ABSTRACT
In 2018, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication regarding fluoroquinolone-associated aortic aneurysm. This quasi-experimental study assessed antibiotic prescribing for 198 patients hospitalized with diabetic foot infection. Following the warning, median inpatient fluoroquinolone days of therapy (DOT) decreased from 3 to 0 days (P < 0.001), corresponding to increased beta-lactam DOT and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy enrollment. FDA communications may influence antibiotic selection and transitions of care, representing opportunities for antimicrobial stewardship.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm , Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Foot , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Aortic Aneurysm/drug therapy , Communication , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Diabetic Foot/drug therapy , Fluoroquinolones/adverse effects , Humans , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
We present a patient with acute myeloid leukemia and prolonged, severe neutropenia who developed fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection refractory to medical therapy and was high-risk for surgical intervention. He was treated with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) for life-saving cure. The patient had subsequent clinical improvement, however, developed multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia 2 days post-procedure. We describe subsequent investigation of this event that found this bacteremia was not related to the donor stool administered during FMT. This case adds to the literature that FMT could be considered in heavily immunocompromised patients with fulminant Clostridioides difficile infection where maximal medical therapy has been ineffective and surgery may carry an excessively high mortality risk.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/therapy , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Immunocompromised Host , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Neutropenia/complications , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides difficile , Diarrhea/therapy , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/microbiology , Male , Neutropenia/microbiology , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Duodenoscopes have been implicated in the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). We compared the frequency of duodenoscope contamination with MDRO or any other bacteria after disinfection or sterilization by 3 different methods. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective randomized study in which duodenoscopes were randomly reprocessed by standard high-level disinfection (sHLD), double high-level disinfection (dHLD), or standard high-level disinfection followed by ethylene oxide gas sterilization (HLD/ETO). Samples were collected from the elevator mechanism and working channel of each duodenoscope and cultured before use. The primary outcome was the proportion of duodenoscopes with an elevator mechanism or working channel culture showing 1 or more MDRO; secondary outcomes included the frequency of duodenoscope contamination with more than 0 and 10 or more colony-forming units (CFU) of aerobic bacterial growth on either sampling location. RESULTS: After 3 months of enrollment, the study was closed because of the futility; we did not observe sufficient events to evaluate the primary outcome. Among 541 duodenoscope culture events, 516 were included in the final analysis. No duodenoscope culture in any group was positive for MDRO. Bacterial growth of more than 0 CFU was noted in 16.1% duodenoscopes in the sHLD group, 16.0% in the dHLD group, and 22.5% in the HLD/ETO group (P = .21). Bacterial growth or 10 or more CFU was noted in 2.3% of duodenoscopes in the sHLD group, 4.1% in the dHLD group, and 4.2% in the HLD/ETO group (P = .36). MRDOs were cultured from 3.2% of pre-procedure rectal swabs and 2.5% of duodenal aspirates. CONCLUSIONS: In a comparison of duodenoscopes reprocessed by sHLD, dHLD, or HLD/ETO, we found no significant differences between groups for MDRO or bacteria contamination. Enhanced disinfection methods (dHLD or HLD/ETO) did not provide additional protection against contamination. However, insufficient events occurred to assess our primary study end-point. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02611648.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Disinfectants , Disinfection/methods , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Duodenoscopes/microbiology , Duodenoscopy/instrumentation , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment Reuse , Ethylene Oxide , Sterilization/methods , o-Phthalaldehyde , Bacteriological Techniques , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Duodenoscopes/adverse effects , Duodenoscopy/adverse effects , Gases , Humans , Prospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antistaphylococcal penicillins have historically been regarded as the drugs of choice for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bloodstream infections (BSI). However, recent outcomes data compared to cefazolin treatment are conflicting. OBJECTIVE: This study compared treatment failure and adverse effects associated with nafcillin and cefazolin for MSSA BSI. METHODS: Adult inpatients with MSSA BSI between January 1, 2009 and August 31, 2015 were included in this retrospective cohort study if they received ≥72 h of nafcillin or cefazolin as directed therapy after no more than 72 h of any empiric therapy. The primary composite endpoint was treatment failure defined by clinician documentation, 30-day recurrence of infection, all-cause 30-day in-hospital mortality, or loss to follow-up. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related acute kidney injury (AKI), acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), hepatotoxicity, and rash. RESULTS: Among 157 patients, 116 (73.9%) received nafcillin and 41 (26.1%) received cefazolin. The baseline characteristics were similar except cefazolin-treated patients had higher APACHE II scores and more frequent renal dysfunction. No difference in the composite treatment failure outcome (28.4 vs. 31.7%; p = 0.69) was detected between the nafcillin and cefazolin groups, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients without known follow-up, there was no significant difference of treatment failure. AKI, AIN, hepatotoxicity, and rash were all numerically more frequent among nafcillin-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among nafcillin- or cefazolin-treated patients with MSSA BSI, there was no significant difference in treatment failure. Observing more frequent presumptive adverse effects associated with nafcillin receipt, future prospective studies evaluating cefazolin appear warranted.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Nafcillin/therapeutic use , Staphylococcus aureus/enzymology , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacteremia/microbiology , Bacteremia/pathology , Cefazolin/adverse effects , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nafcillin/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Tertiary Care Centers , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The American College of Physicians (ACP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently published advice for high-value care on the appropriate use of antibiotics for acute respiratory tract infections. They conducted a narrative literature review of evidence for antibiotic use in this setting that included recent clinical guidelines from professional societies supplemented by randomized, controlled trials; meta-analyses; and systematic reviews. They concluded that clinicians should reserve antibiotic treatment for acute rhinosinusitis in patients with persistent symptoms for more than 10 days, high fever and purulent nasal discharge or facial pain lasting for at least 3 consecutive days, or worsening symptoms after a typical viral illness that lasted 5 days and had initially improved ("double-sickening"). In this Grand Rounds, 2 prominent clinicians debate whether to initiate antibiotic treatment in a 62-year-old man with a history of recurrent sinusitis who presents with persistent upper respiratory symptoms. They review the data on which the ACP/CDC recommendations are based and discuss the potential benefits and risks, as well as the challenges and controversies, of prescribing antibiotic therapy in this setting.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Prescriptions , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care , Recurrence , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Virus Diseases/diagnosisABSTRACT
Candida guilliermondii was isolated from sterile specimens with increasing frequency over a several-month period despite a paucity of clinical evidence suggesting true Candida infections. However, a health care-associated outbreak was strongly considered due to growth patterns in the microbiology laboratory that were more consistent with true infection than environmental contamination. Therefore, an extensive investigation was performed to identify its cause. With the exception of one case, patient clinical courses were not consistent with true invasive fungal infections. Furthermore, no epidemiologic link between patients was identified. Rather, extensive environmental sampling revealed C. guilliermondii in an anaerobic holding jar in the clinical microbiology laboratory, where anaerobic plates were prereduced and held before inoculating specimens. C. guilliermondii grows poorly under anaerobic conditions. Thus, we postulate that anaerobic plates became intermittently contaminated. Passaging from intermittently contaminated anaerobic plates to primary quadrants of aerobic media during specimen planting yielded a colonial growth pattern typical for true specimen infection, thus obscuring laboratory contamination. A molecular evaluation of the C. guilliermondii isolates confirmed a common source for pseudo-outbreak cases but not for the one true infection. In line with Reason's model of organizational accidents, active and latent errors coincided to contribute to the pseudo-outbreak. These included organism factors (lack of growth in anaerobic conditions obscuring plate contamination), human factors (lack of strict adherence to plating order, leading to only intermittent observation of aerobic plate positivity), and laboratory factors (novel equipment). All of these variables should be considered when evaluating possible laboratory-based pseudo-outbreaks.
Subject(s)
Candida/isolation & purification , Candidiasis/diagnosis , Disease Outbreaks , Equipment Contamination , Microbiological Techniques/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
Due to the ongoing concern about the reliability of Staphylococcus breakpoints (interpretive criteria) for other ß-lactam agents, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute recently approved the elimination of all breakpoints for antistaphylococcal ß-lactams except for penicillin, oxacillin or cefoxitin, and ceftaroline. Routine testing of penicillin and oxacillin or cefoxitin should be used to infer susceptibility for all ß-lactams with approved clinical indications for staphylococcal infections. It is critical for laboratories to reject requests for susceptibility testing of other ß-lactams against staphylococci and to indicate that susceptibility to these agents can be predicted from the penicillin and oxacillin or cefoxitin results. This article reviews ß-lactam resistance mechanisms in staphylococci, current antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting recommendations for ß-lactams and staphylococci, and microbiologic data and clinical data supporting the elimination of staphylococcal breakpoints for other ß-lactam agents.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , beta-Lactams/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cefoxitin/pharmacology , Cefoxitin/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Oxacillin/pharmacology , Oxacillin/therapeutic use , Penicillins/pharmacology , Penicillins/therapeutic use , Staphylococcus/drug effects , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration , beta-Lactam Resistance , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use , CeftarolineSubject(s)
