ABSTRACT
Gastric cancer (GC) constitutes a major health problem. In addition to the popularity of laparoscopic gastrectomy, many reconstructive procedures have been reported in the literature. Surgical resection and lymphatic dissection determine long-term survival; however, the election of a reconstruction procedure determines the postoperative quality of life for patients with GC. At present, no consensus exists regarding the optimal reconstructive procedure. A new reconstructive approach was recently adopted at our center. Laparoscopic distal or total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and a so called 'double-loop' reconstruction method with intracorporeal mechanical anastomosis was performed in our patients and we describe the technical note and outcome. The intuition in its use comes from the packaging of gastric bypasses in bariatric surgery. The double-loop method is a valid simplification of the traditional technique of construction of the Roux-limb that could increase the feasibility and safety in performing a full laparoscopic intracorporeal reconstruction with greater ergonomics for the surgeon.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The results of D1-plus lymphadenectomy following gastric resection are seldom investigated. The aim of this study was to compare results of D1-plus vs D2 resections and to provide a literature review. METHODS: Patients who underwent upfront R0 gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2016 in three Institutions were selected using propensity scores and categorized according to lymphadenectomy. Statistical analyses were performed for the nodal harvest (LNH) and survival. Published literature comparing D1-plus and D2 was reviewed and analyzed according to PICO and PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Two matched groups of 93 D1-plus and 93 D2 resections were selected. LNH was significantly greater in D2 vs D1-plus dissections (mean 31.2 vs 27.2, p 0.04), however LNH distribution was similar. The cumulative incidence curves for overall survival, disease free and disease specific events did not report significant differences, however Cox regression analysis disclosed that total gastrectomies (HR 1.8; 95% 1.0-2.9), advanced stages (HR 5.9; 95% 3.4-10.3) and D1-plus nodal dissection (HR 2.1; 95% 1.26-3.50) independently correlated with disease free survival. Literature review including 297 D1-plus and 556 D2 lymphadenectomies documented LNH in favor of D2 sub-group (SMD -0.772; 95%CI -1.222- -0.322). CONCLUSION: D2 provided greater LNH than D1-plus dissections; prospective studies should aim to investigate long-term survival of D1-plus lymphadenectomy.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gastrectomy , Humans , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Propensity Score , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Survival RateABSTRACT
Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery has been increasingly used in the treatment of gastric cancer. While laparoscopic gastrectomy has become standard therapy for early-stage gastric cancer, especially in Asian countries, the use of minimally invasive techniques has not attained the same widespread acceptance for the treatment of more advanced tumours, principally due to existing concerns about its feasibility and oncological adequacy. We aimed to examine the safety and oncological effectiveness of laparoscopic technique with radical intent for the treatment of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer by comparing short-term surgical and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy at two Western regional institutions. Methods: The trial was designed as a retrospective comparative matched case-control study for postoperative pathological diagnoses of locally advanced gastric carcinoma. Between January 2015 and September 2021, 120 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection were retrospectively recruited and compared with 120 patients who received open gastrectomy. In order to obtain a comparison that was as homogeneous as possible, the equal control group of pairing (1:1) patients submitted to open gastrectomy who matched those of the laparoscopic group was statistically generated by using a propensity matched score method. The following potential confounder factors were aligned: age, gender, Body Mass Index (BMI), comorbidity, ASA, adjuvant therapy, tumour location, type of gastrectomy, and pT stage. Patient demographics, operative findings, pathologic characteristics, and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Results: In the case-control study, the two groups were clearly comparable with respect to matched variables, as was expected given the intentional primary selective criteria. No statistically significant differences were revealed in overall complications (16.7% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.489), rate of reoperation (3.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.714), and mortality (4.2% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.987) within 30 days. Pulmonary infection and wound complications were observed more frequently in the OG group (0.8% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.01, for each of these two categories). Anastomotic and duodenal stump leakage occurred in 5.8% of the patients after laparoscopic gastrectomy and in 3.3% after open procedure (p = 0.072). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly longer operative time (212 vs. 192 min, p < 0.05) but shorter postoperative length of stay (9.1 vs. 11.6 days, p < 0.001). The mean number of resected lymph nodes after D2 dissection (31.4 vs. 33.3, p = 0.134) and clearance of surgical margins (97.5% vs. 95.8%, p = 0.432) were equivalent between the groups. Conclusion: Laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 nodal dissection appears to be safe and feasible in terms of perioperative morbidity for locally advanced gastric cancer, with comparable oncological equivalency with respect to traditional open surgery.
Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms , Case-Control Studies , Gastrectomy/methods , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Propensity Score , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, which cover about 1-2% of gastrointestinal neoplasms. They are more common in the stomach (40-60%) while a minor part in jejunum/ileus (25- 30%), duodenum (<5%), colorectal (5-15%) and esophagus (<1%). The clinical presentation depends on the primary localization of the neoplasma and tumor size, however in 18% it is asymptomatic. Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most dangerous complication, often necessitating emergency surgery and represents a common symptom of duodenal GIST. We present a case of a 82-year-old male presented with abdominal pain, asthenia and melena with haemodynamically stable. The patient underwent a recent coronary angioplasty and currently on double antiplatelet therapy. During observation a palpable mass was detected in the periumbilical region and right hypochondrium. A superior digestive endoscopy was performed which revealed an ab estrinseco compression of second duodenal segment and bleeding of third duodenal mucosa segment. No local haemostasis could be accomplished. An Angio-CT showed a large exophytic tumor arising from the 3th duodenal segment with approximately 13x9 cm, with apparent intratumoral bleeding. No indication for possible angioembolization. Due to gradual modification of the haemodynamic , the patient was submitted to emergency laparotomy. A segmental enterectomy was performed and the post-operative period ran without complications. The histopathologic exam showed a gastro-intestinal stromal tumor of epithelioid cell nature with low mitotic count (2 per 50HPF). The immunohistochemical analysis revealed positivity for CD117 (c-Kit) and DOG1 with Ki67<1%. KEY WORDS: Bleeding, Duodenal GIST, Gastrointestinal, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor.