Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 274(4): 1835-1851, 2017 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27475796

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new transcutaneous bone-conduction implant (BCI BB) in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss or with single-sided deafness (SSD), 1 year after surgical implantation. The study design is multicentric prospective, intra-subject measurements. Each subject is his/her own control. The setting is nine university hospitals: 7 French and 2 Belgian. Sixteen subjects with conductive or mixed hearing loss with bone-conduction hearing thresholds under the upper limit of 45 dB HL for each frequency from 500 to 4000 Hz, and 12 subjects with SSD (contralateral hearing within normal range) were enrolled in the study. All subjects were older than 18 years. The intervention is rehabilitative. The main outcome measure is the evaluation of skin safety, audiological measurements, benefit, and satisfaction questionnaires with a 1-year follow up. Skin safety was rated as good or very good. For the mixed or conductive hearing loss groups, the average functional gain (at 500 Hz, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 26.1 dB HL (SD 13.7), and mean percentage of speech recognition in quiet at 65 dB was 95 % (vs 74 % unaided). In 5/6 SSD subjects, values of SRT in noise were lower with BB. Questionnaires revealed patient benefit and satisfaction. The transcutaneous BCI is very well tolerated at 1-year follow up, improves audiometric thresholds and intelligibility for speech in quiet and noise, and gives satisfaction to both patients with mixed and conductive hearing loss and patients with SSD.


Subject(s)
Bone Conduction , Hearing Loss, Conductive/surgery , Patient Satisfaction , Prostheses and Implants , Adult , Audiometry , Female , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Mixed Conductive-Sensorineural/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Speech Perception , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 140(5): 235-238, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37479606

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cogan's syndrome is a rare form of vasculitis mainly affecting young subjects of whatever gender, associating cochleovestibular and ophthalmological damage. Despite medical treatment, auditory prognosis is uncertain, with 50-60% of patients showing irreversible severe to profound hearing loss, thus being candidates for cochlear implantation. Following CARE guidelines, we report 10 cases of cochlear implantation in Cogan's syndrome, with assessment of speech reception threshold and maximum intelligibility after a minimum 1 year's experience with the implant. CASE SERIES: Ten patients from 4 centers received cochlear implants (14 implants) for Cogan's syndrome between 2005 and 2020. After 1 year's experience, there was significant improvement in speech reception threshold (P=0.0002) and maximum intelligibility (P=0.0002). CONCLUSION-DISCUSSION: Audiovestibular signs associated with ophthalmological manifestations should suggest Cogan's syndrome. Hearing impairment is usually irreversible. Cochlear implantation may be necessary and improves hearing performance.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cogan Syndrome , Humans , Cogan Syndrome/complications , Cogan Syndrome/diagnosis , Cogan Syndrome/therapy , Speech
3.
J Laryngol Otol ; 137(8): 906-909, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36511130

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate predictive factors for revision surgery in otosclerosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicentre study in four tertiary centres. The primary objective was to investigate factors that were predictive of the need for revision stapes surgery. RESULTS: The 'revision' group included 145 patients, and the 'control' group included 143 patients. This study identified statistically significant predictive factors for the need for revision surgery: younger age, active smoking status, dyslipidaemia and high blood pressure. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of surgical technique or stapedotomy technique. CONCLUSION: This study showed that patients who are candidates for primary stapes surgery with younger age, active smoking status, dyslipidaemia and high blood pressure are at higher risk of needing revision surgery. A holistic approach prior to stapes surgery with multidisciplinary assessment is recommended. These results are important for better patient counselling on expected outcomes and risks.


Subject(s)
Otosclerosis , Stapes Surgery , Humans , Otosclerosis/surgery , Reoperation , Stapes Surgery/methods , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged
4.
J Neuroradiol ; 37(2): 104-8, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19781784

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe an optimized 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography (3D TR-CE-MRA) at 3T in diagnosing head and neck paragangliomas and assessing their morphology and relation to neighboring vessels. METHODS: In a prospective study, eight consecutive patients presenting cranial cervical masses suspected to be 10 paragangliomas were examined with 3D TR-CE-MRA at 3T. Two neuroradiologists evaluated the overall image quality, the presence of a paraganglioma, the maximum diameter, as well as the vessel invasion. RESULTS: In all of the cases, the overall image quality was scored as good. The tumors (n=10) were all visualized and localized. The mean maximum diameter was 32.7mm [range 7-80]. Vessel invasion was assessed as uncertain in one case and improbable in nine cases. CONCLUSION: 3D TR-CE-MRA at 3T associated with conventional sequences facilitates a comprehensive investigation of paragangliomas, thus providing the anatomical and functional information.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Angiography/methods , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods , Paraganglioma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Arteries/pathology , Cerebral Angiography/instrumentation , Feasibility Studies , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/blood supply , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Magnetic Resonance Angiography/instrumentation , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Paraganglioma/blood supply , Paraganglioma/diagnosis , Time Factors , Veins/pathology
5.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S11-S18, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863156

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Multi-centre study of the National French Registry (EPIIC) of patients with cochlear implants, focusing on infants who were operated-on under the age of 24 months between 2012 and 2016. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 615 profoundly deaf infants, who received cochlear implants (CIs) before their second birthday, were included in the registry by different CI centers. Epidemiological, surgical, speech therapy and school, follow-up data were included in the registry, 12, 24, 36 and 48 months thereafter. The following parameters were studied: type of implantation (uni- or bilateral), complications, cause of deafness, category of auditory perception (CAP), Open-set word recognition score (OSW), speech intelligibility rating, lexical comprehension with EVIP (Peabody), communication mode and type of schooling. Bilateral simultaneous CI (BiCI) and unilateral CI (UniCI) groups were compared. RESULTS: There were 744 implantations. The explantation-reimplantation rate, within the four-year follow-up, was just 3.6%. Mean implantation age was 16.0 months, and similar in the two groups (BiCI/UniCI). A total of 51% of children had their first implant between 12 and 18 months, and 15% before 12 months. Implantation was unilateral in 52% of cases. Fifty-six percent of the bilateral procedures were sequential, with a mean delay of 16.8 months for the second implantation. The cause of deafness was unknown in 52% of cases. Of the 48% (297/615) of attributed cases, 32% had clear genetic causes. The remaining deafness was due to cytomegalovirus (CMV, 8%), inner-ear malformation (5%) and meningitis (3%). The main complications were from infections (47%) and internal device failure (25%). Four years post-operation, 84% of the UniCI and 75% of BiCl groups had a CAP≥5, and 83% of UniCl and 100% BiCI had OSW≥80%. Furthermore 74% of UniCI and 77% of BiCI communicated orally and 85% of UniCI and 90% of BiCI integrated into mainstream schooling. CONCLUSION: The French Registry of cochlear implants (EPIIC) is the only such national registry in the world. Our analysis illustrates the immediate benefits of, either single or double, cochlear implantation for language, perception skills and schooling.


Subject(s)
Auditory Perception , Child Language , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Communication , Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Correction of Hearing Impairment/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/etiology , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Education of Hearing Disabled/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mainstreaming, Education/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Schools , Speech Intelligibility , Speech Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
6.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S45-S49, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32826202

ABSTRACT

This study aims to determine the frequency and causes of cochlear explants with re-implantation (ERI) after 5 years' follow up of the patients included in the French national EPIIC (étude post-inscription des implants cochléaires) registry tracking patients with cochlear implantation. This multicenter, descriptive prospective study was conducted on 5051 patients enrolled in the EPIIC database between January 2012 and December 2016. Ninety-five patients (1.9%) received a primary implant and an ERI during the study. Of these, four benefitted from two ERIs. The number of ERIs was significantly higher in the pediatric population than among adults. The explantation and reimplantation were performed simultaneously in 86% of cases. The reasons for explantation were: in 46.4% of cases linked to a malfunction of the implant, and in 39.3% of cases for medical or surgical reasons. The number of electrodes inserted was significantly higher after the ERI than after the first implantation. There was just one post-ERI infection for these 95 explanted and re-implanted patients. As well as explantation with reimplantation rarely being necessary, it generally presents no major surgical difficulty and in most cases it allows a better integration than in the first implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , France , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Failure , Replantation/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors , Young Adult
7.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S57-S63, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32792302

