Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 101
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Am J Hematol ; 99(7): 1290-1299, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654658

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is recommended for core-binding factor mutated (CBF) AML patients achieving second complete remission (CR2). However, approximately 20% of patients may relapse after transplant and donor preference remains unclear. We compared in this EBMT global multicenter registry-based analysis the allo-HCT outcomes using either haploidentical (Haplo), matched siblings donors (MSD), or 10/10 matched unrelated donors (MUD). Data from 865 de novo adult CBF AML patients in CR2 receiving allo-HCT in 227 EBMT centers from 2010 to 2022 were analyzed, in which 329 MSD, 374 MUD, and 162 Haplo-HCTs were included. For the entire cohort, 503 (58%) patients were inv(16)/CBFB-MYH11 and 362 patients (42%) were t(8;21)/RUNX1-RUNX1T1 AML. On multivariate analysis, Haplo-HCT was associated with a lower Relapse Incidence (RI) compared to either MSD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32-0.97; p < .05) or MUD (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33-0.99, p < .05). No significant difference was observed among the 3 types of donors on LFS, OS and GRFS. CBF-AML with t(8;21) was associated with both higher RI (HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.3-2.47; p < .01) and higher NRM (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.1-2.27; p < .01) than CBF-AML with inv(16), which led to worse LFS, OS and GRFS. To conclude, for CBF-AML patients in CR2, Haplo-HCTs were associated with a lower RI compared to MSD and MUD allo-HCTs. There was no difference on LFS, OS or GRFS. CBF AML patients with inv(16) had a better progonosis than those with t(8;21) after allo-HCT in CR2.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Recurrence , Siblings , Unrelated Donors , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Incidence , Aged , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Adolescent , Registries , Core Binding Factors/genetics , Young Adult , Remission Induction , Allografts , Europe
2.
Cytotherapy ; 23(6): 483-487, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678598

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AIMS: Around 50 000 autologous stem cell transplantations are done each year worldwide using cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs). Cryopreservation is time-consuming and expensive. Since 2007, several retrospective studies have shown that PBSCs can be stored at 4°C for 2-3 days, allowing autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose melphalan. Data with non-cryopreserved PBSCs in patients autografted for lymphoma following longer pre-conditioning regimens are limited. In addition, no controlled comparison has been able to detect unforeseen differences. METHODS: The authors compared outcomes of 94 consecutive adult patients with lymphoma (66 with Hodgkin lymphoma) autografted in our department in Oran (Algeria) using PBSCs stored at 4°C, from 2009 to 2018, with patients receiving cryopreserved stem cells reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. Patients autografted in Oran were matched with patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs in the registry (four controls per patient in Oran). RESULTS: Neutrophil engraftment was significantly faster with cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.003). By day 10, only 17% of patients receiving non-cryopreserved PBSCs engrafted versus 48% for cryopreserved PBSCs. Likewise, platelet recovery to 20 000/mm3 was significantly faster in patients receiving cryopreserved PBSCs (P = 0.01). However, all patients in both groups had recovered by day 20. There were no significant differences in non-relapse mortality (9% versus 7%, P = 0.4), relapse incidence (22% versus 32%, P = 0.13), progression-free survival (70% versus 61%, P = 0.4) or overall survival (85% versus 75%, P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that, in patients with lymphoma receiving pre-transplant regimens such as carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan, PBSCs stored at 4°C for up to 6 days can be used safely in centers with no cryopreservation facility. However, the kinetics of hematopoietic recovery showed a significant, albeit small, delay in engraftment for both neutrophils and platelets, which favors the use of cryopreservation if available.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Lymphoma , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells , Autografts , Bone Marrow , Cryopreservation , Humans , Lymphoma/therapy , Matched-Pair Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous
3.
Cancer ; 126(5): 1004-1015, 2020 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31774557

