Distinguishing Features of the Urinary Bacterial Microbiome in Patients with Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction.

PURPOSE: We aimed to characterize the urinary microbiome of catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and to evaluate differences based on type of bladder management or frequency of urinary tract infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of urine samples from asymptomatic, catheterizing patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction who used either clean intermittent catheterization or indwelling catheters. Patients without symptoms of urinary tract infection provided a catheterized urine sample for urinalysis, culture and bacterial community microbiome analysis. RESULTS: A total of 95 patients submitted urine for analysis, of whom 69 had sufficient sequence reads (>1,203) for microbiome analysis. Cases with low bacterial signal amplification were associated with use of vaginal estrogen, no intradetrusor botulinum toxin A use and no growth on standard urine culture. The most abundant operational taxonomic units were from the phylum Proteobacteria, classified as Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia. Alpha diversity varied among those who used indwelling catheters vs clean intermittent catheterization, and those who underwent botulinum toxin A injection vs not. On linear discriminate analysis, the relative abundance of the operational taxonomic units identified as Pseudomonas was higher among patients using indwelling catheters relative to clean intermittent catheterization. The operational taxonomic unit identified as Aerococcus was at a higher relative abundance among males compared to females. CONCLUSIONS: Enterobacteriaceae and Escherichia were the most abundant genera in the urinary microbiome of patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Urinary microbiome diversity varied based on bladder management type. Future clinical correlations between microbiome of neurogenic patients and clinical presentation may help guide treatment strategies.

Changes in patient reported outcome measures after treatment for female urethral stricture.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of patient reported outcome measure (PROM) data for women with urethral strictures. To address this gap, we aim to evaluate change in PROM among women who underwent surgery for a stricture. METHODS: American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) data from a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of women treated for urethral stricture was assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven women had either AUA-SS or UDI-6 and 26 had baseline and postoperative data for either. Most women underwent urethroplasty (77%) and the majority (73%) remained stricture free at median follow-up of 21 months (interquartile range [IQR] 7-37). The median baseline AUA-SI was 21 (IQR 12-28) and follow-up was 10 (IQR 5-24). After treatment, there was a median decrease of 12 (IQR -18 to -2) in AUA-SI (p = 0.003). The median AUA Quality of life (QOL) score at baseline and follow-up were 6 (IQR 4-6) and 3 (IQR 2-5), respectively. There was a median AUA-QOL improvement of 2 points (-5,0; p = 0.007) from a baseline 5 (unhappy) to 3 (mixed). Median UDI-6 scores were 50 (IQR 33-75) at baseline and 17 (IQR 0-39), at follow-up. After treatment, there was a median decrease of 19 (-31 to -11; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Women with urethral strictures have severe lower urinary tract symptoms which improved after surgery. This study substantiates the claims that recognizing and treating women with urethral stricture disease greatly improves lower urinary tract symptoms and QOL.

Do urodynamics predict urinary retention after sling placement in the complex patient: the value of reproducing symptoms on urodynamics.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To examine urinary retention (UR) after female urethral sling placement in patients with or without detrusor underactivity (DU) or Valsalva voiding whose urodynamics (UDS) accurately reproduced voiding symptoms to determine whether the reproduction of voiding symptoms on UDS in those with DU is predictive of UR after sling placement. METHODS: We performed a review of patients undergoing urethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) looking specifically at the occurrence of short- and long-term urinary retention. Preoperative UDS data were obtained from a prospectively acquired UDS database in which patients were directly queried at the time of the UDS study about whether the filling and/or storage phase of the study reproduced their usual symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 141 women who had a urethral sling procedure, 124 (87.9%) had preoperative UDS. Of those who had UDS, 41 (33%) had de novo UR at some point postoperatively. Compared to those without DU, patients with DU and/or Valsalva voiding were more likely to have UR (75.6% vs. 56.6%, p = 0.04). There was no difference in association of UR in patients with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS reproduced voiding symptoms compared to those with DU/Valsalva voiding whose UDS did not reproduce symptoms (OR 1.01, CI 0.32-3.19, p 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that patients with DU/Valsalva voiding had an increased association with UR but did not find reproduction of symptoms on UDS to correlate with UR in either those with DU/Valsalva voiding or with normal bladder contractility.

Managing Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome in Older Adults.

In this review, the current literature regarding pharmacotherapy treatment strategies available for the management of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome in older adults is addressed. The focus is on those treatments described by the American Urologic Association guidelines, organized according to clinical phenotype. Symptoms at presentation can vary with age, with older adults being more likely to experience nocturia, urinary incontinence, and Hunner's lesions than their younger counterparts. As such, treatment of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome should follow an individualized multimodal plan based on the patient's unique phenotype(s), starting with the most conservative options and escalating as needed. The side-effect profile and medication interactions should be reviewed, especially when treating older adults, requesting the aid of pharmacists or the primary care physician as needed to safely provide treatment.

Is it the Surgeon? A Re-examination of Mid-urethral Sling Complications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential technical factors during initial mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement that contribute to subsequent sling revision procedures. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed examining synthetic MUS reoperations at a single institution from 2008-2020. The implanting surgeon's operative note, when available, was critically reviewed with respect to trocar placement, sling location, and tensioning technique. The reoperative report was reviewed for aberrant intraoperative findings relating to the index surgery. RESULTS: A total of 306 women underwent revision of their MUS. Operative reports from the implanting surgeon were available for 276 (90.2%) women. Review of index operative reports revealed 47 unambiguous descriptions of improper technique, including 19 cases of described excessive tensioning and 2 cases of MUS placement despite noted urethral injury during the index case. Indications for reoperation were clinical obstruction (63%), pain (40%), and mesh erosion/exposure (33%). In 186 (67.4%) women, there was an intraoperative finding during the revision that likely contributed to the need for reoperation. Among these 186 women, 110 (59.1%) slings were noted to have been placed too proximally, 78 (41.9%) were over-suspended, and 57 (30.6%) were placed too deep in the periurethral fascia. CONCLUSION: Review of the index operative note and findings at operative re-exploration of MUS surgeries, often reveals evidence that the initial MUS implantation was technically suboptimal. Such findings suggest that intraoperative surgical technique is a critically important factor contributing to postoperative complications in MUS surgery. This underscores the importance of surgical training and adherence to surgical principles during the placement of a synthetic MUS.