Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selecting frail elderly patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) for pancreas resection using biologic age has not been elucidated. This study determined the feasibility of the deficit accumulation frailty index (DAFI) in identifying such patients and its association with surgical outcomes. METHODS: The DAFI, which assesses frailty based on biologic age, was used to identify frail patients using clinical and health-related quality-of-life data. The characteristics of frail and nonfrail patients were compared. RESULTS: Of 242 patients (median age, 75.5 years), 61.2% were frail and 32.6% had undergone pancreas resection (surgery group). Median overall survival (mOS) decreased in frail patients (7.13 months, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.65-10.1) compared with nonfrail patients (16.1 months, 95% CI: 11.47-34.40, p = 0.001). In the surgery group, mOS improved in the nonfrail patients (49.4%; 49.2 months, 95% CI: 29.3-79.9) compared with frail patients (50.6%, 22.1 months, 95% CI: 18.3-52.4, p = 0.10). In the no-surgery group, mOS was better in nonfrail patients (54%; 10.81 months, CI 7.85-16.03) compared with frail patients (66%; 5.45 months, 95% CI: 4.34-7.03, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The DAFI identified elderly patients with PC at risk of poor outcomes and can identify patients who can tolerate more aggressive treatments.

Age-related next-generation sequencing mutational analysis in 1196 melanomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Melanoma mutational burden is high and approximately 50% have oncogenic mutations in BRAF. We sought to evaluate age-related mutational differences in melanoma. METHODS: We analyzed melanoma samples in the Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange database. Targetable mutations were identified using the Precision Oncology Knowledge Base (OncoKB). RESULTS: We found 1194 patients with a common set of 30 genes. The top mutated genes in patients <40 years old (y/o) (n = 98) were BRAF (59%), TP53 (31%), NRAS (17%), and PTEN (14%); in 40-59 y/o (n = 354) were BRAF (51%), NRAS (30%), TP53 (26%), and APC (13%); and in ≥60 y/o (n = 742) were BRAF (38%), NRAS (33%), TP53 (26%), and KDR (19%). BRAF mutations were almost mutually exclusive from NRAS mutations in <40 y/o (58/59). Mutational burden increased with age, with means of 2.39, 2.92, and 3.67 mutations per sample in patients <40, 40-59, and ≥60 y/o, respectively (p < 0.0001). There were 10 targetable mutations meeting OncoKB criteria for melanoma: BRAF (level 1), RET (level 1), KIT (level 2), NRAS (level 3A), TP53 (level 3A), and FGFR2, MET, PTEN, PIK3CA, and KRAS (level 4). CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in melanoma have age-related differences and demonstrates potential targetable mutations for personalized therapies.

Prognostic indicators for undifferentiated carcinoma with/without osteoclast-like giant cells of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated carcinoma of the pancreas (UPC) is a rare malignancy. There are no standardized guidelines for treatment. Current management has been extrapolated from smaller reviews. METHODS: 858 patients with UPC were identified in the 2004-2017 NCDB. Kaplan-Meier method followed by Cox proportional-hazards regression examined independent prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of surgical intervention and the status of surgical resection by histologic subtype. RESULTS: Patients with osteoclast-like giant cells (OCLGC) had a longer median OS compared to those without (aHR 0.52: 95% CI 0.41-0.67). Of the non-OCLGC subtypes, pleomorphic large cell demonstrated the shortest median OS (2.4 months). Surgical resection was associated with improved survival in all histologies except for pleomorphic cell carcinoma. R0 resection and negative lymph nodes were independently associated with an improved OS. CONCLUSION: This is the largest database review published to date on UCP. OCLGC histology is associated with an improved survival compared to those without OCLGC. Of the non-OCLGC subtypes, pleomorphic large cell is associated with the shortest overall survival. Surgical resection is associated with a significant survival advantage for all histologies except for pleomorphic cell carcinoma.

Disparities in Amputation Rates for Non-metastatic Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas and the Impact on Survival.

BACKGROUND: There are no definitive recommendations guiding amputation use in extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). This study explores disparities in amputation rates and survival in patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic adult-type extremity STSs were identified from the 1998-2012 National Cancer Database. Factors affecting amputation were examined across all ages and separately in adults (> 40 years), adolescent/young adults (AYA: ages 15-39), and children (age < 15). Impact on 10-year overall survival (OS) was explored. RESULTS: Of 15,886 patients, 4.65% had an amputation. AYAs had the most amputations (6.4%) compared to children (5.9%) and adults (4.2%) (p < 0.001). Patients with public insurance (OR 1.3, CI 1.08-1.58) and from central states (OR 1.5, CI 1.2-1.86) were more likely to undergo amputation, whereas those from high income brackets (OR 0.8, CI 0.62-0.94) and treated at community cancer centers were less likely (OR 0.7, CI 0.62-0.90). Amputation was an independent risk factor for death at 10 years, with the greatest impact in AYAs compared to older adults (HR 1.7, p < 0.001). Treatment in eastern or central states, lower income, lack of private insurance, and comorbidities were all associated with decreased OS (all p < 0.05). Female gender (HR 0.8, CI 0.78-0.89) and high-volume centers (HR 0.8, CI 0.74-0.94) were associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS: Although amputations for extremity STSs are rare, disparities exist across age groups, insurance and geography when it comes to the use of amputation in patients with extremity STSs. Moreover, having an amputation is an independent risk factor for death, with the greatest impact in AYAs.

Delay in surgery is associated with axillary upstaging of clinically node negative breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Most breast cancer (BC) patients present with early disease and clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0). Timing of surgery has not been standardized. We hypothesized that surgical delay results in an increased likelihood of nodal metastasis. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with cN0 BC undergoing surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy as initial therapy between 2006 and 2014 were identified in the NCDB and divided into four groups based on time intervals between diagnosis and surgery (<4 weeks, 4-8 weeks, 8-12 weeks, and >12 weeks). Regression analysis evaluated the independent impact of surgical timing on axillary upstaging and survival. RESULTS: Of 355,443 patients with cN0 BC, 39.6% had surgery within 4 weeks and 5.4% more than 12 weeks from diagnosis. After controlling for relevant factors, a month delay in surgery was associated with an increased likelihood of nodal positivity (odds ratio: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.05; p < .001) and decreased overall survival (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.04; p < .001). When compared to patients who underwent surgery less than 4 weeks from diagnosis, the absolute increase in nodal positivity and relative risks were 5.3% (95% CI: 0.047-0.059) and 1.34 (95% CI: 1.30-1.38), respectively, in the more than 12 weeks group. CONCLUSIONS: Delay in BC surgery in cN0 patients was associated with an increased likelihood of axillary upstaging and decreased survival.

Inaccurate pretreatment staging can impact survival in early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Given the survival advantage of neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer, accurate clinical staging is necessary. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical (c) and pathologic (p) staging concordance rates for presumably early stage esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that had upfront esophagectomy (UFE) and evaluate if survival (OS) was negatively affected by inaccurate preoperative staging and subsequent treatment selection. METHODS: An NCDB retrospective review of nonmetastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma patients that had UFE. The rates of concordance between c and p staging system and OS were calculated. RESULTS: Of 2775 patients, most patients presented with cN0 (82.8%) and cT1 tumors (53.6%). The overall concordance between c and p staging was 78.8% for T-classification (moderate agreement; weighted κ = 0.729; P < .001) and 78.8% for N-classification (weak agreement; weighted κ = 0.448; P < .001). Patients that were upstaged due to a lack of concordance between T-classification had decreased 5- and 10-year OS (30% and 16%, P < .001) and those upstaged due to discordant N-classification had decreased 5- and 10-year OS (28% and 23%, P < .001)." CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative staging of esophageal adenocarcinoma has moderate reliability and accuracy for predicting pT and pN classification. Up to 25% of patients have discordant clinical and pathological staging, which impacts OS.

Colon cancer as a subsequent malignant neoplasm in young adults.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colon cancer (CC) is rising in younger adults and can occur de novo or in patients previously treated for another cancer. To the authors' knowledge, the impact on survival of CC occurring as a subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMN) has not been described for younger patients, which the authors anticipate to be lower with SMNs than that of primary CC. METHODS: Patients aged <50 years with CC in the 2004 through 2014 National Cancer Data Base were identified. Patients were stratified by primary or subsequent occurrence. The impact of SMN status on overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS: Of 41,915 patients, 2852 (6.8%) had colon SMNs. More patients with colon SMNs were aged 40 to 49 years compared with patients with primary CC (83% vs 77%; P < .001). Patients with colon SMNs presented with earlier clinical and pathological T, N, and M classifications (all P < .001). Colon SMNs more commonly occurred in the right colon, whereas primary CC was found to have a higher prevalence in the sigmoid colon (P < .001). Patients with colon SMNs more frequently underwent total colectomy (17% vs 5%; P < .001), but received less chemotherapy (53% vs 65%; P < .001). When adjusted for demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics, SMN status was associated with a 23% decreased OS compared with primary CC (95% CI, 1.14-1.31; P < .001). Chemotherapy offered a 33% improvement in OS (95% CI, 0.56-0.8; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Colon SMNs in younger patients present at an earlier stage and are treated more aggressively surgically compared with primary CCs. Patients with SMNs of the colon have decreased survival, although chemotherapy offers a survival advantage. Further investigation is warranted to determine whether these disparities are due to the effects of cancer treatment or differences in tumor biology.

Duodenal GI stromal tumors: Is radical resection necessary?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors that pose a surgical challenge, and long-term outcomes after resection have not been detailed outside of small case series. This study uses the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to examine the determinants of radical resection for duodenal GISTs as well as the impact of local vs radical resection on overall survival (OS). METHODS: The NCDB was queried for nonmetastatic duodenal GISTs from 2004 to 2014. Predictors of radical resection were determined using multivariate logistic regression stratified by extent of tumor involvement. Factors associated with OS were identified with Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: Treatment at an academic center, size >5 cm, and extra-duodenal extension were associated with radical resection. On multivariate analysis, radical resection was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.93; P < .03). Systemic therapy, extra-duodenal extension, grade, stage, mitoses, and receipt of systemic therapy did not impact OS. CONCLUSION: Local resection of duodenal GISTs is associated with improved OS compared to radical resection after controlling for tumor factors and systemic treatment. Traditional indicators of tumor aggressiveness were associated with radical resection, but not OS. When feasible, local resection should be considered for resection of duodenal GISTs.

Impact of latency time on survival for adolescents and young adults with a second primary malignancy.

BACKGROUND: The adverse impact of second primary malignancies (SPMs) on survival is substantial for adolescents and young adults (AYAs; ie, those 15-39 years old). No studies have evaluated whether the latency time between the first malignancy (the primary malignancy [PM]) and the SPM affects cancer-specific survival (CSS). METHODS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for 13 regions from 1992 to 2008 was used to ascertain whether the latency time (1-5 vs ≥ 6 years) to the development of an SPM affected the CSS and overall survival with respect to either the PM or SPM for AYAs with common SPMs. RESULTS: The majority of 1515 AYAs with an SPM had their PM diagnosed between the ages of 26 and 39 years (74.2%) and an SPM diagnosed within 1 to 5 years (72.9%) of the PM's diagnosis. Overall, AYAs that developed an SPM 1 to 5 years after the diagnosis (vs ≥ 6 years) had an increased risk of death from cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-3.29) as well as any cause (HR, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.04-3.32). Specifically, for AYAs with an SPM that was leukemia or a colorectal, breast, or central nervous system malignancy, a shorter latency time (1-5 years) from their PM diagnosis was associated with an overall significantly increased risk of death (2.6-fold) from either their PM or that particular SPM. However, latency did not appear to affect the CSS with respect to either the PM or SPM for AYA patients with a lymphoma or sarcoma SPM. CONCLUSIONS: Most AYAs who develop an SPM do so within 1 to 5 years of their primary cancer diagnosis, and they have an increased risk of death from cancer in comparison with AYAs with an SPM developing after longer survivorship intervals. Cancer 2018;124:1260-8. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Epigenomic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Secondary Breast Cancers.

BACKGROUND: Molecular alterations impact tumor prognosis and response to treatment. This study was designed to identify transcriptomic and epigenomic signatures of breast cancer (BC) tumors from patients with any prior malignancy. METHODS: RNA-sequencing and genome-wide DNA methylation profiles from BCs were generated in the Cancer Genome Atlas project. Patients with secondary breast cancer (SBC) were separated by histological subtype and matched to primary breast cancer controls to create two independent cohorts of invasive ductal (IDC, n = 36) and invasive lobular (ILC, n = 40) carcinoma. Differentially expressed genes, as well as differentially methylated genomic regions, were integrated to identify epigenetically regulated abnormal gene pathways in SBCs. RESULTS: Differentially expressed genes were identified in IDC SBCs (n = 727) and in ILC SBCs (n = 261; Wilcoxon's test; P < 0.05). In IDC SBCs, 105 genes were upregulated and hypomethylated, including an estrogen receptor gene, and 73 genes were downregulated and hypermethylated, including genes involved in antigen presentation and interferon response pathways (HLA-E, IRF8, and RELA). In ILC SBCs, however, only 17 genes were synchronously hypomethylated and upregulated, whereas 46 genes hypermethylated and downregulated. Interestingly, the SBC gene expression signatures closely corresponded with each histological subtype with only 1.51% of genes overlapping between the two histological subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Differential gene expression and DNA methylation signatures are seen in both IDC and ILC SBCs, including genes that are relevant to tumor growth and proliferation. Differences in gene expression signatures corresponding with each histological subtype emphasize the importance of disease subtype-specific evaluations of molecular alterations.

Adjuvant Radiation is Associated with Improved Survival for Select Patients with Non-metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which surgery is the mainstay of treatment and for which adjuvant radiation is infrequently employed; however, small, single-institution series suggest adjuvant radiation may improve outcomes. METHODS: All patients with non-metastatic ACC treated with either surgery alone or surgery followed by adjuvant radiation were identified in the 2004-2013 National Cancer Database. Factors associated with receipt of radiation and the impact of adjuvant radiation on survival were determined by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: Of 1184 patients, 171 (14.4%) received adjuvant radiation. Patient demographics were similar between the two groups, but those receiving radiation were more likely to have had positive margins following surgery (37.4 vs. 14.6%; p < 0.001), evidence of vascular invasion (14.0 vs. 5.1%; p = 0.05), and receive concurrent chemotherapy (57.3 vs. 28.8%; p < 0.001). After adjustment for tumor and other treatment factors, only positive margins following surgery was associated with an increased likelihood of receiving adjuvant radiation (odds ratio 3.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-7.56). Radiation therapy did not confer a difference in median overall survival in the general cohort. However, for patients with positive margins, adjuvant radiation was associated with a 40% decreased yearly risk of death after adjustment for concurrent chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.40-0.92; p = 0.02). This survival advantage was not evident for other traditional high-risk features. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant radiation appears to decrease the risk of death in ACC patients with positive margins following surgical resection, but only a small percentage are currently receiving radiation. Multidisciplinary treatment with surgery and radiation should be considered for these patients.

Disparities in fertility-sparing surgery in adolescent and young women with stage I ovarian dysgerminoma.

BACKGROUND: In many cancers, racial and socioeconomic disparities exist regarding the extent of surgery. For ovarian dysgerminoma, fertility-sparing (FS) surgery is recommended whenever possible. The aim of this study was to investigate rates of FS versus non-fertility-sparing (NFS) procedures for stage I ovarian dysgerminoma in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) by ethnicity/race and socioeconomic status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with ovarian dysgerminoma from 1998 to 2012. After selecting patients aged 15-39 y with stage I disease, a multivariate regression analysis was performed, and rates of FS and NFS procedures were compared, first according to ethnicity/race, and then by socioeconomic surrogate variables. RESULTS: Among the 687 AYAs with stage I ovarian dysgerminoma, there was no significant difference in rates of FS and NFS procedures based on ethnicity/race alone (P = 0.17), but there was a significant difference in procedure type for all three socioeconomic surrogates. The uninsured had higher NFS rates (30%) than those with government (21%) or private (19%) insurance (P = 0.036). Those in the poorest ZIP codes had almost twice the rate of NFS procedures (31%) compared with those in the most affluent ZIP codes (17%). For those in the least-educated regions, 24% underwent NFS procedures compared to 14% in the most-educated areas (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with stage I ovarian dysgerminoma in lower socioeconomic groups were more likely to undergo NFS procedures than those in higher socioeconomic groups, but there was no difference in rates of FS versus NFS procedures by ethnicity/race. Approaches aimed at reducing socioeconomic disparities require further examination.

Socioeconomic disparities affect survival in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors in AYA population.

BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCTs) are a rare form of ovarian malignancy. Socioeconomic status (SES) has been shown to affect survival in several gynecologic cancers. We examined whether SES impacted survival in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with MOGCT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was used to identify AYAs (aged 15-39 years) with MOGCT from 1998 to 2012. Three SES surrogate variables identified were as follows: insurance type, income quartile, and education quartile. Pooled variance t-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare tumor characteristics, the time from diagnosis to staging/treatment, and clinical outcome variables for each SES surrogate variable, while controlling for age and race/ethnicity in a multivariate model. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were calculated using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 3125 AYAs with MOGCT were identified. Subjects with lower SES measures had higher overall stage and T-stage MOGCTs at presentation. There was no significant difference in the time to staging/treatment, extent of surgery, or use of chemotherapy by SES. Subjects from a lower education background, from a lower income quartile, and without insurance had decreased survival (P ≤ 0.02 for all). Controlling for overall stage and T-stage, the difference in survival was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: AYAs with MOGCT from lower SES backgrounds presented with more advanced stage disease. Further studies that focus on the underlying reasons for this difference are needed to address these disparities.

Variations in cancer care for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with ductal carcinoma in situ.

NCCN guidelines recommend tamoxifen (TAM) for adjuvant treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). TAM has side effects that can potentially complicate treatment recommendations and patient acceptance. It is unknown how well-accepted this recommended therapy is for the adolescent and young adult (AYA) patient population with DCIS. The NCDB was used to identify patients aged 15-39 with DCIS treated between 2000 and 2012. Patient demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment data were collected. Chi-squared test and multivariate analysis were used for statistical assessment. A total of 3988 women were identified of which 1795 (45%) were recommended for endocrine therapy. Age > 30 (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.01-1.70), Black (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.12-1.65), or Asian (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.08-1.94) race, treatment at a nonacademic facility (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.91), geographic location of treating facility, receipt of radiation (OR 5.30, 95% CI 4.59-6.11), and negative margins (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.47-3.11) were significant predictors of recommendation for endocrine therapy. Of those recommended, 1484 (83%) accepted treatment. Age, race, and annual income were significant variables affecting acceptance. Overall, only 37.2% (1484 of 3988) of women in this study initiated endocrine therapy for treatment of DCIS. Our results demonstrate that little over a third of patients in the AYA cohort receive endocrine therapy as treatment for DCIS. The bias appears to lie in physician recommendation because when recommended, the majority of patients accept treatment. Factors exist both medical and nonmedical that appear to influence these treatment decisions.

Breast Cancer in Male Adolescents and Young Adults.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in female adolescent and young adults (AYA; age 15-39 years). However, few data exist detailing either in situ or invasive breast cancer in male AYAs. METHODS: All male AYA breast cancer cases were identified in the National Cancer Data Base (1998-2010). Demographics, tumor, and treatment predictors of overall survival (OS) were determined for both patients with in situ and invasive tumors. RESULTS: Of 677 male AYAs, 122 patients (18 %) had in situ breast cancer, while 555 patients (82 %) were found to have invasive breast cancer. Compared to in situ breast cancer, invasive breast cancer in male AYAs was less likely to occur in patients with private or managed care insurance (p = 0.003) or <20 years of age (p = 0.028). In patients with invasive breast cancer, lower OS was associated with age ≤25 years (p = 0.006), black race (p = 0.018), not having Medicaid/Medicare/government/military insurance (p < 0.001), the lowest socioeconomic status (p = 0.001), higher overall stage (p < 0.001), T stage (p < 0.001), nodal stage (p < 0.001), and M stage (p < 0.001), as well as not having any surgery (p < 0.001) or nodal evaluation at surgery (p < 0.001). After controlling for competing factors, only age ≤25 years (hazard ratio 3.064, 95 % confidence interval 1.216-7.720) and not having nodal evaluation (hazard ratio 3.070, 95 % confidence interval 1.423-6.626) predicted decreased OS. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age and not having nodal evaluation at the time of surgery are associated with decreased OS in AYA male patients with invasive cancer. This highlights the need to perform axillary node sampling through sentinel node biopsy at the time of mastectomy in these young male patients.

Breast Malignancies in Children: Presentation, Management, and Survival.

PURPOSE: Pediatric breast malignancies are rare, and descriptions in the literature are limited. The purpose of our study was to compare pediatric and adult breast malignancy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Data Base comparing patients ≤21 years to those >21 years at diagnosis (1998-2012). Generalized linear models estimated differences in demographic, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival. RESULTS: Of 1,999,181 cases of invasive breast malignancies, 477 (0.02%) occurred in patients ≤21 years. Ninety-nine percent of adult patients had invasive carcinoma compared with 64.8% of pediatric patients with the remaining patients having sarcoma, malignant phyllodes, or malignancy not otherwise specified (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients were twice as likely to have an undifferentiated malignancy [relative risk (RR) 2.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-3.79]. Half of adults presented with Stage I disease compared with only 22.7% of pediatric patients (p < 0.001). Pediatric patients were 40% more likely to have positive axillary nodes (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.10-1.84). Among patients with invasive carcinoma, pediatric patients were more than four times as likely to receive a bilateral than a unilateral mastectomy compared with adults (RR 4.56; 95% CI 3.19-6.53). There was no difference in overall survival between children and adults. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric breast malignancies are more advanced at presentation, and there is variability in treatment practices. Adult and pediatric patients with invasive carcinoma have similar overall survival.

Racial and Socioeconomic Treatment Disparities in Adolescents and Young Adults with Stage II-III Rectal Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Stage II-III rectal cancer requires multidisciplinary cancer care, and adolescents and young adults (AYA, ages 15-39 years) often do not receive optimal cancer therapy. METHODS: Overall, 3295 AYAs with clinical stage II-III rectal cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database. Factors associated with the receipt of adjuvant and surgical therapies, as well as overall survival (OS), were examined. RESULTS: The majority of patients were non-Hispanic White (72.0 %), male (57.5 %), and without comorbidities (93.8 %). A greater proportion of Black and Hispanic patients did not receive radiation (24.5 and 27.1 %, respectively, vs. 16.5 % for non-Hispanic White patients), surgery (22.4 % and 21.6 vs. 12.3 %), or chemotherapy (21.5 % and 24.1 vs. 14.7 %) compared with non-Hispanic White patients (all p < 0.05). After controlling for competing factors, Black (odds ratio [OR] 0.7, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.9) and Hispanic patients (OR 0.6, 95 % CI 0.4-0.9) were less likely to receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation compared with non-Hispanic White patients. Females, the uninsured, and those treated at a community cancer center were also less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy. Having government insurance (OR 0.22, 95 % CI 010-0.49) was a predictor for not receiving surgery. Although 5-year OS was lower (p < 0.05) in Black (59.8 %) and Hispanic patients (65.9 %) compared with non-Hispanic White patients (74.9 %), on multivariate analysis race did not impact mortality. Not having surgery (hazard ratio [HR] 7.1, 95 % CI 2.8-18.2) had the greatest influence on mortality, followed by poorly differentiated histology (HR 3.0, 95 % CI 1.3-6.5), nodal positivity (HR 2.6, 95 % CI 1.9-3.6), no chemotherapy (HR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.03-3.6), no insurance (HR 1.7, 95 % CI 1.1-2.7), and male sex (HR 1.5, 95 % CI 1.1-2.0). CONCLUSION: There are racial and socioeconomic disparities in the treatment of stage II-III rectal cancer in AYAs, many of which impact OS. Interventions that can address and mitigate these differences may lead to improvements in OS for some patients.

Characteristics and outcomes in children with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver: A report from the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: To examine patient characteristics and outcomes in children with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) using a multi-institutional database. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: UESL is a rare disease (incidence is one per million). Therefore, the current literature is mostly limited to small case series. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for primary UESL diagnosed between 1998 and 2012. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients (<18 years) were identified. The 5-year overall survival of the entire group was 86%. The best outcomes were seen in children who had tumors smaller than 15 cm and were able to undergo surgical resection with or without chemotherapy. Margin status did not appear to significantly affect survival. The most common type of resection was hemihepatectomy (37%), followed by sectionectomy (10%) and trisectionectomy (10%). Orthotopic liver transplant was performed in 10 children, all of whom survived to 5 years. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection with or without chemotherapy should be the mainstay of treatment in children with UESL, and is associated with very favorable outcomes. Negative surgical margins were not associated with improved survival. Orthotopic liver transplantation may be a viable method of attaining local control in tumors, which would otherwise be unresectable.

Patterns and outcomes of colorectal cancer in adolescents and young adults.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population (aged 15-39 y) is rising. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database to study CRC in the AYA population. We studied clinical and socioeconomic factors associated with survival. RESULTS: Of the 11,071 cases of CRC, the most common site of the primary tumor was the rectum (25%), whereas 66.6% of the diseases were left sided. Most of the patients (72%) presented with regional or metastatic disease. However, the disease-specific survival (DSS) and the overall survival of the AYA population were comparable to those of the general population (DSS; 5- and 10-y: 64.8%, 57.3%; overall survival; 5- and 10-y: 61.5% and 52.4%). On multivariate analysis, disease stage at the time of the diagnosis was the strongest predictor of mortality. After controlling for disease stage, male gender, black race, and higher grade tumors were associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: The AYA population presents with advanced distal CRC but have similar survival compared with the general population.