Abscess/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drainage , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/therapy , Sulfadoxine/therapeutic use , Trimethoprim/therapeutic use , Abscess/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Skin Diseases, Bacterial/drug therapy , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (SA) breast abscesses are a complication of the postpartum period. Risk factors for postpartum SA breast abscesses are poorly defined, and literature is conflicting. Whether risk factors for methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) and methicillin-susceptible SA (MSSA) infections differ is unknown. We describe novel risk factors associated with postpartum breast abscesses and the changing epidemiology of this infection. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study with a nested case-control study (n = 216) involving all patients with culture-confirmed SA breast abscess among >30 000 deliveries at our academic tertiary care center from 2003 through 2010. Data were collected from hospital databases and through abstraction from medical records. All SA cases were compared with both nested controls and full cohort controls. A subanalysis was completed to determine whether risk factors for MSSA and MRSA breast abscess differ. Univariate analysis was completed using Student's t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and analysis of variance, as appropriate. A multivariable stepwise logistic regression was used to determine final adjusted results for both the case-control and the cohort analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-four cases of culture-confirmed abscess were identified: 30 MRSA and 24 MSSA. Risk factors for postpartum SA breast abscess in multivariable analysis include in-hospital identification of a mother having difficulty breastfeeding (odds ratio, 5.00) and being a mother employed outside the home (odds ratio, 2.74). Risk factors did not differ between patients who developed MRSA and MSSA infections. CONCLUSIONS: MRSA is an increasingly important pathogen in postpartum women; risk factors for postpartum SA breast abscess have not changed with the advent of community-associated MRSA.
Subject(s)
Abscess/epidemiology , Mastitis/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Abscess/microbiology , Adult , Breast/microbiology , Breast/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Mastitis/microbiology , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiologyABSTRACT
We report the first case of a prosthetic joint infection caused by Gemella sanguinis. This report includes a description of a "pseudosatelliting" phenomenon by G. sanguinis, the use of gene sequencing for pathogen identification, and successful use of debridement, retention, and chronic antibiotic suppression to preserve the prosthesis.
Subject(s)
Gemella/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Osteoarthritis/microbiology , Prosthesis-Related Infections/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , DNA, Bacterial/chemistry , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Ribosomal/chemistry , DNA, Ribosomal/genetics , Debridement , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Prosthesis-Related Infections/drug therapy , Prosthesis-Related Infections/surgery , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
In 829 hospital encounters for patients with COVID-19, 73.2% included orders for antibiotics; however, only 1.8% had respiratory cultures during the first 3 hospital days isolating bacteria. Case-control analysis of 30 patients and 96 controls found that each antibiotic day increased the risk of isolating multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in respiratory cultures by 6.5%.
ABSTRACT
Antibiotic exposure exerts strong selective pressure and is an important modifiable risk factor for antibiotic resistance. We aimed to identify the role of various antibiotics as risk factors for the isolation of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella spp. in hospitalized patients at a tertiary-care hospital. A parallel multivariable model was created to compare two groups of cases with either nosocomially acquired ESBL- or non-ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp. to a common control group of hospitalized patients (a case-case-control design). Seventy-eight ESBL cases, 358 non-ESBL cases, and 444 controls were analyzed. Significant factors associated with the isolation of Klebsiella spp. were an age of >65 years, transfer from a health care facility, an intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and the presence of a comorbid malignancy or lung, hepatic, or renal disease. A propensity score was generated from the above, and our ability to discriminate between Klebsiella cases and controls (area under the receiver-operating-characteristic [ROC] curve, 0.78) was good. The ESBL phenotype was tightly linked with fluoroquinolone resistance (95% versus 18%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with isolation of ESBL Klebsiella spp. in a multivariable analysis, adjusting for the propensity score, included exposure to beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (odds ratio [OR], 10.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 86.92) and to fluoroquinolones (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.37 to 5.97). Exposure to broad-spectrum cephalosporins was statistically associated with ESBL Klebsiella spp. only among the subgroup of patients not treated with fluoroquinolones. In our institution, where the ESBL-producing-Klebsiella phenotype is coselected with fluoroquinolone resistance, fluoroquinolone and beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, rather than cephalosporins, are the main risk factors for ESBL isolates. Formulary interventions to limit the spread of ESBL-producing isolates should be tailored to each setting.
Subject(s)
Fluoroquinolones/therapeutic use , Klebsiella Infections/drug therapy , Klebsiella Infections/epidemiology , Klebsiella/drug effects , beta-Lactamase Inhibitors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Klebsiella/enzymology , Klebsiella Infections/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , beta-Lactam Resistance , beta-Lactamases/metabolismABSTRACT
We studied the utility of performing a penicillin binding protein 2a latex agglutination (PBP-LA) assay directly on Bactec blood culture broth samples containing Staphylococcus aureus to rapidly detect methicillin resistance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of this method were 94.1%, 97.5%, 98%, and 92.9%, respectively.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/analysis , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Blood/microbiology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/chemistry , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Penicillin-Binding Proteins/analysis , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Humans , Latex Fixation Tests/methods , Penicillin-Binding Proteins/immunology , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
IMPORTANCE: Administration of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated pneumonia carries increased risk of corrected QT (QTc) prolongation and cardiac arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the risk and degree of QT prolongation in patients with COVID-19 in association with their use of hydroxychloroquine with or without concomitant azithromycin. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a cohort study performed at an academic tertiary care center in Boston, Massachusetts, of patients hospitalized with at least 1 positive COVID-19 nasopharyngeal polymerase chain reaction test result and clinical findings consistent with pneumonia who received at least 1 day of hydroxychloroquine from March 1, 2020, through April 7, 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in QT interval after receiving hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin; occurrence of other potential adverse drug events. RESULTS: Among 90 patients given hydroxychloroquine, 53 received concomitant azithromycin; 44 (48.9%) were female, and the mean (SD) body mass index was 31.5 (6.6). Hypertension (in 48 patients [53.3%]) and diabetes mellitus (in 26 patients [28.9%]) were the most common comorbid conditions. The overall median (interquartile range) baseline QTc was 455 (430-474) milliseconds (hydroxychloroquine, 473 [454-487] milliseconds vs hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, 442 [427-461] milliseconds; P < .001). Those receiving concomitant azithromycin had a greater median (interquartile range) change in QT interval (23 [10-40] milliseconds) compared with those receiving hydroxychloroquine alone (5.5 [-15.5 to 34.25] milliseconds; P = .03). Seven patients (19%) who received hydroxychloroquine monotherapy developed prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds or more, and 3 patients (8%) had a change in QTc of 60 milliseconds or more. Of those who received concomitant azithromycin, 11 of 53 (21%) had prolonged QTc of 500 milliseconds or more and 7 of 53 (13 %) had a change in QTc of 60 milliseconds or more. The likelihood of prolonged QTc was greater in those who received concomitant loop diuretics (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38 [95% CI, 1.03-11.08]) or had a baseline QTc of 450 milliseconds or more (adjusted odds ratio, 7.11 [95% CI, 1.75-28.87]). Ten patients had hydroxychloroquine discontinued early because of potential adverse drug events, including intractable nausea, hypoglycemia, and 1 case of torsades de pointes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this cohort study, patients who received hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of pneumonia associated with COVID-19 were at high risk of QTc prolongation, and concurrent treatment with azithromycin was associated with greater changes in QTc. Clinicians should carefully weigh risks and benefits if considering hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, with close monitoring of QTc and concomitant medication usage.
Subject(s)
Azithromycin/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Long QT Syndrome/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Antimalarials/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Cohort Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
We conducted a prospective cohort study of 795 outpatients, many of whom were human immunodeficiency virus-infected men who have sex with men, to characterize risk of skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI) associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares and perianal colonization. Multivariate analysis revealed that perianal colonization, drug use, and prior SSTIs were strongly associated with development of an SSTI. Of the patients who were colonized with MRSA at study entry, 36.7% developed an SSTI during the ensuing 12 months, compared with 8.1% of persons who were not colonized with MRSA.
Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , HIV Infections/complications , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Risk Factors , Soft Tissue Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Carrier State/microbiology , Cohort Studies , Homosexuality, Male , Humans , Male , Nasal Cavity/microbiology , Outpatients , Perineum/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Risk-Taking , Soft Tissue Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Skin Infections/microbiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Background: Guidelines recommend discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis within 24 h after incision closure in uninfected patients. However, how facility and surgical specialty factors affect the implementation of these evidence-based surgical prophylaxis guidelines in outpatient surgery is unknown. Thus, we sought to measure how facility complexity, including ambulatory surgical center (ASC) status and availability of ancillary services, impact adherence to guidelines for timely discontinuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis after outpatient surgery. A secondary aim was to measure the association between surgical specialty and guideline compliance. Methods: A multi-center, national Veterans Health Administration retrospective cohort from 10/1/2015-9/30/2017 including any Veteran undergoing an outpatient surgical procedure in any of five specialties (general surgery, urology, ophthalmology, ENT, orthopedics) was created. The primary outcome was the association between facility complexity and proportion of surgeries not compliant with discontinuation of antimicrobials within 24 h of incision closure. Data were analyzed using logistic regression with adjustments for patient and procedural factors. Results: Among 153,097 outpatient surgeries, 7712 (5.0%) received antimicrobial prophylaxis lasting > 24 h after surgery; rates ranged from 0.4% (eye surgeries) to 13.7% (genitourinary surgeries). Cystoscopies and cystoureteroscopy with lithotripsy procedures had the highest rates (16 and 20%), while hernia repair, cataract surgeries, and laparoscopic cholecystectomies had the lowest (0.2-0.3%). In an adjusted logistic regression model, lower complexity ASC and hospital outpatient departments had higher odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis compared to complex hospitals (OR ASC, 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.5). Patient factors associated with higher odds of noncompliance with antimicrobial discontinuation included younger age, female sex, and white race. Genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgeries were associated with the highest odds of prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis. Conclusions: Facility complexity appears to play a role in adherence to surgical infection prevention guidelines. Lower complexity facilities with limited infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship resources may be important targets for quality improvement. Such interventions may be especially useful for genitourinary and ear/nose/throat surgical subspecialties. Increasing pharmacy, antimicrobial stewardship and/or infection prevention resources to promote more evidence-based care may support surgical providers in lower complexity ambulatory surgery centers and hospital outpatient departments in their efforts to improve this facet of patient safety.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Aged , Antimicrobial Stewardship , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , United States , Veterans Health ServicesABSTRACT
Palivizumab has been used to treat respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-infected hematologic malignancy patients at our institution based on limited published data. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate clinical outcomes and mortality rates of RSV-infected hematologic malignancy patients from 2007 to 2016. A total of 67 patients (19 received palivizumab and 47 received supportive care) were identified. Palivizumab-treated patients had a significantly higher proportion of underlying ischemic heart disease, graft-versus-host-disease, hypogammaglobulinemia, and concomitant pulmonary infections. There were no significant differences in mortality rates or readmission rates between the two groups. The estimated odds ratio for death in patients receiving palivizumab after adjusting for propensity scores and covariates were 0.12 ([0.01, 1.32], p = .08) and 0.09 ([0.01, 1.03], p = .05) respectively. After adjustment for factors associated with severity of illness, there was no difference in mortality among patients treated with palivizumab.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Palivizumab/adverse effects , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/complications , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Palivizumab/administration & dosage , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/etiology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/isolation & purification , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the microbiology of hepatobiliary surgical site infections (SSIs) and to explore the relationship between specific antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens and the development of SSIs. DESIGN: Retrospective matched case-control study comparing patient, procedure, and antimicrobial prophylaxis characteristics among patients undergoing a hepatobiliary surgical procedure with and without an SSI. SETTING: A tertiary referral acute-care facility. METHODS: Patients undergoing procedures defined as "BILI" (bile duct, liver, or pancreas surgery) using National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definitions, excluding those undergoing concomitant liver transplantation, from January 2013 through June 2016 were included in the study population. The SSIs were identified through routine infection control surveillance using NHSN definitions. All patients who developed an SSI were considered cases. Controls were selected randomly matched 2:1 with cases based on fiscal quarter of the procedure. Logistic regression modeling was performed to explore variables associated with SSI, including antimicrobial prophylaxis received. RESULTS: Among 975 procedures, 80 (8.2%) resulted in an SSI. Most cases involved an organism nonsusceptible to standard prophylaxis regimens, including cefazolin (68.8%), cefazolin plus metronidazole (61.3%), and ampicillin-sulbactam (52.5%). In a multivariate model, antimicrobial coverage against Enterococcus spp (aOR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-2.04; P=.40) and against Pseudomonas spp (aOR, 2.40; 95% CI, 0.56-10.29; P=.24) were not protective against the development of an SSI. The presence of a documented ß-lactam allergy was significantly associated with the development of an SSI (aOR, 3.54; 95% CI, 1.36-9.19; P=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Although SSIs at the study institution were associated with pathogens nonsusceptible to the most commonly used prophylaxis regimens, broader-spectrum coverage was not associated with a reduction in SSIs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Aged , Ampicillin/therapeutic use , Boston/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cefazolin/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Perioperative Care , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sulbactam/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , beta-Lactams/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Severe Clostridium difficile infection is associated with a high rate of mortality; however, the optimal treatment for severe- complicated infection remains uncertain for patients who are not candidates for surgical intervention. Thus, we sought to evaluate the benefit of adjunctive tigecycline in this patient population using a retrospective cohort adjusted for propensity to receive tigecycline. We found that patients who received tigecycline had similar outcomes to those who did not, although the small sample size limited power to adjust for comorbidities and severity of illness.