Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 147(2): EL201, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32113282

ABSTRACT

Measures of signal-in-noise neural encoding may improve understanding of the hearing-in-noise difficulties experienced by many individuals in everyday life. Usually noise results in weaker envelope following responses (EFRs); however, some studies demonstrate EFR enhancements. This experiment tested whether noise-induced enhancements in EFRs are demonstrated with simple 500- and 1000-Hz pure tones amplitude modulated at 110 Hz. Most of the 12 young normal-hearing participants demonstrated enhanced encoding of the 110-Hz fundamental in a noise background compared to quiet; in contrast, responses at the harmonics were decreased in noise relative to quiet conditions. Possible mechanisms of such an enhancement are discussed.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Auditory , Noise , Acoustic Stimulation , Adult , Hearing , Humans , Noise/adverse effects
2.
Ear Hear ; 38(1): e13-e21, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556520

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Spatial release from masking (SRM) can increase speech intelligibility in complex listening environments. The goal of the present study was to document how speech-in-speech stimuli could be best processed to encourage optimum SRM for listeners who represent a range of ages and amounts of hearing loss. We examined the effects of equating stimulus audibility among listeners, presenting stimuli at uniform sensation levels (SLs), and filtering stimuli at two separate bandwidths. DESIGN: Seventy-one participants completed two speech intelligibility experiments (36 listeners in experiment 1; all 71 in experiment 2) in which a target phrase from the coordinate response measure (CRM) and two masking phrases from the CRM were presented simultaneously via earphones using a virtual spatial array, such that the target sentence was always at 0 degree azimuth angle and the maskers were either colocated or positioned at ±45 degrees. Experiments 1 and 2 examined the impacts of SL, age, and hearing loss on SRM. Experiment 2 also assessed the effects of stimulus bandwidth on SRM. RESULTS: Overall, listeners' ability to achieve SRM improved with increased SL. Younger listeners with less hearing loss achieved more SRM than older or hearing-impaired listeners. It was hypothesized that SL and bandwidth would result in dissociable effects on SRM. However, acoustical analysis revealed that effective audible bandwidth, defined as the highest frequency at which the stimulus was audible at both ears, was the best predictor of performance. Thus, increasing SL seemed to improve SRM by increasing the effective bandwidth rather than increasing the level of already audible components. CONCLUSIONS: Performance for all listeners, regardless of age or hearing loss, improved with an increase in overall SL and/or bandwidth, but the improvement was small relative to the benefits of spatial separation.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Perceptual Masking , Spatial Processing , Speech Perception/physiology , Acoustic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Auditory Threshold , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
3.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 50(7): 997-1006, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24301436

ABSTRACT

Portability of equipment is an increasingly important component in the practice of audiology. We report on a new device, the OtoID, that supports evidence-based ototoxicity testing protocols, provides capability for hearing testing on the hospital treatment unit, and can automate patient self-testing. The purpose of this article is to report on the validation and verification of the OtoID portable audiometer in 40 subjects both young and old, with and without hearing impairment. Subjects were evaluated by an audiologist using the manual hearing test program and then self-tested via an automated testing program. Testing was done in a sound booth and on a hospital treatment unit. Therefore, data were collected in four conditions (booth vs hospital unit and automated vs manual testing) and analyzed for testing bias, repeatability, and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-significant ototoxicity false-positive rate. Repeatable hearing threshold results were obtained on all subjects who performed the test, regardless of hearing status or testing location.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone/instrumentation , Auditory Threshold , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone/methods , Automation , Diagnostic Self Evaluation , False Positive Reactions , Female , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Point-of-Care Systems , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL