescent Dyes , Peptides , Apelin , Cycloaddition Reaction , Ligands , Peptides/chemistry , Fluorescent Dyes/chemistryABSTRACT
AIMS: Malignant tumours of the lacrimal apparatus are rare and frequently show a poor prognosis, with no clear therapeutic standards. Characterisation of the genetic landscape of these rare tumours is sparse, and therefore therapeutics generally follow those of their common salivary gland counterparts. To further clarify the pathophysiology and discover potential therapeutic targets, we investigated the genetic landscape of eight tumours of the lacrimal apparatus. METHODS AND RESULTS: DNA and RNA sequencing were performed to identify genetic mutations and gene fusions. Immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in-situ hybridisation and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction followed by Sanger sequencing were performed to confirm the identified molecular alterations. Genetic alterations were detected in six tumours. Among five adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACC), four had confirmed alterations of MYB or MYBL1 genes, including a MYB::NFIB fusion, a MYBL1::NFIB fusion, a MYB amplification and a novel NFIB::THSD7B fusion. Mutations in genes encoding epigenetic modifiers, as well as NOTCH1, FGFR2 and ATM mutations, were also identified in ACCs. A carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma showed TP53 and CIC mutations and an amplification of ERBB2. A transitional cell carcinoma was associated with HPV16 infection. No genetic alteration was found for one adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the variety of molecular alterations associated with lacrimal system tumours and emphasises the importance of molecular testing in these tumours, which can reveal potentially targetable mutations. Our results also reinforce the hypothesis of a common physiopathology of all ACCs, regardless of their primary location.
Subject(s)
Adenoma, Pleomorphic , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic , Lacrimal Apparatus , Salivary Gland Neoplasms , Humans , Lacrimal Apparatus/pathology , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/genetics , Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic/pathology , Adenoma, Pleomorphic/genetics , Adenoma, Pleomorphic/pathology , Gene Fusion , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/genetics , Salivary Gland Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the single-arm CHRYSALIS trial, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (Exon 20ins) showed durable responses to amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody targeting tumors with EGFR Exon 20ins. This study compared the effectiveness of amivantamab to real-world systemic anti-cancer therapies in Japan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: External control patients were selected by applying CHRYSALIS eligibility to Japanese patients from LC-SCRUM-Asia. External control patients were included for every qualifying line of therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. Propensity score weighting was applied to external control patients to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Outcomes were compared between external control patients, and all and Asian-only CHRYSALIS patients using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS), and generalized estimating equations with repeated measurements for overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: One hundred fifteen CHRYSALIS and 94 external control patients were identified. Compared to external control patients, amivantamab-treated patients had significantly longer OS (median OS 19.88 vs 14.09 months, HR [95% CI] 0.59 [0.40-0.88]), PFS (median PFS 6.74 vs 4.73 months, HR 0.59 [0.45-0.78]), TTNT (median TTNT 12.16 vs 5.09 months, HR 0.39 [0.29-0.53]), and significantly higher ORR (41.7% vs 14.1%). Analyses of amivantamab-treated Asian patients (n = 61) showed similar clinical benefits. CONCLUSION: In the absence of clinical evidence from randomized clinical trials, this study reflects the benefit of amivantamab after platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR Exon 20ins, compared to current real-world therapies.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Platinum/therapeutic use , Mutagenesis, Insertional , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Exons/genetics , MutationABSTRACT
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a plain language summary of an article published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2021. It describes the first results from 1 group of patients in the phase 1 CHRYSALIS study with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. This part of the CHRYSALIS study (called cohort D) investigated the bispecific antibody amivantamab (brand name RYBREVANT®) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an EGFR ex20ins mutation. EGFR mutations are one of the most common causes of NSCLC tumors, with EGFR ex20ins mutations being more common among people of Asian descent. Patients who took part in this study had cancer that could not be removed by surgery, and whose cancer had worsened after receiving other forms of treatment, such as chemotherapy. Typically, patients with this type of mutation are difficult to treat or do not experience treatment response with commonly used therapies that target EGFR. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: The CHRYSALIS study took place between May 27, 2016, and June 8, 2020, in select hospitals in the USA, Japan and South Korea. In cohort D, amivantamab showed promising results, with an overall response rate of 40%. This means that 4 of every 10 patients in CHRYSALIS cohort D had tumors that shrank or were no longer measurable. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02609776 (the CHRYSALIS Phase I Study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Animals , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Pupa , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Mutation , Exons , Clinical Trials, Phase I as TopicABSTRACT
WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: In this article, we summarize results from the ongoing phase 3 CheckMate 816 clinical study that were published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. The goal of CheckMate 816 was to find out if nivolumab, an immunotherapy that activates a person's immune system (the body's natural defense system) to fight cancer, plus chemotherapy works better than chemotherapy alone when given before surgery in people with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that can be removed surgically (resectable NSCLC). WHAT HAPPENED IN THE STUDY?: Adults who had not previously taken medications to treat NSCLC and whose cancer could be removed with surgery were included in CheckMate 816. During this study, a computer randomly assigned the treatment each person would receive before surgery for NSCLC. In total, 179 people were randomly assigned to receive nivolumab plus chemotherapy, and 179 people were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone. The researchers assessed whether people who received nivolumab plus chemotherapy lived longer without the cancer geting worse or coming back and whether there were any cancer cells left in the tumor and lymph nodes removed by surgery. The researchers also assessed how adding nivolumab to chemotherapy affected the timing and outcomes of surgery and whether the combination of these drugs was safe. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: Researchers found that people who took nivolumab plus chemotherapy lived longer without the cancer getting worse or coming back compared with those who took chemotherapy alone. More people in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group had no cancer cells left in the tumor and lymph nodes removed by surgery. Most people went on to have surgery in both treatment groups; the people who took nivolumab plus chemotherapy instead of chemotherapy alone had less extensive surgeries and were more likely to have good outcomes after less extensive surgeries. Adding nivolumab to chemotherapy did not lead to an increase in the rate of side effects compared with chemotherapy alone, and side effects were generally mild and manageable. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: Results from CheckMate 816 support the benefit of using nivolumab plus chemotherapy before surgery for people with resectable NSCLC. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02998528 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Nivolumab/adverse effects , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Novel anti-EGFR therapies target resistance to standard-of-care anti-EGFR in patients with metastatic lung cancer. We describe tumors at progression versus at the initiation of novel anti-EGFR agents in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR mutation. This clinical case series reports the histological and genomic features and their evolution following disease progression under amivantamab or patritumab-deruxtecan in clinical trials. All patients had a biopsy at disease progression. Four patients harboring EGFR gene mutations were included. Three of them received anterior anti-EGFR treatment. Median delay to disease progression was 15 months (range: 4-24). At progression, all tumors presented a mutation in the TP53 signaling pathway associated with a loss of heterozygosis (LOH) of the allele in 75% (n = 3), and two tumors (50%) presented an RB1 mutation associated with LOH. Ki67 expression increased above 50% (range 50-90%) in all samples compared to baseline (range 10-30%), and one tumor expressed a positive neuroendocrine marker at progression. Our work reports the potential molecular mechanisms of resistance under novel anti-EGFR in patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma, with the transformation to a more aggressive histology with acquired TP53 mutation and/or the increase in Ki67 expression. These characteristics are usually found in aggressive Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma of Lung , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , ErbB Receptors , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma of Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Disease Progression , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Ki-67 Antigen/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Even after resection of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients have a high risk of developing recurrence and second primary lung cancer. We aimed to assess efficacy of a follow-up approach including clinic visits, chest x-rays, chest CT scans, and fibre-optic bronchoscopy versus clinical visits and chest x-rays after surgery for resectable NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial (IFCT-0302), patients aged 18 years or older and after complete resection of pathological stage I-IIIA NSCLC according to the sixth edition of the TNM classification were enrolled within 8 weeks of resection from 122 hospitals and tertiary centres in France. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CT-based follow-up (clinic visits, chest x-rays, thoraco-abdominal CT scans, and fibre-optic bronchoscopy for non-adenocarcinoma histology) or minimal follow-up (visits and chest x-rays) after surgery for NSCLC, by means of a computer-generated sequence using the minimisation method. Procedures were repeated every 6 months for the first 2 years and yearly until 5 years. The primary endpoint was overall survival analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints, also analysed in the intention-to-treat population, included disease-free survival. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00198341, and is active, but not enrolling. FINDINGS: Between Jan 3, 2005, and Nov 30, 2012, 1775 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to a follow-up group (888 patients to the minimal follow-up group; 887 patients to the CT-based follow-up group). Median overall survival was not significantly different between follow-up groups (8·5 years [95% CI 7·4-9·6] in the minimal follow-up group vs 10·3 years [8·1-not reached] in the CT-based follow-up group; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·95, 95% CI 0·83-1·10; log-rank p=0·49). Disease-free survival was not significantly different between follow-up groups (median not reached [95% CI not estimable-not estimable] in the minimal follow-up group vs 4·9 [4·3-not reached] in the CT-based follow-up group; adjusted HR 1·14, 95% CI 0·99-1·30; log-rank p=0·063). Recurrence was detected in 246 (27·7%) of 888 patients in the minimal follow-up group and in 289 (32·6%) patients of 887 in the CT-based follow-up group. Second primary lung cancer was diagnosed in 27 (3·0%) patients in the minimal follow-up group and 40 patients (4·5%) in the CT-based follow-up group. No serious adverse events related to the trial procedures were reported. INTERPRETATION: The addition of thoracic CT scans during follow-up, which included clinic visits and chest x-rays after surgery, did not result in longer survival among patients with NSCLC. However, it did enable the detection of more cases of early recurrence and second primary lung cancer, which are more amenable to curative-intent treatment, supporting the use of CT-based follow-up, especially in countries where lung cancer screening is already implemented, alongside with other supportive measures. FUNDING: French Health Ministry, French National Cancer Institute, Weisbrem-Benenson Foundation, La Ligue Nationale Contre Le Cancer, and Lilly Oncology. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Early Detection of Cancer , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , X-RaysABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Thymic malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of rare thoracic cancers, which are classified according to the World Health Organization histopathologic classification, that distinguishes thymomas from thymic carcinomas. Data regarding the biology of those tumors are limited in the literature, and the vast majority have been obtained using surgical specimens from early-stage disease. Meanwhile, treatment of advanced, refractory thymic tumors currently relies on chemotherapy, with limited efficacy. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of advanced, refractory tumors would open some opportunities for innovative treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 90 and 174 consecutive patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma, respectively, for whom formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from recurrent, refractory tumor were sequenced, were included. Sequencing was performed using hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation-based libraries to a mean coverage depth of >500× for up to 315 cancer-related genes plus 37 introns from 28 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. RESULTS: Thymomas featured a low frequency of genomic alterations (average of 1.8/tumor), and low levels of TMB. The genomic alterations identified in more than 10% of cases were in the CDKN2A/B and TP53 genes. Amplification in the NTRK1 gene was found in an unresectable, stage III, type B3 thymoma. Thymic carcinomas featured a significantly higher frequency of alterations at 4.0/tumor (P < .0001). Clinically relevant genomic alterations were observed in the CDKN2A, KIT, and PTEN/PI3K/MTOR pathways. Elevated TMB in thymic carcinomas was uncommon with only 6% of cases featuring ≥10 mutations/Mb. CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort is the largest available so far, reporting on CGP of thymic epithelial tumors in the setting of advanced disease. The identification of clinically relevant genomic alterations in the KIT, PI3K, CDKN2A/B, or NTRK genes provides a strong rationale for potential precision medicine approaches using targeted agents. A subset of thymic carcinomas show high tumor mutation burden, what may be a predictor of efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial , Thymoma , Thymus Neoplasms , Humans , Thymoma/genetics , Thymus Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/genetics , Mutation , Genomics , Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases/genetics , Biomarkers , Biomarkers, Tumor/geneticsSubject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Venous Thromboembolism , Humans , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/complications , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , ErbB ReceptorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment duration of ICIs for patients with advanced NSCLC remains uncertain. In phase 3 clinical trials, treatment continued for 2 years or until disease progression with similar long-term survival rates. Real-life data are missing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This academic multicentric retrospective study aims at analyzing the characteristics of patients who discontinued treatment after at least 18 months of ICI monotherapy, in the setting of controlled disease. RESULTS: Of the 1127 patients treated with immunotherapy in the given period in six centers, 107 patients had their tumor controlled after at least 18 months of treatment and 54 (50%) of them had discontinued ICI. The median duration of treatment was 26 months. Treatment was stopped due to prescriber choice or toxicity in 46% and 22% of cases, respectively. After a median follow-up of 21 months from ICI discontinuation (95% CI 15.0-26.1 months), 18 (33%) patients experienced tumor progression after a median time of 10.0 months (range 2-33). From discontinuation, 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 90% (95% CI 77.7-95.7) and 71% (95% CI 56.8-81.5), respectively; 24-month OS and PFS were 84% (95% CI 68.7-92.2) and 63% (95% CI 46.1-76.2), respectively. Duration of disease control after ICI discontinuation was correlated with tumor response at treatment discontinuation: PFS rate at 12 months was 76% after complete response (CR n = 11) or partial response (PR n = 37) and 22% after only stable disease (SD n = 6) as best response, p-value = 0.0002. PFS rate at 12 months was 80% for CR and/or complete metabolic response with 18F-FDG PET/CT (CMR) and 65% for others. Fourteen patients out of the 18 relapse patients received a subsequent treatment: seven with ICI rechallenge (best response 14% PR and 86% SD) and five with localized therapy with 60% CR. CONCLUSIONS: This real-life study provides new insight into long-term outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI for at least 18 months before treatment discontinuation in the absence of PD. Tumor response and CMR with FDG PET just before therapy discontinuation may be a predictive factor of prolonged disease control upon discontinuation. These results call for caution in discontinuing treatment in patients with stable disease as the best response.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nowadays, evaluation of the efficacy and the duration of treatment, in context of monitoring patients with solid tumors, is based on the RECIST methodology. With these criteria, resistance and/or insensitivity are defined as tumor non-response which does not allow a good understanding of the diversity of the underlying mechanisms. The main objective of the OncoSNIPE® collaborative clinical research program is to identify early and late markers of resistance to treatment. METHODS: Multicentric, interventional study with the primary objective to identify early and / or late markers of resistance to treatment, in 600 adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic triple negative or Luminal B breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer or pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Patients targeted in this study have all rapid progression of their pathology, making it possible to obtain models for evaluating markers of early and / or late responses over the 2-year period of follow-up, and thus provide the information necessary to understand resistance mechanisms. To explore the phenomena of resistance, during therapeutic response and / or progression of the pathology, we will use a multidisciplinary approach including high-throughput sequencing (Exome-seq and RNAseq), clinical data, medical images and immunological profile by ELISA. Patients will have long-term follow-up with different biological samples, at baseline (blood and biopsy) and at each tumoral evaluation or tumoral progression evaluated by medical imaging. Clinical data will be collected through a dedicated Case Report Form (CRF) and enriched by semantic extraction based on the French ConSoRe (Continuum Soins Recherche) initiative, a dedicated Semantic Clinical Data Warehouse (SCDW) to cancer. The study is sponsored by Oncodesign (Dijon, France) and is currently ongoing. DISCUSSION: The great diversity of intrinsic or acquired molecular mechanisms involved in resistance to treatment constitutes a real therapeutic issue. Improving understanding of mechanisms of resistance of cancer cells to anti-tumor treatments is therefore a major challenge. The OncoSNIPE cohort will lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance and will allow to explore new mechanisms of actions and to discover new therapeutic targets or strategies making it possible to circumvent the escape in different types of cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrial.gov. Registered 16 September 2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04548960?term=oncosnipe&draw=2&rank=1 and ANSM ID RCB 2017-A02018-45.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/therapy , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , Adult , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/pathology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/therapy , Disease Resistance , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
OPINION STATEMENT: Osimertinib is the current standard-of-care for the first-line treatment of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Progression after osimertinib ineluctably occurs, and standard of care treatment options beyond progression have mainly included next-line platinum doublet chemotherapy. With better understanding of the varied molecular mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib, several opportunities for the use of targeted agents are emerging that include MET amplification, observed in 15% of patients, and resistant EGFR mutations, including C797S in 7% of patients. Evidence for the use of targeted therapies in such situations is mostly based on case reports, but clinical trials are being conducted with MET inhibitors, such as amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody, or next-generation EGFR inhibitors, such as patritumab-deruxtecan, a HER3 antibody drug conjugate. In this review, we outline our proposed approach to current clinical practice for patients with EGFR mutant, osimertinib-resistant NSCLC which includes the following potential strategies: - Continuation of osimertinib beyond progression following local ablative treatment of oligoprogressive disease, - Tissue rebiopsy of progressive site and possibly concurrent liquid biopsy to evaluate for mechanism of resistance utilizing comprehensive genomic profiling, -Discussion at a molecular tumor board for assessment for enrollment in clinical trials/expanded access program if available with innovative drugs or possible off-label use of available targeted agents, based on the results of molecular profiling, -If no mechanism of resistance identified, administration of platinum-based chemotherapy with antiangiogenic agents. The role of immunotherapy will also be addressed given the uncertain benefit.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Immunoconjugates , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Mutation , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Immunoconjugates/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/geneticsABSTRACT
Glomus tumors (GTs) are perivascular tumors mostly occurring in the distal extremities. Rare cases arise in the digestive tract and may be misdiagnosed with neuroendocrine or gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We aimed to specify the features of GT of the upper digestive tract. Clinical, histological, phenotypic, and molecular features of 16 digestive GTs were analyzed, of whom two underwent whole exome and RNA sequencing to search for gene alterations. RNA-sequencing disclosed a t(1:5)(p13;q32) translocation, which resulted in the fusion of CARMN and NOTCH2 in two GTs. The fusion gene encoded a protein sequence corresponding to the NOTCH2 intracellular domain that functions as transcription factor. These finding was supported by high expression of genes targeted by NOTCH. The CARMN-NOTCH2 translocation was detected in 14 out of 16 (88%) GTs of the upper digestive tract; but in only in two out of six cutaneous GTs (33%). Most digestive GT arose from the stomach (n = 13), and the others from duodenal (2) or oesophagous (1). Nuclear expression of NOTCH2 was detected in the 14 cases containing the fusion transcripts. The CARMN-NOTCH2 fusion transcript may contribute to activation of the NOTCH2 pathway in GT and drive tumor development. The high frequency of this translocation in GT of the upper digestive track suggest that detection of nuclear NOTCH2 expression may be useful diagnostic biomarker of these tumors.
Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Fusion , Glomus Tumor/genetics , MicroRNAs/genetics , Receptor, Notch2/genetics , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Glomus Tumor/metabolism , Glomus Tumor/pathology , HumansABSTRACT
Investigating the dynamics of structural elements in functional RNAs is important to better understand their mechanism and for engineering RNAs with novel functions. Previously, we performed rational engineering studies with the Varkud satellite (VS) ribozyme and switched its specificity toward non-natural hairpin substrates through modification of a critical kissing-loop interaction (KLI). We identified functional VS ribozyme variants with surrogate KLIs (ribosomal RNA L88/L22 and human immunodeficiency virus-1 TAR/TAR*), but they displayed â¼100-fold lower cleavage activity. Here, we characterized the dynamics of KLIs to correlate dynamic properties with function and improve the activity of designer ribozymes. Using temperature replica exchange molecular dynamics, we determined that the natural KLI in the VS ribozyme supports conformational sampling of its closed and active state, whereas the surrogate KLIs display more restricted motions. Based on in vitro selection, the cleavage activity of a VS ribozyme variant with the TAR/TAR* KLI could be markedly improved by partly destabilizing the KLI but increasing conformation sampling. We formulated a mechanistic model for substrate binding in which the KLI dynamics contribute to formation of the active site. Our model supports the modular nature of RNA in which subdomain structure and dynamics contribute to define the thermodynamics and kinetics relevant to RNA function.
Subject(s)
Endoribonucleases/chemistry , HIV-1/chemistry , RNA, Catalytic/chemistry , RNA-Binding Proteins/chemistry , RNA/chemistry , Binding Sites , Endoribonucleases/genetics , Genes, rRNA/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Models, Molecular , Nucleic Acid Conformation , RNA/genetics , RNA, Catalytic/genetics , RNA, Untranslated/chemistry , RNA, Untranslated/genetics , RNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , ThermodynamicsABSTRACT
The RYTHMIC network, supported by the French National Cancer Institute is dedicated to the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors through regional and national multidisciplinary tumor boards. Tumor board decisions are based on the initial pathology diagnoses. However, following clinical inclusion in the network, a central pathology review is organized, implicating a panel of pathologists, for histotype and stage classification, which is different from a classical second opinion from pathologist to pathologist for a difficult case. Thanks to the participation of all French pathologists, more than 1000 cases have been reviewed by the panel. The aim of this review is to share with the French pathology community, the experience of the group. It underlines the importance of macroscopy and surgeon-pathologist involvement to allow a good central review, the main histopathological and immunophenotypical patterns of the most frequent thymomas and thymic carcinoma types, the differential diagnoses, as well as the difficulties for the panel to reproducibly assess on slides, stage, for some cases.