ABSTRACT

This study concerns the results of cochlear implantation in children and adults from French cochlear implantation centers, monitored at one, two and three years by the Cochlear Implant French Registry EPIIC. This multicenter study enrolled 2603 subjects (1667 adults and 936 children) implanted in one ear. The following parameters were studied: hearing overall performances, monosyllabic or dissyllabic word perception, speech intelligibility, self-assessment questionnaire of Cochlear Implant (CI) benefits (Abbreviated profile of Hearing aid Benefit); professional activity and schooling. This study confirms the ceiling effect in adults' performances after the 1st year and the progressive growth in children's performances. It also shows that the contralateral hearing aid enhances performances compared to the CI alone condition, in all follow-up sessions. The French register of CIs is the only worldwide register of systematic follow-up on a period of three years and more of all adults and children implanted in a country.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Auditory Perception , Child , Child, Preschool , Education , Employment , Follow-Up Studies , France , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Self-Assessment , Speech Intelligibility , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S19-S25, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773333

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the performance of cochlear implants in French patients aged 65 and over, implanted between 2012 and 2016, using data from the French national registry for cochlear implants (EPIIC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The French national registry incorporates patient data from before implantation and for three years after implantation, stratified in different age groups (18-39, 40-64years, 65-74years and>75years). Here, we assessed the latter two categories. Hearing was assessed using mono- and disyllabic words in a silent background. The Category of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale was also implemented and subjects took the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (Aphab) questionnaire. RESULTS: The population aged over 65 accounted for 38% (n=1193) of the 3178 adult implanted patients. The performance for mono- and disyllabic words in silence, the CAP scores and the APHAB questionnaire answers for ease of communication, background noise and reverberation were dramatically improved at one year post-implantation (P<0.0001 for each score) and remained stable between one and three years thereafter. The percentage improvement was similar across all age groups. The scores for loud-noise intolerance did not change after cochlear implantation in any age group. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants improve hearing and communication in subjects aged 65 and over, with comparable efficiency to that achieved in younger subjects. Cochlear implantation should thus be proposed whenever hearing aids provide only limited benefit. However, between 2012 and 2016, cochlear implantation was given to less than 1% of the French population aged 65 and over with profound deafness.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Communication , Female , France , Health Surveys , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Tests/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
9.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S27-S35, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32763084

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate in France the outcomes of cochlear implantation outside the selection criteria, off-label. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study including adults and children having received a cochlear implant (CI) in an off-label indication, that is outside the criteria established by the "Haute Autorité de santé (HAS)" in 2012. The data was collected from the "EPIIC" registry on recipients who received CIs in France between 2011 and 2014. Speech audiometry was performed at 60dB preimplantation and after one year of CI use, as well as an evaluation of the scores of the quality of life with the APHAB questionnaire, the scores for CAP and the professional/academic status in pre- and post-implantation conditions. Major and minor complications at surgery have been recorded. RESULTS: In total, 590 patients (447 adults and 143 children) with an off-label indication for CIs were included in this study from the EPIIC registry (11.7% of the whole cohort of EPIIC). For adults, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 41% in preimplantation condition versus 53% after one year of CI use (P<0.001) and 60% versus 71% in dissyllabic word lists (P<0.001). The CAP scores were 5 versus 6 in pre- and post-implantation conditions respectively (P<0.001) and the APHAB scores were statistically lower after implantation (P<0.001). In the children cohort, the median percentage of comprehension using monosyllabic word lists was 51% in preimplantation condition and 65% after CI (P<0.001), and 48% versus 82% (P<0.001) for dissyllabic word lists. The CAP scores were 5 versus 7 respectively in pre- and post-CI conditions (P<0.001). Thirty-two minor complications (5.4%) and 17 major complications (2.8%) were reported in our panel of off-label indication patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a revision of the cochlear implantation candidacy criteria is necessary to allow more patients with severe or asymmetric hearing loss to benefit from a CI when there is an impact on quality of life despite the use of an optimal hearing aid.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Patient Selection , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Audiometry, Speech/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Off-Label Use/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Care , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Young Adult
10.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S51-S56, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32739279

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the incidence and results of bilateral cochlear implantation in adults and children in France. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study of data in the French national registry of cochlear implantations from January 1st 2012 to December 31st 2016. Functional results from CAP (Category of Auditory Performance) questionnaires and speech audiometry tests, with mono- and di-syllabic word-lists, were compared before and after implantation. Speech audiometry tests were carried out against a noisy background, except before simultaneous implantations. RESULTS: Nine hundred and forty two bilateral cochlear implantations were performed during this period, that is, 16.4% of all cochlear implantations. Five hundred and eighty eight bilateral implantations were performed sequentially. 59% of the bilateral implantations were performed in children. Bilateral implants significantly improved CAP scores in all cases (P<0.001). Auditory performance, with the two types of word-list, were significantly improved after simultaneous implantation (P<0.01). After sequential implantation, the speech discrimination score, already very good with the first implant, reached 63±26% [0-100] with monosyllabic word lists, and 72±28% [0-100] with dissyllabic words. There were more complications due to surgery in bilateral cases than in the entire population of cochlear recipients (9.1% vs 6.4%, P<0.02). CONCLUSION: Hearing is significantly improved by simultaneous cochlear implantation. For sequential implantation, at one year, when auditory results were already excellent from the first implant, in the bimodal condition CAP scores were significantly improved, although there was no further change in speech audiometry in noise.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/rehabilitation , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Audiometry, Speech/methods , Auditory Perception , Child , Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Deafness/etiology , Female , France , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Speech Discrimination Tests/statistics & numerical data
11.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S5-S9, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32891589

ABSTRACT

Cochlear and brainstem implants have been included on the list of reimbursable products (LPPR) in France since March of 2009. The implants were initially inscribed for 5 years, after which an application for renewal with the French National Commission for the Evaluation of Medical Devices and Health Technologies (Commission Nationale d'évaluation des dispositifs médicaux et des technologies de santé - CNEDiMTS) was required [Haute Autorité de santé, 2009]. Upon registration to the list of reimbursable products, the companies and the reference centers for cochlear and brainstem implants were asked to set up a post-registration registry called EPIIC. This article reports the evolution in the EPIIC registry of the general indicators for 5051 patients over the five years from 2012-2016.


Subject(s)
Auditory Brain Stem Implants/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Advisory Committees/organization & administration , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Brain Stem Implants/economics , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/economics , Computer Security , Databases as Topic , Device Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Device Removal/statistics & numerical data , France , Guidelines as Topic/standards , Health Care Sector/economics , Health Care Sector/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Quality Control , Reference Standards , Time Factors
12.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 137 Suppl 1: S37-S43, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32861600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate peri- and post-operative complications related to cochlear implantations. We searched for risk factors predicting these complications and analyzed the complications in the youngest and most elderly. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent cochlear implantation in France between January 2012 and December 2016 were anonymized and registered in the EPIIC database. This population included 3483 adults and 2245 children. Their demographic and surgical data and their incidence of peri- or post-operative complications, including their severity, whether major or minor, were all indicated. RESULTS: The global complication rate was 6.84%. The risk of complication was higher in initial implantation versus reimplantation (P<0.0001). The risk was also higher for bilateral implantation versus unilateral (P<0.0001). Complications were more frequent for patients with cochlear malformation (P=0.002). There was no difference in complication rates across age groups; babies under 1 year old, and the elderly over 80 and even over 90, did not have more complications than the rest of the population. Patients treated in the daily care unit had no more complications than those who were hospitalized for one night or more (P=0.64). CONCLUSION: Cochlear implantation is a safe technique with a low incidence of complications. The absence of increased risk in patients at the extremes of the age spectrum justifies offering this solution to all, without age limitation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlea/abnormalities , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Day Care, Medical/statistics & numerical data , France/epidemiology , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Middle Aged , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
13.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 136(3): 193-197, 2019 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31005457

ABSTRACT

The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery (SFORL) regarding indications for cochlear implantation in adults. After a literature review by a multidisciplinary workgroup, guidelines were drawn up based on retrieved articles and group-members' experience, then read over by an independent reading group to edit the final version. Guidelines were graded A, B, C or "expert opinion" according to decreasing level of evidence. There is no upper age limit to cochlear implantation in the absence of proven dementia and if autonomy is at least partial. Bilateral implantation may be proposed if unilateral implantation fails to provide sufficiently good spatial localization, speech perception in noise and quality of life, and should be preceded by binaural hearing assessment. Rehabilitation by acoustic and electrical stimulation may be proposed when low-frequency hearing persists. Quality of life should be assessed before and after implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/standards , Otolaryngology/standards , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cognitive Dysfunction/etiology , Cognitive Dysfunction/rehabilitation , France , Hearing Loss/complications , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Societies, Medical
14.
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis ; 136(5): 385-391, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31221590

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The authors present the guidelines of the French Society of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (Société française d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie de la face et du cou - SFORL) on the indications for cochlear implantation in children. METHODS: A multidisciplinary work group was entrusted with a review of the scientific literature on the above topic. Guidelines were drawn up, based on the articles retrieved and the group members' individual experience. They were then read over by an editorial group independent of the work group. The guidelines were graded as A, B, C or expert opinion, by decreasing level of evidence. RESULTS: The SFORL recommends that children with bilateral severe/profound hearing loss be offered bilateral cochlear implantation, with surgery before 12months of age. In sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in children with severe/profound hearing loss, it is recommended to reduce the interval between the two implants, preferably to less than 18months. The SFORL recommends encouraging children with unilateral cochlear implants to wear contralateral hearing aids when residual hearing is present, and recommends assessing perception with hearing-in-noise tests. It is recommended that the surgical technique should try to preserve the residual functional structures of the inner ear as much as possible.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Age Factors , Auditory Perception , Autism Spectrum Disorder , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Deafness/surgery , France , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Hearing Aids , Humans , Infant , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Quality of Life , Societies, Medical , Vestibular Function Tests
15.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac ; 125(4): 181-7, 2008 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18678362

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Parapharyngeal space tumors are rare and usually benign. Their treatment is surgical and many approaches have been described. We report our experience in managing these neoplasms. Two points are developed more fully: the correlation between imaging and surgical observation and the reliability of the cervical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of primary parapharyngeal space tumors treated at the Rennes University Hospital between 1992 and 2004 is presented. Nine patients were included, all treated surgically with a cervical approach without parotidectomy. RESULTS: Eight MR imaging and seven CT scans were done. Two retrostyloid tumors and six prestyloid tumors, all independent of the deep lobe of the parotid gland, were found. They were benign in all cases (five salivary tumors and four schwannomas). Two patients treated for a pleomorphic adenoma presented recurrence and were reoperated successfully. The average follow-up was 66 months. None of the patients died. Definitive postoperative complications occurred only for neurogenic tumors. CONCLUSION: The cervical approach is safe and allows the surgical excision of retrostyloid and prestyloid tumors, independent of the deep lobe of the parotid gland. Large tumor (8cm in our study) excision can be done with few complications. An attentive study of preoperative imaging is necessary to choose the best surgical approach.


Subject(s)
Pharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
16.
Arch Pediatr ; 13(2): 149-51, 2006 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16337113

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: In children, chronic cervicofacial ulceration related to dental infection is rare. Thus the diagnosis is often late and the treatment is consequently delayed. We report 2 new cases. CASES REPORT: A 13-year-old boy presented with a 1-year history of chronic and suppurative ulceration on the right cheek. Culture was positive for actinomycetes. In spite of a prolonged and miscellaneous antibiotherapy, the lesion recured. The ulceration healed after the eradication of infection on a right superior molar. A 12-year-old girl presented with a right sub-mandibular ulceration, which appeared 3 months before. This lesion did not respond to penicillinotherapy given during 3 months. An infection on a right inferior molar was diagnosed on a tomodensitometry. 3 months after the tooth extraction, the ulceration healed without recurrence. CONCLUSION: These cases emphasize the interest to look for a dental infection at the origin of chronic cervicofacial lesion.


Subject(s)
Actinobacteria/isolation & purification , Focal Infection, Dental/complications , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Mandibular Diseases/microbiology , Skin Ulcer/microbiology , Adolescent , Cheek , Child , Female , Focal Infection, Dental/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Recurrence
17.
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac ; 123(5): 221-6, 2006 Nov.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17185919

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The management of N0 neck remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of selective neck dissection (SND) in managing N0 neck of oral cavity carcinomas. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 77 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity with N0 neck from 1988 to 2001 was performed. Cervical treatments were "wait and see" policy in 7 cases, neck dissection in 56 cases, radiotherapy alone in 14 cases. 77 neck dissections were performed in which 62 were selective and 15 were radical modified. RESULTS: On pathologic examination, the average number of lymph nodes was 10.7 per neck. Occult disease (cN0pN+) was detected in 32.5%, and occult extracapsular spread (cN0pN+R+) was detected in 7.8%. The median follow-up was 43 months. The overall neck recurrence rate in patients with controlled primary disease was 2.4%. Recurrent disease developed in 2.9% of the cNOpN0 neck. Regional control rate of the dissected neck was 94%. No cervical recurrence occurred in 11 patients treated with SND alone. There was no survival or recurrence rate difference in T1T2pN0 patients with or without post-operative radiotherapy. Post-operative radiotherapy could be avoided in 27% of the dissected neck. One, 3 and 5 years overall survival rate were 89.3%, 77.7% and 63.2%. CONCLUSIONS: SND is an effective procedure for staging and treating the clinically negative neck of oral cavity cancer.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/surgery , Neck Dissection/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Laryngol Otol ; 130(2): 151-6, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26620768

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cochlear implantation is mostly performed under general anaesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate cochlear implantation performed under local anaesthesia and sedation. METHOD: Twenty patients had a cochlear implant fitted under combined local anaesthesia (local anaesthesia group) and 41 patients had one fitted under general anaesthesia (general anaesthesia group) for bilateral profound hearing loss, from 2011 to 2014. Surgical duration, period of post-operative hospitalisation and early post-operative symptoms were compared. In the local anaesthesia group, operative symptoms reported during the surgery and by questionnaire were analysed. RESULTS: Mean surgical duration was significantly shorter in the local anaesthesia group: 87 versus 122 minutes (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the local anaesthesia and general anaesthesia groups regarding mean post-operative hospitalisation and early post-operative symptoms. Under local anaesthesia, patients had no particular symptoms in 60 per cent of cases. The remaining patients in this group experienced vertigo (10 per cent), pain (20 per cent) and pain-related movement (10 per cent) during the intervention. These symptoms can be controlled with symptomatic treatment. CONCLUSION: Combined local anaesthesia for cochlear implantation is a good alternative to general anaesthesia for co-operating patients.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Cochlear Implantation , Conscious Sedation , Hearing Loss/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cochlear Implants , Female , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
19.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 112(10): 1850-9, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11595143

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the localizations of different neural sources (a) obtained from intracerebral evoked responses and (b) calculated from surface auditory evoked field responses recorded in the same subjects. Our aim was to evaluate the resolving power of a source localization method currently used in our laboratory, which is based on a recent spatio-temporal algorithm used in magneto-encephalography (MEG). METHODS: Auditory evoked responses were studied in 4 patients with medically intractable epilepsy. These responses were recorded from depth electrodes implanted in the auditory cortex for pre-surgical evaluation (stereo-electro-encephalography (SEEG)), as well as from surface captors (for MEG) placed on the scalp after removal of the depth electrodes. Auditory stimuli were clicks and short tone bursts with different frequencies. RESULTS: All middle-latency components (from 13 to 70 ms post-stimulus onset) were recorded and localized (via SEEG) along Heschl's gyrus (HG). MEG reliably localized Pam and P1m in the same area of HG that intracerebral recordings localized them in. No significant delay between SEEG and MEG latencies was observed. Both methods suggest that N1 is generated from different sources in the intermediate and lateral parts of the HG and in the planum temporale (PT). The source of P2 (PT and/or Area 22) remains unclear and was in one case, localized in different regions according to the method used. This latter component may therefore also be generated by different sources. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that both techniques are useful and may be used together in a complementary fashion. Intracerebral recordings allow the researcher to validate and interpret surface recordings.


Subject(s)
Epilepsies, Partial/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Attention/physiology , Brain Mapping , Electroencephalography , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Microelectrodes , Reaction Time/physiology
20.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 107(10 Pt 1): 851-4, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9794614

ABSTRACT

Primary laryngeal aspergillosis is exceptionally rare, and only five cases have been reported in the literature. We present here two cases of invasive laryngeal aspergillosis without tracheobronchopulmonary extension and without any generalized immune deficit. Aspergillosis developed after local radiotherapy for a squamous cell carcinoma and preceded a recurrence of the tumor. The relationships between the clinical features, the histopathology, and the etiology of laryngeal aspergillosis and squamous cell carcinoma are discussed. We recommend that following treatment of laryngeal aspergillosis, these rare patients should systematically be investigated for a squamous cell carcinoma or a recurrence thereof.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Humans , Laryngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Larynx/pathology , Larynx/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Necrosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL