ABSTRACT
Standard dosing could fail to achieve adequate systemic concentrations in ICU children or may lead to toxicity in children with acute kidney injury. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was used to simultaneously analyze all available data (plasma, prefilter, postfilter, effluent, and urine concentrations) and provide the pharmacokinetic characteristics of meropenem. The probability of target fT > MIC attainment, avoiding toxic levels, during the entire dosing interval was estimated by simulation of different intermittent and continuous infusions in the studied population. A total of 16 critically ill children treated with meropenem were included, with 7 of them undergoing continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Only 33% of children without CKRT achieved 90% of the time when the free drug concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (%fT > MIC) for an MIC of 2 mg/L. In dose simulations, only continuous infusions (60-120 mg/kg in a 24-h infusion) reached the objective in patients <30 kg. In patients undergoing CKRT, the currently used schedule (40 mg/kg/12 h from day 2 in a short infusion of 30 min) was clearly insufficient in patients <30 kg. Keeping the dose to 40 mg/kg q8h without applying renal adjustment and extended infusions (40 mg/kg in 3- or 4-h infusion every 12 h) was sufficient to reach 90% fT > MIC (>2 mg/L) in patients >10 kg. In patients <10 kg, only continuous infusions reached the objective. In patients >30 kg, 60 mg/kg in a 24-h infusion is sufficient and avoids toxicity. This population model could help with an individualized dosing approach that needs to be adopted in critically ill pediatric patients. Critically ill patients subjected to or not to CKRT may benefit from the administration of meropenem in an extended or continuous infusion.
ABSTRACT
People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are the individuals most affected by the current Monkeypox virus outbreak that was first announced in May 2022. Here we report Pan-pox-specific T-cell responses in a cohort of HIV-1-infected individuals after receiving the nonreplicative, attenuated smallpox vaccine JYNNEOS from Bavarian Nordic. Intradermal (i.d.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) vaccination was safe without major side effects. Dose-sparing i.d. vaccination was superior to s.c. vaccination and promoted T-cell polyfunctionality, and the expression of the gut-homing marker α4ß7 integrin on lymphocytes. HIV-1-infected individuals with CD4 T-cell counts ≤500/mm3 blood required at least a booster vaccination to exhibit efficient virus-specific T-cell responses. The magnitude of the Th1 response after this booster directly correlated with the CD4 T-cell count of the vaccinees. Further studies with a larger number of participants are warranted to confirm and expand our observations.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Humans , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The clinical use of colistin methanesulphonate (CMS) is limited by potential nephrotoxicity. The selection of an efficient and safe CMS dose for individual patients is complicated by the narrow therapeutic window and high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. In this study, a simple predictive equation for estimating the plasma concentration of formed colistin in patients with multidrug and extremely drug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections was developed. METHODS: The equation was derived from the largest clinical cohort of patients undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of colistin for over 8 years in a tertiary Spanish hospital. All variables associated with C ss,avg were selected in a multiple linear regression model that was validated in a second cohort of 40 patients. Measured C ss,avg values were compared with those predicted by our model and a previous published algorithm for critically ill patients. RESULTS: In total, 276 patients were enrolled [the mean age was 67.2 (13.7) years, 203 (73.6%)] were male, and the mean (SD) C ss,avg was 1.12 (0.98) mg/L. Age, gender, estimated glomerular filtration rate, CMS dose and frequency, and concomitant drugs were included in the model. In the external validation, the previous algorithm appeared to yield more optimized colistin plasma concentrations when all types of C ss,avg values (high and low) were considered, while our equation yielded a more optimized prediction in the subgroup of patients with low colistin plasma concentrations (C ss,avg <1.5 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed equation may help clinicians to better use CMS among a wide variety of patients, to maximize efficacy and prevent nephrotoxicity. A further prospective PK study is warranted to externally validate this algorithm.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Colistin , Drug Monitoring , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Colistin/blood , Colistin/pharmacokinetics , Colistin/therapeutic use , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Male , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/blood , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring/methods , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , AlgorithmsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ceftaroline is a novel cephalosporin active against MDR Gram-positive (GP) bacteria. For ß-lactam antibiotics, such as ceftaroline, prolonged infusions and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are used for dosage optimization based on their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with TDM and PK/PD target attainment of ceftaroline administered by intermittent and prolonged infusion in a cohort of patients with MDR-GP bacterial infections. METHODS: Patients treated with ceftaroline administered by continuous (24 h), extended (3 h/6 h) and intermittent infusion (1 h) and undergoing TDM of plasma concentrations were included. A 100%fT>4×MIC was the pre-specified PK/PD target and 100%fT>10×MIC was considered overexposure. Dose recommendations were made based on TDM results and each patient's clinical condition. RESULTS: Twelve patients [83.3% male, median age of 73 (38-83) years] were included. Nine patients (75%) achieved 100%fT>4×MIC, all under prolonged infusions. In one patient, the 100%fT was >10×MIC but no toxicity was observed. Based on TDM results, initial doses were recommended to be maintained in eight patients, decreased in three and increased in one. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of ceftaroline by prolonged infusion together with TDM may be a useful strategy for achieving the desired PK/PD target in these patients. However, more studies evaluating the relationship between PK/PD attainment and clinical outcomes are needed.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Male , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Monitoring/methods , Cephalosporins/adverse effects , Infusions, Parenteral , Monobactams , CeftarolineABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Regardless of the available antifungals, intraabdominal candidiasis (IAC) mortality continues to be high and represents a challenge for clinicians. MAIN BODY: This opinion paper discusses alternative antifungal options for treating IAC. This clinical entity should be addressed separately from candidemia due to the peculiarity of the required penetration of antifungals into the peritoneal cavity. Intraabdominal concentrations may be further restricted in critically ill patients where pathophysiological facts alter normal drug distribution. Echinocandins are recommended as first-line treatment in guidelines for invasive candidiasis. However, considering published data, our pharmacodynamic analysis suggests the required increase of doses, postulated by some authors, to attain adequate pharmacokinetic (PK) levels in peritoneal fluid. Given the limited evidence in the literature on PK/PD-based treatments of IAC, an algorithm is proposed to guide antifungal treatment. Liposomal amphotericin B is advocated as first-line therapy in patients with sepsis/septic shock presenting candidemia or endophthalmitis, or with prior exposure to echinocandins and/or fluconazole, or with infections by Candida glabrata. Other situations and alternatives, such as new compounds or combination therapy, are also analysed. CONCLUSION: There is a critical need for more robust clinical trials, studies examining patient heterogeneity and surveillance of antifungal resistance to enhance patient care and optimise treatment outcomes. Such evidence will help refine the existing guidelines and contribute to a more personalised and effective approach to treating this serious medical condition. Meanwhile, it is suggested to broaden the consideration of other options, such as liposomal amphotericin B, as first-line treatment until the results of the fungogram are available and antifungal stewardship could be implemented to prevent the development of resistance.
Subject(s)
Candidemia , Candidiasis, Invasive , Humans , Antifungal Agents/adverse effects , Candidemia/drug therapy , Echinocandins/pharmacology , Echinocandins/therapeutic use , Candidiasis, Invasive/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To compare clinical characteristics, outcomes, and resource consumption of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and seasonal influenza requiring supplemental oxygen. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary-care hospital. Patients admitted because of seasonal influenza between 2017 and 2019, or with COVID-19 between March and May 2020 requiring supplemental oxygen were compared. Primary outcome: 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes: 90-day mortality and hospitalization costs. Attempted sample size to detect an 11% difference in mortality was 187 patients per group. RESULTS: COVID-19 cases were younger (median years of age, 67; interquartile range [IQR] 54-78 vs 76 [IQR 64-83]; P < .001) and more frequently overweight, whereas influenza cases had more hypertension, immunosuppression, and chronic heart, respiratory, and renal disease. Compared with influenza, COVID-19 cases had more pneumonia (98% vs 60%, <.001), higher Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and CURB-65 (confusion, blood urea nitrogen, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and age >65 years) scores and were more likely to show worse progression on the World Health Organization ordinal scale (33% vs 4%; P < .001). The 30-day mortality rate was higher for COVID-19 than for influenza: 15% vs 5% (P = .001). The median age of nonsurviving cases was 81 (IQR 74-88) and 77.5 (IQR 65-84) (P = .385), respectively. COVID-19 was independently associated with 30-day (hazard ratio [HR], 4.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2-10.4) and 90-day (HR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.4-11.4) mortality. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, including a subgroup considering only patients with pneumonia, did not show different trends. Regarding resource consumption, COVID-19 patients had longer hospital stays and higher critical care, pharmacy, and complementary test costs. CONCLUSIONS: Although influenza patients were older and had more comorbidities, COVID-19 cases requiring supplemental oxygen on admission had worse clinical and economic outcomes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Oxygen , Hospital MortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tigecycline is the first member of the glycylcyclines. Both the FDA (2010 and 2013) and the EMA (2011) issued safety warnings describing an increased mortality risk associated with tigecycline compared with other antibiotics treating severe infections. One of the best strategies to optimize antimicrobial therapies is through the establishment of antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in hospitals. In June 2011, our ASP was implemented. OBJECTIVES: To analyse trends in tigecycline prescription, after drug safety warning announcements by regulatory agencies and after an ASP implementation. METHODS: A 6â year prospective observational study of tigecycline use was performed, including all consecutive adult patients treated with at least one dose during the 6â years after approval of the drug for its use in the hospital. The primary outcome was tigecycline consumption assessed by DDD/100 bed-days. A segmented linear regression model for interrupted time series (ITS) was designed to detect any significant trend changes. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients were included. After the FDA warning alert, tigecycline consumption decreased by 35.9%. Moreover, following the ASP implementation, a dramatic reduction in tigecycline prescription by 67.3% was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The role of the ASP was essential to establish adequate control of prescriptions, collaborating with the clinicians in a better adaptation of the tigecycline indication.
Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Prospective Studies , Tigecycline/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Scopulariopsis/Microascus isolates cause infections with high mortality in lung transplant recipients. Treatment is challenging due to antimicrobial resistance. We describe two cases of Scopulariopsis/Microascus tracheobronchitis in lung transplant recipients successfully treated with nebulized micafungin. This antifungal was well tolerated and achieved high concentrations in epithelial lining fluid up to 14 h after nebulization without significant plasma concentrations. Nebulized micafungin may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of fungal tracheobronchitis.
Subject(s)
Mycoses , Scopulariopsis , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Lung , Micafungin , Mycoses/drug therapy , Transplant RecipientsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) of micafungin in critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH, 30 mL·kg-1·h-1) with those of patients receiving equidoses of hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF, 15 mL·kg-1·h-1 + 15 mL·kg-1·h-1) and determine the optimal dosing regimen using the developed model. METHODS: Patients with septic shock undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy and receiving a conventional dose of 100 mg micafungin once daily were eligible for inclusion. Total micafungin plasma concentrations from 8 CVVH sessions and 8 CVVHDF sessions were subjected to a population PK analysis using Pmetrics. Validation of the model performance was reinforced by external validation. Monte Carlo simulations were performed considering the total ratio of free drug area under the curve (AUC) over 24 hours to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (AUC0-24/MIC) in plasma. RESULTS: The median total body weight (min-max) was 94.8 (66-138) kg. Micafungin concentrations were best described by a 2-compartmental PK model. No covariates, including continuous renal replacement therapy modality (CVVH or CVVHDF), were retained in the final model. The mean parameter estimates (SD) were 0.96 (0.32) L/h for clearance and 14.8 (5.3) L for the central compartment volume. External validation confirmed the performance of the developed PK model. Dosing simulations did not support the use of standard 100 mg daily dosing, except for Candida albicans on the second day of therapy. A loading dose of 150 mg followed by 100 mg daily reached the probability of target attainment for all C. albicans and C. glabrata, but not for C. krusei and C. parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: No difference was observed in micafungin PK between equidoses of CVVH and CVVHDF. A loading dose of 150 mg is required to achieve the PK/PD target for less susceptible Candida species from the first day of therapy.
Subject(s)
Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy , Hemodiafiltration , Critical Illness/therapy , Humans , Micafungin , Microbial Sensitivity TestsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Invasive mould diseases are associated with high morbidity, mortality and economic impact. Its treatment is often started prior to differential pathogen diagnosis. Isavuconazole is approved for treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) and invasive mucormycosis (IM) when amphotericin-B is not indicated. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of isavuconazole vs voriconazole for the treatment of adult patients with possible IA prior to differential pathogen diagnosis, in Spain. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was performed using the Spanish Healthcare System perspective. Among all patients with possible IA, it was considered that 7.81% actually had IM. Costs for laboratory analysis, management of adverse events, hospitalisation and drugs per patient, deaths and long-term effects in life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) were considered. Efficacy data were obtained from clinical trials and utilities from the literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were conducted. RESULTS: In patients with possible IA and when compared to voricanozole, isavuconazole showed an incremental cost of 4758.53, besides an incremental effectiveness of +0.49 LYs and +0.41 QALYs per patient. The Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio was 9622.52 per LY gained and 11,734.79 per QALY gained. The higher cost of isavuconazole was due to drug acquisition. Main parameters influencing results were mortality, treatment duration and hospitalisation days. The PSA results showed that isavuconazole has a probability of being cost-effective of 67.34%, being dominant in 24.00% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Isavuconazole is a cost-effective treatment compared to voriconazole for patients with possible IA for a willingness to pay threshold of 25,000 per additional QALY.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnosis, Differential , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Voriconazole/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/economics , Aspergillosis/drug therapy , Aspergillosis/economics , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/economics , Fungi , Hospitalists/economics , Humans , Mucormycosis/drug therapy , Mucormycosis/economics , Spain , Standard of CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Kron et al (Mycoses, 64, 2021, 86) found cost savings for the use of the innovative pharmaceutical isavuconazole in the inpatient setting in Germany (Bismarck-based healthcare system). Little is known about the reimbursement of innovative pharmaceuticals in the inpatient setting of Beveridge-based healthcare systems. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the market access process and reimbursement of isavuconazole, exemplary for innovative pharmaceuticals, in England and Spain. PATIENTS/METHODS: Market access processes of both countries were described. Focussing on typical patient clusters for isavuconazole treatment, reimbursement data regarding inpatients with (i) allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation or (ii) acute myeloid leukaemia was considered. Data were publicly available and of high topicality (England 2020/2021, Spain 2018). Discounting and a currency conversion to Euro were applied. RESULTS: This study showed that market access processes of both countries are broadly similar. Further, full reimbursement of isavuconazole as an innovative pharmaceutical may lead to reduction in resource utilisation. Without medication costs, isavuconazole can thus result in cost savings for both patient clusters due to a reduction in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Expenses for innovative pharmaceuticals may be balanced or even lead to cost savings due to a reduction in length of stay. The latter contributes to a greater patient benefit. For both healthcare system, the analyses highlighted drugs' cost-effectiveness and assessing its added value into reimbursement decisions is highly relevant.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Nitriles , Pyridines , Triazoles , Antifungal Agents/economics , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , England , Health Care Costs , Hospitals , Humans , Inpatients , Nitriles/economics , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/economics , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Spain , Triazoles/economics , Triazoles/therapeutic useABSTRACT
In recent years, the worldwide spread of the so-called high-risk clones of multidrug-resistant or extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has become a public health threat. This article reviews their mechanisms of resistance, epidemiology, and clinical impact and current and upcoming therapeutic options. In vitro and in vivo treatment studies and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models are discussed. Polymyxins are reviewed as an important therapeutic option, outlining dosage, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and their clinical efficacy against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Their narrow therapeutic window and potential for combination therapy are also discussed. Other "old" antimicrobials, such as certain ß-lactams, aminoglycosides, and fosfomycin, are reviewed here. New antipseudomonals, as well as those in the pipeline, are also reviewed. Ceftolozane-tazobactam has clinical activity against a significant percentage of MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa strains, and its microbiological and clinical data, as well as recommendations for improving its use against these bacteria, are described, as are those for ceftazidime-avibactam, which has better activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa, especially strains with certain specific mechanisms of resistance. A section is devoted to reviewing upcoming active drugs such as imipenem-relebactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefiderocol, and murepavadin. Finally, other therapeutic strategies, such as use of vaccines, antibodies, bacteriocins, anti-quorum sensing, and bacteriophages, are described as future options.
Subject(s)
Pseudomonas Infections/epidemiology , Pseudomonas Infections/therapy , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effectsABSTRACT
Combination therapy is an attractive therapeutic option for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Colistin has been the only treatment available for these infections for many years, but its results are suboptimal. Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a newly available therapeutic option that has shown good antipseudomonal activity, even against a number of XDR P. aeruginosa strains. However, data about combinations containing C/T are scarce. The aim of this study was to analyze the activity of C/T and colistin alone and in combination against a collection of XDR P. aeruginosa strains containing 24 representative clinical isolates from a multicentre Spanish study. Twenty-four time-kill experiments performed over 24 h were conducted in duplicate to determine the effects of colistin and C/T alone and combined. An in vitro pharmacodynamic chemostat model then was used to validate this combination against three selected XDR P. aeruginosa ST175 isolates with different susceptibility levels to C/T. Static time-kill assays demonstrated superior synergistic or additive effect for C/T plus colistin against 21 of the 24 isolates studied. In the in vitro dynamic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model, the C/T regimen of 2/1 g every 8 h with a steady-state concentration of 2 mg/liter colistin effectively suppressed the bacterial growth at 24 h. Additive or synergistic interactions were observed for C/T plus colistin against XDR P. aeruginosa strains and particularly against C/T-resistant strains. C/T plus colistin may be a useful treatment for XDR P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by high risk-clones resistant to C/T.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Pseudomonas Infections/microbiology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Tazobactam/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cephalosporins/pharmacokinetics , Colistin/pharmacokinetics , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial/drug effects , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Models, Biological , Pseudomonas Infections/drug therapy , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/growth & development , Tazobactam/pharmacokinetics , beta-Lactam Resistance/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Optimal antimicrobial drug exposure in the lung is required for successful treatment outcomes for nosocomial pneumonia. Little is known about the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem when administered by continuous infusion (CI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the PK of two dosages of meropenem (3 g vs 6 g/day by CI) in the plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia. METHODS: Thirty-one patients (81% male, median (IQR) age 72 (22) years) were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Sixteen patients received 1 g/8 h and 15 2 g/8 h by CI (8 h infusion). Plasma and ELF meropenem concentrations were modeled using a population methodology, and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to estimate the probability of attaining (PTA) a free ELF concentration of 50% of time above MIC (50% fT>MIC), which results in logarithmic killing and the suppression of resistance in experimental models of pneumonia. RESULTS: The median (IQR) of meropenem AUC0-24 h in the plasma and ELF was 287.6 (190.2) and 84.1 (78.8) mg h/L in the 1 g/8 h group vs 448.1 (231.8) and 163.0 (201.8) mg h/L in the 2 g/8 h group, respectively. The penetration ratio was approximately 30% and was comparable between the dosage groups. In the Monte Carlo simulations, only the highest approved dose of meropenem of 2 g/8 h by CI allowed to achieve an optimal PTA for all isolates with a MIC < 4 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in the dose of meropenem administered by CI achieved a higher exposure in the plasma and ELF. The use of the highest licensed dose of 6 g/day may be necessary to achieve an optimal coverage in ELF for all susceptible isolates (MIC ≤ 2 mg/L) in patients with conserved renal function. An alternative therapy should be considered when the presence of microorganisms with a MIC greater than 2 mg/L is suspected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT-no. 2016-002796-10). Registered on 27 December 2016.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia , Meropenem , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Female , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Humans , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Meropenem/administration & dosage , Meropenem/pharmacokinetics , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: New antibiotics with bactericidal activity against multi-drug-resistant bacteria are increasingly used in the intensive care units. Here, we aimed to evaluate the influence of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on plasma levels of ceftolozane. CASE REPORT: A 34-year-old female was admitted to the intensive care unit after bilateral lung transplantation, complicated by primary graft dysfunction and cardiogenic shock needing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was started. Plasma ceftolozane levels were monitored on the first and third days of antibiotic treatment. A non-compartment pharmacokinetic analysis was performed and the extraction rate through the oxygenator was calculated. DISCUSSION: The extracorporeal circuit of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may alter the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics, to varying degrees due to drug sequestration and increased distribution volume. In this case, the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit had little impact on the ceftolozane plasma concentration. CONCLUSION: Plasma levels of ceftolozane are stable in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit, suggesting that adjustment of standard doses of ceftolozane in patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support may not be needed.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cephalosporins/therapeutic use , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Adult , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Female , HumansABSTRACT
Bone infections can be challenging to treat and can lead to several surgeries and relapses. When a graft is needed, cavitary bone loss can be grafted with cancellous or cortical bone. Both can be used for grafting. However, the antibiotic releasing capacity of these grafts has not been compared. Which type of bone is best at releasing the most antibiotic has not been well established. The aim of this study was to determine which type of bone is best for antibiotic release when the bone is suffused with antibiotics by the surgeon. The hypothesis is that there would be a difference between the type of bone tested due to different release capacities of cortical and cancellous bone. This was an experimental study. Cortical spongy bone in chips, Spongy bone in chips and demineralized cortical bone powder were compared. For each type of bone, 5 samples were tested. Processed and decontaminated grafts were freeze-dried to be kept at room temperature. The primary endpoint was the amount of vancomycin released by the graft as it affects the concentration of antibiotic around the graft in clinical practice. The procedure for the study consisted of full graft immersion in a vancomycin solution. Then, the liquid was removed with aspiration. In order to measure the quantity of antibiotic released, the bone was put into distilled water in agitation in a heated rocker at 37 °C. After 30 min of soaking, 1 mL of the liquid was removed. The same extraction process was also carried out after 60 min soaking, 2 h, 3 h, 24 h, and 48 h. No differences were found between each type of bone relative to the concentration of vancomycin released at each time of the assessment. There was a significant difference in the weight of the bone with a higher weight for the cortical powder (1.793 g) versus cortical spongy bone and spongy bone (1.154 g and 1.013 g) with a p value < 0.0001. A significant difference was seen in the weight of the bone with vancomycin after the aspiration of the liquid with 3.026 g for cortical powder, 2.140 g and 2.049 g for the cortical spongy bone and the spongy bone with a p value < 0.0001. In daily clinical practice, one can use cancellous bone, cortico-cancellous bone or cortical powder in order to add vancomycin to a bone graft. Our results show the release kinetics of the soaked allografts. With a maximum of 14 mg/mL in the first minutes and a rapid decrease it shows a pattern comparable to antibiotic loaded bone cement. The method used appears favourable for prophylactic use, protecting the graft against contamination at implantation, but is not sufficient for treating chronic bone infection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cancellous Bone/chemistry , Cortical Bone/chemistry , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Bone Transplantation , Drug Liberation , Humans , Powders , Vancomycin/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess the pharmacokinetics of formed colistin in plasma and the safety of two different high doses of colistimethate sodium administered via nebulization in critically ill surgical patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) or ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Formed colistin plasma concentrations were measured in critically ill surgical patients with pneumonia treated with two different doses of nebulized colistimethate sodium (3 MIU/8 h versus 5 MIU/8 h). Adverse events possibly related to nebulized colistimethate sodium were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (15 in the 3 MIU/8 h group and 12 in the 5 MIU/8 h group) were included. Colistin plasma concentrations were unquantifiable (<0.1 mg/L) in eight (53.3%) patients in the 3 MIU/8 h group and in seven patients (58.3%) in the 5 MIU/8 h group. Median (IQR) quantifiable colistin plasma concentrations before nebulization and at 1, 4 and 8 h were 0.17 (0.12-0.33), 0.20 (0.11-0.24), 0.17 (0.12-0.23) and 0.17 (0.11-0.32) mg/L, respectively, in the 3 MIU/8 h group and 0.20 (0.11-0.35), 0.24 (0.12-0.44), 0.24 (0.10-0.49) and 0.23 (0.11-0.44) mg/L, respectively, in the 5 MIU/8 h group, with no differences between the two groups at any time. Renal impairment during nebulized treatment was observed in three patients in each group, but was unlikely to be related to colistimethate sodium treatment. Nebulized colistimethate sodium therapy was well tolerated and no bronchospasms or neurotoxicity events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this limited observational case series of critically ill patients with HAP or VAP treated with high doses of nebulized colistimethate sodium, systemic exposure was minimal and the treatment was well tolerated.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacokinetics , Colistin/analogs & derivatives , Pneumonia, Bacterial/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/blood , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/blood , Colistin/pharmacokinetics , Critical Illness , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated/microbiology , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
The cost of treating Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in Spain is substantial. Findings from the randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 EXTEND study showed that an extended-pulsed fidaxomicin (EPFX) regimen was associated with improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence of CDI versus vancomycin in patients aged 60 years and older. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of EPFX versus vancomycin for the treatment of CDI in patients aged 60 years and older from the perspective of the National Health System (NHS) in Spain. We used a Markov model with six health states and 1-year time horizon. Health resources, their unit costs and utilities were based on published sources. Key efficacy data and transition probabilities were obtained from the EXTEND study and published sources. A panel of Spanish clinical experts validated all model assumptions. In the analysis, 0.638 and 0.594 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient were obtained with EPFX and vancomycin, respectively, with a gain of 0.044 QALYs with EPFX. The cost per patient treated with EPFX and vancomycin was estimated to be 10,046 and 10,693, respectively, with a saving of 647 per patient treated with EPFX. For willingness-to-pay thresholds of 20,000, 25,000 and 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that EPFX was the most cost-effective treatment was 99.3%, 99.5% and 99.9%, respectively. According to our economic model and the assumptions based on the Spanish NHS, EPFX is cost-effective compared with vancomycin for the first-line treatment of CDI in patients aged 60 years and older.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fidaxomicin/administration & dosage , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/economics , Health Care Costs , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , National Health Programs , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Spain , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An optimal antifungal therapy for invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients is essential to reduce the high mortality rates. Acute kidney injury is common, and continuous renal replacement therapies are frequently used. Previous studies have demonstrated a lack of effect from different continuous renal replacement techniques on micafungin clearance. However, the use of high cutoff pore size membranes could potentially allow for the loss of albumin and alter micafungin pharmacokinetics. The objective was to explore the pharmacokinetics of micafungin in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous high cutoff membrane hemodialysis (CVVHD-HCO). METHODS: Prospective observational study performed in critically ill patients treated with 100 mg/d of micafungin and undergoing CVVHD-HCO. CVVHD-HCO sessions were performed using Prisma-Flex monitors and dialyzers with a membrane of polyarylethersulfone of 1.1-m surface area and 45-kDa pore size. Blood samples were collected from arterial prefilter, venous postfilter, and the drainage line ports at 0 (predose), 1, 4, 12, 24 hours after dose, and micafungin concentrations were determined using HPLC-UV. RESULTS: Nine patients (55.6% male; age: 28-80 years) were included. Median (range) of micafungin concentrations in the effluent were <0.2 (<0.2-0.4) mg/L at low (predose) and 0.4 (<0.2-0.7) mg/L at high (1 h) concentrations. The extraction ratio was <12% at each time point. A 2-compartment model best described the time course of plasma concentrations, and body weight was the only covariate that improved the model. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study demonstrating that CVVHD-HCO does not alter the pharmacokinetics of micafungin, and that standard doses of this antifungal can be used.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/blood , Antifungal Agents/pharmacokinetics , Micafungin/blood , Micafungin/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy/methods , Critical Illness , Female , Hemodiafiltration/methods , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited data regarding altered linezolid pharmacokinetics in patients with liver cirrhosis are available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of linezolid in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: A case-control 1:1 study of patients undergoing linezolid therapeutic drug monitoring was conducted between January 2015 and June 2017. Cases with liver cirrhosis were matched with controls by age, body weight, comorbidities, renal function, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included, 26 in each group. Patients with Child-Pugh Scores A, B, and C were 1 (3.8%), 13 (50.0%), and 12 (46.2%), respectively. Cases had higher median linezolid trough plasma concentrations than controls [20.6 (17.4) versus 2.7 (11.3); P < 0.001)] and more frequently achieved an optimal pharmacodynamic index [26 (100%) versus 16 (61.5%); P = 0.002]. In addition, potentially toxic concentrations and treatment discontinuation due to overexposure and hematological toxicity were also more frequently seen in cirrhotic patients. Overall clinical cure rate was high (67.4%), and in-hospital mortality was 28.8%. No differences in clinical outcomes were observed between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid showed a high clinical cure rate. Nevertheless, plasma concentrations and treatment discontinuation due to hematological toxicity were higher in cirrhotic patients. Liver cirrhosis may influence linezolid pharmacokinetics and question the use of standard doses. Therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid would be valuable in these patients.