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a matched sibling donor (MSD) is considered the first choice for an allogeneic transplantation. However, a female donor for a male recipient is a poor prognostic factor. The authors compared haploidentical (HAPLO) donors with female MSDs. METHODS: In total, 834 men underwent allogenic transplantation from a female MSD, and 232 men underwent allogenic transplantation from a HAPLO donor. Of these, 86% of HAPLO recipients and 3% of MSD recipients received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis posttransplantation with high-dose cyclophosphamide. A significant qualitative interaction was observed between donor type and cytogenetics, Therefore, the analyses were stratified on cytogenetics. RESULTS: Of the men with intermediate-risk AML, 638 received transplantation from a female MSD, and 160 received transplantation from a HAPLO donor. In multivariate analysis, poor risk factors were a HAPLO donor versus an MSD for nonrelapse mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; P = .02) and patient age for nonrelapse mortality and overall survival (HR, 1.22 [P = .02] and 1.15 [P = .02], respectively). HAPLO transplantation resulted in less chronic GVHD (HR, 0.43; P < 10-4 ) but lower leukemia-free survival (HR, 1.7; P = .04). The GVHD/relapse-free survival (GRFS) was not different. Of the men with high-risk AML, 196 received transplantation from a female MSD, and 72 received transplantation from a HAPLO donor. By multivariate analysis, HAPLO recipients had a lower incidence of relapse (HR, 0.40; P = .004), better leukemia-free survival (HR, 0.46; P = .003), better overall survival (HR, 0.43; P = .003), and better GRFS (HR, 0.54; P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: In men who have intermediate-risk AML, allogenic transplantation from a sister MSD or a HAPLO donor produces similar GRFS. However, in men who have high-risk AML, a HAPLO donor combined with prophylactic high-dose cyclophosphamide posttransplantation may be a better choice.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Siblings , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Transplantation, Haploidentical/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Marrow/chemistry , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
4.
Haematologica ; 105(6): 1507-1516, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32241850

ABSTRACT

The FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene is mutated in 25-30% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because of the poor prognosis associated with FLT3-internal tandem duplication mutated AML, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (SCT) was commonly performed in first complete remission. Remarkable progress has been made in frontline treatments with the incorporation of FLT3 inhibitors and the development of highly sensitive minimal/measurable residual disease assays. Similarly, recent progress in allogeneic hematopoietic SCT includes improvement of transplant techniques, the use of haploidentical donors in patients lacking an HLA matched donor, and the introduction of FLT3 inhibitors as post-transplant maintenance therapy. Nevertheless, current transplant strategies vary between centers and differ in terms of transplant indications based on the internal tandem duplication allelic ratio and concomitant nucleophos-min-1 mutation, as well as in terms of post-transplant maintenance/consolidation. This review generated by international leukemia or transplant experts, mostly from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, attempts to develop a position statement on best approaches for allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for AML with FLT3-internal tandem duplication including indications for and modalities of such transplants and on the potential optimization of post-transplant maintenance with FLT inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Bone Marrow , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Remission Induction , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics
5.
Haematologica ; 105(1): 47-58, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537691

ABSTRACT

Donor lymphocyte infusion has been used in the management of relapsed hematologic malignancies after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. It can eradicate minimal residual disease or be used to rescue a hematologic relapse, being able to induce durable remissions in a subset of patients. With the increased use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation, there is renewed interest in the use of donor lymphocytes to either treat or prevent disease relapse post transplant. Published retrospective and small prospective studies have shown encouraging results with therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusion in different haploidentical transplantation platforms. In this consensus paper, finalized on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, we summarize the available evidence on the use of donor lymphocyte infusion from haploidentical donor, and provide recommendations on its therapeutic, pre-emptive and prophylactic use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Consensus , Humans , Lymphocytes , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
6.
Br J Haematol ; 184(5): 782-787, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30467839

ABSTRACT

Strategies for relapse prevention after allogeneic transplantation in acute leukaemia are warranted. A registry-based matched-pair analysis evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion (proDLI). Adults receiving proDLI in complete remission (CR) and controls were pair-matched for age, diagnosis, cytogenetics, stage, donor, gender, conditioning and T-cell depletion. Eighty-nine pairs were identified (median follow-up: 6.9 years). Within the entire cohort, no difference was observed. However, among patients with high-risk acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) (unfavourable cytogenetics and/or transplanted beyond first CR), proDLI recipients had improved overall survival (69.8% vs. 40.2% in controls, P = 0.027). ProDLI has moderate efficacy, but can contribute to improved outcome in high-risk AML.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Lymphocyte Transfusion , Stem Cell Transplantation , Tissue Donors , Adult , Aged , Allografts , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors
7.
Ann Hematol ; 98(10): 2389-2398, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392462

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is considered an effective way to prevent relapse in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This study aimed to assess general trends in the use of various types of HSCTs performed between 2001 and 2015 in Europe, based on data reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry. We also evaluated HSCT rates with respect to ALL incidence in selected countries. Altogether, 15,346 first allogeneic (n = 13,460) or autologous (n = 1886) HSCTs were performed in the study period. Comparing 2013-2015 and 2001-2003, the number of allogeneic HSCTs performed in first complete remission increased by 136%, most prominently for transplantations from unrelated (272%) and mismatched related donors (339%). The number of HSCTs from matched sibling donors increased by 42%, while the total number of autologous HSCTs decreased by 70%. Increased use of allogeneic HSCT was stronger for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive (166%) than for Ph-negative ALL (38%) and for patients aged > 55 years (599%) than for younger adults (59%). The proportion of allogeneic HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) increased from 6 to 27%. The age-standardized rates of allogeneic HSCT per ALL incidence varied strongly among countries. Our analysis showed a continued trend toward increased allogeneic HSCT use for adults with ALL, which may be attributed to increasing availability of unrelated donors, wider use of RIC regimens, and improving efficacy of pretransplant therapy, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors for Ph-positive ALL. Allogeneic HSCT remains a major tool in the fight against ALL in adults.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/trends , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/trends , Unrelated Donors , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Allografts , Autografts , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/epidemiology , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Societies, Medical
8.
Am J Hematol ; 93(7): 859-866, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29644709

ABSTRACT

Autologous stem cell transplantation remains a clinical option to consolidate some adult patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR1). In a small cohort of patients, we have previously shown better outcomes following Busulfan and Melphalan (BUMEL) over Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide (BUCY). To identify the subpopulations that might get the highest benefit with BUMEL, we designed a larger study. All adult patients with primary AML and available cytogenetics, autografted from January 2000 to December 2016 in CR1, were included: 1137 patients received BUCY and 512 BUMEL. All factors differing in distribution between the 2 conditioning groups were introduced in multivariate analyzes. In a primary analysis, we found an interaction between conditioning and the poor risk group defined as poor cytogenetics and/or presence of the FLT3-ITD mutation. During analysis of the poor risk group, 176 patients received BUCY and 62 BUMEL. BUMEL was associated with a lower RI at 5 years (53% versus 69%, HR: 0.52, P = .002), a better Leukaemia-free survival (LFS) (42% versus 25%, HR: 0.54, P = .002) and a better OS (54% versus 36%, HR: 0.61, P = .02). During analysis of the non poor risk group, 961 patients received BUCY and 450 BUMEL. At 5 years, the RI was 50% and 47%, the LFS 45% and 48% and the OS 56% and 60% respectively, with no significant difference. We conclude that BUMEL is the preferable conditioning regimen for the poor risk leukemic patients, while in AML patients without poor risk cytogenetics or FLT3 both conditioning regimens are valid.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Child , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Remission Induction/methods , Survival Analysis , Transplantation, Autologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
9.
Am J Hematol ; 93(12): 1532-1542, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30218444

ABSTRACT

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who relapse after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be rescued by allogeneic SCT. We identified 537 adult patients with AML allografted in second complete remission (CR2) or first relapse after ASCT in the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry. At 3 years post allograft, leukemia free survival (LFS) was 31.4% [95%CI 27.3-35.6], overall survival (OS) 39.5% [95%CI 35.1-43.9], relapse incidence (RI) 34.6% [95%CI 30.4-38.8], and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 33.7% [95%CI 29.6-37.9]. RI was higher in patients transplanted in relapse in comparison to those transplanted in CR2 (HR 1.76, P = .004) and in patients who relapsed later after ASCT (HR 0.97 per month, P < 10-3 ), both translating into better LFS/ OS. Relapse was also lower in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) from an unrelated donor (UD) in comparison to those transplanted from a matched sibling donor (MSD) (HR 0.49, P < 10-3 ). NRM was increased in patients who received total body irradiation (TBI) pre-ASCT (HR 2.43; P < 10-4), translating into worse LFS/OS. LFS/OS did not differ between patients allotransplanted with reduced intensity (RIC) or myeloablative (MAC) conditioning. In conclusion, one third of adult patients with AML relapsing post ASCT can be rescued with allo-HSCT, with better LFS/OS in patients who relapsed later post ASCT, those transplanted in CR2 and those who had not received TBI pre-ASCT.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Adult , Humans , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous , Whole-Body Irradiation
10.
Cancer ; 123(5): 824-831, 2017 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27906458

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for adult acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) is a valid therapeutic option for patients with good-risk and intermediate-risk disease. The authors used the registry of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation to compare combined busulfan and melphalan (BUMEL) with combined busulfan and cyclophosphamide (BUCY) before transplantation. METHODS: From 2005 to 2013, 853 patients with available cytogenetics underwent ASCT in first remission, including 257 after receiving BUMEL and 596 after receiving BUCY. The proportion of patients with good-risk AML was lower in those who received BUMEL (14% vs 20%; P = .02). More patients who received BUMEL underwent autograft in molecular remission (89% vs 78%; P = .02). Three years after transplantation, the relapse incidence (RI) was 48.7%, the leukemia-free survival (LFS) rate was 47.7%, the overall survival (OS) rate was 66.2%, and the nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rate was 3.6%. RESULTS: Patients who underwent an autograft after receiving BUMEL fared better than those who underwent an autograft after receiving BUCY with a lower RI (39.5% vs 52.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-0.87; P = .003) a better LFS (55.4% vs 44.6%; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.53-0.89; P = .005), and a better OS (73.8% vs 63%; HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.47-0.82; P = .0007). There was no difference in the NRM rate (BUMEL vs BUCY, 4.5% vs 3.2%, respectively). Among 74 patients in the BUMEL group and 187 in the BUCY group who underwent autograft in molecular remission, the RI was 30% versus 51%, respectively (univariate analysis; P = .01), and the LFS rate was 66% versus 47%, respectively (univariate analysis; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AML in first complete remission who undergo ASCT, the BUMEL combination is a better preparative regimen. Cancer 2017;123:824-31. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Busulfan/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/epidemiology , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology , Male , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation Conditioning
11.
Haematologica ; 102(2): 224-234, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27927772

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is increasingly used as treatment for patients with life-threatening blood diseases. Its curative potential is largely based on immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia effects caused by donor T cells contained in the graft. Unfortunately, donor T cells are also the cause of graft-versus-host disease. The vast majority of human leukocyte antigen-matched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants are nowadays carried out with peripheral blood stem cells as the stem cell source. In comparison with bone marrows, peripheral blood stem cells contain more hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells but also one log more T cells. Consequently, the use of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow has been associated with faster hematologic recovery and a lower risk of relapse in patients with advanced disease, but also with a higher incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. These observations have been the basis for several studies aimed at assessing the impact of immunoregulation with anti-thymocyte globulin on transplantation outcomes in patients given human leukocyte antigen-matched peripheral blood stem cells from related or unrelated donors. After a brief introduction on anti-thymocyte globulin, this article reviews recent studies assessing the impact of anti-thymocyte globulin on transplantation outcomes in patients given peripheral blood stem cells from human leukocyte antigen-matched related or unrelated donors as well as in recipients of grafts from human leukocyte antigen haploidentical donors.


Subject(s)
Antilymphocyte Serum/therapeutic use , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Animals , Antilymphocyte Serum/pharmacology , Clinical Trials as Topic , HLA Antigens/genetics , HLA Antigens/immunology , Haplotypes , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/immunology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/metabolism , Humans , Immunomodulation/drug effects , Immunomodulation/immunology , Immunosuppressive Agents/pharmacology , Rabbits , Siblings , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Unrelated Donors
12.
Am J Hematol ; 92(12): 1318-1323, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960419

ABSTRACT

Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia have a better outcome if reaching molecular remission. We compared the outcome of 373 patients autografted and 335 patients allografted with a 10/10 compatible unrelated donor in first molecular remission. Patients were stratified using the ELN European Leukemia Net classification. ELN favorable group: (234 auto and 70 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, the Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) was lower (3.7% versus 19%; P < 10-4 ), Relapse Incidence (RI) higher (29% versus 17%, P < 10-4 ), Leukemia Free Survival (LFS) identical (67% versus 64%) and Overall Survival (OS) better than in the allogeneic group (83% versus 62%; P = .008). By multivariate analysis, autologous transplantation was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 4, P = .01) and a better OS (HR: 2.08, P = .04). ELN intermediate group 1: (87 autologous and 172 unrelated transplants). By univariate analysis, in the auto group, NRM was lower (2.5% versus 11.8%; P = .03), RI higher (59% versus 18%, P < 10-6 ), LFS lower (39% versus 70%; P < 10-6 ) and OS lower than in the unrelated donor group (61% versus 74%; P = .005). By multivariate analysis, unrelated donor was superior to autologous transplantation for LFS (HR: 0.36, P < 10-5) and OS (HR: 0.53, P = .01). ELN intermediate group 2: (52 autologous and 93 unrelated donors). The outcome was identical. We conclude that good risk patients get higher benefit from autologous transplantation. Intermediate risk 2 patients have the same outcome and Intermediate risk 1 patients get higher benefit from unrelated donor transplants.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Transplantation, Autologous/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Remission Induction , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Survival Rate , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Unrelated Donors , Young Adult
13.
Cancer ; 122(19): 2941-51, 2016 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27309127

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) is a standard of care for patients with Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to first-line therapy has improved overall outcomes; however, a significant proportion of patients still relapse after alloHSCT. Posttransplant TKI maintenance was demonstrated to reduce the risk of relapse in a large retrospective study and, therefore, should be considered a valuable option. This consensus paper, written on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, presents an overview of clinical studies on the use of TKIs after alloHSCT and proposes practical recommendations regarding the choice of TKI, treatment timing, and dosage. It is hoped that these recommendations will become the state of art in this field and, more importantly, lead to a reduction of Ph-positive ALL relapse after alloHSCT. Cancer 2016;122:2941-2951. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Societies, Medical
14.
Cancer ; 122(12): 1880-7, 2016 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27018549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Leukemia recurrence is a major cause of treatment failure after autologous stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It usually occurs within the first 2 years after transplantation. The goal of the current retrospective study was to assess the follow-up of and characterize risk factors for outcome among patients who survived free of disease recurrence after this period. METHODS: The analysis included 3567 adults (median age, 45 years) with AML who underwent autografting during the first (86% of patients) or second (14% of patients) complete remission between 1990 and 2008. The stem cell source was the bone marrow in 32% of patients or the peripheral blood in 68% of patients. The median follow-up was 6.9 years. RESULTS: At 5 years and 10 years after transplantation, the probability of leukemia-free survival was 86% and 76%, respectively; the recurrence incidence was 11% and 16%, respectively; and the nonrecurrence mortality rate was 3% and 8%, respectively. The observed survival was decreased compared with the expected survival of the general European population. In a multivariate analysis, decreased probability of leukemia-free survival was demonstrated for patients who underwent peripheral blood autologous stem cell transplantation; had French-American-British subtypes M0, M6, or M7; and were of an older age. The same factors were found to be associated with an increased risk of disease recurrence. Nonrecurrence mortality was found to be affected by older age. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current analysis indicate that late recurrences remain a major concern after autologous stem cell transplantation among patients with AML, indicating the need for close monitoring of minimal residual disease and additional leukemic control measures after transplantation. Cancer 2016;122:1880-7. © 2016 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
15.
Haematologica ; 101(6): 773-80, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26969081

ABSTRACT

The outcome of patients undergoing HLA-matched unrelated donor allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation following reduced-intensity conditioning or myeloablative regimens is reported to be equivalent; however, it is not known if the intensity of the conditioning impacts outcomes after mismatched unrelated donor transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia. Eight hundred and eighty three patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning were compared with 1041 myeloablative conditioning regimen recipients in the setting of mismatched unrelated donor transplantation. The donor graft was HLA-matched at 9/10 in 872 (83.8%) and at 8/10 in 169 (16.2%) myeloablative conditioning recipients, while in the reduced-intensity conditioning cohort, 754 (85.4%) and 129 (14.6%) were matched at 9/10 and 8/10 loci, respectively. Myeloablative conditioning regimen recipients were younger, 70% being <50 years of age compared to only 30% in the reduced-intensity conditioning group (P=0.0001). Significantly, more patients had secondary acute myeloid leukemia (P=0.04) and Karnofsky Performance Status score <90% (P=0.02) in the reduced-intensity conditioning group. Patients <50 and ≥50 years were analyzed separately. On multivariate analysis and after adjusting for differences between the two groups, reduced-intensity conditioning in patients age ≥50 years was associated with higher overall survival (HR 0.78; P=0.01), leukemia-free survival (HR 0.82; P=0.05), and decreased non-relapse mortality (HR 0.73; P=0.03). Relapse incidence (HR 0.91; P=0.51) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (HR 1.31; P=0.11) were, however, not significantly different. In patients <50 years old, there were no statistically significant differences in overall survival, leukemia-free survival, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, and chronic graft-versus-host-disease between the groups. Our study shows no significant outcome differences in patients younger than 50 years receiving reduced-intensity vs myeloablative conditioning regimens after mismatched unrelated donor transplantation. Furthermore, the data support the superiority of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens in older adults receiving transplants from mismatched unrelated donors.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning , Unrelated Donors , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Graft Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
16.
Oncologist ; 20(1): 50-5, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25480827

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese patients with malignant diseases is a significant challenge because limiting chemotherapy doses in these patients may negatively influence outcome. There is a paucity of information addressing high-dose chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: The Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) designed an electronic survey to assess current practice of dose adjustment of chemotherapy in obese patients undergoing HSCT. RESULTS: A total of 56 EBMT centers from 27 countries responded to the online survey. Overall, 45 centers declared that they routinely adjust chemotherapy doses for obese patients (80.5%), and only 11 (19.5%) declared they do not adjust dose. Among the former group, most used body mass index as the parameter for defining obesity (28 centers, 62%). The method for determining the weight for chemotherapy calculation was actual body weight (ABW) in 16 centers, ideal body weight (IBW) in 10 centers, IBW plus 25% of the difference between IBW and ABW in 16 centers, and other methods for the rest. Among centers that used dose adjustment, 44% also capped the dose at 2 m(2) for a chemotherapy dose based on body surface area (BSA), whereas 56% did not cap. Interestingly, most of the centers (9 of 11) that did not adjust dose for weight also did not cap the BSA at 2 m(2). CONCLUSION: This EBMT survey revealed large diversity among transplant centers regarding dose-adjustment practice for high-dose conditioning chemotherapy. Our next step is to analyze outcomes of transplantation according to dose-adjustment practice and, subsequently, to formulate a methodology for future prospective studies.


Subject(s)
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia/drug therapy , Obesity/complications , Bone Marrow/pathology , Data Collection , Humans , Leukemia/complications , Leukemia/pathology , Obesity/drug therapy , Obesity/pathology , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous
17.
Haematologica ; 100(4): 558-64, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637051

ABSTRACT

Adult patients with acute leukemia in need of a transplant but without a genoidentical donor are usually considered upfront for transplantation with stem cells from any other allogeneic source, rather than autologous stem cell transplantation. We used data from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and performed a matched pair analysis on 188 T-cell-replete haploidentical and 356 autologous transplants done from January 2007 to December 2012, using age, diagnosis, disease status, cytogenetics, and interval from diagnosis to transplant as matching factors. "Haploidentical expert" centers were defined as having reported more than five haploidentical transplants for acute leukemia (median value for the study period). The median follow-up was 28 months. Multivariate analyses, including type of transplant categorized into three classes ("haploidentical regular", "haploidentical expert" and autologous), conditioning intensity (reduced intensity versus myeloablative conditioning) and the random effect taking into account associations related to matching, showed that non-relapse mortality was higher following haploidentical transplants in expert (HR: 4.7; P=0.00004) and regular (HR: 8.98; P<10(-5)) centers. Relapse incidence for haploidentical transplants was lower in expert centers (HR:0.39; P=0.0003) but in regular centers was similar to that for autologous transplants. Leukemia-free survival and overall survival rates were higher following autologous transplantation than haploidentical transplants in regular centers (HR: 1.63; P=0.008 and HR: 2.31; P=0.0002 respectively) but similar to those following haploidentical transplants in expert centers. We conclude that autologous stem cell transplantation should presently be considered as a possible alternative to haploidentical transplantation in regular centers that have not developed a specific expert program.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control , Haplotypes , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Leukemia/diagnosis , Leukemia/mortality , Lymphocyte Depletion , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
18.
Cancer ; 120(17): 2760-5, 2014 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24804873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total body irradiation (TBI) is widely used for conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation. Its efficacy and toxicity may depend on many methodological aspects. The goal of the current study was to explore current clinical practice in this field. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all centers collaborating in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and included 19 questions regarding various aspects of TBI. A total of 56 centers from 23 countries responded. RESULTS: All centers differed with regard to at least 1 answer. The total maximum dose of TBI used for myeloablative transplantation ranged from 8 grays (Gy) to 14.4 Gy, whereas the dose per fraction was 1.65 Gy to 8 Gy. A total of 16 dose/fractionation modalities were identified. The dose rate ranged from 2.25 centigrays to 37.5 centigrays per minute. The treatment unit was linear accelerator (LINAC) (91%) or cobalt unit (9%). Beams (photons) used for LINAC were reported to range from 6 to 25 megavolts. The most frequent technique used for irradiation was "patient in 1 field," in which 2 fields and 2 patient positions per fraction are used (64%). In 41% of centers, patients were immobilized during TBI. Approximately 93% of centers used in vivo dosimetry with accepted discrepancies between the planned and measured doses of 1.5% to 10%. In 84% of centers, the lungs were shielded during irradiation. The maximum accepted dose for the lungs was 6 Gy to 14.4 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: TBI is an extremely heterogeneous treatment modality. The findings of the current study should warrant caution in the interpretation of clinical studies involving TBI. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how methodological differences influence outcome. Efforts to standardize the method should be considered.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid/therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Whole-Body Irradiation/methods , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Europe , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Radiometry , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Haematologica ; 99(3): 535-40, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24143000

ABSTRACT

Double cord blood transplantation extends the use of cord blood to adults for whom a single unit is not available, but the procedure is limited by its cost. To evaluate outcomes and cost-effectiveness of double compared to single cord blood transplantation, we analyzed 134 transplants in adults with acute leukemia in first remission. Transplants were performed in France with reduced intensity or myeloablative conditioning regimens. Costs were estimated from donor search to 1 year after transplantation. A Markov decision analysis model was used to calculate quality-adjusted life-years and cost-effectiveness ratio within 4 years. The overall survival at 2 years after single and double cord blood transplants was 42% versus 62%, respectively (P=0.03), while the leukemia-free-survival was 33% versus 53%, respectively (P=0.03). The relapse rate was 21% after double transplants and 42% after a single transplant (P=0.006). No difference was observed for non-relapse mortality or chronic graft-versus-host-disease. The estimated costs up to 1 year after reduced intensity conditioning for single and double cord blood transplantation were € 165,253 and €191,827, respectively. The corresponding costs after myeloablative conditioning were € 192,566 and € 213,050, respectively. Compared to single transplants, double cord blood transplantation was associated with supplementary costs of € 21,302 and € 32,420 up to 4 years, but with increases in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.616 and 0.484, respectively, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of € 34,581 and €66,983 in the myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning settings, respectively. Our results showed that for adults with acute leukemia in first complete remission in France, double cord transplantation is more cost-effective than single cord blood transplantation, with better outcomes, including quality-adjusted life-years.


Subject(s)
Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Leukemia/therapy , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Cord Blood Stem Cell Transplantation/economics , France , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Leukemia/diagnosis , Leukemia/mortality , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
20.
Haematologica ; 99(8): 1380-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24816236

ABSTRACT

Oral busulfan is the historical backbone of the busulfan+cyclophosphamide regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation. However intravenous busulfan has more predictable pharmacokinetics and less toxicity than oral busulfan; we, therefore, retrospectively analyzed data from 952 patients with acute myeloid leukemia who received intravenous busulfan for autologous stem cell transplantation. Most patients were male (n=531, 56%), and the median age at transplantation was 50.5 years. Two-year overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and relapse incidence were 67±2%, 53±2%, and 40±2%, respectively. The non-relapse mortality rate at 2 years was 7±1%. Five patients died from veno-occlusive disease. Overall leukemia-free survival and relapse incidence at 2 years did not differ significantly between the 815 patients transplanted in first complete remission (52±2% and 40±2%, respectively) and the 137 patients transplanted in second complete remission (58±5% and 35±5%, respectively). Cytogenetic risk classification and age were significant prognostic factors: the 2-year leukemia-free survival was 63±4% in patients with good risk cytogenetics, 52±3% in those with intermediate risk cytogenetics, and 37 ± 10% in those with poor risk cytogenetics (P=0.01); patients ≤50 years old had better overall survival (77±2% versus 56±3%; P<0.001), leukemia-free survival (61±3% versus 45±3%; P<0.001), relapse incidence (35±2% versus 45±3%; P<0.005), and non-relapse mortality (4±1% versus 10±2%; P<0.001) than older patients. The combination of intravenous busulfan and high-dose melphalan was associated with the best overall survival (75±4%). Our results suggest that the use of intravenous busulfan simplifies the autograft procedure and confirm the usefulness of autologous stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia. As in allogeneic transplantation, veno-occlusive disease is an uncommon complication after an autograft using intravenous busulfan.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Busulfan/administration & dosage , Data Collection , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Marrow Transplantation/mortality , Data Collection/methods , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Transplantation, Autologous/mortality , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL